Historian at Brown University, author of *Plantation Goods: A Material History of American Slavery* forthcoming from University of Chicago Press, Nov. 2024
History of Capitalism syllabus discussion ahead, a 20 tweet thread.
I'm refining a syllabus for a graduate seminar, essentially a 500-year survey across time, place, and methodology. The idea would be to introduce students to the field (to the extent I see it) 1/
HISTORY OF CAPITALISM BIBLIOGRAPHY
The spring 2021
@BrownHist
graduate seminar compiled an extensive and eclectic annotated bibliography on the global history of capitalism.
Hopefully there is something for everyone.
Download here:
Ever notice that very few scholars who work on the social history of enslaved people in the US, 1787-1860 are primed to celebrate the American Revolution for its "consequences" of creating the circumstances that would eventually result in the end of slavery?
Think about why.
A TEXTILE HISTORY OF ATLANTIC SLAVERY is now underway
@BrownHist
.
This seminar for new college students explores African Diasporic history and material culture, utilizing the amazing recent scholarship on the topic.
Can't wait to learn with (and from) these students!
New course launches
@BrownHist
this week:
“A Textile History of Atlantic Slavery.”
The course will introduce students to the history of slavery and material culture methods, and consider how the material/visual record can respond to the silences of the (paper) archive. 1/8
There is a simpler explanation to why the current slavery/capitalism historiography looks the way it does in terms of the focus on the post-Revolutionary US.
@mugwump2
@yeselson
@EricLevitz
@AdamSerwer
@mattyglesias
This is correct. But thats why these are questions that can’t really be answered in a US-centric framework. For that the real story is in the Caribbean. North American slave economies were relatively marginal in wealth production until pretty late.
Think academic book reviewing has gotten soft? From latest JAH:
"His writing style is attractively informal, if occasionally too casual. His preface blames any errors on his cats (p.xiii). Presumably they are responsible for misspelling the name of James Fenimore Cooper (p. 72)."
Fantastic to see
@projo
re-publish this 2006 set of articles about Rhode Island and the slave trade.
From
@hartfordcourant
's Complicity thru
@nytimes
and
@nhannahjones
's 1619, our newspapers have been at the forefront of getting this history right.
A much-appreciated end-of-school-year present from an undergraduate: an embroidered shipping container in honor of the history of capitalism! Thank you!
Hard to focus this week, but big event coming up this Friday
@SlaveryJustice
: "Race, Slavery, Colonialism, and the Making of Capitalism" with
@abufelix12
@ProfJLMorgan
Pepijn Brandon, and Anthony Bogues. Link to registration in the next tweet...
I wrote an essay called "The Unfree Origins of American Capitalism"-- originally a 2001 conf paper, published in 2006-- that does a more articulate job of walking through this historiography. /end+1
Big news from Brown in anticipation of 2026: a multi-year investment in scholarly engagement re: the American Revolution, its legacies, and the role of research universities in a democratic society, beginning with... a POSTDOC!!
What's next? "Biden needs a 'Willy Horton ad'"?
It is so disappointing that commentators in the public sphere are openly calling for a race-baiting strategy as the best bet for saving "democracy" from rightwing book burners, covid deniers, and election liars.
Biden needs a “Sister Souljah moment”: He needs to attack the far-left activists who want to defund the police, boycott Israel and divide Americans by race.
Biden should champion liberalism, not leftism.
My latest in
@PostOpinions
.
What does scholarship look like at the intersection of Labor History and History of Science?
A thread.
tl;dr Conference in Philadelphia, June 2022, see the cfp:
A good day to commemorate the time in 2019 when
@knott_sarah
and I tried our darnedest to suggest that economic logic shouldn't organize family life, and that "data driven" was a mask for class privilege rather than a synonym for objectivity. We clearly failed.
Whoa! Brown will soon define assigning one's own book to a class as a conflict of interest, require formal disclosure, and ask that a departmental chair or ad hoc committee determine if text "is the best choice for the class in question." That's serious!
What do modern labor fights, terrible worker protections and massive income inequality among workers of all races have to do with the legacy of U.S. slavery? Watch the CAPITALISM episode of
#1619hulu
.
#1619Project
out now.
Dear Brown University PR Apparatus:
The work you are promoting here by a long-retired emeritus professor undermines the current Brown University History Department and its commitment to a recovering and recounting a full, honest, and inclusive American past.
