Can we just take a second to appreciate how bonkers it is that you can inject mRNA into someone and the body is like “ok cool I’ll translate that, recognize it as exogenous, and develop lasting immunity to what it codes for”
Three infected travelers at a scientific conference have now infected at least SEVENTY others. If you're organizing a conference in next several months, please ask yourself whether you want the same to happen there. Because it will.
The conference can wait.
BREAKING: Massachusetts has just announced 51 *new* cases of coronavirus, bringing the total number of presumptive cases to 92 -- a 124 percent increase from yesterday. Seventy of the cases are related to the Biogen conference in Boston. Six people are hospitalized.
#WBZ
I appreciate journals making Covid19 work open access, and I hope when this is over we don’t forget that their logic in doing so tacitly admits that their traditional model slows down the advancement of science
The most toxic, destructive people I’ve known in academia knew exactly what to say publicly to look good and kind.
Before deciding to work with someone, don’t just read what they put out publicly. Talk to them and people who have worked with them, and trust your instincts
It looks like they just took the CDC fifteen minute contact definition and multiplied it by the filtration percentages and called it a day. This is not something responsible journalists or scientists should be repeating credulously
I've told my lab that they are welcome to volunteer for any efforts to fight Covid19, whether it uses their scientific skills (like testing) or not (like community support). They will be fully paid (and receive benefits) for the duration. I encourage other PIs to do the same. 1/2
It may look on paper like I was productive in 2020. I wasn't. All the systems I've carefully built to work around ADHD got blown up. I wrote little, I did almost no good thinking.
But I survived, and I kept my family, my lab, and my community as safe as I could. And that matters
Part of the issue is that academics are too slow to explicitly call out one another's bullshit. There's a bit of a bystander effect, and when that happens, people who do call it out are more likely to be targeted through peer pressure or sometimes even lawsuits.
If only there were some cheap, safe, and extraordinarily effective way to teach people’s immune systems how to make antibodies when they need it instead of injecting super expensive ones that don’t work as well when they’re already sick and likely damaged🤔
Monoclonal antibody treatments such as Regeneron have had a major impact in preventing hospitalizations & saved lives. We are utilizing monoclonal antibody strike teams to bring treatment directly to our vulnerable populations in long-term care facilities.
When you see things like this, ask yourself:
Do we know what an infectious dose is? (not really)
Does it make sense the numbers are symmetric? (No)
Does 15 minutes for unmasked/unmasked make any sense? (Definitely not)
Is there a dependence on distance? Ventilation? Why not?
You say: They must have had a preexisting condition, right?
You mean: I desperately want to justify why I’m still safe
You sound like: The lives of people with disabilities or health issues are less valuable
It’s the season for grad school interviews. I’ve been doing these a couple years now (for a few different programs), and in the interest of dismantling the hidden curriculum, here’s how I’d interview you and what I’d look for: 1/
If there was only one scientific practice I could teach to every scientist regardless of stage or field I think it would be: look at the data. Spot check it. Find a few data points and trace them through to see if they make sense. Look at the raw data. Don't just do analyses.
Every few seconds I have another realization of how important this is. Right now it's knowing that my incredible students and postdocs now won't get their visas denied or arbitrarily deported in a cynical play to appeal to xenophobes.
Just remembering today how in a mandatory faculty training, Harvard's Title IX office boasted that most of the victims who contact them don't contact them a second time and that that was evidence that they were doing their job well
One thing about PI life that I don't think any postdoc training can prepare you for is how much of a rollercoaster it can be, how you can go from "things are going really well" to "my current situation is untenable" even in a matter of minutes
NIAID, the primary funder of infectious disease research (including virology) for the entire United States, has a budget of $5.9B/year. The NYPD, police for 2.6% of the US population, has a budget of $6B/year.
If these numbers were measured and not just guessed, you’d expect three things:
1) noise
2) asymmetry (since it’s an asymmetric process)
3) not breaking down into clean ratios
It’s none of these things
There was a time when my wife was researching performative environmentalism and I was modeling latent tuberculosis.
