Myles O'Neil Profile Banner
Myles O'Neil Profile
Myles O'Neil

@MylesOneil

1,804
Followers
2,550
Following
20
Media
557
Statuses

@hi_reverie prev: Fidelity

Boston
Joined March 2011
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Pinned Tweet
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Sharing some long-form thoughts on protocol business models, how to evaluate protocol financials, and best practices that we can apply from studying the most successful marketplace businesses of the past.
3
3
33
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
At this point, almost every L1 has pivoted to an appchain-centric scaling roadmap. While this is a welcome pivot, I’m concerned that we’ll end up speedrunning through lessons already learned in the evolution of Polkadot and Cosmos over the past few years. 🧵
18
46
316
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Most protocols are far too focused on tokenomics. At best, it’s time that could be better spent elsewhere. At worst, it leads to worse products (or ponzi loops). In this thread, we’ll lay out some thoughts on what sustainable business models looks like in crypto. 🧵
10
25
171
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
9 months
Most rollups have a RaaS-sized hole in their business model. Some thoughts on the challenge that rollup frameworks face today, and why they should use M&A to solve it. 🧵
11
14
100
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
8 months
Rollup-as-a-Service (“RaaS”) providers are at the center of one of crypto’s most important questions: who is best positioned to capture value in the rollup ecosystem? The answer to that question, it makes sense to start by examining RaaS economics 🧵
7
16
98
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
It’s well known that MEV extraction can accelerate network centralization and harm users through strategies such as front-running. This post compares a few of the approaches being taken to mitigate the impact of MEV in the Ethereum and Cosmos ecosystems.
3
24
91
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Cosmos needs to 10x its urgency around distribution. It has a few projects that will be best in class for their sector (e.g. Osmosis, dYdX). But you can't create the "wow" moments that drive organic adoption without getting these products into the hands of non-Cosmos users.
@zmanian
Zaki ⚛️🍷
1 year
@rphmeier I think Cosmos social capital has about 12 months to do something unique and differentiated otherwise we get swallowed by Eth flavored variants of Cosmos originated ideas like roll apps and Eigenlayer. I feel intense urgency. The hour is late.
43
64
437
2
6
61
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Cosmos Security budgets today - 100% native staking token or 100% ATOM Cosmos security budgets tomorrow - X% secured by native token - Y% secured by mesh partners - Z% secured by BTC via Babylon
@dntse
David Tse
1 year
@sunnya97 A glimpse into that future?
Tweet media one
4
9
53
4
7
51
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
MEV is top of mind right now for every chain and application. Sooner or later, every protocol must land on their own solution. As @AntonioMJuliano and others have observed, appchains have a few big advantages 🧵
@AntonioMJuliano
Antonio | dYdX
1 year
App chains will be able to mitigate and potentially solve MEV far better than dapps built on generic chains
11
22
136
3
10
38
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Extremely excited to announce an initiative that we've been working on for the past few months! As detailed in the post, Mesh Security will hugely improve the economic security of Cosmos chains and enable a number of exciting new use cases.
@OsmosisGrants
Osmosis Grants Program (OGP)
1 year
In partnership with @axelarcore , @akashnet_ , and the @ATOMAccelerator , @OsmosisGrants is thrilled to announce an initiative that will fund the development of Mesh Security and bring it to mainnet across the Interchain! More details below 🧵
7
32
151
3
3
41
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
The thread below points to a larger strategic question for @osmosiszone . It’s ineffective and expensive to do both, so Osmosis needs to decide if it wants to be: A. The only DEX that can match the asset coverage and feature set of a CEX B. The primary liquidity venue for Cosmos
3
3
35
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Excited to co-host this season of Bell Curve with @MikeIppolito_ ! We'll explore all flavors of app-chains and their various trade-offs with the help of some of the leading builders in the space. Tune in next week for our chat with @sunnya97 and @dberenzon !
@MikeIppolito_
Mippo 🟪
1 year
The season 3 opener of bell curve on the appchain thesis is live! This season my co-host is @MylesOneil , one of my good friends but also one of the smartest people on the subject I know. Enjoy! Apple:🎙 Spotify:🎙
Tweet media one
1
1
12
3
4
33
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Ok crap – we have two issues: 1) Recruiting high quality sets of sequencer operators and bootstrapping collateral to secure them is actually really expensive. 2) These apps want atomic composability or at least guaranteed inclusion for cross-chain txs.
