Bringing together transit advocates, environmentalists, and unions to fight for fast, clean catenary electric rail in California.
@calelectricrail
.bsky.social
Why are we so focused on electrification, instead of just improving service, when mode shift is the biggest environmental benefit of trains? There are a few reasons: 1/
Trains run every 10-15 minutes Monday through Saturday from 5:45am to 11pm. A ticket costs 1,500 CFA ($2.50) for second class and 2,500 CFA ($4.30) for first class one way. Ridership is currently 115,000 passengers per day with capacity for up to 200,000. 🚆
This is what we need for every transit project in the state. Ditch the consultants, use your own engineers, and electrification becomes even more cost-competitive with vaporware alternatives.
Not only can the hydrogen trains
@CaltransHQ
bought and plans to run on the Surfliner not reach 110 mph, they can't even reach the current diesel Surfliner's 86 mph top speed. Caltrans is spending big on worse service and undermining the value of massive investments in tunneling.
.
@ValleyLinkRail
is planning 100% hydrogen operations, even though it's running on freeway medians & lacks the usual barriers to catenary:
- no "visual impacts"
- no objection from Class 1s
- substantial capital costs from the hydrogen production facility
Make it make sense!
CA and Norway should also team up to push zero emissions freight forward. Electric trains haul >90% of the rail passengers and freight in Norway, including heavy, high capacity ore trains.
California and Norway are teaming up to fight climate change. 🇺🇸🤝🇳🇴
Today, standing at the Larkspur Ferry Terminal – home to one of the world’s first clean hydrogen fuel cell passenger ferries – we signed a new Memorandum of Understanding to advance climate collaboration.
This should be the Surfliner, Capitol Corridor, Metrolink, and rail across the state. Californians deserve world-class trains just like the Northeast has.
⚡️ it's electric ⚡️
Did you know: riding Amtrak on the Northeast Corridor can reduce a passenger’s greenhouse gas emissions up to 83% compared to driving!
$127 million for fossil fuel greenwashing and experimental technology that is set up to fail and could compromise service on CA's rail lines. Invest in clean, proven, reliable electric wires instead please!
Increasing our electric fleet ⚡
Switching to electric traction over diesel boosts the benefits of rail even more - cutting carbon emissions by over 90% compared to road haulage - that's why we have increased our fleet of electric locomotives to 25.
#Freightliner
Highways have streamlined environmental review and are designed and built by in-house experts with reusable formula, but our rail projects are bespoke and subject to endless review. We have a growth machine for planet-killing highways. Why can't we have this for rail?
About a third of the cost to electrify
@Caltrain
(and tees up the
@CaHSRA
) but the electrification project reduces travel times for EVERYONE, helps move tens of thousands more people daily, and lowers carbon emissions
The state of Utah wants to spend $217 million PER MILE widening Interstate 15 through Salt Lake City.
$3.7 billion in total on sprawl-inducing, heavily subsidized freeway expansion. And the
#utleg
is willing to write blank checks to fund it.
Caltrain will start replacing 75% of its stock with electric trains with higher capacity next year, while Metrolink's plan is 2 hydrogen trains a day, with less than half the capacity of typical trains. Caltrain is planning for growth, Metrolink is planning for failure.
Class 1 railroads have tried to convince policymakers that they can't run freight trains under wire. Meanwhile in reality, freight trains run under trolley wires in San Diego County every night.
New Video Alert! 🎥🤩
We have made significant progress at our Copthall Tunnel site. Located within the London Borough of Hillingdon, between Harvil Road and Breakspear Road South. The 880m long tunnel sits between the twin bored Northolt Tunnel and the Colne Valley Viaduct.
Great thread, but missing one key improvement: electrification. Caltrain electrification will 25 min off a similar length trip; electrifying the Surfliner/Coaster would be a game changer even without the much-needed improvements suggested here.
Newsom could push to electrify, speed up, and expand service on Capitol Corridor. Instead, he's pushing this highway widening and unproven hydrogen trains that will lock in existing service for decades. So much for climate leadership!
I have commuted from Sacramento to Davis daily for 14 years. What's the climate-friendly solution?
1) Make Davis build more homes to make it affordable to move there
2) Improving transit options links
3) Widen freeways
Caltrans & Newsom picked freeways
This is excellent news. What's not so excellent is that it took nearly two months to restore full rail service between CA's 2 largest cities. We need an empowered, unified agency to take over that can move fast on vital infrastructure upgrades like moving tracks inland.
