Some extraordinary quotes in this piece. It’s hard not to conclude from it that many Republican officials believe that only Republicans can be trusted to administer elections, and only Republicans can legitimately win them. (Any Rs who do certify a D victory are also purged.)
In Arkansas, the GOP legislature enacting laws giving a GOP-controlled state board power to “institute corrective action” and “take over and conduct elections” in counties.
One of the law's authors believes Trump won the election.
It’s worth dwelling on this for a moment. Texas legislators want to make it illegal for citizens to voluntarily travel together without registering with the government — if and only if the aim of their travel is to lawfully cast a ballot.
This is a real letter from state senator Chris Kapenga, a die-hard Trump supporter, after Trump accused him of covering up election fraud. (!) He calls out Trump’s lies … amidst Pravda-era praise.
Stockholm Syndrome could be renamed for a town in Wisconsin’s 33rd district.
“Keyword warrants” demand that a search engine turn over a list of identifiers for every Internet user who performed a particular search within a time window.
"TikTok, when opening any website in their app, injects tracking code that can monitor all keystrokes, including passwords, and all taps." Paging
@FTC
h/t
@macargnelutti
🔥 New Post: Announcing InAppBrowser - see what JavaScript commands get injected through an in-app browser
👀 TikTok, when opening any website in their app, injects tracking code that can monitor all keystrokes, including passwords, and all taps.
This really drives home
@AdamSerwer
’s observation that “fraud” can encompass the idea that one’s opponents are illegitimate participants in politics and governing, even if they’re fellow Americans.
The House Judiciary Committee is where articles of impeachment are drawn up. If that very committee majority is asking the VP to invoke the 25th Amendment, why wouldn't it proceed to impeachment?
NEW: I am sending a letter with
@RepTedLieu
and our colleagues on the House Judiciary Committee, calling on Vice President Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove Donald Trump from office after today’s events.
With the help of the ace
@nytimes
digital team, we compiled a list of ~2.2 million externally-facing hyperlinks that had been used in articles since its launch in 1996. The goal was to discern how many of them had fallen victim to linkrot or content drift.
Timnit Gebru’s work on AI bias is necessary and pathbreaking.
The prospect that she’d simply be instructed by her employer to withdraw her academic work-in-progress — with no discussion — implicates all the church/state issues of corporations hosting academic research units.
This from
@crampell
is a jaw-dropping revelation of the blandest of evil, sneaky rules. An embarrassment to and mockery of equal justice under law, and our country.
If you’re ok with this, try to be honest about why.
I've said for a long time: Republicans decry bureaucracy, then weaponize it against vulnerable people. But the Trump admin has taken it to a truly horrific level.
Read
@crampell
on the Kafkaesque techniques they're using against immigrants:
I've read this proposed law in Oklahoma twice. Any parent can unreviewably demand a book be removed from a public school library. Any official not complying is to be fired and the district to pay the complaining parent at least $10K/day the book stays. ...
Writing in 2010,
@jonathanchait
observed the same phenomenon: Any D electoral wins are seen as uniquely illegitimate; any subsequent D policy as unacceptable without R support, which is naturally not forthcoming.
The person on the left, Chris
@CISAKrebs
, may be removed from his job at any moment by the person on the right, the President, because Chris has done his job and upheld his oath of office so consummately well. Another dark moment for our country and its citizens if it happens.
Here’s how the purged Republican official described his removal by fellow Rs and the pressures he’d been under: “blinded by power and partisanship … to disregard the oath of office.”
If reporters covered assassinations the way they're talking about current events: “Some in the campaign have floated plans to physically attack the winning candidate. However, experts believe this approach has little chance of success.”
The new R laws and the quick flexing of them described in
@reidepstein
’s article are the structural counterpart to individual actions, such as purging the Republican who cast a legally-mandated, ministerial vote to certify Michigan’s electoral votes.