3
1
30
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
To be more specific, I see an increasingly common disconnect between the capabilities being marketed, the solutions proposed to deliver on these promises, and the realistic trade-offs they'll have to make based on what we've seen from solutions already in production.
1
0
26
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
I’ll stop there because this thread is long enough but I hope you see the point that I’m trying to get across. Almost everyone now agrees that in a perfect world, you could offer the sovereignty of a Cosmos appchain with the security properties of an L1 like Ethereum.
2
1
25
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@hasufl Took a shot at mapping these to P&Ls (Maker is understated until MKR expenses are added) Lido's GM % looks like a healthy SaaS business, Maker looks like financial services This changes if you consider the 1.5M LDO incentives to Curve to be COGS (liquidity maintenance cost)
Tweet media one
3
2
24
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
9 months
For the nerds still here, I’d encourage you to check out our podcast episode with @KAndrewHuang from @conduitxyz . We dig into the value prop of RaaS, the competitive dynamics between different stakeholders, and a whole lot more.
1
2
21
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Let’s start with a simple observation: token appreciation is not a business model. Financial engineering can be useful in particular cases (e.g. EIP1559 burn mechanism), but only as a complementary feature of an economic system.
1
1
21
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
We like Polkadot’s shared security in theory, but it's likely unrealistic to expect an L1 like Ethereum to build this into the protocol. And we want the benefits of Cosmos sovereignty and IBC, but there are a few things we don’t like about Cosmos and want to avoid.
1
0
20
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Ah crap, now we have a cost problem. State-aware sequencers are a lot more expensive so it doesn’t seem like state-aware shared sequencers can scale beyond ~10-20 chains. Wait, doesn’t this sound like the issues that the Cosmos Hub is facing with its consumer chains?
2
0
20
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
This is absolutely what we should be striving for, but it feels like many ecosystems are underappreciating the trade-offs associated with appchains and think it will be easy to “have their cake and eat it too.”
1
0
20
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Now that we’ve come around on appchains, we need to figure out how these chains will a) secure themselves and b) communicate with each other.
2
1
18
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
But if it turns out that we haven’t yet discovered the silver bullet to scaling, I hope we can save ourselves some pain by looking at the past with a better appreciation for the design choices and associated trade-offs made by first-gen appchain builders.
1
0
18
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Here is how the internal monologue seems to go for many projects: Gen purpose chains don’t scale and appchains enable better products. Ok, appchains are the way!
2
0
17
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
We don’t want our chains and interop channels to be secured by their native token. And unlike Cosmos, we want our L1 to play an important role and accrue significant value to the token so it can continue serving as the schelling point for alignment and coordination.
2
0
17
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
We greatly appreciate the support from our partners @axelarcore , @akashnet_ , and @ATOMAccelerator , as well as the awesome team of contributors that will bring it to mainnet! h/t @confio_tech , @JunoNetwork , @cosmology_tech , @TheDesignDAO , @josefleventon_
0
2
18
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Ok we got it! We’ll have multiple base layers (e.g. OP mainnet, Starknet) serve as messaging hubs to enable composability and we’ll have appchains secure themselves using the base layer's token, which should drive demand and accrue value through fees / rev share.
1
0
16
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
And to be fair, there are definitely projects that are not cutting corners in their marketing and working to develop novel solutions to these problems (e.g. @sovereign_labs , @anoma , @ArgusLabs_ ).
1
0
17
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Now we arrive at the current state of the world. Sound familiar? Most of the ideas I’ve heard sound a lot like lightweight versions of the Polkadot security model (e.g. restaking) combined with the elements of Cosmos hub and spoke approach.
1
0
17
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
They may look at Polkadot and think they can replicate the benefits of shared security without the pain that parachains have to deal with. They may look at Cosmos and think they can replicate the benefits of sovereignty and IBC without the scary security tradeoffs.