Full passenger rail service will return through
#SanClemente
beginning Mon., March 25! Metrolink trains will once again operate to
#Oceanside
& Pacific Surfliner trains will operate without bus connections to
#SanDiego
. Details:
We are proud to work with Streets for All and RailPAC on our first piece of legislation, AB 2503! Electric rail is a critical climate solution, one of the cleanest modes of transit, and it's time to put an end to the roadblocks holding it back.
AB 2503 by
@alex_lee
This exempts electrified catenary rail from CEQA, streaming the cleanest and highest quality rail transit in the world 🚄✨
Thanks to cosponsors:
@calelectricrail
&
@RailPAC
Now would be a great time to start planning to electrify the
@Metrolink
Antelope Valley Line, which shares track with HSR from Burbank to Los Angeles.
@MetroLosAngeles
We’ve environmentally cleared 422 of the project’s 494 miles!
By this summer, the Palmdale to Burbank section’s environmental document will be considered by our Board.
If approved, we will have completely cleared the 463 miles from downtown SF to LA Union Station.
#FactFriday
Catenary trains have substantially lower operating costs than diesel trains. Policymakers shying away from catenary because "it's too expensive" is a classic case of short term thinking that is pennywise and pound foolish.
Electrified Brightline is breaking ground and will be in Southern California before you know it. Clock is ticking,
@metrolosangeles
@goSBCTA
. Where are the plans to electrify the Metrolink SB line so Brightline can continue to LA?
Why is
@Metrolink
asking for $200 million to widen the I-15 in the most polluted region in the US when it urgently needs more funding of its own?
We can't let the highway lobby keep running regional rail into the ground, it's time for a new, centralized rail agency for SoCal.
Hydrogen on the Antelope Valley line makes zero sense given:
- The route will be shared with High Speed Rail, which needs wires
- The tracks are publicly owned
- High frequency service is planned in the near future
Lancaster is pushing Metrolink to use hydrogen-powered trains on Antelope Valley Line, and to build hydrogen station instead of planned diesel station at Lancaster station. They say it makes sense because Lancaster will be a large hydrogen producer.
California high speed rail is happening sooner than you think. SoCal, it's time to start planning for the future and putting up wires to bring CAHSR into Palmdale, LA, Anaheim, and beyond!
If you listen to California’s political class, the high-speed rail project sounds like a textbook boondoggle – over-budget, delayed and larded up with waste. Yet in communities across California’s farm belt, the discourse is refreshingly different. 1/4
Regional rail in Southern California is in serious trouble. If we want an electric rail network that compete with cars, we need serious reforms. That's why we, together with
@streetsforall
and
@RailPAC
are proposing a merger of all the rail agencies on the LOSSAN corridor. 🧵
Great editorial from the LA Times. We agree, why can't we have the urgency seen for the 10 Freeway for essential Surfliner infrastructure, or for railway electrification?
“Why can’t more transportation projects get the speedy treatment? Although the work being done on the 10 Freeway is a model of expediency, other important transportation repair jobs have taken far longer to complete,”
@latimes
editorial board writes:
This is why SoCal needs governance reform. Provincial interests like this (wealthy mansion owners in a tiny town) cannot be allowed to hold back infrastructure vital for national security, millions of passengers, and air quality for millions more.
why does a village of 4000 people get to hold up a project that connects literally millions? it’s going UNDER them, there should be no problem at all but here we are
We agree: San Bernardino, Davis, Fullerton, Palmdale, Pomona, Encinitas, Gilroy, Santa Barbara, Fairfield, and many other cities across the state deserve this type of train service.
Electrify Metrolink, electrify the Alameda Corridor, get people and goods out of cars and trucks and onto trains, or our air is never going to get better.
LA just earned its 25th-straight F in air quality from
@LungAssociation
. 😷
With transportation, warehouses, railyards & ports cited as major sources of pollution in California, the takeaway is clear - we need to
#ElectrifyEverything
now. ⚡
Absolutely unacceptable for a major, costly, infrastructure project like the Del Mar tunnel to be planned to preclude proven, global standard overhead catenary tech needed for high speed + frequency service.
@SenBlakespear
please hold SANDAG accountable for this terrible plan.
@calelectricrail
Del Mar realignment by SanDag has assumed value-engineered TBM to reduce diameter saving $200M. How? b/c "overhead electrification of the trains is not planned for the corridor and .. should assume use of battery- or hydrogen-operated trains in the future.