For the first time in history, you can do ngrams across all American (and Colonial!) case law -- pick a word or phrase and see how often it's been used in the law over time, including comparisons across different states. All thanks to scanning 44 million pages of 44,000 volumes.
Similarly, for a fair investigation of Democratic President Clinton, a Republican special counsel investigated. Robert Fiske was praised by Rs until he cleared Clinton. Republican Ken Starr replaced him and impeached.
"Nothing more captures the man than holding a Christian bible in the air as a sort of dominance talisman after driving priests out of a church where they were tending to the needs of peaceful protesters."
Failing to deal with this company’s behavior when it started is the biggest public policy failure in the digital space in a generation. Reining it in is that much tougher now that it’s well-funded and so frequently used by government clients.
@drewharwell
For an investigation of Republican President Trump after his FBI Director (R) was summarily fired, his own Attorney General (R) recused, leaving the deputy (R) to appoint a special counsel (also R) for a fair investigation. Bob Mueller was praised until he failed to clear Trump.
Too often the headlines about a court decision are misleading — what appears outrageous turns out be to unremarkable once you get full context from the court’s opinion.
Not here. Opinion linked below. This is a total failure of the system in plain sight, a court crushing a life.
a man in mississippi was in jail for a misdemeanor. he asked an officer if he could charge his phone, which was apparently never taken from him. he was then charged with having a phone in jail and was sentenced to TWELVE YEARS IN PRISON.
These two press releases, the second saying that the first is a lie, are both current on the Department of Justice’s official web site. h/t
@marty_lederman
This from
@SangerNYT
nails the story, including both the historical context and the current stakes around this betrayal of a Constitutional oath -- and the American people.
@restoreorderusa
@AlecMacGillis
I guess it’s fitting that the eye-opening statistics here are sourced to a news article that in turn cites to a non-peer-reviewed op-ed that in turn cites to … nothing, with no methodology for how these numbers are arrived at.
Truly no real basis (so far) to believe them.
What happens when AI gives us seemingly correct answers that we wouldn't have thought of ourselves, without any theory to explain them? These answers are a form of "intellectual debt" that we figure we'll repay -- and too often we never get around to it.
If reporters covered assassinations the way they're talking about current events: “Some in the campaign have floated plans to physically attack the winning candidate. Could it work? Criminal law experts are highly skeptical.”
Researchers have objected that using bots to scrape information in bulk from, say, Facebook could be deemed a felony.
If there were ever a case to make, though, this is it: a company snatching 3 billion photos to build a service to identify any stranger.
Just as there was/is an unconstrained scramble for PPE, there is no national strategy for the allocation of scarce testing — much less a national strategy to produce more. Even though this is a completely basic thing any citizen should expect the federal government to do.
There is also a shortage of reagents needed to run
#COVID19
tests so some labs are working on manufacturing their own. I don’t have words to express how unbelievable it is that 7 months into this pandemic we are still dealing with this nonsense. Why not invoke full power of DPA?
@kevincollier
Accidental suicide - killing off its own network with a faulty routing update, to the point admins can't put everything back the way it was. They may well be down for a good long while.
First two comments have been deleted
Hard to say what’s more worrisome for the preservation of humanity’s knowledge today: the fact that online sources disappear without warning, or that they can be changed without anyone noticing?
Extraordinary: A number of Microsoft Exchange servers were compromised with no easy way to alert their owners. The DOJ, with a court’s license, used the same vulnerability to undo the hack, and now is trying to get the word out.
Don’t overlook the dozens of extreme Trump Administration “midnight rules” being rushed through right now that could be promptly reversed with simple majorities under the CRA if Ds win tonight.
Some examples below, compiled by
@propublica
.
Wow. They really did publish a cubic fit with deaths heading to zero.
Notice the visual trick here of trying overlaying outdated forecasts next to that cubic fit, which is the only way of making it look sane.
