BREAKING: Bipartisan Agreement on Rand Paul's Risky Research Review Act Within Reach
"We are very close..very, very close to an agreement on Ranking Member
@RandPaul
's Risky Research Review Act....I'm confident we're going to move it out [of committee] in a bipartisan way next
1/ Why did Daszak release this email?
An obvious reason comes to mind...
Morens: "As a coda, Tony knows about your work. Sometimes around 1 Feb, I sent him an email outlining your work."
"We will be doing what is possible to protect you and your research over the long haul"
.
@R_H_Ebright
is right - some of these people are sociopaths.
Weiss belligerently defends the nondisclosure of DEFUSE: to expect otherwise is "bizarre" and
"There's no reason why someone should go around telling you what's in their grant proposal."
h/t
@dr_handler
Never tell Fouchier that he cannot create something in his lab!
"I do not understand Andrew's argument. Molecular biologists like myself can generate perfect copies of viruses without leaving a trace."
Baric clones a MERS-like CoV.
van der Merwe (Oxford):
“There is no prospect of using such work to develop a vax or antiviral since these can only be tested in humans during an actual pandemic."
"It seems to me this experiment is simply not justified”
😯 Accident in Kawaoka's BSL3 lab (UW Madison) running experiments on H5N1 in *Dec 2019* !!
"...{Fauci and Auchincloss] “were briefed about the incident”..."
Fantastic investigative reporting by
@alisonannyoung
.
Simon Wain-Hobbs: "In short, there are no benefits from GoF virology...Weighing up the risks and benefits of such work should be a no-brainer. It was for me and many others who don't believe in making the world a more dangerous place."
This is the best quote so far from "Textbook Science"😅😅
"All of this work getting bat samples was supported by PREDICT. So if they are not able to predict the pandemics they themselves cause, then I'd say their program is in pretty bad shape"
2/ Reading Morens' bizarre email, one would think that Trump canceling Ecohealth's NIH grant was one of the greatest disasters to befall US science.
Far worse was the cringe-inducing letter by 77 Nobel laureates circling their wagons around Daszak.
1/ Now that it's clear that the DoD is protecting Ecohealth, it's a good time to revisit articles that hint at the 'special' nature of EHA.
Neil Harrison: "There is also a strange and slightly sinister climate of intimidation that hangs around Daszak..⬇️
1/ A few Daszak-Morens emails, courtesy Ecohealth!
"We have 15,000 samples in freezers in Wuhan and could do the full genomes of 700+ CoVs we've identified"
Apparently, his "work" is essential for US "National Security", vaccines, science, etc🙄
Daszak: "I am trying to downplay the non-US focus of this proposal so that DARPA doesn't see this as a negative".
"This proposal" proposed doing DURC in a powerful and secretive authoritarian country. 🤦♂️
This shady middleman's best excuse is that he's clueless.
1/ Baric on DEFUSE:
"We were fundamentally interested in why sarbecoviruses didn't have a furin cleavage site" (P 193-194)
🙂This "fundamental" question turned out to have an amazingly simple answer...
@ydeigin
@mitch_benzine
On Fauci and GOFROC at WIV:
Ratcliffe: "Some of Dr. Fauci's testimony is inconsistent with some of the intelligence we have that remains classified..."
Is he talking about unpublished GOFROC work?
@emilyakopp
Fauci's sworn testimony that the U.S. did not fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan ("Sen. Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, OFFICIALLY") is inconsistent with classified intel and publicly available information
1/
@emilyakopp
's DEFUSE draft reveal is a huge deal, from various points of view.
Even Thorp cannot spin away Daszak's stated intent to mislead DARPA!
🚨🚨🚨
@ScienceMagazine
AGREES that EcoHealth Alliance may have misled the U.S. government about its highly controversial DEFUSE proposal — which some believe created a blueprint for COVID-19.
WATCH 📺👇
1/ Don McNeil, the ex-NYT health reporter who is now whining that the Proximals misled him, is a dangerous d*mwit.
In April 2023, he wrote:
‼️"Supporting the bat research done by EHA and the WIV was the right thing to do"‼️
It is amazing how sensible some of these people were pre-COVID19. Reading Garrett's tweets on the origin issue, I wouldn't have expected this ⬇️
h/t
@snorman1776
The original DEFUSE gang:
R. Baric (University of N. Carolina)
P. Daszak (EcoHealth Alliance)
Z. Shi (Wuhan Institute of Virology)
L. Wang (National University of Singapore)
I. Lipkin (Columbia University)
V. Munster (Rocky Mountain Labs)
Rand Paul's letter to NIH Dir:
@SherylNYT
@benjmueller
"The finding, while hardly conclusive, pointed to an infected animal."
