SEENinJournalism is a new network for all reporters, columnists, investigative journalists, producers, editors and content-makers across platforms, who seek to restore accuracy and impartiality to the media coverage of sex and gender.
/
“Where have large swathes of the media been? And sadly, I include the BBC in that outside of this programme…” A devastating critique of professional failure to stand up for truth and safeguarding from
@hannahsbee
on
@BBCNewsnight
Shocking from
@BBCRadioScot
. Interviewee seems determined to medically stop his 10-year-old daughter’s puberty after deciding she was a boy before she could even talk. The BBC has policies around raising safeguarding alerts. We hope they are being followed. Clips below.
Unusual BBC headline that misses the story on the key findings and recommendations of the Cass report.
‘Children questioning their gender identity are being let down by a toxic debate over the subject - that’s according to a major review’
This is not the story, BBC.
The loss of trust in media accuracy is seen in the number of accounts doubting the sex of the alleged attacker.
This is *entirely* because the media has repeatedly ‘mis-sexed’ accused and convicted people.
‘Girl, 13, charged after school stabbings’
Update: there is nothing this morning from the BBC on the statement by the Health Secretary to the Commons on the inquiry into the medical scandal that could affect up to 10-thousand children.
Worse: the Cass report has been removed from the catalogue of health stories in >
Which papers have covered the landmark Commons statement by Health Secretary Victoria Atkins in the wake of the Cass Review?
So far, the
@Telegraph
, front page, with the warning that doctors who prescribe puberty blockers could be struck off >
Greatest respect to
@seanmcginty
, a BBC journalist, who has spoken at length about the safeguarding and accuracy problems around the BBC’s coverage of sex and gender.
‘Three biologically male trans murderers held in women-only jail’
Daily Mail doesn’t use ‘trans women’ except in quotes, when it can’t be helped. Male trans’ is a good descriptor.
‘Biological’ is unnecessary but this is a major stride toward accuracy.
Which papers have covered the landmark Commons statement by Health Secretary Victoria Atkins in the wake of the Cass Review?
So far, the
@Telegraph
, front page, with the warning that doctors who prescribe puberty blockers could be struck off >
Puberty blocker story makes it to
@guardian
front page with a fair and balanced piece (despite use of ‘gender affirming’)
Most notable: of ALL today’s coverage that we’ve seen - NONE has used the phrase ‘trans children’.
It’s a significant shift.
One of the people who has been helping Ofcom to hire diverse talent is Suki Sandhu OBE, who has called JK Rowling a ‘repeat offender in gatekeeping human rights’ with her ‘transphobic views’
‘Under 18s in Wales will not be prescribed puberty blockers following a huge review of gender services. The Welsh Government confirmed the step following the publication of the Cass Review, which looked at gender services in England’
@WalesOnline
“No guidance, no evidence, and no training …” Cass tells
@JustinOnWeb
in a powerful interview why children were wholesaled into GIDS by GPs nervous about not affirming their young patients’ delusions.
‘Support for Stonewall crumbles after Cass’
‘The NHS has distanced itself and other public bodies are reviewing their associations, as the fallout from a landmark report on gender identity shines a spotlight on Stonewall’
@thetimes
share token
The BBC has dropped Cass, with none of the follow up that might be expected on such a significant review.
Here are some of the stories that have passed the front page test of time over Cass.
@soniasodha
explaining on
@BBCNews
how the failure of the media to report this issue properly - and the horrendous backlash for the few who did - led to a dereliction of clinical duty.
‘The NHS’s most senior adviser on transgender health, Dr Derek Glidden of the Nottingham Centre for Transgender Health, refused to share data about his clinic’s patients with the Cass Review’
Third day of coverage in the
@Telegraph
This is the Streisand effect in action on the media. These protests at the
@CanSG_org
conference have done more to garner press attention than panel members or discussion topics. This is the
@Telegraph
front page.
Footage
@bindelj
Sky and the BBC now the only outlets not previewing the Cass report.
Daily Mail here
Children questioning their gender need 'holistic' care, report urges
At last
@sueevansprotect
, an original Tavi whistleblower, is platformed by the BBC. She was on
@BBCNewsnight
but balanced by yet another trans-identified male.
This is a very high quality guest who didn’t need balance within the programme, as is allowed by impartiality rules.
Letter to
@ObserverUK
from 15 clinical psychologists
‘GIDS clinics..were psychology-led services. Intentionally or not..it was clinical psychologists who promoted an ideology that was almost impossible to challenge’
The BBC considers itself an outlet of record but on Cass it failed to live up to that.
Coverage on the day was misleading and the follow up was absent.