In
@WSJ
,
@BrownUniversity
@BrownHist
Prof Gordon Wood, a noted Revolutionary War era historian, reviews “American Republics: A Continental History of the United States, 1783-1850” by Alan Taylor: "His book is written in clear, readable prose."
Question for colleagues in economic history so dismayed about the discussion of cotton, plantation slavery, and capitalism in
#1619
: Are there ways you would analyze 20/21st c. petroleum that might be useful for thinking historically about cotton/slavery/capitalism? 1/12
At long last, I've been denounced on the website of the Mises Institute!
"How College Profs Push Students to Socialism." My only consolation is that at least someone is reading Scraping By as part of the HoC conversation.
Had a chance to revisit this book yesterday zooming with a high school class in Baltimore. Grateful that the book is still getting assigned and read, and that it seems to hold up pretty well! Thanks, Calvin for the kind words.
Next up in my grad US core course:
@sethrockman
’s modern classic Scraping By: Wage Labor, Slavery, and Survival in Early Baltimore: a history of hard workers in an unforgiving labor market and how racial, ethnic, and gender diversity figured in the making of American capitalism.
it's weird how the framers of the US Constitution actually get off easy when people say they counted black people as 3/5 of a person, when really they made black people worth 0/5 of a person and the slave owners 8/5 of a person
A set of important observations from one of the best scholars of post-1865 US History.
@charlespostel
is not often on twitter, but perhaps that's about to change...
1/The NYT letter vs
#1619
Project objects to the words “for the most part” black people “fought alone,” w/ some critics focusing on post-Civil War history of interracial class solidarity against corporate power. But history is more complicated than critics allow. Some thoughts.
I appreciate all the kind words about the prospective syllabus for a history of capitalism graduate seminar. There was a point I was trying to make about what the history of capitalism looks like, and so I wanted to try again with an alternative model. A 18-tweet thread...
While it seems easy to attribute university closings to liability fears, might one also credit the presence of faculty epidemiologists, public health experts, and (dare I say) historians, social scientists, and humanists in the decision-making loop?
@mattyglesias
Last year my American daughter learned German in a Berlin public school classroom designed primarily to serve refugee families from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. The school's motto was "School without Racism." We should try that here.
Scene in 2050:
"Daddy, what did you do to stop the rise of fascism in the US back in 2019?"
"I stridently resisted the telling of an American history that foregrounds slavery in the nation's past, and spent a lot of time trolling a prominent Black intellectual on the internet."
Turns out that Wilentz has a new piece in the WaPo that "both-sides" the issue, saying 1619 and Trump are "closely matched symptoms of the same era." How obtuse do you have to be to miss the disproportionate danger of the state purporting to control the production of history?
Anyone know when the “we write as historians” letter from Victoria Bynum, James McPherson, James Oakes, Sean Wilentz, and Gordon Wood about the 1776 Commission and that executive order is coming out in the NY Times?
New England colleges dependent on slavery for endowments, New York insurance companies issuing policies on slaves' lives, Rhode Island companies making clothing for slaves, a Massachusetts cotton industry using slave-grown cotton to employ 10000s of people in factories.
Summer 2020 had its share of triumphs and defeats, but if nothing else, I read a bunch of new History books. If you've read some of these and want to talk them over, give a shout...
It doesn't mean that 1790-1860 US is the only story for the making of modern capitalism. But it does attest to the fact that most of the established stories of how national independence and political democracy made for a booming national economy had excluded slavery.
Thrilled to be holding a copy of Lindsay Schakenbach Regele's *Manufacturing Advantage*-- a wonderful account of "national security capitalism" in the early republic. Much pride at
@BrownHist
on the publication of our 2015 PhD's new book from
@JHUPress
. Congratulations, Lindsay!
In my recasting of the 1790s as 2020, I've got the Jacobins as antifa, the St. Domingue slaves as BLM, the Bavarian Illuminati as Q...
What else you got for me here?
People teaching the history of capitalism will want to be in better conversation with Nancy Fraser-- start with the New Left Review 2014 article, pick up her new book, and then listen to this podcast. Good stuff here.
Application portal open for a year-long fellowship ($72k) at
@JCBLibrary
and
@SlaveryJustice
-- a tremendous opportunity to work on the histories Atlantic slavery and its legacies. Closes 3/31. Would love to welcome colleagues to Providence next year!
