In 1984, Edward Said wrote a landmark essay, “Permission to Narrate,” in which he critiqued the Western media’s biased coverage of Israel-Palestine. Now
@m7mdkurd
picks up where Said left off in his own essay, “The Right to Speak for Ourselves.
This, I think, is a deeply poisonous legacy of Western expansion: the conviction that everywhere, always, states are established by mass killing or ethnic cleaning. If you will the end—a state—then you must will the necessary means—the mass murder.
Tonight I spoke with
@MarkRegev
, senior advisor to Israel’s Prime Minister, about the huge civilian casualties in Gaza, why so much aid is reportedly not being allowed into the strip, and whether any political settlement might be possible. Watch our full conversation here.
Unlikely: the authorities plotted to kill him in secret because he was popular (John 11); an earlier attempt to arrest him failed because even the temple guards sent bought the story he was telling (John 7); the people here seem to be the religious establishment’s mob
@russokrauss
Doesn’t English have a v similar problem with a v similar word: “oversight” to mean both “a careless mistake” and “meticulous attempt to avoid a careless mistake”?
@David_Goodhart
@DavidLammy
@akalamusic
If you hadn’t already called
@DavidLammy
Britain’s Al Sharpton, and then failed to defend the charge, there might be some point in this. At the moment, you seem to be trolling him (and not well).
This is stirring up a lot of debate but I think there’s a growing sense among what
@KonstantinKisin
calls the children of Dawkins that atheism, in
@Ayaan
’s words, cannot equip us for a civilizational war, or infuse our lives with meaning.
Still, this approach to Christianity…
“We, Lumumba’s children, his family, demand the proper return of the relics of Patrice Emery Lumumba to the land of his forebears, so that we might pay our tribute of filial grief.”
Was stunned by hostility and hatred in comments m under a recent piece in
@thetimes
about the growing use of Māori in New Zealand. Fair to say settler colonials don’t like to be reminded of the survival or identity of those from whom they seized the land.
Peru's Prime Minister addressed Congress today in Quechua, but the right-wing representatives shouted him down because they don't understand it.
He reminds them that it's his constitutional right to speak his own language.
(1) It must be tiring, as a liberal Zionist, to be so constantly surprised by events.
(2) It’s worth asking which frame (Israel as colonising power/ Israel as liberal state with a persistent security problem) better predicted its behaviour, and the outcomes we can now all see.
I've spent the past month talking about what's happening in Gaza with some of the world's leading experts on military strategy, counterterrorism, and the law/ethics of war.
What emerged was a story of a war gone terribly, horrifically wrong:
There’s a special philosophy derangement where fancy faculty get so confident in their intuitions that they deliver them as counterpoints to empirical facts? You describe something you experienced and they’re like “I expect not” and it’s like right. no one did. But it happened…
Can’t remember who said it first, but: leaving the enforcement of anti-genocide norms to a state which annually celebrates Columbus was never going to end well.
This ICJ case has opened a Pandora Box of the intersection between colonialism and genocide. International law, and indeed the international community, will not be the same after it.
Apparently, the right response to an unrepentant arsonist burning your house is to cheer on another arsonist burning other people’s houses. HTF is this not aid and comfort to imperialism?
ICYMI the most recent episode of
#HoPWaG
looked at Teresa of Ávila and John of the Cross, and how their works fit into Spanish contemplative/mystical literature in the Renaissance.
Ouch. The old Catholic Encyclopaedia calls Hobbes “an antagonist worthy of any man's steel” — they know a worthy opponent when they see one. No such compliments for Locke, IIRC.
@BenBurgis
The second claim “99.99% of everyone else restricts to Israelis who live in settlements …” is question begging and anyway false. Lots of non-Americans and non-Westerners who’re otherwise competent users of English use settlers to refer to ordinary members of the privileged caste
1150AD
gede/gedi -kenya <expanded>
settled by the bantu-speaking swahili btn the 12th and 16th cent.
gede was the innermost of the swahili cities (but weaker than its neighbors malindi and mombasa), the ruins include a five mosques, multi-roomed houses and a city wall
#historyxt
I think it was
@christapeterso
who relayed to me the quip that Rawls is said to have wrote Theory of Justice as a response to his experience of World War Two and one’s whole orientation in philosophy is given by whether that makes any sense to you.
Also expelled or killed converts to Christianity from Judaism, and their entire Jewish population; and committed genocide in the new world. Colonisers who want belonging without justice or reconciliation are tiresome, but medieval Spain *really* isn’t a model for decolonisation.
The Moors were in Europe for 700 years and when the Spanish took control they expelled the Moors from their country. Just something to keep in mind about Europeans who claim to have a right to land in Africa because their family had been there for several generations.
Always surprised by this reasoning. If it were true that everyone had always fought everyone else (so colonialism is perfectly fine) wouldn't it also be true that falsely asserting noble savagehood is fine because everyone has always lied about others?
@nhannahjones
@ncbuller
@jasonintrator
At least some natural-law theorists think slavery (and other kinds of radical inequality) justified. CRT assumes slavery is unjustified. AFAICT, “replacing CRT with natural law” means something like “replacing basic moral assumptions of CRT with inegalitarian ones friendlier …
Especially evident in Kiswahili, where words for “Greece”, “Greek” &c have come into the language at least twice—from Arabic as “Uyunani”, “Kiyunani”, and from English as “Griki”, “Kigiriki”—and both clusters of words are pretty clearly unrelated
The names for Greece in Arabic (al-Yūnān), Hebrew (Yavan), Persian (Yūnān) and Turkish (Yunanistan) are very different from and are unrelated to the English or to Greek Elláda.