Visual impact of these wires: positive. Let's stop requiring expensive reports and mitigations before putting them it. It's time to pass AB 2503 to exempt electric rail from CEQA and catalyze implementation of this transformative green technology!
Imagine the jobs created by LA Metro getting a head start on HSR to SoCal by electrifying the Antelope Valley Line! Let alone electrifying freight rail and the rest of Metrolink in SoCal.
High-speed rail will help connect Californians in modern and more efficient ways. 13,000 jobs have been created as
@CaHSRA
continues to work on the nation's first high-speed rail project. Which will connect the Bay Area with LA County! 🚄☀️
There's an alternative form of zero-emissions freight that's existed for decades in the US and elsewhere: electric trains.
The infrastructure will cost money either way, why not put that investment into a mode that reduces traffic & road violence and helps transit?
@ValleyLinkRail
Valley Link is seeking to create their own hydrogen via electrolysis in Tracy and are seeking legislation, SB 746, to enable them to recoup the losses from expensive H2 tech by selling excess H2. Almost feels like this whole rail project is an excuse for this H2 facility.
The ten fastest high-speed trains in Europe all use overhead wires. We're fighting to bring this to California, but NIMBYs, Class 1 railroads, and the hydrogen interests embedded in the governor's office want to keep this from you.
This is what we have to look forward to not only on the Arrow but on the Surfliner, Capitol Corridor, and San Joaquins if Caltrans has their way.
#CatenaryNow
We are a grassroots, all volunteer organization. Meanwhile, Sempra donated $250k to CA politicians and Chevron spent $1.2 million lobbying (both are banking on hydrogen to keep them in business).
If any donors from Big Catenary would like to get in touch, our DMs are open...
If electricity is free, shouldn't it be very cheap to run overhead wires? Green hydrogen uses at least 3x more energy, the price should be at minimum 3x higher.
Incidentally, the retail price of gray hydrogen in California is over $30/kg.
Director Jain says he is very supportive of hydrogen trains, says UPRR would likely not support catenary wires for electric trains. Says sometimes electricity is free b/c so much clean energy and DOE is lowering hydrogen costs (cites hydrogen hub). So says hydrogen will be cheap
Brightline West officially broke ground on the nation's first true high-speed rail system which will connect Las Vegas to Southern California. The 218 mile system will be the greenest form of transportation in the world, with zero emission, fully electric trains reaching 200 mph.
The last point is outright false. Stadler claims that the maximum speed of their H2 FLIRTs is 79 mph - slower than diesel trains currently travel on the Surfliner. Gradinger is clearly not paying close attention to the technical details
According to
@CaltransHQ
asst. dep. director Kyle Gradinger, problems with the performance of hydrogen trains are a “Twittersphere exaggeration” and that testing for Caltrans-purchased FLIRTs are performing “as well as we expected, if not better.”
Things we need to make this excellent vision possible:
- Electrification to handle those 110 mph speeds
- A unified regional rail agency with its own staff running the show so that we can get these projects built under budget and on time.
Why do we need to exempt rail electrification from CEQA? Why doesn't environmental law promote environmental goods like catenary? We've published Part 1 in a series answering these questions, starting off with some basic principles about the law.
#AB2503
Shell, which last year lobbied CA for bigger hydrogen subsidies, is shutting down all its H2 fueling stations in the state. Don't let this underdeveloped technology compromise service and reliability on our rail systems; invest in overhead wires instead.
Part 2 in this series is up: a deep dive on how lawsuits against Caltrain electrification by some of the US's richest towns misused CEQA to cause 3 years of delays, millions of extra taxpayer dollars spent, and untold increased emissions. 🧵
Why do we need to exempt rail electrification from CEQA? Why doesn't environmental law promote environmental goods like catenary? We've published Part 1 in a series answering these questions, starting off with some basic principles about the law.
#AB2503
Important point here. Freight RRs are pushing hydrogen, a technology they know won't work, so they can claim that zero-emissions trains don't exist and avoid having to make any new investments in zero-emissions. Of course, electric freight trains have existed for a century.
@pdfguru
@joffemd
@CaltransHQ
@CAgovernor
@CA_Trans_Agency
yea,
@AirResources
already agreed to put in a "feasibility review" of their locomotive rule in 2027 at which point they're suppose to assess what "progress" has been made on zero-emissions solns w the implication being that they could delay it if they "aren't ready yet" so...
Congressmembers including CA's Laphonza Butler, Mark Takano, Nanette Barragan, Katie Porter, Ro Khanna, and Barbara Lee, are calling on the EPA for stronger railroad emissions standards. They understand catenary better than CARB.