Yes, we were studying conspicuous nonconsumption and nonconspicuous consumption.
I’ve had several PhD students now ask me how to start identifying potential postdoc labs. Here’s my best advice:
When you read a paper so good, so elegant, you’re almost a little jealous you didn’t write it, add the senior author (and the first if applicable) to your list. 1/2
At this point, every PI running a wet lab who isn’t in hard shutdown should start preparing for it immediately. It’s a matter of when not if, eventually university leadership will catch up and realize what’s going on.
At that point they may not give you much warning.
The reason to cancel meetings and seminar visits is the same reason we have them in the first place: by establishing long-distance connections and high-connectivity nodes, we help ideas spread much faster through our social networks. It's the same for a virus.
Honestly this is probably the single best advice for making it through grad school or a postdoc as well. Just get stuff done. It may feel smart to critique things well, it may even be useful, but ultimately you are judged on what you've gotten done
Here's the thing about AI in biology: it absolutely has revolutionary potential, but any model is only as good as the data it's trained on. And there's a lot we don't know or are simply wrong about in bio.
Want to truly build AI for bio? Invest in basic discovery science.
There's a cognitive bias I've seen again and again this pandemic: that the same behavior is equally risky at different times.
Seeing co-workers this week is materially riskier than a week and a half ago. Don't think what you did in October won't result in getting infected today
There’s a useful point in this dumpster fire of a tweet:
It’s a common misconception that evolution optimizes fitness. It doesn’t. As long as organisms are just barely able to produce more kids than there are of them, they’ll persist.
It’s survival of the “eh, good enough”
If masks were necessary for our survival as a species we would have evolved one by now. We haven’t. We have noses and mouths. We have airways. It is not natural for people to go around with face masks on in their general life. And no amount of govt propaganda can change that.
Is it bad that as a microbiologist I really couldn't care less whether viruses are considered alive? It yields no testable predictions, and so is unfalsifiable. It's a distinction without a difference, and it really isn't science. It's like arguing whether Pluto is a planet
People often talk about having "good hands" in the lab like it's some kind of magical gift certain people have. Yet every person I've met with good hands approaches lab work like a physical discipline with repetitive, focused practice. Good hands are a skill you learn.
Vaccines don't need to prevent infection entirely to stop transmission! For a super-infectious pathogen where each person infected infects an average of four others (Re=4), even just reducing transmission by 76% will take that number below 1 and end transmission chains
Large boulder the size of a small boulder is completely blocking east-bound lane Highway 145 mm78 at Silverpick Rd. Please use caution and watch for emergency vehicles in the area.
That feeling you’re feeling, like “why did we shut down just to have Covid come roaring back?” It’s betrayal. You sacrificed, maybe a lot, and the government just gave up because they thought it might make them look bad to fight. November is a while off, but don’t ever forget.
Fellow biomedical scientists: if you have Viral RNA isolation kits in your lab, due to shortages local or regional hospitals may soon be in dire need for diagnostics.
Consider reaching out to their micro labs and letting them know you have them and are willing to donate/lend.
I just did an updated calculation of what happens to America if we do nothing. And it is nothing short of terrifying.
The current rate of spread is a near-perfect exponential. If we do not change our behavior dramatically and fast, here is what the math says: 1/n
In a separate release, Moderna claims that its mRNA vaccine is now stable for 30 days at temps of 36° to 46°F.
Translation: You can store it in a regular refrigerator i.e. they're tossing shade at Pfizer's candidate, which requires ultra-cold freezers.
I don’t know if any of the students and postdocs who follow me need to hear this, but it’s ok not to be ok right now. Your anger, your fear, your sadness make you human, and no less of a scientist, even if you have more important things than science going on today.
