Harris Berton Profile Banner
Harris Berton Profile
Harris Berton

@HarrisBerton

984
Followers
679
Following
194
Media
7,717
Statuses

Climate dad, Canadian energy policy nerd. I tweet about energy technologies and how we can use them to stop climate change. Views my own.

Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Pinned Tweet
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
Confused about electricity regulation in Canada? You're not alone! There's likely not another jurisdiction that has more regulatory complexity relative to its size. So let's break it down in a 🧵! Starting in BC, going "coast to coast to coast" (as we say up here.)
4
12
48
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
I am so so sick of people not understanding that gas furnaces have a fan that runs on electricity. Blackouts in winter are just as deadly with gas furnaces as they are with electric ones. Please stop saying otherwise.
@mattyglesias
Matthew Yglesias
9 months
@Noahpinion If you get people to rely on electricity for home heat, then even occasional winter blackouts turn deadly fast and I think you need more margin for error than that.
69
5
266
82
96
2K
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
3 months
In fact this is good news. Fully amortized wind and solar farms can be repowered with the latest tech and lower costs than a greenfield site. Don't mistake this for a problem, in fact it's one of the reasons for my optimism.
@PendulumFlow
Pendulum Flow
3 months
This is a sobering thought. All of the windmills currently installed will need to be replaced before our net zero target date of 2050 💀 Welcome to the Red Queen effect.
Tweet media one
143
327
1K
45
39
297
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
13 days
I really have zero time for any arguments about the land use of renewables as an argument against them.
@NiyerClimate
Nathan Iyer
13 days
You can still do stuff like "cow pasture/range/feed/horses/goats/ethanol" in the land in between. Which is most of US land! It's pretty dang close to the lowest direct use of land per MW, especially with larger turbines!
Tweet media one
10
11
87
41
24
176
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 year
This is the kind of abject bullshit from renewable advocates that has poisoned the debate and made nuclear advocates ridiculously defensive.
Tweet media one
14
18
155
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 month
The implication here (range for EVs isn't any worse) shows you that "range" was never actually the problem. We have solved the range issue, only to realize it is really a charging speed issue. Faster charging, not bigger batteries, is the way forward.
@drvolts
David Roberts
1 month
Quick, without looking: what is the range of your gas car? How far can you go on a full tank?
513
10
192
42
9
152
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
Alright folks, a bunch of people are pointing out that gas fireplaces don't need electricity. That's great for those who one them, doesn't change much for the majority of people who don't.
12
4
143
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
25 days
Priceless. Yes, elements (Lithium in this case) do in fact last forever, that's what makes them elements 🤣
@JDog969
Jason
25 days
@HarrisBerton So it is just like magic, it lasts forever? Ever. like, hear of science? Maybe the laws of thermodynamics?
14
0
1
16
9
112
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
@slucy Guy who doesn't understand current residential HVAC equipment stock ;)
1
1
107
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
3 months
I feel like people who valorize lifetimes >30 years for energy equipment have never done an NPV calculation with a moderately high discount rate before.
@SavageOnTheSun
The Savage Wolfe
3 months
@HarrisBerton That’s cope. Having to redo massive infrastructure every 25 years is not a feature.
2
1
0
17
5
107
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
7 months
You have two options: 1. Conduct a rigorous technical and financial analysis to determine the right mix of electricity resources. 2. Use arbitrary metrics to come to a binary decision on the sole technology to use.
@Andercot
Andrew Côté
7 months
You have two options: Tile the forested mountains with black silicon panels and get 50-100 megawatts for 25-30 years. Put a BWRX-300 in an IKEA-sized building and get 290 megawatts for 60-80 years. Which is better for the environment?
765
2K
13K
11
9
107
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
26 days
These charts should make it abundantly clear that the material usage difference between renewables and nuclear is basically irrelevant given how big of a step change both are from the status quo.
@atrembath
Alex Trembath
26 days
ROCKS Nuclear energy has conspicuously low minerals/material footprint compared to other electricity generation technologies. Brand new research from my colleagues @TheBTI :
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
9
36
150
19
18
95
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 month
This is very misleading. Steel production can be decarbonized with electricity, but the feedstock (pig or sponge iron) cannot be produced without coal/biochar, hydrogen or natural gas. EAFs are mostly used for recycling, not primary steel production.
