The world has changed so much since 1929.
Our population in the US has nearly tripled while our House of Representatives has remained capped at 435 members.
We've blocked the representation of the many to favor the squabbles of the few.
It's time for change.
NEW: a federal court just selected Alabama's new congressional map, featuring an additional Black majority district. Under the remedial plan,
#AL02
swings from Trump +29 to Biden +12, virtually assuring a Dem pickup.
TRUTH.
1. We need to uncap the House.
2. We need to uncap the House.
3. We need to uncap the House.
4. We need to uncap the House.
5. We need to uncap the House.
6. We need to uncap the House.
7. We need to uncap the House.
8. We need to uncap the House.
It used to be normal for the House of Representatives to expand.
It wasn’t until 1929 that Congress arbitrarily capped the size of the House at 435 members.
Back then, each House member represented roughly 200,000 people.
Today, that number is 760,000.
Expand the House.
Alaska should have more than one district.
Delaware should have more than one district.
North Dakota should have more than one district.
South Dakota should have more than one district.
Vermont should have more than one district.
Wyoming should have more than one district.
When I started this page 3 years ago, there was little to no effort to uncap the Hose.
Since then, this page gained over 6,000 followers, two bills were introduced to Congress, and we know candidates + politicians at many levels who support us.
And we're just getting started.
The size of the House of Representatives was never supposed to be a zero-sum game. It's not coincidence that the Census and apportionment happen every 10 years.
As the country grows with people, so too should the House representing the will of the People.
It’s true. The EC is broken because of Congress’s failure to expand the House in over a century.
We don’t need to abolish the electoral college when we can make it work how the Framers intended.
🚨We Can End the Electoral College by Congressional Reapportionment - It doesn't require an amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
The Electoral College has long been a focal point of criticism by many who believe that it undermines American democracy in favor of minority tyranny.…
A motion to vacate has only been voted on one other time in US history. The last time was 1910 but that motion failed.
With this motion to vacate passing, maybe we should do something else that we haven't done for over 100 years: expand the size of the House.
The Framers didn't institute term limits for members of Congress but they also didn't expect the House to get capped at 435 members. The cap on the House systemically locks out new voices and new generations.
The Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929 that created the cap on the size of the House is anything but permanent.
We are on a mission to repeal it, and we can do so without a constitutional amendment.
Representative Casten laying it out as clear as day: "Because if we are the House of Representatives, we should make sure that all of us represent, as close as we can, the same number of people."
The second bill would expand the size of the House of Representatives based on US population growth and reduce disparities in district size across states.
Correct.
435 was set in 1911 when the population of the US was 92,000,000 people. Today, the US population is over three times larger with 330,000,000 million people.
The Framers created the House with the expectation it would grow with the population. It hasn't.
The Constitution allows us to expand the House without a constitutional amendment because the Framers wanted us to expand it every 10 years.
Why, then, have we not expanded the House in over 100 years?
The House of Representatives and, consequently, the Electoral College, haven't been properly sized since 1911.
Wondering why you feel underrepresented in Congress? This is why.
Uncapping the House is the constitutional issue of our lifetimes.
The total US population has grown three times larger since we last expanded the House in 1911. Americans lack proper representation.
We’re building a movement to change that.
Join us.
While everyone sits around wondering what happens next in the House of Representatives, we are still building a movement to uncap the House by 2029, the 100-year anniversary of the cap on the House.
If you support this movement, repost this and we'll make sure we follow you.
Thank you,
@RepDavidTrone
:
"The House of Representatives would immediately increase to 585 members and be tied to population increases each census, keeping in line with the original intent of our nation’s founders. This would lead to better representation, smaller districts, and…
The whole point of having a House and a Senate is for them to serve two different functions:
The House represents the people and was designed to grow as the population grows; while the Senate represents the states.
The cap on the House completely destroyed its function.
When I started this account, there was not a single bill in Congress to uncap the size of the House.
Fast forward to now, and we have two bills: one introduced by
@RepCasten
, and the other by
@repblumenauer
.
If you don't think this movement is growing, you're wrong.
The single weirdest thing about Twitter is that lots of people on here are deeply committed to the idea that there should be 5,000 members of the house
We’ll keep saying it until it’s clear:
We’re not uncapping the House because it favors one political party over another. We’re uncapping the House because it favors the American people.
Uncapping the House is not the silver bullet to end all of our problems.
But it is an easy solution with deep historical roots for many of the problems we are currently seeing
When we started this account about two years ago, there was not a single bill that would uncap the House.
Two years later, we have TWO different bills.
The movement grows.
Americans alive today have never lived under the Electoral College system as it was envisioned.
We broke the EC when we stopped expanding the House in 1911.
Why would anyone take on the effort to expand the Senate or abolish the Electoral College (both of which require a constitutional amendment) before finishing the effort to expand the House (which only requires a simple bill)?
Here's what we know:
1. The cap on the House was an arbitrary action that has had a negative impact on the US over the past century; and
2. We can fix it without a constitutional amendment.
There should be WAY more districts electing representatives tonight. The reason they are not is because of a law from 1929.
More districts = more competition = better representation in Congress for all Americans
The second bill would expand the size of the House of Representatives based on US population growth and reduce disparities in district size across states.
This page has 6,000 followers and we are building a movement to uncap the House by 2029, the 100-year anniversary of the cap on the House.
We're gearing up for the next phase.
What would you like to see during the next phase of this movement?
Quick reminder that we would have over 1,300 representatives if we had the same person-to-representative ratio that we had in the House before we capped it in 1929.
Tomorrow, the 118th Congress is sworn in.
Also tomorrow, Congress could expand the size of the House as was the tradition of our nation until 1929 when that Congress refused to follow the intent of the Framers.
Another day, another post where people comment “that’s why the House of representatives exists” without realizing that the cap on the House broke this dynamic.
Population of California: 39,538,223
Population of Wyoming: 578,803
The 40 million people who live in the 22 smallest states get 44 senators to represent their views. The 40 million people in California get two. This is undemocratic and an unfair representation of voters.
I know it sounds odd but we actually need more Representatives in Congress.
Only 435 Representatives in the House is outdated and limits the voice of the People to have a say in the direction of their government.
435 is not some magic number. It’s not in our Constitution. It’s not a limit our Founders didn’t want us to cross.
It’s random, arbitrary, and signifies a century-long failure of Congress to meet its Constitutional duty to apportion the House.
We must enlarge it.
In 1913, Congress set the number of Representatives at 435 when the US population was 92,000,000. It’s been 435 Representatives ever since.
Today, the US population is over 331,000,000.
In 1869, Congress set the number of Supreme Court Justices at 9 — in part because there were 9 circuits at the time. It’s been 9 Justices ever since.
Today, there are 13 circuits.
The Framers of the Constitution set up a system with the belief that power in the hands of a few individuals is a one-way ticket to tyranny.
At one Representative in the House per 750,000 people, the Framers would be begging us to uncap it.