It failed to respect its own impartiality rules around covering all perspectives, and is guilty of bias by omission.
This is Exeter Uni threatening to expel a student after he was overheard on a private phone call in his room alone saying (among other things) gender fluidity is ‘stupid’.
A neighbour complained he was being transphobic.
In the
@Telegraph
There is nothing in police reports or reports from the scene to support this doubt. It is simply a measure of the collapse in the trustworthiness of news outlets on the issue of sex and gender.
Shocking from
@WomensHealthMag
Male athlete is unchallenged as he describes campaigners for fair female sports ‘nasty groups’ and makes unfounded claims about male-female parity
‘Trans woman, 51, takes on London Marathon and Ride Across Britain’
>
‘This has all happened because children have been lied to’
By
@suzanne_moore
‘Cass report may now see the legal dam break’
Unusual to see a comment so high up, but pertinent, deserved
Education Secretary to stop saying ‘trans women are women’
‘At the time of writing that response I didn’t have any direct experience of this topic and took advice on how best to respond’
What happens when the media curtails debate and hides the facts👆>
Given the volume of follow up work from the
@thetimes
@guardian
and
@Telegraph
on Cass, we went back to check the BBC’s follow-up - the BBC having full teams of Identity, Politics, Health, a previous close relationship with Stonewall and a history of child transition coverage. >
‘Dr Hilary Cass has criticised the spread of disinformation around her report..the paediatrician said that young people were being put at risk by the spread of false information’
@thetimes
This disinformation went unchallenged on the BBC this week >
Both
@SkyNews
and
@BBCNews
have produced considerably more live and follow-up content on OJ Simpson than the Cass report. After special live coverage through yesterday, he’s still prominent on both front pages.
Cass was dropped by both from their front pages within 24 hours.
Remarkable day of crowd-sourced journalism after
@timeslucy
’s piece was published in The Times on the role of Baroness Hunt and Stonewall. Hundreds of people have shared receipts on social media - evidence rather than claims or opinion.
This is a fascinating read from
@TimesLucy
, who speaks with former Stonewall chief Baroness Hunt following publication of Cass report. Hunt did in fact meet with GIDS staff in 2018 and listened to their serious concerns about what was happening to children. From Time to Think:
A peculiar feature of this story is that there are a very large number of “ordinary” people who understand this story and its nuances better than the journalists who are paid to understand it. Cass coverage has exposed how large swathes of the media are 5 years behind the curve.
The problem with this article, and the BBC will not be alone in this today, is that it fails the test of accuracy.
Nowhere does it explain that it is males, men - not trans-identified women - that Yousaf is planning to include in a law to protect women.
The
@Telegraph
has now put a special correspondent on this story.
‘A group of Church of England schools told teachers they would probably be breaking the law if they said a person cannot change their sex..despite legal rulings to the contrary’
Some notes:
1 the phrase ‘trans children’ seems to have gone forever. In all the (truly minimal) BBC coverage the phrase hasn’t made an appearance since Evan Davies was corrected by David Bell on R4Pm
Gender care report author attacks 'misinformation'
/
No impartial news outlet should be describing opposite sex hormones as ‘gender affirming’.This is the BBC TikTok account.
The presenter is reading a script. He didn’t write it.
Last week I inadvertently misled the House by quoting a figure from a Stonewall briefing.
I'm grateful for conversation with Dr Cass and am happy to correct the record because that's what politicians should do.
I have more to say watch this space !
BBC News - which hasn’t covered WPATH or
@CanSG_org
- publishes an extremely long story about cancelled appointments.
Again the questions about bias by omission, by, for example. ignoring issues such as destroyed sexual function and fertility.
More reality-based journalism from the NYT, a shift in coverage that’s become so noticeable it’s been accused of being ‘obsessed’. The article points out the obvious - that sex is not ‘assigned at birth’ - and looks at why such language was adopted./
A reminder that
@BBCNews
received nearly 300 complaints when it platformed Luxion’s peculiar claims and admitted it might have been better to have included “another voice”.
Anyone chancing on this excellent new podcast might think the BBC has radically changed its “both sides” position on the puberty blockers scandal. It unflinchingly exposes the lack of evidence for PBs esp the reversibility claims. But there’s a catch…
🧵
Keira Bell
@klbfax
has spoken to the
@thetimes
Voices like hers should have been all over the airwaves on Wednesday - these are the voices that would be the appropriate ‘lived experience’ response to Cass
This link has a pay wall
‘Using she/her pronouns did not fundamentally affect the overall accuracy of the report’
‘Referencing biological sex was not necessary to ensure the material met its requirement to be duly accurate’
Were there any doubt that
@Ofcom
is captured by activism, it stills it here.>
This is a profile of Paul Sinton-Hewitt - founder of Parkrun - on BBC Sounds
About 12’ in, the current CEO is given the opportunity to justify including trans-identified males in the female category.