@MattLoszak
Matt Loszak
1 month
Note that there are some processes like steel smelting that are easier to economically decarbonize, via electric arc furnaces with clean power.
Tweet media one
3
4
78
15
8
77
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
The dominant narrative in the Ontario is that the nuclear buildout in the late 60s-80s was a financial disaster leading to the collapse of Ontario Hydro. I want to explore this history and explain why (I think) this narrative is wrong, or at least extremely misleading. 🧵
3
9
66
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
3 months
Tweet media one
19
5
64
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
@KevinSKrause @JohnSmillie42 Yeah the point is not that there's no way to make furnaces resilient, it's that we haven't bothered to do so, and it's not straightforward to do so for most ppl. In that context, why the resiliency freakout over electric heat?
5
1
19
0
4
58
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
"But labour costs will eventually prevent utility-scale PV cost declines!" Yeah nope, humans are sort of good at developing labour saving technology for modular installations.
@SolarInMASS
Commercial Solar Guy
2 months
I was today years old when I learnt of this module lifter available for rent.
15
15
145
7
6
57
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
7 months
Time for a 🧵 on running my hybrid gas+ #heatpump system according to Ontario's ultra-low overnight rates! TLDR - heating overnight with a HP is roughly HALF the cost of using gas overnight, pretty similar off/mid peak, and stupid expensive on peak. #energytwitter
Tweet media one
8
12
51
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
Nevermind that PHEVs have almost no capex advantage, much higher opex, AND we need to mine the fossil fuels needed to run them. There's just nothing here that tracks reality. Why are nuclear advocates against BEVs? It's weird.
@Mining_Atoms
B.F. Randall ⚛ ⛏ ⚡
9 months
Hybrid tech is way underrated. Full EVs just consume too many materials with insufficient payback. “The last 10% of performance requires 90% more inputs” or something like that.
12
9
95
19
0
48
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
@slucy Pretty sure almost nobody buys them ;)
3
0
47
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
This is why people have perpetually underestimated solar PV cost declines, and why we are currently making the same mistake with batteries. They're just a bunch of rocks guys! They can become infinitely cheap from an economic perspective! $10-$20/kWh by 2050 (USD$2020).
@mgoetzke
Matthias Götzke
2 months
@JessePeltan it's glass, some sand, some metals, scaling laws were always going to be effective
5
0
42
11
10
41
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
8 months
I would want policymakers to know how this list could mislead them: 1. EROEI is not relevant to economics 2. load factors VS capacity factors 3. system costs cannot be determined without scenario modelling 4. energy density only really matters for EV batteries
@harryhhutch
Harry Hely-Hutchinson
8 months
7 things politicians should prove they understand before being allowed near energy policy: 1. EROEI 2. load factors 3. system costs 4. energy density 5. basics of supply & demand 6. the diff between energy & electricity 7. the diff between capacity & generation anything else?
68
54
233
9
4
42
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 year
Alright folks, here's my gorgeous new new heat pump! Currently pumping the accumulated heat from the day (it's 32C), alongside a crazy amount of water into my drain. Gas hookup and full commissioning tomorrow - Ontario TOU rate strategy to come! #energytwitter #heatpumps
Tweet media one
8
3
41
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
3 months
This. BEV range is a solved problem. Charger availability is not.
@JohnSmillie42
John Smillie
3 months
My hypothesis is range anxiety is more about charger availability and charge speed as it is about battery range (once you get beyond 240 miles/4 hours of driving), otherwise people would be anxious about their gas cars limited range, too. Faster charging > enormous battery
39
14
208
15
4
38
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
Alright folks, it is time to stop using the word "reliable" or "reliability" unless you are talking about very specific power engineering topics. Bad use of words that have both technical and non-technical meanings poisons semi-technical debates about energy policy.
@russellgold
Russell Gold
9 months
Renewables aren't reliable? This is the last 30 days of solar on the @ERCOT_ISO grid. That looks pretty reliable to me. Data from @grid_status
Tweet media one
165
178
854
10
1
40
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
7 months
How on earth can one look at a list that leads with Jigar Shah and Jesse Jenkins and suggest a disregard for the importance of nuclear power? My dude, the importance of clean firm (incl. Nuclear) is like all they talk about, sit down and pay attention.
