Putting up a preprint for the poster I’ll have at
#ASHG2023
questioning whether BG is a null field. Hopefully an easy and entertaining read. Debate welcome, but you gotta read it first. I affectionately call it my “Oak Island” piece.
My grandfather and grandmother came from a poor village in Italy. Neither had much education. My grandfather worked in the coal mines for twenty years, got black lung and then stared a small market in Philadelphia. My father is an MD, uncle PhD, I am an MD.
#heyjohnkelly
@bariweiss
@CraigSilverman
It is beyond parody that you are given space in The NY Times for this nonsense. Nevertheless, any fool offered six figures for an Op-Ed gig can’t be faulted for taking it, so you have to blame The NY Times, again, for hiring without considering merit or personal integrity.
@lastpositivist
“In 2002, Yglesias was a strong supporter of invading Iraq, Iran and North Korea, calling the countries on his blog ‘evil’ and stating that ‘we should take them all out’”
@DrDebraSoh
That it was fake? That Bill Gates was putting microchips in it? That hospitals are pretending have patients in the ICU with Covid? That doctors are preventing the cure-alls HCQ and Ivermectin because, something? Which of these were right?
@embeeonhere
I had a friend who, on a road trip, would apply for jobs at the McDonald’s we would stop at. We would be waiting in the car and he would show up with a big smile and tell us he got the job.
My review of Kathryn Paige Harden’s “The Genetic Lottery” is available at my blog:
I tried to make this more accessible for those who might have an interest in the subject, but don’t necessarily have a knowledge of the nuts and bolts of such research.
@toadmeister
I like that logic: all of our people who initiated this have quit or run away, so it’s the fault of those who opposed them for trying to pick up the pieces without following what the escapees wanted in the first place.
I recently wrote to the UK Biobank (haven’t heard back, yet) re: the study below and requested that the authors of that study be prevented from utilizing the UK Biobank in any future studies. My letter here:
Thread… 1/
It is just unfathomable to me that this book gets this much free publicity. The problem is that much of what is printed is accepted as fact by the general public, leaving a perception of genetic determinism that is dangerous and false.
@_RichardHall
@NavinPokala
Dude, I marched in dozens and we were screamed at regularly. About three quarters of our marches didn’t even make it in the papers and the ones that did would usually highlight the one or two counter protesters with a “both sides” kind of coverage. It was very difficult.
A GWAS for the aristocrats trying to find genes for “occupational status and prestige,” with statistical sophistry to claim it has a genetic basis. Disgusting. I might critique later, but for now I want to discuss the deceptive use of the
@uk_biobank
. 1/
@fasc1nate
Lincoln" and "Kennedy" each have seven letters.
Both assassins were born in '39 and were known by their three names, composed of fifteen letters.
Booth ran from a theater and was caught in a warehouse; Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.
@NickKristof
@washingtonpost
And when was that realization? Did it make it into your paper? Because, this is the first I've heard of it, so unless it happened yesterday, I'd be interested in knowing why I'm only hearing this today?
@capitalismandf1
@AlexTISYoung
I’m saying that’s what it shows. An aristocracy. People marry within their social class over generations. They will thus have some genetic variants in common, that have nothing to do with making them more aristocratic.
@NewYorker
Can Progressives be convinced that eugenics has a sunny side? Well, they were before and it didn’t turn out too well.
My review of Harden’s book and the bad science behind it:
I suppose that these kinds of statistical arguments are necessary, but I’d like to advocate for common sense. The idea that you can look at wealth distribution in England for the last 400 years and and conclude that wealth is sustained due to genetics is ludicrous on its face. 1/
@reddyrc
@emrazz
Ro,
You walk by a 2 unit building on fire. One side has a case with 10,000 viable, frozen embryos. The other side has one baby in a crib. You only have time to save either the baby or the case, but not both. Which do you choose?
@_RichardHall
@NavinPokala
Fox sure did. CNN was not sympathetic, either. For the most, though, there was no anti war coverage in the US. Getting a letter to the editor in your local paper was as good as it got.
@sfmnemonic
The problem for the NYT's is that they have to double down everytime this guy writes a column or admit that everyone else was right all along.
@McKayMSmith
@CleverTitleTK
When we appoint a CIA Director involved in torturing people, look the other way when peaceful protesters are killed (even blaming them), rabidly support bombing people, openly defend dropping two nuclear bombs on cities, napalm, etc., let’s not be befuddled by the lack of remorse
@davelevitan
@KevinMKruse
It amazes me that people still take news networks seriously. The only time I watch them is when they are blaring at the gym, and it gets me completely angry and worked up. Never watch them otherwise.
Trying to figure behavior by looking at genes is akin to saying something about the driver of a car by examining the wiring of a their car. You can correlate the wiring of a Prius vs a Hummer to make a generalization about their drivers, but it has nothing to do with the wiring.
@CaNerdIan
@jaubert_moniker
@m8urnett
In our defense, none of us expected our crap code from the 1980’s to still be around by 2000. I vaguely remember someone asking why we only use 2 digits for the year and a few disinterested chuckles followed, but that might not be a real memory.
@ewanbirney
@GoodwinMJ
If we are talking about behavioral genetics, we are not on the “cusp” of anything. This belief is what drives race science bros. Charles Murray, for example, has been pushing the “within 5 to 10 years” claim for decades.
@chucktodd
They know who it was. There is no point in reporting such drivel. Even if they didn't know, they can just ask the Navy who made the request. This kind of stuff is really disingenuous.
@noamscheiber
It’s worth noting that the economists who bashed unions were being rewarded financially for doing so. Ironically, economists rarely address how the wealthy control the workings of the economy to serve their interests.
I keep hearing about a “scientific consensus” claiming that there is some presumed genetic or biological mechanism contributing to depression and other psych diagnoses. Who are these “concensors”? What makes one qualified to be a part of it? No one ever asked me.
@awaisaftab
Interesting study showing that even cloned fish have behavioral differences at birth and these differences increase over time. Would like to have seen a control to determine whether genetics has any influence in their behavior at all.
@gdebenedetti
@KevinMKruse
The idea behind their donations was to keep centrist dems in power. They don't want to risk an actual leftist in office. Whether donating or running, their purpose is to keep the party toothless.
@reveal
@carlzimmer
That said, medicating children without their consent that aren't specifically diagnosed with a treatable mental disorder is not appropriate and in many cases could be considered malpractice.