Here are the sorts of books to be removed. A parent believing a book to fit these broad categories need only make a request, and there's no discretion to weigh or review the request. So not only are the categories truly unduly broad; they impose no practical limit at all.
It’s like shooting the moon in Hearts. A company’s ongoing security practices so awful, the breach so large and the sensitivity of the material so personal, that the journalists alerted to it realize it’s irresponsible to name and shame.
Thinking about today's capricious and hasty
#twitterlayoffs
and the amount of extraordinary talent affected.
@bkcharvard
builds online in the public interest, and we're starting new projects – drop us a line and we'll be in touch: rebootingsocialmedia
@cyber
.harvard.edu
This
@newsbeagle
and
@meharris
piece describes a retinal implant used by hundreds of people to gain sight -- one that has been declared by its vendor to be obsolete, leaving customers -- patients -- with no recourse against hardware or software bugs or issues. h/t
@Williamjmarks5
Which brings us back to the study we did with the help of the
@nytimes
digital team.
Of the ~2.2 million URLs, we found that:
25% of deep links to specific content were completely rotted.
It got worse over time:
6% of links from 2018 had rotted
43% from '08
72% from '98
The word “betrayal” should be in quotes below. The Attorney General could not betray the President by telling the truth, because the AG owed the President no “loyalty” to lie, or even keep silent, about this stuff. The AG owed the country the truth.
Why isn’t it disqualifying for a judge to refuse to commit to support of a peaceful transfer of power as specified by the Constitution? How is this remotely conservative!
I know all the prudential reasons why a second impeachment by the House is a bad idea. I realize that it's likely just a question of a nation collectively holding its breath until Jan 20th.
But if this isn't the Constitution's high crime and misdemeanors in progress, nothing is.
It’s profoundly regrettable that always-on mics are becoming so ubiquitous, without any updated framework for how they’ll be used for law enforcement or national security surveillance.
No one knows how these cicadas can keep track of the 17 years they stay dormant. Even more amazing is that they know exactly where the Massachusetts border is.
Years ago Dan Geer warned of the dangers of software monocultures.
Facebook is not only an app so central that people call it a platform — but it’s also a de facto basis for identity across the Web and Internet.
Users put more eggs in its basket than appears. Dan was right.
Facebook's data breach just got substantially worse than initially reported. In a follow up call this afternoon, the platform revealed that if your account was impacted, a hacker could have accessed any account you log into using Facebook
Your periodic reminder that photos you post publicly on Facebook and Instagram are grabbed by a company to power a comprehensive facial recognition database, and Facebook hasn't done anything meaningful to stop it.
It's been twenty years and there are still no clear boundaries on behavior like this. No one charged with looking out for users' interests save public interest-minded folks to discover some of what even mainstream apps are doing. (TikTok has over a billion monthly active users!)
@normative
@davidfrum
Absolutely. In some instances perhaps pseudonymity rather than anonymity can help. Name not revealed, but guarded path back to author.
No big deal, just ~USD$600 million stolen this morning in a hack of a decentralized finance network. Below is a plea to return it.
Because blockchains are blockchains, everyone can "see" the ill-gotten gains sitting in the hackers' wallets.
I'm delivering the Tanner Lectures on Human Values
@ClareHall_Cam
@Cambridge_Uni
in January 2020 about the strangeness by which technology empowers humanity at the same time it so rightly feels like we're losing control ... and what to do about it.
Near-daily privacy panics are often overwrought or based on incomplete stories.
Not this one.
A feedback loop of thoughtless, pervasive, and leaky parent-child surveillance irresistibly transforms love and concern into a helicopter parenting nightmare.
Today marks the 25th anniversary of John Perry Barlow's "A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace," a ringing, lyrical call for the freedom of mind online. It has resonance today, even as its polemic smoothed over real and still-growing problems.