@chrispydog
chrispydog
7 months
Devotees of "renewables" have a colossal blind spot when it comes to reality: they nearly all disregard the clear necessity of a BIG NEW SLAB of nuclear power and follow the money all the way to their salaries and prestigious jobs. Cults/mass delusions are ALL the same.
7
0
5
3
3
40
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 year
I've commented on copper scarcity before - looks like this is one thing I might be wrong about, and I'll be thrilled.
@AukeHoekstra
AukeHoekstra
1 year
Because I keep reading about copper scarcity being a roadblock for the transition to renewable energy, I wrote a blog to refute that. I show most copper can be replaced by aluminum, which will also be cheaper and better for the environment.
Tweet media one
178
385
2K
3
0
38
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
11 months
Germany's focus on nuclear retirement has single handedly ruined productive conversations about nuclear versus renewables - it's a real shame, and Germans should be ashamed of their country and leaders. Any credit for early energiewende policies has very much been exhausted.
@energybants
Mark Nelson
11 months
Germany's Energiewende but Keeping the Nuclear: Almost looks like a real decarbonization plan.
Tweet media one
36
422
1K
2
3
37
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
6 months
I'm pretty pessimistic on residential rooftop solar, it just seems that for the extra $/W, it just doesn't make sense when we can get the same benefits from commerical rooftops for less. BUT *direct* PV use in homes is super interesting to me, here's a 🧵 of key opportunities!
14
3
38
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
7 months
This is an unbelievable abuse of community notes. There's a legitimate debate on the role of CCS, bucy the "evidence" can't tell you whether it's cost effective or important - this is an extremely complicated and uncertain question which we need to debate context-by-context.
@Ben_Inskeep
Ben Inskeep
7 months
Community notes adding some important context on Chevron's CCS advertisement. Oil & gas interests have been pushing CCS -- a transparent attempt to greenwash fossil fuels.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
1
4
10
3
3
38
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
@cullenhendrix Radiant heat is a delivery system, not a heat source.
0
0
37
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 year
Today is an exciting day - time to ditch this SEER 9 monstrosity (and it's single stage indoor cousin) and get a hybrid heat pump! Updates to come! #energytwitter #heatpumps
Tweet media one
2
1
36
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
I'm sure Jesse will have a robust response, but I want to emphasize how much variation there will be in load profiles and solar performance. This means there isn't going to be a "rule of thumb" that works for generalizing like this, you just have to model it.
@Noahpinion
Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇸🇺🇦
9 months
Seems like if we overbuild by 70% and have batteries for nighttime, solar's intermittency is pretty much a solved problem. @JesseJenkins would you say that sounds roughly right?
71
4
198
5
2
34
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
8 months
It's really time for an adult conversation about plastic recycling. Can anyone provide a good reason to not just landfill this stuff?
@JavierBlas
Javier Blas
8 months
Lego is scrapping plans to make its toy bricks from recycled plastic bottles after determining that switching to the material would result in it producing higher carbon emissions. (please, someone buys a drink to the subeditor who came with that headline)
39
208
960
19
2
34
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
One of the reasons I'm so passionate about decarbonization in Canada specifically speaks directly to one of Hannah's points here - if we do it, it makes it so much easier for the rest of the world.
@_HannahRitchie
Hannah Ritchie
4 months
I often hear claims like "the UK [or another country] only emits 1% of emissions. What we do doesn't matter." Here's why I think that's a poor argument:
119
191
617
6
5
35
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
3 months
@markcojuangco I think you are unfamiliar with the fundamental nature of all depreciating assets.
4
0
34
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 year
Three words from this podcast every policymaker/analyst needs to hear: "Agency requires uncertainty." If your analytical approach revolves around "predicting" the future, it's bad policy analysis.
@drvolts
David Roberts
1 year
Specifically, I talk with Erica Thompson ( @H4wkm0th ) about her new book Escape from Model Land, a thought-provoking account of how models work, the assumptions & uncertainties involved, & the role of human judgment in applying the results to the real world.