1
0
17
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
8 months
@conduitxyz started by aligning themselves to a single framework in the OP stack. By going deep instead of wide on framework support, they were able to get a boost to distribution from OP as well as being able to focus all resources on building one, truly great product.
1
2
15
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Huge thanks to our friends at @tokenterminal for helping us source the data in the piece, and a special thanks to @FelixLts , @_portersmith and @hasufl for providing feedback to this piece!
2
0
14
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Thanks to @aidan0x , @hxrts , and @BPIV400 for helping think through these ideas!
3
0
14
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
But my sense is that the solutions being marketed are either a) not as scalable as folks think they will be or b) present a direct tension with the benefits of sovereignty that you get from appchains (which led to these pivots in the first place).
1
0
12
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
7 months
I applied, but what about the rest of the Cosmothereum gang? cc @0xkaiserkarel @0xkrane @hxrts @JakeHartnell
@eigenlayer
EigenLayer
7 months
📣 Announcing the EigenLayer Research Fellowship (ERF) The EigenLayer Research Team currently has bandwidth to work with 5 fellows deeply on a topic that they care about and interests us 🤝
13
42
351
3
1
13
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
I’m not saying that every design choice made by “first-generation” appchains was correct or could not be improved upon. There are definitely second-mover advantages that these projects should try to capitalize on.
1
0
13
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@0xMagmar Open RFP for anyone that's wants to build an Urbit app that serves as a personal client for Osmosis!
Tweet media one
0
3
12
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Wait, we have a state-awareness problem: These appchains want their sequencers to be state-aware so they can optimize blocks and do fancy MEV things. And the shared sequencer needs to be state-aware to guarantee the validity of tx’s which we need to guarantee inclusion.
1
0
13
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Here’s a solution: We’ll have different chunks of the base layer val set handle the standard tx’s. We’ll get 3rd party shared sequencer networks to handle the cross-chain txs. And both can be done cheaply by limiting the role to ordering tx’s as they come in!
1
0
12
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
7 months
While I’m firmly in the camp that that issuance = cost for networks, over-cutting on costs could lead to outcomes that undermine the value prop of the network. @sachayve does a great job of exploring this trade off space in his latest piece. Highly recommend a read!
@marginxsafety
sacha💧
7 months
some thoughts on mvi tl;dr: while minimum viable issuance is, by definition, a good idea, if we are to minimize the risk of unexpected negative externalities we need to start viewing viability through a more multidimensional lens.
Tweet media one
7
10
63
0
1
12
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Of course – I could be very wrong. Maybe centralized sequencers are the end state, sovereign rollups can replicate all the capabilities of a full-stack appchains, and coordination is improved through the alignment of building on a shared L1.
1
0
12
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Based on the history of Polkadot and Cosmos, here’s one potential version of how the future could play out:
1
0
12
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@luigidemeo Seems like many are on step 2 1. Ok, appchains are the way 2. Shared seqs will get us composability 3. Wait, we need state-aware seq's to optimize blocks and do fancy MEV stuff 4. State-aware shared sequencers can get us both 5. Wait, this has the same scaling issues as ICS v1
2
0
11
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
9 months
Really enjoyed chatting with @KAndrewHuang and @bcmakes about the rapidly evolving RaaS space. Similar to AWS's role in Web2, RaaS providers have a huge opportunity to expand the market of rollup devs by offering production ready components that can be easily pasted together...
@derek_hsue
Derek Hsue
9 months
The newest episode of @ReveriePod features @KAndrewHuang , the founder of @conduitxyz , as well as @bcmakes . We explore what Conduit is building, RaaS dynamics as a whole, and dive into what the future of the rollup space might look like.
3
3
28
1
2
11
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
Fine – we’ll just make these sequencers state-aware so that they can do both of these things.
2
0
11
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
And special thanks to @0xMagmar , @BPIV400 , @FelixLts , Michael Moser, @0xave , @hasufl , Yang Wong ( @dYdX ), and @max_holloway for reviewing earlier versions of this post!
3
0
10
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
2 years
@ttunguz did some quick back of the napkin math to help answer your question. you're right in that the numbers don't look good vs b2c SaaS BM's, but there's some important considerations to keep in mind:
Tweet media one
@ttunguz
Tomasz Tunguz
2 years
@MylesOneil @realWilliamFu if that math is correct, then a customer who is referred and unstakes before the 18 month mark is contribution margin negative, no?