@DrCJ_Houldcroft
@aero_anna
We thank the readers for their scrutiny of our articles: when we get it wrong, the crowdsourcing dynamic of open science means that community feedback helps us to quickly correct the record.
DNA Extraction Tip 3: When sequencing plants, it is recommended to obtain the youngest leaf/shoot tissue from an individual plant that has been dark treated (kept out of light) for 24-72 hours.
#Sequencing101
More at:
How stable are bacterial genomes as they adapt to an environment? My collaboration with
@anuraglimdi
,
@EvolSys
,
@RELenski
, and
@ten_olivier
exploring this over 50,000 generations of evolution is out today!
1/
I know a few science writers follow me, and today I'm asking you to please, please learn about Poisson Noise (or Standard Error). It's an estimate that basically means if you see N events, you really can only trust that to within +- sqrt(N)
When I was studying undergrad genetics I thought the term “linkage disequilibrium” was a ridiculously overcomplicated way of saying covariance between alleles.
With the benefit of twenty years more experience, I stand by that
At a conference like
#ASMicrobe
many of you are going to be meeting a lot of new people. Networking (😱). I don't recall where I got this, but for a template, just remember Inigo Montoya:
1) Greeting
2) Name
3) Relevant professional connection
4) What to expect from the encounter
JUST IN: President Trump plans to sign an executive order extending to January a pause on issuing “green cards” to new immigrants -- and will also halt temporary work visas for skilled workers, managers and au pairs in the H-1B, H-4, H-2B, L-1 and J categories.
What is your favorite example of a unit of measure having unexpected dimensionality?
Mine is miles per gallon. Miles are a unit of length, gallons a unit of volume, or length^3. Meaning fuel efficiency is an area. Seems counterintuitive, but there's a simple physical explanation
My issue here isn’t with back-of-the-envelope calculations. With proper caveats and warnings those can be very useful for estimating and reasoning. Reporting it without those caveats and context is as scientific as declaring a five second rule for the coronavirus.
I don't think it's widely appreciated how incredible an achievement this is. Biotechnology has advanced unbelievably in the last fifteen years, but even still, going from new virus to completed phase 3 clinical trials in eleven months is like... I can't come up a good metaphor
Me, as a trainee, before a talk: Am I going to remember my talk? Are they going to criticize my science? Are people going to think I'm smart?
Me, as a PI: Are they going to notice I'm wearing the same shirt as my profile photo? Will they think I only own one shirt? Do I?
The combination of the difficulty in getting NIH and NSF grants that are shrinking wrt inflation with all this billionaire money tossed around in already-rich areas very much feels like US science is reverting to renaissance patronage and abandoning 20th century democratization
I don’t see the big deal with recruiting postdocs, I haven’t had a problem with it. Sure I’m at Harvard, have some famous older work, and am a dude, but I think it’s really because I have a paragraph somewhere on my website about what I think mentoring is
What junior faculty actually need is for tenure committees to realize that the point of the evaluation is future-looking and adjust expectations to the reality of a pandemic world, not give us an extra year to hew to artificial standards from a world that no longer exists
If you can't wake up on Monday, go for a five mile run, meditate, write an entire R01 before 8am when the sponsored research office starts work, and make latte art with hand-ground espresso, are you just too lazy for faculty life?
Mentoring junior scientists is the most meaningful and probably most important part of being a professor. I could not be more honored or flattered to be selected for this award
Congratulations to
@HarvardDBMI
's Michael Baym
@baym
for being named a 2021 recipient of
@harvardmed
's A. Clifford Barger Excellence in Mentoring Award! For background on this award see
The biggest misconception of graduate school I see is that you are going to learn science directly from your professors. Even if you learn more from your PI than from any one other person, you will learn far more in aggregate from other trainees than any one professor.
I’ve heard a lot of “but what about the risks of a new vaccine tech” takes from usually reasonable people recently. My math is that over 35000 people have now been given an mRNA vaccine. If there were risks anywhere close to Covid’s we’d have seen it. It’s by far the safer option