2
3
25
0
9
33
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
7 months
The idea the transition doesn't have benefits will die hard, but two *current* realities show it's nonsense: - EVs are already cheaper to own than a new vehicle (if driven often) - gas+electric heating is cheaper and more comfortable than gas-only heating
@mattwridley
Matt Ridley
7 months
Net zero is "not like the fortunes we spent setting up the railways in the 1840s or the electricity grid in the 1950s or the internet in the 1990s. These gave us something new and useful. Net zero merely gives us exactly the same product in a different way... It's like replacing
343
555
2K
17
1
33
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
As we think about the right mix in Ontario going forward, it behooves us to clearly understand what worked and what didn't. As always with my threads, welcome clarification or debates on this weird history - but bring evidence, NOT vibes! Hope you enjoyed the 🧵!
3
1
32
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
I'm isn't really. Both new nuclear technologies and better solar and batteries are both far more promising. I'm all for funding it as a science project, but it doesn't qualify as strategic investment in a medium term context relative to alternative investments.
@JohnArnoldFndtn
John Arnold
2 months
Nuclar fusion is the most important technology under development today for long term human flourishing yet commands just 0.5% of total government research outlays. It easily deserves 10-20x this commitment.
54
60
500
7
1
31
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
7 months
Really, really does. This is the single most important paper for energy modellers to absorb and incorporate in their sensitivity analysis.
@AukeHoekstra
AukeHoekstra
2 years
This paper deserves another upvote: the faster we transition to renewables (RE) the more money we save! In essence it's simple: RE become cheaper as we scale up until they are cheaper than fossil fuels. If we scale up faster the moment we profit from cheaper RE comes earlier.
Tweet media one
21
120
297
4
7
31
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
Holy BEV misinfo batman! - rentals were always an odd fit this early - demand isn't actually waning - there's plenty of rocks bro - "china bad" is a lame argument - NG power with EVs lowers emissions - transit as the solution? Gimme a break...
5
7
30
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
@surlygopher It is a problem in Canadian northern communities where electricity is subsidized and you get fuel oil allocations. Folks run the oven and sell the oil. Not their fault, they're making the best of a hard situation.
0
1
30
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
Today, for the most part, you can use electricity whenever you want, but you have to watch how much. In the future, it will flip if we do this right - use as much electricity as you want, but just watch when you're using it.
@JesseJenkins
Jesse D. Jenkins
2 months
This is definitely a problem for residential heating electrification. It's also in part a product of rate design choices, treating network usage as if it is a volumetric cost (it is not) rather than driven by coincident peak usage. Electrification demands a rethink of rate design
16
32
200
9
5
30
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 month
What a great opportunity for a district heat network!
@JohnPompliano
John Pompliano
1 month
Amazon building a data center right behind homes in Virginia. If you’re going to buy a home next to an empty lot, make sure to do thorough due diligence.
Tweet media one
340
54
1K
2
0
29
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
We have an obligation to understand the economics of energy, as it is how we define wealth, prosperity, and abundance from a material perspective. There is no universal formula to convert physical aspects to economic ones, just textbook exercises in confirmation bias like this.
@Andercot
Andrew Côté
2 months
We have a moral obligation to understand the physics of our energy economy because it is the basis of all wealth, prosperity, and abundance in your life, and the lives of all future generations.
Tweet media one
147
523
2K
7
2
29
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
It's important to first recognize two key points upfront. 1) Internationally, Ontario's nukes are seen as a financial success and something to emulate. 2) Of the ~14GW of capacity, only 3.6 GW at Darlington suffered from cost overruns.
Tweet media one
1
0
29
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 year
I know this is confusing for most people, but you either break down the complexity or hide it, you can't really make it go away. These fees are a direct consequence of public policy, not corporate policy. If you don't like them, your issue is with regulators, not utilities.
@Ben_Inskeep
Ben Inskeep
1 year
People are horrified when they get itemized billing from their electric utility and see all the underlying grifting spelled out for the first time. That's why every utility tries to hide all of their absurd underlying fees, charges, and trackers by just showing you a total.