Why does it point to an infected animal?
If this is your idea of "taking great care" and "parsing every word", perhaps you and
@benjmueller
should move on to something else.
1/ Rand Paul:
"Under duress, the administration finally released documents that show that the DEFUSE project was pitched to at least 15 agencies in January 2018."
"These documents also reveal that [Ian Lipkin] was also part of the original plan"
The familiar bunch of virologists and their media sidekicks (Hiltzik, in particular) are furious about
@JamesCTobias
' recent article in The Nation.
The ferocity of this mob attack on a thoroughly professional freelance reporter is puzzling.
@_everythingism
I mean a good part of the US Congress, the former CDC director, and numerous prominent scientists believe there was malfeasance here. Are reporters just supposed to ignore that fact and blot out their voices? Both sides of the debate are represented in this piece.
1/ This is unbelievable.
Daszak continues to be funded for doing very risky and useless stuff (hunting novel viruses, infecting humanized mice, etc) in *South-East countries*.
I thought he was "only" into virus hunting, post-pandemic.
1/ EHA has received a combined total of $50 million *since 2020* from US agencies!!
Rep. Paul Gosar: “EHA does not deserve any taxpayer support after its years of empty promises of predicting and preventing pandemics and instead probably causing one"
Daszak's attempt at gaslighting Baric seems depressingly familiar - We have been (and continue to be) fed similar BS narratives by third-rate "scientists" and sci-comm hacks regularly over the past four years.
The furious response to Daszak's email is relatable...
In my opinion, the release of DEFUSE by DRASTIC in Sept 2021 was *the* single most important development in the search for the origins of COVID-19.
Thank you, Major J. Murphy & DRASTIC (
@CharlesRixey
,
@gdemaneuf
,
@BillyBostickson
,
@MonaRahalkar
,...)!
@BiophysicsFL
He just forgot to mention that the original Defuse project was released by Drastic, main lead was
@CharlesRixey
, to whom a brave whistleblower sent it. We analysed the project
@BillyBostickson
@gdemaneuf
and me. This was 2.5 years ago, Sept 2021, when none of the PIs mentioned!
1/ Now that I think about it, Fauci's attack on Alina is indeed shocking.
One of the most powerful and visible men in the biomedical sciences publicly disparaged a junior female scientist (in personal terms) because she dared to question the "consensus"!
Shocking to see Dr. Fauci make it personal, calling an honest, careful young scientist a "fuzzy person."
@CBSMornings
should host
@Ayjchan
to summarize the case that covid arose in a lab. Gross that virologists seem to abuse female academics like chan and
@zeynep
in particular
1/ Excerpts from a remarkable NIAID meeting on MERS in 2013 featuring prominent GOFROCers Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, Mark Denison, Kanta Subbarao, etc.
h/t
@jhas5
, who has a long thread on this meeting.
1/ Daszak is supposed to have turned over an extensive set of documents to
@COVIDSelect
by Nov 10.
The long list includes documents related to DEFUSE and proposals for "private funding that involved the insertion of an FCS into a CoV".
Will there be a report by
@COVIDSelect
?
😯 "Baric’s documents have been subpoenaed by the Congressional subcommittee and he should be up for transcribed interviews soon."
h/t
@Florin_Uncovers
for 'discovering'
@mbalter
's post.
From 2013: Baric finds it amusing that creating chimeric SARS viruses "may scare the hell out of some" in the audience.
"Maybe dual-use is a concern" is accompanied by chuckles.
Fantastic thread by
@jhas5
.
@emilyakopp
@davidzweig
@dwallacewells
1/ David Morens' gaslighting attempts (in his transcribed interview) are so crude that he comes across as a mor*n. To be fair he might be one: he actually believes in the value of Daszak's "work".
On DEFUSE:
"I have not heard that term. I don't know what that is."
1/ The Stoyan-Chiu critique of the Worobey market paper has been accepted in the Journal of The Royal Statistical Society (series A).
The article is by senior "domain experts" in spatial statistics and is "peer reviewed" 😱
cc
@Ayjchan
Apparently, a single mutation in mACE2 makes mice susceptible to SARS2.
Passaging it 30 times through their mice gave a highly pathogenic strain and a publication!
Now imagine virologists all over the world doing such pointless and risky cr*ap...