The presenter adopts activist convention >
Hannah Barnes has spoken to the Times about how her important work on the Tavistock was treated by the BBC.
Deborah Cohen was also of course an equal part of that team.
‘I exposed Tavistock clinic. Now gender ideology is even more entrenched’
Baroness Claire Fox
@Fox_Claire
in the Lords asking the government for guidance to ensure that crime statistics are accurate and consistent by not using gender as a synonym for sex.
M
Sandhu appears to have made his JKR comments around the same time as he was being lauded by Ofcom’s Director of Communications as a “tour de force” in diversity and inclusion.
@HJoyceGender
is asking the Mail to correct various misrepresentations including that she referred to the defendant as ‘female’.
Style conventions should never override direct quotes, particularly when those conventions are misguided.
Strong words from Suzanne Moore on the Hate Crime Act 👇- ‘All it will do is stir up more hatred’
‘Some activists are passing round Police Scotland forms, saying: ‘Save this form and get dobbing Terfs on April 1. You can do it anonymously. I know I will’
We are hearing that the Institute of Physics Publishing
@IOPPublishing
is planning to host a talk by the ‘trans children’ charity Mermaids this month titled ‘Transgender, non-binary and gender-diverse awareness’.
Mermaids is still under inquiry by the Charity Commission.
// 1
Bias by omission here. If you relied on
@itvnews
for what’s going on in Scotland you’d have no idea about the importance of Alba, Ash Regan, gender reform and the implementation of the Cass Review. Rehash of Green comments yesterday.
> The stories have not been taken down from the website: they are findable on more specific searches. They have been hidden on the ‘health’ tag.
The BBC Health hub has fallen well below the standards expected on Cass, as have story commissioners. >
Listen here from about 7:41 for a lesson in the danger of seriously under-researched lived experience interviews with highly invested parents.
Extremely shocking five minutes: the parent unchallenged - not even when he makes debunked claims about Cass>
Who has had nothing to say about the Hate Crime Act in the run up to April 1 ?
The Society of Editors
@EditorsUK
has been very quiet, so was contacted by one of our members.
Has its view that the ‘Proposed Scottish Hate Crime law change threatens free media in the whole UK’/
Well done
@MishalHusain
raising this issue but
@CMO_England
should not have got away with this ‘vitriol on both sides’ claim. It’s well evidenced and Cass has said that the impact on researchers was a one-sided phenomenon stemming from a fear of being called transphobic.
The BBC, via the Hugh Pym package, focusses on waiting lists again. Does it have no other winch to crank? This is not a waiting list story. Also a trans-identified male is its first contributor.
Feels tired, old, badly framed.
Sky Australia covers Tickle vs Giggle but not findable on the UK site
Surprising this case has so little global coverage - it’s such a click-generator
‘Never in my wildest nightmare’: Sall Grover says she will appeal to the High Court if she loses’
@BBCPM
takes the novel approach on a story about medical malpractice to devote a large chunk of coverage to “Amelia” - a satisfied customer. Would they do the same if a maternity unit had harmed babies through malpractice? “Let’s hear now from Lisa whose baby was fine…”
After one week the BBC results are in:
Misleading primary online article and VTs
On the day reax: resorted to anecdote for balance on live programming with a succession of trans-identified males
No detransition guests or trans-identified females
No reporting on health >
@seanmcginty
@shellenberger
It was Michael
@shellenberger
who revealed and exposed
@_CryMiaRiver
’s WPATH files
The BBC’s Sean McGinty has spoken up at considerable personal risk in defence of safeguarding children caught up in media gender affirmation.
Listen on Michael’s substack
Follow
@seanmcginty
Overheard in the
@bbc5live
production office just now: “This
@HJoyceGender
is a fantastic speaker and really knows her stuff - why haven’t we had her on before?” We jest ofc - but answers on a postcard please (a great listen from 0805)
Complacency isn’t an option. Even Dr Cass felt obliged to adopt certain compliant language conventions in her review. Every official journalism style guide, where it mentions identity, recommends Self-ID. The language of gender identity has become absorbed into policy in every>
No pronouns either. The next step is stop using ‘trans’ instead of ‘male’.
Every news outlet does this and it’s completely inaccurate
The issue isn’t ‘trans people’ in women’s prisons, sports, refuges, all single sex spaces. The issue is male people, men, in those spaces.