1
0
1
3
2
9
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
8 months
Before diving deeper, I’d encourage you to check out our long-form thoughts if this topic is up your alley. For everyone else, I’ll do my best to provide the tl’dr version below.
2
0
10
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
10 months
@hxrts And soon you can add: - Protocol enforced proposer commitments - Enshrined AA
0
1
10
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Perhaps because crypto lacks these frameworks, few teams track their business models and associated financials closely. That often leads to poor decisions and business practices.
1
0
9
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
As Bezos says, even if it’s a 10% chance of a 100x payoff, you should take that bet every time. It may be the harder path, but I strongly believe Osmosis should take a bet on itself and try to become the largest version of what it can be.
0
0
8
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
8 months
Special shout out to @KAndrewHuang , @neelsalami , @rflih_ , @cemozer_ , @xparadigms , and @0xDinoEggs for reviewing earlier versions of this post.
1
0
8
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Really enjoyed hearing such a wide range of perspectives on MEV in this episode. Thanks so much @0xMagmar , @niteshnath , and @0xave for coming on!
@MikeIppolito_
Mippo 🟪
1 year
New episode of Bell Curve is live! We took a deep look at the Cosmos approach to MEV, including: - MEV value chain - ETH vs Cosmos approach to MEV - Separation of OF vs blockspace mkts - What makes “bad MEV?” Enjoy 🙏🏼 Apple: Spotify:…
Tweet media one
0
3
22
0
0
8
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
I see a large opportunity for infra and service providers developed with app-chains/rollups in mind from day 1 Incumbents can’t charge the L1 level pricing required support their cost structure, and they aren’t nimble or motivated enough to rebuild their architecture
@instantfinality
Ivan Bjelajac 🔭
1 year
EVM is the de-facto industry standard when we are talking about Smart Contract platforms, which in terms means that Ethereum should continue to be the leader among Web3 app developers. This also means it will continue to have the most value locked compared to other Smart…
4
3
13
4
4
8
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Really enjoyed chatting with @sunnya97 and @dberenzon ! We dive deep into the motivations and trade-offs of appchains, considerations around blockspace permissioning, the future of interoperability and much more!
@MikeIppolito_
Mippo 🟪
1 year
Season Premiere of Bell Curve is now Live! @MylesOneil and I went deep with Sunny and Dmitry on the Appchain Thesis. Enjoy 🙏 Apple:🎙️ Spotify:🎙️
Tweet media one
2
4
26
0
0
8
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
But Osmosis has 2 advantages over both Uni and CEX’s: - Unlike Uni, Osmosis can offer coverage for almost every major asset as well as an integrated margin engine via @mars_protocol in a single UI. - Unlike CEX’s, the protocol is transparent and controlled by its community.
3
1
7
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
2 years
We're live! Incredibly excited to support @OsmosisGrants with the @hi_Reverie team. The OGP represents an open invitation for any teams or individuals that want to help accelerate the growth of Osmosis and its ecosystem. DM's are open for anyone that wants to get involved!
@OsmosisGrants
Osmosis Grants Program (OGP)
2 years
We are Live! The proposal for the Osmosis Grants Program has officially passed. We are now ready to accept applications and get to work!
3
15
99
1
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
2 years
@0xtuba Soluna (anchor on solana) x Saber at comfy 40% ain’t bad as long as jump keeps insuring the wormhole
0
0
7
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Time for Cosmos to start looking outside its own ecosystem for distribution.
@lsukernik
Larry Sukernik
1 year
Something to watch closely — can OP Superchain add support for interoperability/sovereignty faster than Cosmos can build brand/distribution/ecosystem? Generally, my sense is brand/distribution/ecosystem are significantly harder to reproduce than good technology/ideas.
4
1
16
0
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@MattFiebach Removing the absurd bridging fees will be a big step. But that still assumes the user is 1) already crypto native, 2) knows about Cosmos and 3) wants to use a Cosmos app This is still too small of a pie. Acquiring new users before they even try Ethereum should be the goal.