1/ From the latest FOIA release by USRTK:
Frieman to Menachery (8/2/20):
"The first email from Shibo was that the senior guy died and no one knew anything about the samples or where the virus was. That seemed strange to me."
senior guy = Yusen Zhou, Shibo = Shibo Jiang
In 2009 the Gates Foundation funded Kawaoka's useless & insanely dangerous H5N1 GOFROC experiments.
Now that USG funding for GOFROC & virus hunting is under scrutiny, careerists might turn to private sources.
@RandPaul
@SenGaryPeters
h/t
@BanounHelene
A person who had previously expressed serious concerns about the FCS in SARS2 pretending that DEFUSE was just a random grant proposal is just revolting.
And this specimen was just elected to the NAS.
@JamieMetzl
, your sunny optimism looks more baffling by the day.
Here we go...
Gostin and other enablers of the "pandemic prediction" grift pose an immense danger to global public health.
Perhaps the "One Health" agenda needs an addition: Exclude these dangerous liars from decision-making bodies.
1/ Dazsak's upcoming (and long overdue) Congressional transcribed interview reminded me of his 'interesting' interview with The Intercept from March 2022.
His crude attempts at CYA result in repeated self-contradiction 🙂
3/ Heavyweight supporters of Daszak (Nobel laureates Harold Varmus, Richard Roberts, etc) were furious with Francis Collins for canceling Daszak's grant.
Here Morens apologizes to Daszak by pinning the blame on Collins
1/ From the Associate Director for International Affairs at NIAID Gray Handley's transcribed interview:
Q: 'In your role overseeing the research the NIAID does abroad, are you aware of countries' obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention?"
Handley: "Vaguely."
1/ Interesting timeline of the FBI's Covid origins investigation by
@HansMahncke
and
@Themarketwork
.
Barely a week after the FBI had leads suggesting a lab leak, the investigation was shut down by the DNI Richard Grenell, a Trump appointee!
Reminder:
(1) Daszak gave a *9.5* hour to
@COVIDSelect
on Nov 15, 2023. The transcripts have not been released.
(2) He was asked to submit an extensive set of documents (emails, project proposals, purchase receipts, etc) by Nov 10.
No word on this from
@COVIDSelect
.
USAID terminates mega virus hunting project DEEP VZN over fears that "the programme could inadvertently ignite a pandemic."
Another fascinating story by WaPo investigative journalist David Wilman.
@StevenSalzberg1
@kesvelt
@R_H_Ebright
It's obvious that the purpose of constantly braying "follow the science" is to thwart actual investigations.
Still, this is shocking:
Rambaut:
"someone needs to lay out the science of this before it gets out of hand (and causes more formal investigations)
A scathing commentary on Daszak from Nov '21 by Professor Neil Harrison (Colombia University).
"Scientists are seriously spooked by Daszak and are unwilling to discuss EHA..."
I am starting to bore myself, but I can't help pointing out the elephant in the room:
‼️The man who wrote that part of DEFUSE works at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill‼️
Why hasn't he been asked to testify by
@COVIDSelect
?
I believe this is total BS-- someone tell Debarre to stop trying to get ahead of more bad news by spreading disinformation.
I also have the documents -- please tell me PRECISELY what you are referring to because my read of the same docs you claim to have is that they confirm the
"We don’t want to offend China."
The near-universal fear of offending China might explain why *no* country has forcefully called for an investigation of COVID origins.
If so, zoonosis-peddling corrupt scientists are only a sideshow.
Debarre and Hensel, "domain experts" in aggressive sealioning, teamed up to whine and make false allegations against
@jbloom_lab
in connection with his 2021 paper on early sequences.
Bloom's matter-of-fact response:
"... the data do not show that animals at the market were infected with SARS-CoV-2, or that people were infected from exposure to infected animals at that market. "
@mvankerkhove
on the HSM metagenomics data (aka "strongest evidence yet").
1/ One would expect "caused millions of deaths" to be followed by "It's appalling that the USG continues to withhold information (including assessments by the FBI and DoE) related to Covid origins".
Instead: "There's no proof".
One of the more remarkable passages (there are several) from the WaPo article on virus hunting is this ⬇️ It goes to the heart of the matter of US biodefence plans being at odds with the basic needs of developing countries.
cc
@colindavidbutler
This⬇️is amazing.
The NIH rep pathetically pleads with the audience to curb their enthusiasm for GOFROC and recognize that a paper in Nature or Science is not "the most important thing ".
The audience responds with guffaws.
@zeynep
@mbalter
1/ Some amazing bits from
@KatherineEban
's latest:
WIV was so desperate to work on Ebola that they were thinking of developing a reverse genetic platform to construct it.