Tweet media one
7
13
57
3
4
28
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
6 months
Tweet media one
@Heather_mom4nuk
Heather Hoff
6 months
Do people know that when we build solar plus storage, that the solar charges the storage and then we get 80% back out of it later? Just curious. Seems like a rosy picture is portrayed, but it’s quite impactful in terms of materials.
Tweet media one
44
12
134
5
3
26
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
The idea efficiency is the "cheapest kWh" bugs me. Energy is a means to an end - if you avoid the means, you don't get the ends. That's called "opportunity cost", and it's just as important as any other cost! Promise you it nets out for Olympic athletes wanting aircon.
@TomH_Analyst
Tom Haddon
2 months
@duncanmgibb I'm fully happy to admit that the French view on AC is a bit like encountering an alien when an American is involved, but it doesn't stop the mantra of 'the cheapest kWh of electricity is the one you do not use' no matter where that kWh comes from being 100% true.
2
0
3
7
1
25
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
5 months
Had a debate about new nuclear designs. The argument is, why wouldn't you build nuclear plants with better safety, fuel economy, and waste management? The reason folks, is that those are the EXISTING advantages of nuclear. Piling on tech makes the core problem - capex -worse.
@JohnSmillie42
John Smillie
5 months
@PaulFDietz Less than $1B for more than 1GW of capacity, for a plant that is still running today. The question is why we failed to replicate this.
Tweet media one
4
1
6
4
3
25
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
"20 year old system needs to be replaced, must mean it's a failure!" There's interesting news here, but I am confused about why everyone doesn't freak out at the end of life of gas furnaces which have warranties of (checks notes)... 20 years. So much misinfo flying around! 🤦‍♂️
@CBCNews
CBC News
2 months
Drake Landing, Alta., once the leading solar heating community of its kind in North America, may have to revert to fossil fuels as the aging system is breaking down and may be too expensive — or even impossible — to fix. .
412
402
773
11
1
25
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
@PendulumFlow You seem to be unaware of this concept:
1
0
25
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
22 days
Tweet media one
@JessePeltan
Jesse Peltan
22 days
"Electricity comes from gas generators" Where does the gas come from? (hint: if you want gas on demand, you need to store it somewhere)
Tweet media one
7
6
91
5
1
25
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
6 months
The end of cost declines for PV, in my view, are being greatly exaggerated. Julien provides a good summary of this point of view in this post, but I want to go through why I think it misses the forest (LCOE) for the trees (module prices).
@JomauxJulien
Julien Jomaux
6 months
Solar cost is still going down but how far can it go until the end of this decade? Elements of answer here:
4
12
43
1
1
24
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
8 months
If developed countries want to help developing ones decarbonize, the best thing they can do (aside from significant direct aid) is scale the technologies in their own economies to de-risk them. I think about this every time someone says "but Canada's total emissions are tiny!"
@arvindpawan1
Arvind P. Ravikumar
8 months
My #hotTake is this: Many in climate space in the West tend to project their view of conservative/progressive divisions on climate on to developing countries. It just doesn't work that way. The politics (+solutions) of climate are *very* different in developing countries.
0
2
12
3
2
23
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
7 months
Nuclear pitched as "too cheap to meter" was a golden example of engineers not having a clue on techno-economics, doing a disservice to nuclear energy in the process. It serves as an important reminder how useless EROI is as a predictor of cost.
@Peters_Glen
Glen Peters
7 months
I don't think that environmentalists are as powerful as they think when it comes to nuclear & CCS/CDR. Nuclear never delivered on the "too cheap to meter" & CCS / CDR has not performed sustained, at scale, & at reasonable cost. It is "cost" that ultimately kills these things!
30
17
113
7
4
23
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
6 months
I think before defining individual actions that can affect climate change, there's a key prerequisite question: do you own a (heated) home and/or a car? If so, you need an EV or a heat pump (hybrid fine for now). Until then, anything else you might do is a rounding error.
@AkshatRathi
Akshat Rathi
6 months
A question I often get asked at Climate Capitalism book events: So what should I do about tackling climate change? My answer: Two big baskets. An individual's power lies in their influence and their actions. And currently influence can count for a lot more than actions. 1/2
17
60
166
14
2
22
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
8 months
There's one really important line in here, which I want to explore in a long🧵: "There is an outstanding question over ...hybrid systems... not necessarily because of efficiency performance but because of the high output capacity of heat pumps needed at very low temperatures."