0
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
9 months
Excluding applications, it looks like 3 major stakeholders will compete to capture value in rollups: 1. Rollup frameworks 2. RaaS + infra services 3. Shared sequencers
1
0
7
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Maximizing marketshare: Bootstrapping liquidity for long tail assets has been a great way to break into the market for Osmosis as it was for @Uniswap . But over time, Uni shifted its focus to large caps + stables which has allowed them to compete with CEX’s in volume.
Tweet media one
1
1
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Studying the economic attributes of the most successful traditional marketplaces businesses and thinking about how to apply those lessons to your protocol is a great place to start.
1
0
7
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
I’d argue that the majority of protocols most closely resemble software marketplace businesses. Similar to marketplaces, many protocols provide a service by connecting the supply side to the demand side in order to create new markets.
2
1
7
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@0xShitTrader I think this is a big challenge for gen purpose chains given their value prop. The obvious answer is via permissioning at the L1 layer like we see with Cosmos appchains. But for ETH, the cons of intro'ing formal governance to express these opinions far outweigh the benefits
2
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
9 months
If you’re building in the rollup space and want to jam on ideas, please come chat with us at @hi_Reverie !
2
0
7
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
With applications in particular, these mechanisms typically lead to short-term, narrative-driven price pumps followed by a return to the mean. In the long run, these strategies are not a substitute for a sustainable business model.
1
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
There are plenty of low hanging fruit improvements to be made in crypto. I suspect that in the years to come, a big differentiator between the winners and losers will be those with a firm grasp of their business model vs those that don’t.
1
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
A good place to start is to think about the economic qualities of a protocol – the product, customer, cost structure, and revenue model. With this context, you can then look at existing companies with similar business models to see how they work out in practice.
1
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@sunnya97 @aidan0x Implicit permissioning via a heavy tax tx’s for non whitelisted contracts could be a happy middle ground You don’t want NFT mints clogging up a DeFi chains blockspace as we saw with Solana / Serum
4
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
10 months
Congrats @MikeTaormina and @fallow8DeFi ! If you're building in the RWA space, I highly recommend reaching out to chat with the @SwitchpointStra team
@MikeTaormina
MikΞ Taormina
10 months
What drew me initially to crypto was that DeFi and blockchain technology could actually deliver on fintech's original promise to reimagine traditional finance. Fintech simply put a new sheen on old rails. Crypto represents entirely new rails. It will take time, but the world…
17
17
80
0
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@hxrts @MikeIppolito_ the one that everyone owns and doesn't fluctuate in value* sounds like the logical choice to me :) (*excluding the occasional bank run crisis)
1
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@AlanaDLevin It’s a choice just like appchains (e.g. Optimism’s whitelist), tho would note that we haven’t seen it curated through governance yet Also will be interesting to see at what point permissioned appchain deployments actually get contentious
0
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
The question then becomes, what types of crypto business models exist and how can you assess their quality? We go into far more detail in this piece, but I’ll try to summarize our thinking as best I can in the rest of this thread:
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Sharing some long-form thoughts on protocol business models, how to evaluate protocol financials, and best practices that we can apply from studying the most successful marketplace businesses of the past.
3
3
33
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Tweet media one
0
0
6
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@mattimost @hasufl I think its a mix of COGS and CAC (OPEX) spend today COGS: cost to ensure sufficient liquidity on DEXs (Curve) for users and integrations (Aave). How fast this trends to zero after withdrawals are enabled is important CAC: incentives on L2s or other L1s, referral program, etc
2
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
9 months
These stakeholders will fight over two sources of revenue that represent the lion’s share of value capture: 1. Direct execution fees (sequencer) 2. Production ready, hosted infra services
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
2 years
@Flowslikeosmo @osmosiszone Wouldn’t it be great if someone could measure the ROI of these investments to understand where Osmosis is overpaying and where it is underspending for liquidity?
2
0
4
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
A few that come to mind on the Cosmos side are @scanworks_ , @SkipProtocol , @Fair_Block , @NumiaData But very interested to see how this develops on the Ethereum side. If you’re building infra and services to support this appchain future, we’d love to chat!
0
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Cosmos projects should lean into this competitive advantage and develop systems that are tailored for the application’s use case.
