For those who expect to see a set of labels at the top I won't have any. I'd rather you ask my position on something that assume from those labels. closest you'll get for intercity travel
cars< Bus< trains< electric trains
@TheHistoryOfTh2
@AugustJPollak
The unions want better pay, healthcare, more staff as they’ve cut 30% in the last 5 years and consistent schedules as the current on call 24/7/365 is destroying people.
Class 1 want to save every dime then can and give it to Wall Street as they are failing slowly.
@jameallow
@CityOfMemphis
How the profit margin on roads, most airports? That’s right they lose massive amounts of money but are done for the public good.
@Abierman117
@MadiHilly
A flawed reactor design that had a history of issues and design failures known from the start. Rushed into production and issues hidden under the guise of national security.
Also every production reactor in the west has a thick containment building. Something Russia cut for costs
@InvestingMerc
@DrChrisCombs
Yeah and all the teslas that were rated highly had massive amounts of crash zones afforded to them by not having a combustion engine under the hood
@dana916
This a branchline owned by a small company who hauls mostly grain. This is excepted track. Limited to 10mph and freight only
They’ve rebuilt most of the track
The video is clearly sped up at points
No they should. The project needed reform and if you listen to the current staff they don’t want to repeat the mistake of CP1-3 and it’s insane costs. They delayed and redid contracts to lower costs and increased competition for future segments, track, trains.
Quick little
@CaltransHQ
roast for hydrogen trains
By ZE they mean hydrogen most of which isn't green hydrogen
I love how much this next slide bends the truth
What are we going to run 2-3 of these sets on most service, 250 seats isn't a lot an 90mph top speed sucks
@jkwessel
@TallDarknJewish
@expolineledger
@Amtrak
@PacSurfliners
We've got 2-3 major tunnel sections to build along the coast here. Getting it done faster is going to be a real challenge but we need to. 2035 for Del Mar is too far.
The State really needs to take out the checkbook and fund rail
@elliotsharron
@townble09
@LaurenKGurley
Actually having enough staff. Class 1 have cut 30% of their staff in the last 5 years. Key safety tasks are being rushed and trains are so long they can’t fit into siding and have mechanical issues that take hours to resolve because the train is 2-3 miles long.
On Saturday and Sunday, January 13-14, VC Line trains will not operate due to track maintenance. Alternate transportation will not be available. For more info visit
@CougarSpider
It’s not. Car average speed is lower than the 70s, more derailments, the RR are the biggest oil users after the US army, carload freight is dead and we’ve done all this by overworking people, cutting staff and reducing infrastructure.
This is so stupid and is unlikely to save as much as claimed. the cost difference between a 28ft TMB and a 33-35ft is a rounding error on a project this large.
@calelectricrail
Del Mar realignment by SanDag has assumed value-engineered TBM to reduce diameter saving $200M. How? b/c "overhead electrification of the trains is not planned for the corridor and .. should assume use of battery- or hydrogen-operated trains in the future.
Q: Can you talk about the cost?
A: The cost is $12.7b and half is secured by local $ and the state. We are working towards a full funding grant agreement from the feds for the rest.
Traffic in and out of LA is being significantly impacted due to the closure of a portion of the 10 Freeway in Downtown LA. We’re adding extra cars and service along the San Bernardino Line.
Learn More:
The top of the tunnel we’re building needs to be about 50 ft. underground. So why do we build so far down? To increase the amount of cover over the tunnel to help control the surface settlement and to help with the buoyancy resistance of the tunnel.
#vtabsv2
#educational
#vtatbm
@B_rian_B
@MadiHilly
There’s no waste with solar and wind? Those blades and pannels need replacement every 20-30 years.Know what we do with massive fiberglass blades? Burry them in landfills
We can cut both of those massively if we actually had good Project Managers and didn’t allow local corruption
Another homicide near BART gates: Until we get
#faregate
replacement at all
@SFBART
stations, along with reversing the spiraling down numbers of
#police
officers,
@SFBART
will never be any more safe than the street outside.
Feb. 22 Update: The OCTA & Metrolink project team has started staging equipment to begin construction on a catchment wall to protect the rail line in
#SanClemente
at Mariposa Point. Drilling is expected to begin as early as 2/27, weather permitting. Info:
@TheHistoryOfTh2
@AugustJPollak
The RR are having more and more safety issues from poor upkeep. They are spending the bare minimum on capital. They are losing old major shippers like coal.
Single or small groups of cars move at a painful pace slower than the 70s and unreliably so no one wants to ship with them
Amtrak sold 7 coaches, 3 coach baggage, 3 sightseer lounges and 3 sleepers.
California really should buy all of those cars and rebuild them to expand our fleet now and to give us enough railcars to bring a sleeper train back via the coast
@philritz1
@AndrewDLewis
The cube was the worse way to get density possibly. We can easily build taller structures that use a good layout to make sure every bedroom has a window
January 2024 LA Metro update on Link Union Station. Utility relocations starting. Looks like project has been value-engineered (cost cutting): 4 platforms instead of 7, thinner bridge over US-101 holding fewer tracks, shortened platforms so tracks can converge before bridge.
