PhD Economics
@PSEinfo
| Visiting
@MITEcon
2022-23 | Development economist interested in how social values change, discrimination, stigma, effective altruism
Excited to present my JMP: Silence to Solidarity
My job market paper studies whether communication between discriminatory people can lead to large reductions in discrimination
🔗
👇for more
@BrendanJKearney
Every time I order a coffee in this city, the person laughs, confused, asks me my name again, then gives me a cup with "Dunkin'" written on it - apostrophe and all
Can conversations between discriminators lead to less discrimination? Evidence from anti-transgender discrimination in India - today's job market post by
@dunc_webb
shows how persuasion can reduce discrimination
Advances with Field Experiments week is here! Hundreds of field experimentalists will be descending upon UChicago later this week to present their own work and to hear from the always wonderful trio:
@I_Am_NickBloom
@UriGneezy
and
@S_Stantcheva
Can't wait to get to
@YaleEconomics
to present my work at
#neudc2022
tomorrow! I'll be talking how critical periods in early childhood can imply dramatic long term effects on cognitive development
#econtwitter
Very excited to be talking about my research with
@srajagopalan
on the
@IdeasofIndia
podcast! We had a great discussion about my field experiment that shows that group dynamics can sharply reduce discrimination against the transgender community in India.
I kick off the 2023 job market series of
@IdeasofIndia
Duncan Webb
@dunc_webb
, a PhD candidate in economics
@PSEinfo
. We discuss his field experiment on how group discussions by cisgender customers reduces prejudice against transgender workers.
@mercatus
@JustinSandefur
@davidroodman
The Duflo analysis is also vulnerable to the worries about using fixed effects with heterogeneous treatment effects, as described here:
I ran an experiment in Chennai with over 3,000 people, measuring discrimination by offering participants a free grocery delivery and seeing who they select to carry out the delivery
E.g. this paper from the US shows that tax cuts on the bottom 90% are the ones that generate employment growth - trickle down economics isn't empirically supported!
But if people were earlier involved in a group discussion, in which they spoke to two of their neighbours and collectively decided who to hire, this discrimination disappeared on average
This is John Wolfenden, who led a report recommending the decriminalisation of homosexuality in 1957, live on BBC saying that homosexuality is "morally repugnant". A reminder of just how far we've come since back then
#LGBTrights
This seems to be driven by persuasion between participants - even just *listening* to a discussion, without taking part in one, is enough to reduce discrimination substantially
We normally think that discrimination is hard to change, but sometimes societies shift rapidly towards less discriminatory preferences: how can this happen?
This effect is 1.7x larger than top-down communication about the legal rights of transgender people in India, and it partially persists even after 1 month
🏛️Policy implications? We should try and design hiring decisions to involve group decision-making more often, and use discussion-based sensitisation programmes to improve discriminatory attitudes
@HaydenWilko
Also worth noting: plausible views that care about autonomy/freedom rather than "pleasure" could easily imply longtermism - people don't have much freedom when they don't get to exist, nor when being ruled by an indefinitely long dictatorship...
@davidroodman
@JustinSandefur
The bias can generate heterogeneous effects, but even if there was no bias as identified in your paper, the analysis would still be suspect.. and any solution to the heterogeneous effects problem might lead to different results
@economeager
@hmmlowe
I like this idea! Doesn't seem to be what is going on, because people make overwhelmingly pro-trans statements in the discussions.. but maybe that's partly because they anticipate how silly they'll sound if they try and defend an anti trans view(?!)
And people are persuaded to be more pro-trans, rather than anti-trans, because the pro-trans people are much more vocal when faced with a transgender choice - they speak first more often, and dominate the discussion.. So on net everyone is persuaded to be more pro-trans
⭐ New article out in Nature Communications - using novel testing data, we show large socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 infections in Bogota, Colombia
Excited to present my JMP: Silence to Solidarity
My job market paper studies whether communication between discriminatory people can lead to large reductions in discrimination
🔗
👇for more
@robertwiblin
That doesn't necessarily seem like an irrational bias: if you're already plugged in, you've probably lost all your "real" relationships with people in the outside world or have lost touch with goals related to the outside world, so no point coming back out?
@albrgr
I agree that this is a crucial crux. And the discussion of moral values was strangely lacking in this perspective. I would have loved to see a more rigorous discussion of the *ex ante* probability of changing long-term values if we take certain actions
@griambau
People might be inferring from the fact that the average wage in B is lower that the cost of living is also lower, so that real wage is higher in B. Can you rule that out?
📌
#TamilNadu
: Hiring a Research Associate to work w/
@DuncanWebb1
on a project evaluating ways to reduce anti-LGBT prejudice
You will:
👉Design surveys
👉Manage field & data teams
👉Supervise data collection
Fluency in Tamil & English is required
@albrgr
@MichaelDPlant
@Parthion
@JoelMcGuire12
@HappierLivesIns
On the question of within-household mental health spillovers, there is suggestive evidence from other contexts e.g. "A 1SD change in the mental health of household members is associated with a 0.22–0.59SD change in own mental health."
@paulkrugman
I'm very sympathetic to this argument, but you claim that there is "no evidence" that tax cuts for the rich strongly increase economic growth. What's your take on this new empirical evidence that taxation (especially at the top) disincentivises innovation?