I'm fascinated (& shocked) by the practice of demanding that people publicly apologize for what they say or write. Sure, a heart-felt apology means a lot. But being made to publicly recant one's honest beliefs is degrading, and to demand this is an act of dominance & cruelty.
Many see bullying, piling-on, and mockery on academic twitter as good people trying to make the world a better place. Others dismiss all of this as "grandstanding" or "virtue signaling".
Here's a third explanation: Sadism. People often enjoy humiliating and dominating others.
I am reading people who insist that the president did not actually _tell_ people to drink bleach, he was just raising it as an idea worth pursuing, and I'm starting to take seriously the theory that we are living in a simulation
Such sad news. He was a brilliant philosopher who had a profound influence on cognitive science. And he was hugely supportive to young scholars—including me, long ago. A great loss.
Exciting news: In July, I'm moving to the Psych Department at the University of Toronto. Thrilled to be joining such a great university & wonderful community of scholars!
Will miss my friends at Yale, where I've been for most of my career. (Once the border is open, come visit!)
I was just interviewed over the phone, and after saying goodbye, I said "Looking forward to seeing you soon". Which made no sense, and so, in a desperate attempt to repair the conversation, I added "Hope all is well!". So I'm not allowing myself to use the phone anymore.
.. and The Focusing Illusion, nicely summed up as “Nothing in life is quite as important as you think it is while you are thinking about it.” We overestimate the significance of what we're worried about. (It's usually not that bad.) (3/3)
The Spotlight Effect: People overestimate how much others are paying attention to them and so are too easily embarrassed and too worried about public disapproval ... (2/3)
This is so cool. Since I figure that nobody actually builds and uses a spinner when answering the question (I certainly didn't), does it show that we are tremendously accurate at randomizing?
Agreed: This is an awful abuse of the science of implicit bias. (Certainly the founders of the IAT have long argued against using their method this way).
California just passed a law requiring officers to be screened based on their implicit biases. That's a bad policy.
Implicit bias tests aren't diagnostic enough for screening. I study implicit bias & I can't think of a single scientist who'd endorse this.
I am very excited to say that it's launch day for "Psych"! Please spread the word, retweet, write a review, DM me good wishes, and, uhm, buy the book! (blurbs and amazon link here: )
If anyone feels like taking a (free) online Yale course during this period of isolation, here are two of mine that I'm pretty happy with:
Moralities of Everyday Life:
Intro Psych:
(these are fine for high school students, btw)
A statement signed by 150 people incl. Bill T. Jones, Wynton Marsalis, Jennifer Finney Boylan, Noam Chomsky, J.K. Rowling, Margaret Atwood, and Salman Rushdie expresses concern over the illiberal trend intensified by our national reckoning.
The hardcover arrived this morning--so happy to finally see it!!!
Psych will be coming out on Feb 28. For more, see . There's also a link there for pre-orders, which makes such a difference for the success of a book.
This is excellent. It gives a nice picture of Chomsky's views on language and mind and politics. And Scott is a great interviewer, asking all the right questions and gently pushing back on some points. Really worth the time.
"There are a lot of people like Foucalt and many others who say there is no human nature. First of all, that’s insanity.”
- Noam Chomsky on
@psychpodcast
(see full video at )
VERY pleased to announced my brand new "Introduction to Psychology" course on
@coursera
. (Big thanks to the
@PoorvuCenter
at
@Yale
for their terrific work putting this all together -- the videos are amazing.)
Please check it out and spread the word!
Hi Everyone -- It's publication day for the "The Sweet Spot"! I'd be very grateful if people would RT and otherwise spread the word.
To buy the book:
Blurbs, excerpts, interviews, etc.:
Holy Sisyphus!--the North American copy has arrived. For info--and links to Amazon and other sites--see . It comes out on Nov 2, but pre-orders are critical for the success of a book, so very grateful if you RT and spread the word. Thank you!
you might think that its obvious that putting yourself in other people's shoes is a powerful force for good but what you have to do here is distinguish empathy from compassion and also--and this is important--to distinguish emotional empathy from cognitive empathy and you also
So many developmental psychology papers find support for the hypothesis that, as children grow older, they will become more and more like adults.
I'm confident that most of this work will replicate.
Any recommendations for a good podcast? Looking for one that is engaging/funny/interesting, but NOT connected to politics, current events, psychology, or philosophy. (I listen to plenty of those--I'm looking for something different.) Thanks.
Psychology mavens: I'm writing a piece where I talk about some of the major discoveries in our field over the last few decades. Any advice on what to put on this list?
A fascinating article by
@avlskies
about a 72-year-old who feels no pain & has no negative emotions. Most psychologists (including me) would say that these aversive experiences are valuable & necessary, but, no, she seems to live a great life without them.