Despite being the same distance apart, there are 89 fewer trains every day between Montréal and Toronto than between Milan and Rome. The former also takes two hours longer. Canada can do better.
I see
@CaHSRA
has gone lets copy the UK
This whole thing should be in house. California needs to be buying key passenger routes from the freight railroads wherever possible
I won't be suppressed if all upkeep is contracted out which has had major issues before
@the_transit_guy
Right now refinery issues.
Our special blend costs more, we’ve got a bit higher taxes than most states .67$ a gallon.
However for a decade now there’s been an extra .1-.2$ per gallon cost can’t be accounted for outside of a markup by oil companies
@jake_gotta
Grayhound is not functional. They are cutting service left and right along with increasing not caring about riders because it’s the transportation of last resort
@SnazzyQ
I’ve always had otter boxes last me 4-5 years. Combine that with large packs of screen protectors. I spent ~20 a year.
It’s just not really an option to have my phone out of service. Everything I do has MFA tied to my phone.
@CaltransHQ
They specifically sandbagged electrification by not considering that nearly identical battery units are capable of 100 miles off wire and so services like Oakland to Santa Barba could easily be done with Salinas north and Goleta south along with a mid run recharge around SLO
Battery light rail sounds good until you realize that for anything more than a handful of trains having a short off wire section it becomes a massive burden, battery packs don't last that long with daily cycles far higher than almost anything else
Q: What are the benefits of battery light rail vehicles.
A: Less wire maintenance, you can still operate when the wires are down. We are looking at how it's working in Europe with battery trains.
@CaltransHQ
California has been short rolling stock for 15 years now and instead of ordering more venture sets and rebuilding more F59 to provide service in 2-3 years Caltrans wants more experimental trains to meet some stupid order that ignores how modal shift can reduce emissions
@CaltransHQ
4 was stupid but okay now we've got 10 units coming which will not be good. Stadler you'll make great things but you needed to laugh Caltrans out of the room when they asked for Hydrogen MUs
State rail capacity is critical, this should be under 150M but instead its 4x that.
11 mi of double track should be 50-75m, the 16 upgraded crossings 32-48m, 2 upgraded stations 30-40M
May 2024 LA Metro presentation on Brighton to Roxford Double Track project for Metrolink Antelope Valley Line. Adding 11 miles of track, estimated cost $500-$625m. Project split into 4 segments. They are seeking federal CRISI grants for Segments 1 and 3.
There has been a derailment on Tehachapi believed to be caused by a broken rail. Coast line is down and will be for weeks more as Honda Bridge is damaged.
At this point there is no north south rail links in the state left in service.
Wow Investors are insane about railroads they want a 15-20% return to shareholder and a OR of around 60%. For some idea for most railroads 70-80% was considered healthy and a normal amount for decades.
Hunter Harrison NOT well liked by anyone but wall street
This is a failure. We should be trying to hit out 2040 railplan by the early 2030s and pass its goals by 2040
Modal shift is the key to reducing emissions and increasing equity
Refreshing honesty from Caltrans’ Gradinger:
1) catenary is the gold standard
2) Caltrans doesn’t believe California can increase regional and intercity service levels to justify costs
@maxdubler
@contrerasforca
It’s also mostly a lie. If we actually banned parking near corners they can easily fit everything they run right now down much smaller streets
@Noahpinion
Shovels didn’t hit the ground till 2015 because NIMBYs and lawsuits delayed it.
10 years from first shoves in the ground to 120 miles done is pretty good given it’s never gotten the funding needed
We just released our shortlist of qualified potential suppliers for California High-Speed Rail’s electrified trains!
The shortlist includes two teams:
@AlstomUSA
@SiemensUSA
We look forward to moving this process forward to get high-speed trains here in California.
This is bad
@California_CTC
needs to stop funding highway projects
there is 191M we could be putting into
@CapitolCorridor
to upgrade Davis to Sacramento
@the_transit_guy
Another insane fact is CAHSR will replace 150-200 flights a day between LA and SF. To do so it needs just 2 trains an hour or 1 coupled set an hour.
CAHSR at its theoretical max with single level rolling stock can move 18k PPHD.
Frankly I don’t care. They and other top staff represent a large part of many small agencies budgets and I’ve watched them waste their money on rides share and on demand pilots
I really wish that more transit advocates would listen to what the Bay Area small agency GMs have to say.
They get vilified so much because they can't afford the same PR resources as the big agencies, but they care so much and are doing amazing work for their communities.
@CaltransHQ
Why Lancaster to LA is even being considered for hydrogen is lost on me. The clear choice is wire up Burbank to Vista canyon and run on battery outside of that
This project deserves so much hate
Not because the goal is bad but because the execution sucks and they are wasting so much money going down 580
this has BART going 2 stops to allow a yard but that could also be valley link instead
@bzzltyr55
@hankgreen
The point of the new one is to push prices lower at the dealer and have them be produced in the US. The old one was just about making them a cheaper and it only applied at the end of the tax year. That was a hard sell for some who might have otherwise been able to afford them
@Metrolink
All lines, all days.