They couldn't import samples because of the "overly cautious and bureaucratic" Chinese govt!!
“Each day of delay helps."
This was a tactic endorsed by EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak and employed by Dr. Morens and his team in an effort to postpone Dr. Morens's public testimony until after Dr. Fauci's public hearing.
See NEW email evidence👇
Kinney: "Two decades of inaction by the scientific community and scientific funding agencies have demonstrated that scientists alone cannot be trusted to police themselves on matters that present such obvious risks to every human on the planet."
World-renowned virologist Simon Wain-Hobson describes why UW-Madison should not support research that enhances potential pandemic pathogens.
Not mentioned by SWH: Kawaoka's lab, one of the most dangerous labs in the world, has had several shocking accidents in the past decade.
The DEFUSE proposal has IMO always been a precise blueprint for how SARS2 came into existence.
Now
@emilyakopp
and
@USRightToKnow
used the FOIA to get access to draft documents that contain further damning details. a 🧵.
1/x
.
@DavidBahry
's critical response to the letter by 156 virologists ("A call for rational discourse") has been published as a "Commentary" in mBio.
@jbkinney
@Bryce_Nickels
"Here, I answer the call..." 🙂
.
@COVIDSelect
's bombastic announcements are beginning to wear thin.
A year has passed and Baric has not even been mentioned, let alone called to testify.
Daszak's interview is yet to be released.
🚨DR. FAUCI TODAY🚨
For the first time since retiring from public service, Dr. Anthony Fauci will appear in front of Congress.
@COVIDSelect
has prepared more than 200 pages of questions and approximately 100 exhibits.
2-days, 14-hours. Serious work needs serious answers.
1/ Daszak (March 2021): “A lot of this work has been conducted with EHA…We do basically know what’s in [WIV's] databases.”
But here comes the unbelievable punchline: “We don’t think it’s fair that we should have to reveal everything we do.” !!!
cc
@COVIDSelect
@RandPaul
"Covid-19: the [French] Academy of Medicine leans towards a laboratory accident"
"The reference medical authority in France has broken the taboo of an origin linked to manipulations by virologists in Wuhan."
Salzberg: "...the U.S. should also strive very hard to coordinate internationally with the WHO or other international bodies to get an international agreement making it clear this kind of work is very dangerous and carries pretty minimal benefits."
1/ Is US Intel (specifically, the DoE) in possession of CoV sequencing data from WIV?
According to this CNN story from Aug 2021, Illumina sequencing machines are connected to external cloud-based servers and US intel accessed these.
1/ Interesting...
COVID Select Democrats (!):
"...testimony and documents reviewed by
@COVIDSelectDems
raise serious concerns that EHA disregarded federal reporting requirements that ensure grantees are accountable to the American people"
From 2018: Fauci talks about the "elegance" of Kawaoka's airborne H5N1 GOFROC experiment and
how its "benefits" outweighed its risks.
The man's GOFROC fixation is inexplicable. Surely he'd know better? In any case, he gaslights/lies with ease.
🤣Cheerleaders and patrons of risky virology explaining why past lab leaks were, in fact, not lab leaks at all is either entertaining or unnerving - these are the geniuses propping up "scientific" grifts that can negatively affect the entire planet?
1/ Apparently, the origins of the pandemic (or any related matter) that has taken >20M lives is like religion or politics - one does not discuss it in polite society, even when the conversation *is* about risky bioresearch/ biosafety!
Why?
The COVID origin cover-up: "The Elephant in the Room" (Part 2)
During a panel discussion at the American Enterprise Institute on Feb 21, 2024, Marc Lipsitch & Gustavo Palacios did not respond when asked if the NIH funded gain-of-function research in a lab in Wuhan, China.
(1/3)
An interesting detail: the management plan for the infamous DEFUSE proposal named Ben Hu from the WIV side. In 2019 he received a Chinese grant to investigate two new SARS-like CoVs in humanized mice. Still implausible to think Ben might’ve thought to insert an FCS?
The FCS, according to Peter "The Scientist" Daszak:
"An insertion point that would cleave furin"
Whose brilliant idea was it to pay this dunce millions of taxpayer dollars to conduct DURC in China and put the whole world at risk?
In this clip from Oct 2020, Peter Daszak clearly doesn't understand what a furin cleavage site is.
He should buy a hat, mug, T-shirt, doormat, poster, or ornament from
@BiosafetyNow
’s “Inconsistent with Evolution” collection to help him better understand.
