I don’t normally let my kids play video games but I recently let my kids play Minecraft. I don’t know a lot about the game and my daughter just told me, “We’re killing all the villagers so we can take their stuff. It’s fun watching their houses burn!”
@tracewoodgrains
@turrible_tao
One day someone will become a utilitarian for reasons more principled than “this will allow me to justify my sexual desires”. But today is not that day.
Children simplify and radicalize a subset of their parents’ beliefs. The compromises adults make to cope in a complex world do not appeal to them. That’s part of what makes children so pure.
@kunley_drukpa
I know people like to post fake things as a joke, but I actually looked these up, and only the first of these three citations is genuine.
The important distinction here is:
1) Everybody does matter the same amount
2) And I am called to compassion to everyone I encounter
BUT
3) God has also placed on each person special duties to certain others (especially kin!)
4) "Reading an article"=/=Good Samaritanism
@skdh
This is not a good argument. I cannot observe electrons (they’re too small), yet their existence elegantly explains what I do see (e.g. when I am observing a cloud chamber).
@ZachWLambert
@TheIllegit
This is, at best, a speculative reading whose only merit is that it minimizes conflict between a literal reading of Scripture and the modern pro-LGBT movement, which didn’t exist in St. Paul’s day. This is not a plausible construal of his meaning.
"Ah, but what you haven't considered yet is this digression. This digression will spin a long yarn based on an extended metaphor, and this digression, the digression will take thirty minutes to explain, when in fact the point could be stated in plain English in ten seconds,"
@eigenrobot
I have some sympathy for the idea that economics has more under-theorized applied math than is ideal. But the idea that *English* departments are somehow more rooted in reality is deranged.
(My undergraduate degree is in English.)
The most dramatic and romantic parts of the Iliad center on humans and human conflict. The comic and light-hearted parts center on the interactions between the gods.
@mattparlmer
Maybe so, but if a little socon disagreement is going to rustle your jimmies, you better plan your escape too. Because we're just getting started.
@VDAREJamesK
If you cut off Satan’s head that’s a hate crime. If you cut off Robert E. Lee’s head you are rendering a service to the state and they will cut you a check.
Alfred Tarski’s theorems should be marked with an asterisk because he constantly abused amphetamines to derive them. Kurt Gödel’s proofs are all natty.
@TheIllegit
St. John Chrysostom did it all the time. But he did backtrack at least once, on the grounds that it is wrong to affirm that wild animals are as debased and vile as sinners.
@shakoistsLog
It is an achievement to have a model with which to quantify uncertainty appropriately. If you don’t have such a model it’s good to be honest about that fact.
@gomiam
@skdh
You observe something that can be explained hypothetically as “their effects”. But you cannot observe the electrons themselves, because that causal connection is itself also not known by direct observation.
I made it out to the Reconciliation Monument, which is apparently to be removed from Arlington Cemetery in a few days. It’s a beautiful piece whose existence reminds me of a time when we were led by great men with a sense of honor and magnanimity.
@keithfrankish
I disagreed with what Sabine said, but I was very disappointed in some of the philosopher response. IMO no one should shame her for not holding the most popular position among philosophers, or for not “staying in her lane”.
@tracewoodgrains
@Steve_Sailer
@know_tru
@whstancil
I could be mistaken, but I understand Sailer’s irreverence as aimed against liberal conversational norms that punish candid & important conversations about race. To the extent that’s true I think such irreverence is salutary.
@shakoistsLog
Wrong. There are different dimensions of uncertainty, not all of which can be captured in whatever object level model you’re using to give the probabilities. Someone might think the object level numbers aren’t appropriate for the situation.
@phl43
To be honest I don’t think the latter is very different from a lack of sincerity. It’s not that I think they were lying per se, only that one can be self-deceived about the depth of one’s beliefs.
@ContraireSous
@skdh
But that is always true. There is nothing necessary about our postulation of electrons. Science involves deducing things that aren’t necessary all the time, and that’s ok.
The Enlightenment era was a time of relative stagnation in the development of logic. The late medieval and Romantic periods saw much greater progress in that science.
@Peter_Nimitz
Nothing in these passages suggests that Christianity “adopted” Neoplatonism. Christ lived long before the existence of Neoplatonism (Plotinus was born in the 3rd century after Christ), and Hebrew monotheism (which was appropriated by Christians) long pre-existed Plato.
As our Christian moral inheritance is set aside we’re going to see more of this. Human reason alone is incapable of leading us to any stable moral foundation.
Another thought-provoking article is "Zoophilia Is Morally Permissible" by Fira Bensto (pseudonym), which is just out in the current issue of
@JConIdeas
.
This piece challenges one of society's strongest taboos and argues for the moral permissibility of some forms of sexual…
@Philip_Goff
I share your view about the explanatory value of the existence of electrons, but I think you are too hard on the physicist in question.
She explicitly flagged herself as an instrumentalist, so she’s at least familiar with the philosophical debate.
@eigenrobot
I was going to fight with you because I live in the DC area, but since my suburb is outside the circles that means only I’m getting cooked during the workday. Family is safe. Not ideal but not worth beefing over.
@phl43
Couldn’t disagree more. Any kind of accountability for academics on any dimension is past overdue. Plagiarism may be mostly harmless, but clearing out academics guilty of doing it would be a positive good.
Fwiw they did *not* find a general statement of the theorem. They found a few Pythagorean triples (e.g. “3, 4, 5”). Interesting, but not the same thing.
An extraordinary quote from St. Pantaenus, a second century Church Father whose works are otherwise lost. This is as radical a statement of creatio ex nihilo as I’ve ever seen.
@TheIllegit
@ZachWLambert
All Christians everywhere should believe in Romans 13, which mandates respect for the law and thus respect for borders. The authorities do not bear the sword in vain.
Friedrich Nietzsche and Tom Holland disagree about whether Christianity has been beneficial for mankind, but they both characterize it in the terms of a secular anthropologist. I recognize little or nothing of my religion in their words.
A planned economy can only be as good as its inputs. This is where centralized economies fail, because there’s so much decentralized info planners can’t access. How do faster computers address this?
The Enlightenment era was a time of relative stagnation in the development of logic. The late medieval and Romantic periods saw much greater progress in that science.
I used to like self-deprecating humor until I realized that it’s often used for manipulative purposes. Not wanting in any way to be manipulative, I stopped using it. I miss it, but I’m worried that I miss it for the wrong reasons.
A few years ago I mentioned I was having trouble finding a math curriculum I liked for homeschooling my kids. I’ve finally found it: Math Academy. It’s insanely good. My kids love it, it works, & it allows kids to go at their own pace, much faster than a traditional program.