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Uniswap is a financial marketplace that connects traders (demand) with liquidity providers (supply). AirBnB is a physical marketplace that connects renters (demand) with property owners (supply).
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
8 months
@Calderaxyz has been framework agnostic, aiming to offer customers with max optionality at onboarding. By operating rollups on multiple frameworks, they can see which components are most valuable and incorporate these learnings into the guidance they provide to new customers.
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
11 months
@nosleepjon @Hyperlane_xyz Very interested in Hyperlane! Seems like it falls somewhere in btwn the shared standard approach (eg IBC) and the solution on top of many standards approach (eg Axelar). Is that a fair read?
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@MonetSupply @EffortCapital @RoboMcGobo Aren't there are some far bigger issues here? 1) This revenue is needed to support the $25M/yr DAO expense (they don't have a "17.5 yr runway" as OP suggests) 2) even when they become profitable, there are cap allocation options w far higher ROI to maximize LT token value
2
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
For example, @osmosiszone is implementing a number of systems that aim to 1) eliminate harmful MEV extraction entirely, and 2) use on-chain protocol controlled mechanisms that allow the protocol to capture the value of benign MEV extraction.
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
2 years
@0xtuba Not exactly CAC to LTV but some math on the referral program
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
2 years
@ttunguz did some quick back of the napkin math to help answer your question. you're right in that the numbers don't look good vs b2c SaaS BM's, but there's some important considerations to keep in mind:
Tweet media one
3
2
9
0
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@PossibltyResult @AdiSeredinschi @dualityxyz @osmosiszone @youssef_amrani Fwiw, @youssef_amrani and @ATOMAccelerator broadly have multiple positive sum partnerships in the works with @OsmosisGrants that we’re excited share soon
0
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
8 months
As we’ve already begun to see, it seems likely that the majority of startups will go directly to RaaS providers to outsource the complexity of operating a rollup. If this trend persists, RaaS providers will own the top of funnel as well as the customer relationship.
2
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
9 months
@EffortCapital TBH I don't understand this attitude. If teams build on the Cosmos stack bc 1) it enables the best version of their product and 2) they don't need to deal with the technical or economic constraints of building a rollup then Cosmos should absolutely be embracing this approach.
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Maximizing Cosmos adoption: The best way for Osmosis to increase Cosmos mindshare is to demonstrate that you can build the best version of your application as a full-stack appchain. And the best way to demonstrate this claim is to capture the marketshare required to back it up.
1
1
3
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
Using this framework, you could start to assess a business like @Uniswap similarly to how you’d assess AirBnB. It’s not exactly the same, of course, but the marketplace model roughly maps over to most protocols:
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
With these qualities, Osmosis can offer the closest thing to a CEX experience while retaining all the benefits of a DEX. In light of everything we’ve seen in the past cycle (e.g. the rise and fall of FTX), that’s an extremely compelling value prop!
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
@AlanaDLevin One advantage that the Superchain could have is around coordination of adopting / upgrading standards (e.g. AA, interop, sequencing). All of Cosmos uses the SDK and IBC ofc, but getting everyone to coordinate on version upgrades + implementation standards has been a challenge.
1
0
5
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
9 months
That said, there are very big questions about value accrual and potential competition with the underlying stacks. We dig into both the value prop and these competitive dynamics in this episode. Highly recommend a listen to anyone building in the rollup space!
0
0
4
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
1 year
This might be the minority view right now, but I think betting big on option A is the path to maximize 1) Osmosis’s long-term potential marketshare and 2) adoption of the Cosmos stack.
@playwo_
Playwo 🐉 🌲
1 year
Hot take: I think @osmosiszone should stop incentivizing pools for major bridged tokens like FTM, BNB, ARB etc. Yes, those incentivizes result in pools deep enough to facilitate trading on Osmosis, No, I do not think that it is worth it. Here is why🧵 👇 #FlipsideAmbassador
Tweet media one
10
25
91
1
0
4
@MylesOneil
Myles O'Neil
9 months
Despite this, the current conditions are extremely favorable for rollup frameworks to consider M&A or a large investment in a RaaS provider. In fact, I don’t think they will ever be as favorable as they are today for rollup frameworks.
1
0
4