1/ GOFROC nutter "Yoshi" Kawaoka, sci-comm hack Apoorva Mandavilli (infamous for her "lab leak is racist" post), Nature Medicine...all come together in this cringe-inducing puff piece from 2006.
h/t
@Amy31129057
I️ deeply believe in civility but we must also speak honestly. Peter Daszak has been dishonest, disingenuous, and dangerous. Not a single penny of US government funding should go to
@EcoHealthNYC
while he is involved and until every sub-grant and grantee is 100% accounted for.
1/ Weiss gaslights that the FCS in SARS2 is no big deal (1:01:11 in the video).
Baric (from his
@COVIDSelect
interview):
"We were fundamentally interested in why sarbecoviruses didn't have a furin cleavage site"
@antonioregalado
@jbloom_lab
1/ The Rocky Mountain Labs - Colorado State University project is wilder than I thought.
Step 1: Capture horseshoe bats in Bangladesh and ship them to CSU.
Step 2: Perform infectivity studies of Nipah (sampled in B'desh), SARS-2, and ...*RATG-13*!?
h/t
@WhiteCoatWaste
@BallouxFrancois
@MJnanostretch
That, in a nutshell, is why virology cannot be treated as just another scientific discipline.
Every academic discipline has people doing mediocre/pointless research - but virology is unique in that even third-rate work could end up devastating the whole planet.
1/ So the DoD is in the same boat as the NIAID - they have been funding risky work in foreign countries but don't know the details of the work or expenditure.
And they admit to outsourcing ("Fee-for-service") risky work😲
This is a recipe for disaster if there ever was one.
Bloom on DEFUSE (15:00):
"It was the moment for me when the possibility that the FCS was engineered went from a seemingly low possibility to a completely plausible possibility".
1/ "Tony" shows why he had/has the US biomedical establishment in the palm of his hand.
If you did his bidding, lavish rewards awaited you. Otherwise, banishment...
"But she’s a pretty fuzzy person, quite frankly."
WATCH: Later, Fauci got testy when Dokoupil brought up the lab leak theory.....
Dokoupil: “[T]he viruses funded by the NIH were so distant from the origin standpoint, or we call it phylogeny, or evolutionarily —”
Gayle King: “We all know what that means, yeah.”
Tony Fauci:
1/ More from Garry's transcribed interview with
@COVIDSelect
(June 2023):
Garry admits that
* it's common for work to begin before proposals are submitted.
* DEFUSE proposed to insert FCSs into "background viruses".
From the man who went out of his way to thwart (and even sabotage) oversight and regulations:
"If it’s a lab leak, then we really should have been much, much more attentive to protocols and training and restrictions."
Truly brilliant investigation of virus-hunting, with a focus on Thailand, by David Willman and
@JobyWarrick
.
This article is an eye-opener.
Virus-hunting in remote corners of the globe putting the locals at risk is biodefence, not public health.
Robert Redfield and Marc Siegel:
"Despite the devastation of the COVID-19 pandemic, many kinds of potentially dangerous GoF research continue in the U.S., China, and around the world."
"We call for a full moratorium on this kind of GoF research."
@MarionKoopmans
For starters, please stop talking about "the" science - it sounds silly at best. More often it sounds like Soviet-style propaganda.
For instance, the fantasy dished out by Worobey-Pekar is not "the" science. It's just flawed speculation based on very sparse and biased data.
I suspect scrutiny of PREDICT/USAID will make the NIH cover-up scandal look like kindergarten mischief.
For one thing, the entire virus-hunting mafia (shady stalwarts include Dennis Carroll, Metabiota, etc) will be in trouble.
@RandPaul
@mitch_benzine
Fauci's testimony:
His gaslighting (Topics: his career, GOFROC, Proximal Origin, zoonosis vs lab leak) is topnotch until he gets to Morens.
Fauci drops his 'elder statesman' act and tosses Morens aside with contempt...
1/ Bob Garry's transcribed interview with
@COVIDSelect
was conducted by
@mitch_benzine
, who was *very* thorough - for the most part.
But when it came to Garry's "relationship" with the intel community,
"I don't want to dig too much in because we might get in trouble."🙂
Enough with the "HIndsight is 20/20" BS.
Ebright, Wain-Hobson, and many others pointed out the dangers of supporting risky research in a secretive authoritarian country with poor safety standards back in 2016.
@RepMMM
The National Institutes of Health ADMITS to serious shortcomings in grant awarding and grant oversight procedures that allowed EcoHealth Alliance to facilitate gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.
@RepMMM
and
@NIH
agree: "Hindsight is always 20/20."