Have been thinking about G. Wood’s 1987 “Interests and Disinterestedness in the Making of the Constitution" as something of a parable for the current discussion regarding who gets to say what the Am Rev was actually about. (Life imitating art, or something like that) 1/5
Are you history of capitalism-curious?
Do you wish you could access a short talk that might outline some of the contours and commitments of the field (at least as I understand them)?
Apparently, such a talk exists...
"...a keen reminder that historians do not discover anything. Instead, we learn to listen and to look in different places."
What a wonderful closing line in an excellent essay!
My
@AmHistReview
piece is up! Search for the new AHR thru your library for access! I'm so excited that this essay is available; I think it'd be great for SC/Lowcountry, agricultural, Atlantic World, & material culture history classes, or a methods course.
At this point, probably every third or fourth citation to this book. I think it is
@arothmanhistory
's turn to claim this one because
@rothmanistan
got the last one.
So what you have is a scholarship in 2019 that yes, is focused on US 1790-1860 largely as an artifact of the historiography that we inherited from the 1990s.
Thinking about the East Side parents for whom Election Day is the one time a year they visit a Providence public school. Is there any cognitive dissonance here regarding what civic engagement means in a diverse, multiracial city?
And so you've had a bunch of scholars thinking about how to write slavery into the story and what happens if you *don't* take it as a prima facia assumption that slavery had nothing to do with capitalism.
If you started grad school in the early 1990s, you had to read Gordon Wood's Radicalism of the American Revolution, Joyce Appleby's Capitalism and the New Social Order... books that said post-Rev US economy maximized freedom for pretty much everyone.
History of Capitalism
@BrownHist
starts this morning. Beginning with Ha-Joon Chang, ending with *The Box*, and making many stops along the way. Recent favorites include Susie Pak’s *Gentlemen Bankers* and David Arnold’s *Everyday Technology*.
And those of us focusing on the post-rev US saw wage-earning slaves in Baltimore, Philadelphia banks owning Louisiana plantations, advanced bookkeeping in plantation spaces, southern judges promoting instrumental jurisprudence, remote communities of interest invested in slavery.
You read Eric Williams and Sidney Mintz and you knew there was a compelling story regarding slavery/capitalism in British economic development-- you wondered where there seemed to be so little compelling work on these entanglements for the US.
That's where the scholarship is today. It has made an argument about US economic development specifically because of the arguments that the US has made (enabled by generations of historians) about itself and its unrivaled economic freedom. /end
There was, of course, compelling cultural history, like Roediger's Wages of Whiteness (in debt to Du Bois) that pointed the way, indicating slavery's "value" to the national economy was in the "unmaking" of white labor radicalism (which had Econ value to capitalism certainly).
People have many opinions about what the history of capitalism field "looks like" from a sociology of knowledge perspective. It doesn't have to look like it has previously. If you want the field to look different, you can make it look different. 20/end.
To amplify both
@drhonor
and
@activisthistory
, SHEAR does not have to be this. Very few of us want it to be this. Many of us must redouble our efforts to make it something else, something better.
FWIW, the shitshow of a
#shear2020
plenary I just watched online does not make me want to abandon SHEAR. Quite the opposite. This organization has been my intellectual home. We are better than this. This cannot stand.
#notmyshear
A thread about threads… specifically, the surprisingly difficult answer to the seemingly easy question of “Did enslaved people wear blue jeans?”
(of interest if you watched the PBS documentary last night) 1/
Announcement: The Carl Becker Lecture Series is set for March 14 through March 16 with Seth Rockman presenting on his project: Plantation Goods and the Material History of American Slavery.
Have you put a book on the syllabus so you'd finally have the space to read it? Have you ever then sat down to read that book and said, "Wow, this is a truly impressive book! How have I not read this yet?"
That's me right now with Francesca Trivellato's Familiarity of Strangers.
Charles Sellers' book by that title was a devastating critique of capitalism as an anti-democratic social formation. But the hero, fighting on behalf of democracy, was an Indian-killing slaveholder named Andrew Jackson... so that was ind of confusing.
So, you mean like Nell Painter, Patricia Limerick, Linda Kerber?
Maybe I am naive too, but it seems like a weird coincidence how "the greatest living American historians" are so demographically similar to one another.
@saletan
I suppose I'm naive, Will, but wouldn't any reasonable person--any sane person (socialist, libertarian, or whatever)--want to know what the greatest living American historians think of an enterprise like the 1619 project? Does there have to be a backstory?