@janrosenow
Jan Rosenow
8 months
NEW RESEARCH: Heat pumps are 2-3x more efficient than oil and gas based fossil heating systems in cold and sub zero temperatures. Even in temperatures approaching -30°C they perform significantly better than their fossil-fuel based competitors. All the detail here👇
118
669
2K
3
4
23
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
Today, nuclear power is the backbone of Ontario's low carbon grid, and I shudder to think what it would look like with coal instead. Hydro from QC wasn't really an option either, as they struggle to build enough supply to meet peaks as residential heat was electrified.
Tweet media one
1
1
23
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
Had Quebec - lauded for the lowest electricity prices in the world - failed to promote space heat electrification, they would have had the exact same problems as Ontario. Importantly, Hydro Quebec was also developing nuclear at the time.
1
0
22
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
Demand growth from electrification is inevitable, but I do think most people underestimate how much industrial energy efficiency is likely to blunt the effects of growth in the long run.
@SolarInMASS
Commercial Solar Guy
2 months
Again, electric utilities have been wrong - or lied - about demand growth since the 1970s. I expect no different with tomorrow.
Tweet media one
14
19
111
2
4
19
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
What happened was, amid the tumult , the corporation was dissolved according to the "deregulated" model sweeping the United States. In the end though, this ultimately meant the level of "regulation" in Ontario's grid was about to grow exponentially.
1
0
22
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
Given multiple drivers, one thing is clear: cost overruns on 3.6/14GW of capacity did not - on their own - cause electricity prices to jump 31% between 1991-1993. More important, by a wide margin, was the fact demand was simply much, much lower than OH had anticipated.
Tweet media one
1
1
22
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
6 days
The correct answer for all is zero because light bulbs need electricity.
@ecomodernist1
Ecomodernist Society of North America
6 days
Tweet media one
56
184
1K
5
1
22
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
Wow, new all-electric homes are really cheap compared to having to install gas lines! ;)
@RichardMeyerDC
Richard Meyer
9 months
The construction costs of an all-electric home relative to a baseline natural gas home in four representative cities range between $4,000 and $15,000. In colder climates, the more expensive electric equipment also results in higher costs for energy use.
Tweet media one
9
2
12
6
1
22
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
Wind/solar advocates used to call energy storage "the holy grail", but that's stopped. Why? Because now storage has scaled, and it hasn't automatically made VRE-only grids cost-effective. Energy is too complex for holy grails. Fusion boosters would do well to remember this.
@Atomicrod
Rod Adams
9 months
Fusion is the Holy Grail of energy. Advanced fission is buried treasure whose location is marked with big X's on readily accessible, easily duplicated maps. Conventional fission is accessible treasure generating abundant income today.
10
21
144
7
4
22
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 year
Cold weather sucks - but they're a great day for looking at electricity supply mixes in Ontario! Say it with me folks: wind 👏 can 👏 help 👏 meet 👏 seasonal 👏 peaks! #energytwitter
Tweet media one
5
4
21
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
So why this narrative? Let's unpack the history. In the early-mid 20th century, the system was controlled by a provincial commission. It was created to exploit the substantial hydro resources and operate new local distribution networks financed via municipal debt.
Tweet media one
1
0
21
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
I want to make one thing very clear - Ontario Hydro did not "go bankrupt". It fact, it couldn't really as a crown corp. If expenses were greater than revenue, then OEB simply raises rates (as they did in 1991-1993). OH was no closer to bankruptcy than the government itself.
3
0
21
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
Today in silly, wacky reasons to oppose renewable energy sources 😂
@wingod
Dennis Wingo
2 months
@DiracDel I worry about shifting terawatts of the earth’s internal heat around like that.
2
0
2
3
2
21
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
Here, it boils down to the 1970s oil crisis, which created a heretofore non-existent pressure for utilities to promote conservation. It also drove a shift to domestic sources and the expansion of the gas network, robbing the nuclear fleet of a critical source of load growth.
Tweet media one
2
0
20
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 year
Finally starting the #electrifyeverything process in my own home, and have run into a frustrating barrier that heat pump water heater manufacturers should note: My basement ceiling is not high enough for a heat pump water heater. The heat pump adds a lot of height!