It was impossible to justify taking metrolink into LA from Ventura county to do things at night because there wasn’t even a bus option back
@Andrew4Berkeley
@itsthelee
Even if we crazy and spent 150B on CAHSR phase1+2 and another 150B the other regional and intercity projects we needed in the next decade. It’s a minor part of our states budget.
@monicamallon
27 agencies present a barrier to reliable service as most aren’t large enough to have staff dedicated to deliver projects like TSP, bus lanes ect. They also struggle to have 24/7 customer support and enough spare operators
Happy to see this happen. LA metro now needs to fund the capacity improves and push to fill in a few small gaps to complete double track between Burbank Junction and Vista Canyon outside of the tunnel. Doing so will allow 2-4RT hourly
I'm at the
@metrolosangeles
Board mtg. today. Glad our Board approved $1.6M to fund new mid-day & evening
#AntelopeValley
@Metrolink
trains during the week + more weekend service. The
#AV
line will be the FIRST
#Metrolink
line to offer nearly hourly service w/ a…
Scaling the project back is trying to cut cost from a project which has rapidly increasing in cost from the wrong tunneling method. BART needs a yard in San Jose and the Santa Clara station has been simplified.
Go back to twin bore or cut and cover to save far more than this
Aaaaaand we got another BART San Jose scoop
Former Mayor Sam Liccardo says San Jose BART needs to be scaled down, a stunning admission from the project’s biggest champion
@CaltransHQ
Service north of Sacramento could run under wire till Yuba city then run battery to Chico and back. At terminals without OCS cables could easily be plugged in to help charge the unit and avoid hotel and accessories from draining the battery
2 key
@PacSurfliners
projects were funded but because
@metrolosangeles
wouldn't stand up to NIMBYs and LOSSAN replaced caltrans as project lead nether have been completed
I’m hearing
@Metrolink
wants to but
@Caltrain
galley cars for the Olympics. With 66 trailers and 27 cab cars 13 7 car sets could be made or 12 4 car and 15 3 car
I expect they’ll go for the longer sets likely pulled my MP36 maybe rebuilt to MP40 standards
@Eyezak_M
It’s basically a yearly occurrence and definitely something Amtrak needs to plan around when it comes to future fleets. Expect 1-2 trains a year to be damaged massively and for it to take 2-3 years to get all the insurance and liability sorted out so have a half zone more sets
@tjosborne_
@the_transit_guy
@Amtrak
The fact there isn’t a push for electrification is frustrating. Hydrogen works for low frequency mid distance trains but is a waste of energy on high frequency services.
This seems like what’s the cheapest way we can do this ignoring long term costs
Gold line extension needs to be ended at Pomona, There is 0 reason to duplicate metrolink SBL when that money could do massive things for the SBL like full double track from El Monte east to beginning to wire up segments
🚉 Foothill Gold Line from Glendora to Pomona remains on time & on budget to be completed & turned over to
@metrolosangeles
in about 9 months!
🔨 Procurement process to hire builder for Pomona to Montclair ext. now officially underway
Learn more ⤵️
In case you were working off of old information
The latest designs for Downtown San José Station will only be 75ft below the surface
For comparison, SF's BART stations are 50ft below the surface, and the new SFMTA Chinatown station is 100ft below the surface
@MassJumbo
Almost everyone wants a clean timetables with predictability
That comes with a 30,20,15,12,10,7.5,6,5,4,3,2 min headways. Every else doesn’t repeat each hour
We still lack the state capacity to do the design and engineering work for railways. Local government and the state are still ready to burn tens of billions on roadway expansion which is really burning money with extra negative effects.
Failure this isn’t the state of California. Coaches are going to be interesting, locos are easy
This should be a Caltrans service instead of private. I also hope they cover part of the PTC cost given Caltrans was going to foot the bill
@alanthefisher
The 80s FRA report saying we can put every major line under wires, 40,000 miles and it will pay itself back in 15 years assuming traffic stays the same
@erikmbaker
My frustration is the extremely slow process and the fact that “environmental” groups block projects that have a minor direct local but have positive overall
Stuff like nuclear power plants that we need gets fought and delayed or canceled. We should have left coal decades ago
Congressman Brad Sherman met with LA Metro’s potential Sepulveda monorail contractor. He forces Metro rep to leave meeting. He provides many suggestions for contractor to make monorail alternatives more appealing to public. He says Bel Air and Sherman Oaks will oppose tunnels.
Why do American urbanists talk almost solely about inner-city metros and not high-frequency suburban rail systems that serve both inner city and suburban residents, and would do far more to ease car dependence in sprawled-out cities?
@ArmandDoma
The route though the Central Valley is already under construction no reason to abandon it even if you think i-5 is better
It’s also just months away from being entirely CEQA and NEPA cleared