These names (and others) instead go back to the eastern region of Greek speakers in antiquity, Ionia!
Won’t matter, obvs, but anyone who’s followed his family story will have wondered what triggered his grandfather’s migration to Kenya. A while ago,
@thetimes
dug a bit and found that it might have been a colonial massacre.
"When these groups claim Britain is, & has been on the wrong side of history, we should reject it & reject it again"
4 million dead in the Bengal famine, systematically torturing & murdering thousands in Kenya, a million dead in Iraq, Libya. What can you say?
@harufathelamp
@mostqualmishly
@ortoiseortoise
James Beattie's reply, in 'Essay ... ' (1809, see ) suggests that dissatisfaction with Humean racism isn't confined to 21st century readers of the passage quoted earlier.
@ariehkovler
@Grimezsz
@s_r_constantin
In the relevant letter, he’s talking about what he calls the Germanic ideal, which he’s careful to distinguish that from what he calls “classics” (presumably stuff happening further south) and to mention that it’s a “contribution to” Europe (so presumably not identical to it).
If in a matter this serious Western elites can’t be persuaded by open public arguments in languages they understand, by rules they wrote, and in a forum they established, then I’m not sure fault lies with SA.
@Pseudoplotinus
@jennfrey
Aristotle’s argument for slavery in “Politics” is made *against* (unnamed) others who deny that it’s just. He knows that people argue that slavery is unjust; he takes them seriously enough to argue that they’re wrong; slavery cannot have been self-evidently just in his time.
My review of
@yhazony
's new book "Conservatism: A Rediscovery" is up for
@LiberalCurrents
. Needless to say I disagree with most of it, but it's an important book operating at a higher level than many competitors
Sir, Please display your Native Movement Permit (Kikuyu, Embu, and Meru) prominently at all times. You also appear to be standing on the pavement in a White neighbourhood. Please step off.
Must say I’m enjoying what seems a sudden mass conversion to deontology—lots of people in what seemed a totally consequentialist movement now want Bostrom to stay, come what may. Sly pleasure for those of us who’ve no time for consequentialism.
... The people who would legislate our species' future have not managed to govern their own institution in such a way that it's clear they'll survive till 2025. They must persuade us to trust them and their ideas with investments of monumental importance. Something has to change.
Fairly standard take from the right: liberalism is the cause of, and liberals bear responsibility for, fascism. Not subtle; not consistent with usual responsibility rhetoric; fervently believed all the same. (Cf RW conviction that racism is caused by its victims.)
Palestinian Academic Ghada Karmi tells
@kayburley
about being displaced from Palestine in 1948.
Ghada says she went back to Jerusalem a few years ago and found the house she and her family used to live in.
📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602 and YouTube
Because I'm a genuinely stupid person it didn't occur to me that the odd level of interest in whether Yale has a logic course was anything other than sincere interest in pedagogy. I now saw people debating whether or not this is woke DEI something something and I am like... oh...
Rarely agree with
@AgnesCallard
, but can’t stop reading her. This essay (and Martha Nussbaum’s accompanying piece) are the most memorable philosophy I’ve read this year.
Clive's loot
The loot which Clive lifted from Murshidabad after winning the Battle of Plassey in 1757 made him the richest self-made man in Europe. In 2004, a Qatari royal bought a jade flask from his descendants for £3m. Its now in Islamic Museum in Doha.
@gathara
Can’t see what the relevance of the public money might be. Matatus are privately, not publicly owned. Public spending on Muthaiga roads doesn’t grant private owners a right of use. (Things might be different for public bus services.)
One reason I’m sure we’ll beat empire in the end: the arguments never change and there’re all bad. Here’s an old favourite: if I establish a political community that excludes you on your land, you bear the burden of proving that you deserve not to be dominated on your own land.
correcting some trivial misconceptions
-modern Benin used to be "Dahomey" and is nowhere near the kingdom of Benin
-Biblical Ethiopia is Kush not modern Ethiopia
-Most North Africans aren't Arab but Berbers and Copts who speak Arabic
-Kongo was mostly found in Angola not Congo
@YairWallach
@StefPL
This is equivocation: the boycott was important because it showed the ANC that peaceful means would bring recognition and support. That other causes were more important *for the end of apartheid* doesn’t change the former fact. And it’s the effect of peaceful means on the choices
My basic model of student protests is that in general students don't know shit about what they're protesting against, they do it because it's cool, makes them feel like they're part of something important and they want to be with their friends.
In the vast majority of cases,…
@BenBurgis
One doesn't follow from the other: that Israel is a settler-colonial state doesn't imply that mass expulsion is the answer to the problems it creates.
The reparations craze is the result of decline in belief in a last judgement; without that faith, people long for an impossible, final human reckoning. But it cannot purge or rescue the human beings of the past.
@d08890
It's so transparent and kinda pathetic from the outside, like there's this *very* recognisable genre of nerd machismo which takes the form "oh my God in the seminar room the things I am good at finally put me in the position to slap down others, the power!!!" and it's just sad.
@Enceladusty
@ryanlcooper
@BossSeanTN
Isn't this kind of self-defeating? If the history of unjust takings means that the most recent unjust taking is justified or at least needn't be remedied, then all you need to do to justify land back is to make sure that the most recent taking is the reparatory one.
@lastpositivist
There is a difference between being philosophically White and racially White, and we all know this. I am not defending Thomists or Kantians, but we all know this, and should stop pretending that we don’t.
I have many “conservative” inclinations. I think building things is hard but breaking them is easy and character matters. I care about my country and generally respect authority.
It’s just that actual cons think none of that’s as important as going peepee poopoo at trans people.