7
0
20
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
This is an ostensibly thoughtful thread about energy technology tribalism. Unfortunately it completely undermines itself by simply concluding pro nuclear tribalism is better than anti nuclear tribalism.
@LukeBro92
Luke Horn
9 months
Pro-nuclear and anti-nuclear people by and large do not live on the same factual plane. What do I mean by that? 1/x
13
44
230
8
1
20
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
15 days
This is a nasty and unsubstantiated attack and one of the most valuable and advanced pieces of analysis ever done on US decarbonization. There's lots to debate about in this study, that's healthy. Do that. Not this. This is just lazy.
@Ben_Inskeep
Ben Inskeep
16 days
>>BP paid $2 million for Princeton's Net Zero America study, according to new Senate report. >>The study recommended that the US prioritize investment in CCS. >>IIJA & IRA subsequently enacted, massively expanding CCS subsidies >>BP to get billions $$$
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
20
70
174
3
0
20
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
This became the vertically integrated "Ontario Hydro" Corporation in the 70s, now a rate-regulated crown corporation. It was during this transitional period from the late 60s - 80s when Ontario's nuclear fleet was built, and was also a time when energy paradigms were shifting.
Tweet media one
1
0
20
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
It's a complex story, but I do think it's paints a more nuanced picture than "nuclear cost overruns did it." It also makes it clear that nuclear power wasn't necessarily a bad choice, the planned buildout was just misaligned with an evolving energy policy context.
1
0
20
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
6 months
As expected, concerns about the slowing costs declines of solar and batteries are aging badly. Maybe wait a year or two after a pandemic to start ringing the alarm next time?
@ShanuMathew93
Shanu Mathew
6 months
"Battery prices are back to a declining trajectory in 2023, after an unprecedented year of increases in 2022. @BloombergNEF 's annual battery price survey has found that the volume-weighted average price for lithium-ion battery packs dropped to $139 per kWh in 2023, a 14% decline
Tweet media one
5
42
190
4
2
20
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
Now things get messy - the new firm would last scarcely more than 20y. While the nukes had been planned by a commission gung ho on expanding electricity demand, the new planning context which was almost diametrically opposed. (great paper below)
1
0
20
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
7 months
It is staggering to me, after how much progress we've made on a levelized cost of PV, how much further we still can go. And it's important, PV's production profile means we really do need ultra cheap prices for high penetrations to make sense.
@SolarInMASS
Commercial Solar Guy
7 months
Bifacial HJT will be our future - we’ll add various layers (perovskite) to move past 30%
4
5
29
4
2
19
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
@KevinSKrause @JohnSmillie42 Yeah the point is not that there's no way to make furnaces resilient, it's that we haven't bothered to do so, and it's not straightforward to do so for most ppl. In that context, why the resiliency freakout over electric heat?
5
1
19
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
7 months
Good thread on a common misconception about heat pumps, a few points to add: - an oversize with a good turndown ratio (e.g. 25% like mine) won't run inefficiently - important to note resistance provide supplementary heat, not backup, so you still get a COP of 1.5+ at -30
@christaggart
Chris Taggart ⚡️🔌🏡
7 months
I’m seeing a lot of assumptions over the last couple days around backup heat for heatpumps needing to be duplicate equipment. Here’s a small 🧵 on heat strips.
5
22
43
3
2
19
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
This meant many, many new local distribution networks, and the associated municipal debt, were incorporated as new firms. As a result, Ontario's urban distribution system is fragmented between 63 municipally owned firms, now all regulated by the OEB.
1
0
19
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
5 months
This thread is very clearly written by a successful tech expert, not an expert on energy systems or climate change. It has a large amount of directionally accurate information, but ultimately provides a deceptively incomplete picture of climate solutions.
@tomaspueyo
Tomas Pueyo
5 months
We could easily stop climate change right now if we wanted to For example, we could pause global warming with 100x less money than countries pledged in the recent UN's COP28 If we don't do it, it's just because we don't really want to Here's how to do it in 3 steps 🧵:
Tweet media one
129
239
1K
2
0
19
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 month
The mechanisms of cost reduction matter! Solar is getting cheap for reasons that are different than wind. If nuclear gets cheap it will be for reasons unique to the technology. Can't just rely on learning rates and modularity and stop thinking about this.