Run, don't walk, to download (for free) Laura Edwards's wonderful new JAH article on early republic textiles: "James and His Striped Velvet Pantaloons: Textiles, Commerce, and the Law in the New Republic"
This was also what Democrats were called to do in 2016. So basically, whether we win or lose an election, we are apparently obliged to reach out and try harder to understand the perspectives of people who hate us... with no reciprocity expected.
Instead of asking us to reach out to the Trumpers who’ve been attacking and demonizing us, maybe they should be trying to understand us and reaching out to us. Perhaps “I am sorry for my behavior” is in order. “I am sorry for supporting a racist fascist.”
Like a normal trial, but where the sworn-to-impartiality jurors consult with the defense team and the defendant issues public threats of violence to the prosecution. And the judge sits in silence. Oh, and also no witnesses or documents.
Very pleased to announce that
@BrownHist
student and former
@mcneilcenter
fellow Simeon Simeonov successfully defended his dissertation this afternoon:
"Empire of Consuls: Consulship, Sovereignty, and Empire in Revolutionary Atlantic (1778-1848)”
Congratulations, Simeon!
There is every reason to be excited about the upcoming Laura Edwards talk
@SlaveryJustice
October 10. I am also very pleased with the poster since I wove the fabric in the background!
The last sixteen minutes have brought two requests to read manuscripts for major university presses.
I am super impressed by-- and envious of-- everyone who managed to complete a draft book ms over the last 18 months.
Also, when am I ever going to finish my book?
Upcoming deadline, 2/15:
@BrownUniversity
invites applicants for a two-year postdoctoral fellowship in Labor History, 1500–Present. Open to any geography, but with a preference for scholarship focused outside the U.S. and Europe. Learn more and apply:
What follows is a fairly nerdy and perhaps unduly confessional thread, but I recently realized something about my interest in US history: I had been an avid stamp collector between the ages of 8 and 13. 1/
Candidate for state office running ads about start of the school year for PPSD, referencing "our students."
Ad pictures the candidate's children... who go to private school.
Sorry, but if you opt out of collective institutions, you don't get to speak for the collective.
Read (once again)
@arothmanhistory
's **Slave Country** with my early republic undergrad class. This book has only gotten better with age (its age, not my age). Adam was out in front of a lot of things in this elegant and unsparing account of slavery's centrality to US history.
Because, remember, Eric Williams didn't answer this, Sidney Mintz didn't answer this, Gordon Wood didn't answer this, Robert Fogel only took it so far, Charles Sellers didn't answer this. A big empirical hole in the scholarship on the spillovers and entanglements of slavery/cap.
A thought for anyone with an academic milestone this year: document it! There aren't enough special occasions in this career, so don't let your qualifying exams or dissertation defense go by without a picture (or screenshot). You'll be glad to have a memento. [Davis CA, 1996]
Labor and social history are dead! Long live labor and social history?
You know I am all in favor of this topic, but genuinely curious about this framing relative to 50 years of labor and social history that has unabashedly told-- and continues to tell--capitalism from below.
Calling historians of economic life and economic thought!
CFP for a workshop i'm co-organizing (w/
@hammock_tussock
) on “Histories of Capitalism from Below" inviting papers which position themselves as part of histories of capitalism and place at their center non-elites.
Really, there were great books conceptualizing the relationship of slavery and capitalism largely in global/Atlantic terms, but very little that got into the nitty-gritty for the post-Rev US (when as you recall from several tweets above, the US economy maximized freedom).
I have spent the last five days— with a near monomaniacal focus— reading
@sarahschulman3
's _Let the Record Show:A Political History of ACT UP New York, 1987-1993_. Completely blown away. Just finished it, and there's much to process, but some initial thoughts...
Well, I guess
@Sven_Beckert
would find out eventually that I was throwing down the gauntlet for wool as the most important fiber in the making of modern capitalism. 😉
A review that touts the firm's success "underwriting cotton shipments to Britain on behalf of farmers in the American South." Tell you something about the ongoing inability of business journalists to take slavery seriously.
via
@financialtimes
(kind of confusing, in previous tweet). And then "market revolution" got picked up as a generic term for early-US economic development, minus the politics. But slavery was largely excluded from that literature. The south, we were told, didn't have a market revolution.