Great to see sensible standards for green hydrogen subsidies! But even with these standards, hydrogen should not be used to power trains. H2 uses 2.5x more power than electric rail and can't provide reliable, high frequency service, compromising rail's power to cut car emissions.
Well folks, it's been a year. But after a long contentious deliberative process, I'm happy to confirm that the US Treasury has endorsed the 'Three Pillars' standards for subsidized clean hydrogen production:
It's almost as if they read our paper :)
Today we told SBCTA to focus on double tracking and service, hold off on more unproven hydrogen trains, and electrify the San Bernardino Line. SBCTA received dozens of comments thanks to you! Keep up the pressure! You can read our letter here:
A step in the right direction, but disappointingly this plan does not address freight rail at all. Electric freight trains, not hydrogen trucks, are the best ZE way to haul goods long distances, and we will need federal action to force Class 1s to electrify across state lines.
#BREAKING
: The Biden Administration announced a new national strategy for achieving a zero-emission freight network by 2040.
Cleaning up dirty freight pollution will help us meet our climate goals AND protect the health of our communities.
We need a unified Southern California Regional Rail Agency that will take decisive action to move the Surfliner tracks inland and electrify the tunnels.
Biodiesel produces as much if not more ozone (SoCal's top pollutant) as petroleum diesel. To truly improve air quality, the Surfliner should be converted to overhead catenary electric rail, yet there's currently no timeline to do so.
It's
#CleanAirDayCA
! 💙 We're proud to share that
#PacificSurfliner
trains are now powered by renewable diesel, a more sustainable fuel alternative. This change will further reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help improve the air quality in
#SouthernCalifornia
!
SoCal Gas spent millions in ratepayer money to fight electrification and sell policymakers on hydrogen - likely contributing to Caltrans' & ARCHES' senseless push for hydrogen trains. SB 938 (Min) would crack down on this practice.
Taking a break from my X break to share that
@DaveMinCA
introduced a bill in response to our investigation into SoCalGas' use of customer $$ to lobby against clean energy policies
This is a step in the wrong direction. California needs strong leadership from the state to design and implement a statewide rail electrification program, but this appointment perpetuates the car-oriented status quo.
Rancho Cucamonga is not Los Angeles,
@HSRail
.
You'd still have to take
@Metrolink
, drive, get a rideshare, or find other ways to and from Los Angeles.
This is a huge problem for SoCal regional rail, and why we need a unified agency to take over. LAUS, Oceanside, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Burbank need to become transfer hubs with through-running (especially at LAUS), but poor service and captial management get in the way.
Many US rail networks lack radial connectivity and this hurts their ridership. We should be building rail networks with the mentality of everyone going everywhere at once, not just commuting downtown for work.
Electrifying the San Bernardino Line, Antelope Valley Line, and freight lines from Fullerton to Barstow will similarly provide good union jobs in the communities where many workers live. Let's make it happen!
#ElectrifyMetrolink
Check out this great
@KTLA
piece on California High-Speed Rail's latest milestone - 13,000 good-paying labor jobs created since the beginning of construction!
Hydrogen fueling stations across California are down. Are we really going to build our vital lifeline public transportation network around this in 10 years?
One of the largest companies in the world cannot make
#hydrogen
#FCEV
refueling work in one of the largest markets, what does this tell you? News release today.
This really gives the game away. Transit riders are being asked to subsidize industry via hydrogen trains. How is this fair? Why is the strategy to decarbonize heavy industry to force sub-par tech in transportation, with far more emissions and more impact from failure?
EU
#hydrogen
targets are 'impossible' as green H2 costs eight times as much as grey H2 today:
@TotalEnergies
CEO
Prices will not come down if renewable
#H2
is used in hard-to-abate industries only, warns Patrick Pouyanné
"But won't electric rail strain the grid?"
As this chart shows, hydrogen has far more potential impact on the grid. To fuel a train with H2 uses at least 3x more energy than wires. Let's save that hydrogen for where we really need it, and save the grid by wiring up our trains!
There's been a lot of consternation & digital ink spilled over Bitcoin, data centers, AI and their impact on the grid. But do you know what's even bigger load growth driver, according to
@TheBrattleGroup
: hydrogen electrolysis! Wouldn't it be good if
@USTreasury
ensured 10s of
The fight for electric rail and the fight for better transit service are one and the same. Electric rail enables, and in fact requires, to be cost effective, more frequent service, while hydrogen rail locks in the status quo and prevents better for cost reasons.