‘Children who believe they’re trans may actually have mental health issues, a landmark report is set to find..It’s expected to advise that children should not be rushed onto a path to change gender, and receive counselling rather than being put on drugs’
Not so long ago, a piece in the Sunday papers questioning gender dogma was a rare event. Now it’s commonplace - and they compete for the scoop.
@thetimes
reckons Cass is due to report Tuesday
1/2
Other recent session hosts at Ofcom include Pips/Philip Bunce (she/her/they) who featured in the landmark Forstater case after being described as a part time cross dresser.
@skynews
has awoken
'Dr Hilary Cass says she is more upset and frustrated about the falsehoods being peddled about her research than the abuse directed at her, because it is 'putting children at risk''
Exceptionally newsworthy statement on the Cass report to the Commons from Victoria Atkins, which will be of interest to
@hughpym
,
@PaulBrandITV
@ashishskynews
and
@joshparry
. We look forward to balanced coverage.
This isn’t BBC journalism. It’s been bought in from
@thetimes
. Over 30 minutes
@TimesLucy
lays out her excellent work in helping to expose the scandal. Great. But the result is we now have two different editorial lines about PBs running on the BBC at the same time …
Prominence at
@GBNEWS
for this interview with
@RosieDuffield1
The BBC last spoke at length to Rosie Duffield was 20 months ago despite the electoral importance of the debate around around gender, women’s rights and medical transition.
@thetimes
@TimesLucy
So well done to the series commissioner
@leachf
chancing her arm that the audience of BBC Sounds might be able to cope with some actual facts. Just a shame the BBC had to outsource to achieve this.
Incredible reader response after the
@yorkshirepost
reports on gender identity and women and children’s rights
Women's rights, trans issues and gender dysphoria - a deluge of concern, worry and hope - you have your say
Time for news outlets to stop implying that Scotland’s proposed misogyny law would settle the problem of ‘sex’ being absent from the Hate Crime Act.
The legislation would be based not on sex, but on gender. Please start explaining the issue properly.
1/
Sending support to all journalists, but particularly Scottish journalists, who plan to continue using fact-based and accurate language to report sex and gender issues after midnight.
In just under 30 minutes a law takes effect that could see them accused of a crime for doing so.
> date order.
It seems extremely odd but this coverage -
- weak and misleading as it was, and this story
Cass review: Health secretary criticises gender care 'culture of secrecy'
Can no longer be found under ‘health updates>
Interesting - all news outlets who’ve previously shown gender identity capture have played down or totally ignored the gender controversy at the heart of Scotland’s crisis. The only exception is
@BBCNews
Here
@APNews
pretends it doesn’t exist
We’ve heard from so many journalists who feel that speaking up at work would bring career repercussions or even disciplinary action.
It’s always wrong, so we’ll be producing a compilation of advice and personal experience on how to raise it with editors.
BBC: ‘Expanding gender services is a key focus of the review’
Badly misleading after telling viewers the problem is waiting lists.
Most of the important lines - for example ‘extreme caution’ on cross sex hormones, the dangers of social transition - are omitted.
Not impartial.
Straight down the line from
@BBCNewsScotland
, no shying away from the importance of Ash Regan and sex and gender rights.
Terrific 24 hours from
@bbclornag
and
@BBCJamesCook
‘Can Humza Yousaf survive as First Minister?’
>Given that the BBC has never fully explained the issues around Parkrun, much less included in the Parkrun debate the voice of an important contributor such as
@mara_yamauchi
, this is inappropriate bias.
This is the BBC’s only coverage
The BBC’s responded to criticism voiced by
@hannahsbee
and others of its coverage of the puberty blockers scandal, saying it’s proud she broke the story at the BBC. Shout out to
@deb_cohen
since her contribution is overlooked in the statement (as read out on The R4 Media Show)
> No follow up except from a trans affirmative perspective
> Ignored Cass warnings about the continued vulnerability of young adults by profiling 19 and 20 y-o on the ‘benefits’ of medical transition
> Declined to cover Commons statement
> Has hidden Online coverage >
SEENinJournalism is committed to the protected belief that sex is binary and immutable, and to the belief that journalists have the right to report this issue with integrity and honesty, upholding the first principles of our profession, without suffering disbenefit or loss.
/
@guardian
Impartiality is not just reporting both sides - it’s reporting ^at all^.
The BBC has more of a duty to report the Commons statement than other outlets, due to its public remit.
Ŵe’ll check again tomorrow and update.
Some conspicuous absences across medical journalism.
While the
@bmj_latest
interviewed Hilary Cass and explained the contents of the report,
@mjauk
and
@HealthSenseUK
have been strangely silent - one has nothing at all, one a couple of reposts.
There is scope here for a ///