@JessePeltan
Jesse Peltan
1 month
A lot of people compare small modular reactors (SMRs) to solar and batteries. We made them cheap by producing them repeatedly at scale. But, solar panels didn't get cheap by chopping them up into smaller pieces to make the same total. We exponentially scaled module production.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
46
52
239
4
2
18
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
@ghunkinking Good for those people who own RVs.
1
0
18
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 months
Got my gas bill this month, -$9.55! How is that possible? Last month they didn't read my meter, so they assumed I used the same amount as last year. This month I finally reaped the reward of the hybrid heat pump, as my gas usage was 130m3 lower than last year!
Tweet media one
3
0
18
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
The reality was, Ontario's nuclear fleet was never viable unless paired without the kind of demand stimulating programs that the commission has spent the last 70 years engaging in. Great example of this ambition in my old thread below.
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
2 years
Lots of discussion recently on SMRs for industrial heat - but it’s not a new idea, and an exchange yesterday got me digging around on a case study right here in Canada: The Bruce Energy Centre! 🧵 @Leigh_Phillips @RichardKCarlson @bataille_chris #energytwitter
Tweet media one
3
4
15
2
0
18
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
26 days
Begging solar PV advocates not to use this chart as an argument against nuclear. Awesome stuff in this thread!
@wang_seaver
Seaver Wang
26 days
So, on a per-GW capacity basis, most materials are unsurprisingly concrete + steel. Solar needs the least materials (114 kt/GW). An AP1000 nuclear plant or offshore wind farm are both at 280 kt/GW. Onshore wind, the EPR, and BWRX-300 are comparable at 540-630 kt/GW.
Tweet media one
2
2
30
4
2
18
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
26 days
@JDog969 That's not correct.
1
0
18
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
This is an underrated solution for a variety of problems in the energy/climate/environmental space.
@NiyerClimate
Nathan Iyer
9 months
@gnievchenko @MichaelEWebber Couldn't we just put it in a hole and bury it?
1
1
7
2
0
17
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
1 year
Great example on my recent post on the need to be a bro for decarb, not these other kinds of bros.
Tweet media one
@BrosForDecarb
Bros For Decarbonization (not parody)
2 years
Don't be a Renewabro be a Bro For Renewables. Same with Nukebros, Storagebros, and all the rest of you bros giving us a bad name. Chill the fuck out
8
6
73
2
0
17
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
26 days
@JDog969 No we can recycle it.
2
0
17
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
@RickScampini Yeah to be fair you can solve that problem, we manage *fine* in Canada on -45C days. (Only pointing this out so someone more annoying can't use it to upend the actual point lol).
1
0
17
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
4 months
The asset value would need to be written off by these new firms and the debt absorbed by taxpayers, but ultimately still paid via ratepayer revenue streams. This shows that while the debt was absorbed by taxpayers, the cost was ultimately still borne by ratepayers.
Tweet media one
1
1
17
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
26 days
@JDog969 We recycle lithium friend.
1
0
17
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
9 months
@AMoser_E I am being sarcastic and snarky. I do not need you to explain to me that electric heating uses more electricity than gas heating. But people very much need it explained to them that gas heating requires electricity.
1
0
17
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
7 months
Wind and solar have capacity value - they need firming/balancing power, but have yet to see an hourly model suggest a need for 100% backup. Also, capacity value manifests at the system level, not generator level; that changes with every incremental new kW of demand and supply.
5
0
17
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
8 months
Arrested Development Narrator: "It, did not."
@CJHandmer
Casey Handmer, PhD
8 months
Remember, batteries this cheap also invalidate all the renewables grid modeling that requires a massive build out and lots of "clean firm" capacity.
11
8
130
1
0
17
@HarrisBerton
Harris Berton
8 months
PSA: This only applies to plastic.
@Mining_Atoms
B.F. Randall ⚛ ⛏ ⚡
8 months
PSA: Recycling almost always consumes more fossil fuels than manufacturing new articles. The “circular economy” idea is a myth.
38
44
270
2
0
17