Making Metrolink, Capitol Corridor, Surfliner, Coaster better than driving is critical to meet our climate goals. We need electric rail ASAP, and we can't allow them to wither and die through neglect, hydrogen, and erosion.
#CatenaryNow
What are the implications of this? Well, if we want to reduce VMT by shifting people onto sustainable modes, we need to focus heavily on those LONGER trips if we want to make major reductions in VMT. That means getting people on transit - especially regional transit.
@Tony_CTDirector
Hydrogen trains use 2.5x more energy than electric trains, and >95% of hydrogen on the market comes from fossil fuels. Overhead catenary is a climate solution, H2 is not.
Meanwhile in Germany, this "innovative solution" has been tested and found lacking
Notably missing from these plans: Metrolink. Metro could electrify all of the Antelope Valley Line and parts of the San Bernardino line if it wanted to. 2028 is coming soon, the time to put up the wires is now.
#ElectrifyMetrolink
LA is going for the gold (standard) in zero-emission transportation for the 2028 Olympics. 🥇
Read more on their plans to electrify transportation so residents can breathe easy when millions flood their city for the games.
#ElectrifyEverything
Once again, the overwhelming winner of the "sources of greenhouse gases" contest? Passenger cars. Time to invest in fast, clean, electric rail and get some mode shift going to cut those emissions - the planet can't wait.
#CatenaryNow
Our letter to Capitol Corridor board calling on them to stick to their 2016 vision plan and pursue electric, not hydrogen trains. Thanks to
@TransbayC
@streetsforall
@Transit_Co
for signing on!
It's not too late to give public comment at 10 am tomorrow.
With overhead catenary, you can greatly increase speed with small upgrades over time. Metra Electric is decades old, and small changes will get it to 90 mph. Whereas SBCTA's brand new hydrogen FLIRTs top out at 79 mph. Catenary = better service.
Currently, speeds are limited to 65 mph, but
@metra
is exploring up to 90 mph in some sections.
IMO, the agency’s vision under CEO Jim Derwinski has been much more ambitious than it had previously.
What do hydrogen rail pilots (in Tracy, San Bernardino, and Lancaster) have in common? Low income, transportation cost-burdened, POC residents who could really benefit from better transit. But instead, they get unreliable, leaky, explosive H2. Environmental injustice in action.
Lancaster is pushing Metrolink to use hydrogen-powered trains on Antelope Valley Line, and to build hydrogen station instead of planned diesel station at Lancaster station. They say it makes sense because Lancaster will be a large hydrogen producer.
🚨🚨Action Alert: Call into the Capitol Corridor Board of Directors meeting to tell them you want catenary-battery hybrid, NOT hydrogen FLIRTs on Capitol Corridor. 🚨🚨
May 1st at 10 am
or email ccjpaboard
@capitolcorridor
.org before 3 PM on April 30.
Californians for Electric Rail is proud to support SB 1031 to fund Bay Area transit operations and increase regional integration.
Southern California needs a similar measure to save Metrolink - who's with us?
Bay Area transit is at a crossroads. We need big changes for a vibrant future.
Today, we’re announcing the Connect Bay Area Act (SB 1031) to authorize a 2026 ballot measure to fund, modernize & integrate our transit systems.
I’m joined by my legislative partner
@aishabbwahab
.🧵
Metra's new battery trains use a pantograph to charge. A much better option for low-frequency branch lines like the Arrow or Valley Link than hydrogen, and allows for gradual phase-in of catenary with battery-OCS hybrid networks
New from me: Caltrans's I-80 CEQA analysis is flawed and reflects a concerning pattern that must change for California to reach our climate, mobility and equity goals.
The EPA is holding a hearing today to decide whether to authorize CA's In-use Locomotive Rule, which mandates a transition to zero emissions rail and is currently under threat of lawsuit by the Class 1s. We've got a number of members and allies calling in today to testify 🧵
This type of freight opposition is why we need strong federal regulations & a national electrification plan mandating a transition to catenary. When Class 1s are required to electrify, they will change their tune - catenary is the only viable zero emissions solution for freight.
Director Jain says he is very supportive of hydrogen trains, says UPRR would likely not support catenary wires for electric trains. Says sometimes electricity is free b/c so much clean energy and DOE is lowering hydrogen costs (cites hydrogen hub). So says hydrogen will be cheap
The Antelope Valley Line is
#1
priority for catenary, as a high frequency line that will be shared with HSR. Battery electric is how to transition gradually while they wire up the whole route, and avoid the sunk costs and drawbacks of hydrogen, which we must stop at all costs.