Neat question. If the blue check itself is Twitter speaking -- representing that someone is verified -- then 230's immunities around being not responsible for someone *else's* speech could be irrelevant, even though it's that someone's speech beneath the badge that causes harm.
I don’t know any plausible legal basis by which a federal official can “revoke” consent to publish a public speech made in an official capacity.
And since there’s no copyright in U.S. gov’t works, consent isn’t even required to begin with.
Tech companies including Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Uber should publicly articulate how they will respond to subpoenas for user data as private lawsuits begin under the new Texas law.
A link to a great roundup by
@issielapowsky
below.
"I could see it being abused by anti-abortion groups who could potentially use the discovery process in a civil lawsuit to demand sensitive information about people and organizations providing reproductive justice services and information." -
@evan_greer
I just lost my wallet on the way home from work. I didn't have much identifying info in there so a good Samaritan got in touch with my via my... bank account 🤯
4x transfers of £0.01 each with a reference up to 18 chars
Today, a crisp one-sentence open letter warning about existential AI threat: “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”
I did not sign the letter.
We just put out a statement:
“Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”
Signatories include Hinton, Bengio, Altman, Hassabis, Song, etc.
🧵 (1/6)
Former AG Barr and Sen. McConnell spoke with
@jonkarl
to confirm they knew and know there was no material election fraud in 2020. While their account is surely self-serving, it still shows them putting party above country, violating their oaths. And not helpful to the GOP anyway.
“We need the president in Georgia,” McConnell told Barr, “and so we cannot be frontally attacking him right now. But you’re in a better position to inject some reality into this situation. You are really the only one who can do it.” Via
@jonkarl
All of this was presaged by the move to App Store models just over ten years ago. Before, the way PCs were architected no one could tell Bill Gates to kill a Windows app.
People predict they (and others) wouldn’t unlock and hand over their phones if asked to in the course of an experiment.
Then 100 out of 103 people do exactly that.
Standardized frameworks of consent and choice are too often fig leafs for use — and sometimes abuse — of power.
Very glad to see this must-read article published: "The Voluntariness of Voluntary Consent: Consent Searches and the Psychology of Compliance," in the
@YaleLJournal
, by
@rosesomm
and
@profbohns
. Totally fascinating.
This is the sort of thing that creeps people out — but/and if the industry keeps doing it people will get used to it.
The enduring effect of an Internet of Things is to turn products (TVs) into services (TV watches *you*!).
CTO Of Vizio confirms that Data collection in Smart TV's is now offsetting the cost of the hardware to the point that a non-Smart TV would have a higher price tag. Just like android phones, user data is used to reduce costs and stay competitive.
So, how to solve this?
The
@internetarchive
and
@brewster_kahle
have done extraordinary -- unparalleled, really -- work to preserve and make available links over the course of decades. .
There can also be more tailored newsroom-specific solutions.
The public and private failures to confront the scraping of 10 billion photos of people, with tags -- to facilitate instant facial recognition of anyone for the rest of their lives -- will rank as one of the biggest unforced and irreversible losses of privacy in thirty years.
My latest story: The man behind ClearviewAI, a controversial face recognition tool that lets police find people online, says he's developing new AI features to make it more powerful. Some say it could also make it even more problematic.
A grimly droll - and vital - warning from
@zeynep
about the seemingly farcical coup attempt-in-progress by the President, explaining why dwelling on “actually, it’s technically not a coup” misses the point.
What’s most amazing is that typical legal textbooks comprise mostly public domain material. That’s the highest price I’ve seen yet.
We are working to fix this: . Cc
@HarvardLIL
In law we’re making open-source casebooks in the face of $250+ texts. Made easier because American judicial opinions — 90% of a typical book — are public domain.
A study I co-authored with
@KendraSerra
and
@lessig
(w/more thanks below to the many who helped!) in 2014 found that 50% of the links embedded in Supreme Court opinions since 1791 (well, 1996) no longer worked.
75% of the links in the Harvard Law Review no longer worked.