We like clear answers to Qs like “Why did Trump win?”, “What caused the Civil War?”, “Why did she leave him?”. But reality doesn’t work this way-actual events are caused by a crazy mishmash of multiple causal forces.
Any good discussions of the limits of historical narratives?
A lot of people are mocking SBF's quote about Bayes theorem and Shakespeare, but it's worth noting that he wrote this when he was ... a junior in high school.
Amazon review: "Paul Bloom has hoist himself on his own petard. ... It is so frustrating to see someone of unquestionable erudition, such as himself, coming up with what is little more than a dish of red herrings and begged questions."
Me: "Unquestionable erudition" YESSSS!!! 🥳
I don't usually use twitter to share personal information, but I did want to announce some good news, which is that I'm doing very well financially. I'd also like to invite all my followers to watch "Most Extreme Airports", where I play an air traffic controller with a dark past.
I think you are.
To say math is "constructed" implies that mathematical claims are like rules of baseball--they wouldn't be true without us. Do you think this is so? My own sense is that, say, "There is no largest prime number" was discovered by Euclid, not invented by him.
Very interesting article by
@sbkaufman
, including some provocative thoughts about how calm and mindfulness might not be the best recipe for a life well lived.
A great study of impersonal honesty using the lost wallet paradigm in 355 cities spanning 40 countries (17,000 lost wallets). Big variation across cities, but (almost) everywhere people were MORE likely to return the wallet when it had MORE money in it.
@MichelAMarechal
.
@peez
and I are thrilled to announce our podcast "Psych", where we discuss every aspect of the mind. Based on my book of the same name (), but you can listen without doing the reading.
On Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and right here:
A stranger just emailed this picture to me, without comment. I figure it's a dramatic portrayal of me fondly waving goodbye to all my colleagues at Yale as I set off to the University of Toronto.
Are you an undergraduate (from anywhere in the world) interested in pursuing graduate studies in developmental, social, or cognitive psychology? Please consider applying for a paid 2021 Summer internship at the Yale "Mind and Development" lab!
Many people agree that selective universities should accept the "best" students--and then argue bitterly about the fairest way to determine who these students are, about SATs, diversity, etc.
But why do we accept the premise? An university education shouldn't be a prize. 1/3
My new TED talk is now available -- on the powerful impulse to do the wrong and the immoral. I love the topic so much that I'm going to write my next book about it.
At the end of his oral exams at Cambridge, Wittgenstein gets up, cordially touches the shoulders of his two examiners—Moore and Russell—and says: "Don't worry, I know you'll never understand it."
-- great beginning of "Time of the Magicians", by Wolfram Eilenberger
New semester coming up (!!!!), so here is my (sometimes controversial) Informal Teaching Advice for new college and university profs. Additional suggestions are welcome.
One of the best pieces of advice I ever got, delivered by a wise person while I was fuming over a parking ticket:
"3% of your income is for mistakes. If it's too much over, you're too sloppy. If it's too much under, you're sweating the smalls stuff too much."
So I'm working on my book and I just looked over a 10 page section that took me a VERY LONG TIME to write and decided that, nope, it doesn't really fit, have to cut it, all that writing and research for nothing. And how is your early afternoon? 😡
Philosophers use the word "hedons" to refer to units of pleasure. But I had a really bad day yesterday, and I think we also need a term for units of misery. I vote for "peedons"
#Peedons
The Banality of Empathy, by
@namwalien
in
@nybooks
, is a brilliant and beautifully written critique of those who think of stories as empathy-elicitors. Best article I've ever read on this topic.
I just finished "The Idea of the Brain" by
@matthewcobb
, and loved it. Great stories, wonderful reviews of different domains of neuroscience, and it's bracingly honest about what we know and don't know. A gem.
Re-reading an excellent & enjoyable
@BBSJournal
paper (by
@fierycushman
on rationalization) and it's reminding me of the value of good writing in academia. "Good writing" in the sense that the author knows that there's another person who is going to read this and makes a serious
I'm a believer in lifehacks, morning routines, writing routines, bedtime routines, and stuff like that.
But everything is easy when life is going well. Mike Tyson had wise words here: “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.”
A friend of mine told me that if he was on a plane that was about to crash, he'd put on his headphones and listen to music. This seems like a good idea. Any recommendations about what to listen to?
In "Everybody Lies",
@SethS_D
discusses data showing that almost nobody finishes non-fiction books (novels are different). They read the first chapter or so and then put it down. This has two important implications ...
When you read the psych literature, you get the impression that believing in conspiracies is irrational/pathological. But real conspiracies do exist, and so _some_ degree of conspiratorial thinking is reasonable. You can be too prone to think this way--but also too low.
Using ChatGPT to help with reference letters. To get it warmed up, I asked it to write one for Thanos and explicitly address the main thing people might be worried about. I think it did well.