More news on the Antelope Valley Line zero-emissions pilot, but no solid answer on choice of technology (hydrogen vs battery electric). Metrolink's study favored battery multiple units, but their board still wants hydrogen. Let's hope they go battery.
Clean, renewable hydrogen is essential to our energy future and cutting pollution.
This is an all-of-government approach to creating the market for more zero-emission vehicles, a clean electric grid, and more.
Yet another example of the dominance of hyper-local interests on what should be regionally planned decisions - and why we need a stronger, unified SoCal Regional Rail Agency.
Lancaster is pushing Metrolink to use hydrogen-powered trains on Antelope Valley Line, and to build hydrogen station instead of planned diesel station at Lancaster station. They say it makes sense because Lancaster will be a large hydrogen producer.
We agree with environmental justice groups around the state - things that can be electrified, should be electrified. And rail is one of them - electricity has been the best way to power a train for 100 years and will only improve.
America is stuck in the past.
As Germans plow ahead with plans to further modernize and electrify their rail lines, we continue to funnel our own money into expanding highways and airports.
We deserve clean, affordable transit — let's make it happen. 🚅
More track closures due to coastal erosion. We need to get to work on electrifying and moving the tracks inland ASAP, no more foot-dragging from OCTA. To do that, we need a stronger, unified SoCal Regional Rail Agency.
Disappointing statement from
@POTUS
, a famous rider of electric rail as a senator. H2 trains have higher operating costs, lower capacity & max speed than electric trains. They have been found lacking when tested for passenger and don't yet exist for freight. Please do better.
Biden appears to be endorsing hydrogen trains. Remember, H2 trains use 2.5x more energy than electric trains, lax regulations on "green" H2 could increase CO2 emissions, and H2 poses serious hazards + feasibility issues in transport & refueling. Bad sign for federal rail regs.
This is why CA must stop delaying critical emissions reducing electric rail projects writing reports about the aesthetic impact of wires. Rail electrification needs to be exempt from CEQA.
#AB2503
CA is falling behind its 2030 greenhouse gas targets. We need meaningful transit service improvements and rail decarbonization today, not doomed to fail hydrogen pilots that waste critical time to cut emissions.
#CatenaryNow
The 190 page EIR for the SBCTA environmental impact report spends as much space on the aesthetic impacts of a facility next to a rail yard as it does the risks from storing large amounts of hydrogen, a flammable, leak-prone gas.
Action Alert: Tell SBCTA no more hydrogen trains! SBCTA wants to buy 3 more H2 trains. Instead, they should retrofit to battery and double track the SB line to make way for future catenary. Email clerkoftheboard
@gosbcta
.com by 5 pm tomorrow. More info:
nestled in this agenda, we find this gem: apparently
@goSBCTA
canNOT actually convert the existing
@MetrolinkArrow
FLIRT fleet to h2 as was originally planned & must instead buy completely new vehs. that seems odd, but at least maybe they can do battery conversions for cheaper.
We sent the Treasury a letter pushing back on this industry rent-seeking. Tax credits must put zero emissions before growing the hydrogen industry, given the potential service disruptions caused by unreliable new tech and the existence of viable alternatives (like electric rail!)
Unbelievable. A group of "hydrogen hubs" -- i.e., giant subsidy-farming machines -- have informed the US gov't that it would like those subsidies to be even more generous, with even fewer strings attached. The absolute brass balls.
While the CTC gears up to widen I-80, Capitol Corridor is preparing to abandon plans for faster, more frequent electric rail service on the same corridor in favor of expensive, unproven hydrogen trains. Our government's addiction to cars is why we don't have good rail service.
The CTC is gearing up to allocate a hundred million in Trade Corridor dollars to a low-scoring plan to widen I-80 while San Diego’s only freight rail link to the rest of the country falls into the Pacific for want of funding.
Southern California needs this yesterday, to combat the pollution, traffic, and dangerous road conditions caused by our overreliance on trucks at our ports and warehouses.
The Jinhua Railway, connecting the commodities trading capital of the world (Yiwu City) to one of the world's busiest container ports (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port) has begun dynamic testing of all systems. The railway is an electrified line that can run double-stack container trains.
🚨🚨Hearing Notice: AB 2503, which exempts rail electrification and service improvements on existing right of way from CEQA, is getting its first hearing in the Assembly in one week on April 8th at 2:30 PM! 🚨🚨
Check this link for a livestream: