Greg @gm7t2 Twitter profile

Last Seen Profiles

@gobsofcolor

@carolina

@dapanji_eth

@_MorrTex

@dralmosa

@Yuuga_Ours

@SubToOptimus

@W3ST_90

@aidounaiwu

@cu_malawi

@__sereto_K_

@SirPugger

@_gee36

@dotdump

@billdownes1

@Zervas_

@ZSpavital

@drewfanacc

@baitomist

@CestShanks

@SirPugger

@blank0429

@_MorrTex

@billdownes1

@Carnomiuart

@LDHAL4Q2

@ahad_en

@aka_mkhewa

@clem_burke

@dr_folviv

@drewengels

@zannencanada

@TheHAVI

@AIfqihi

@JusticeGanguly

@QUBWellbeing

Greg

@gm7t2

13 days

. @LeonidasNFT The DOG airdrop is complete. All 117 airdrop txs have confirmed. Check your wallets!

83

57

445

Greg

@gm7t2

17 days

@LeonidasNFT To be fair, it wasn't me that got it to number 3. It was the pile of BTC that the community donated. I simply took the donations and forwarded them to the miners

40

9

222

Greg

@gm7t2

2 months

@LeonidasNFT @ord_io @zachmeyer_ @raphjaph @veryordinally @realizingerin @Psifour @bruffstar @ElizabethOls0n @ordinalenjoyer @KingBootoshi @polydexz @t4t5 @nicksainato Wow. Thanks @LeonidasNFT . I just went from 2k to 12k followers!

34

3

139

Greg

@gm7t2

13 days

@LeonidasNFT The DOG airdrop is complete. All 117 airdrop txs have confirmed. Check your wallets!

14

18

100

Greg

@gm7t2

5 months

Ribbit

Leonidas

@LeonidasNFT

5 months

@opensea show and tell: an Ordinal you collected this year

181

60

229

32

19

48

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@krush1729 @ConceptualJames "I am having trouble reconciling my love of my husband with my racism"

2

1

42

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@ZheMoza @thecryptomonk The correct answer isn't listed. Pumping 100% doubles the price, so pumping 500% is a 6x. That leaves you 18% of your starting value, so profit is -82%, not -85%.

4

3

42

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@StopAndDecrypt It has happened 968 times. 670 were in the first 100k blocks, 97 in the 2nd, 31 in the 3rd, 27 in the 4th, 91 in the 5th, and 52 so far in the 6th 100k blocks.

2

1

25

Greg

@gm7t2

2 months

@LeonidasNFT The supply should be 112,383,000. 1000 per Runestone. Keep it simple.

0

24

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@FarmerNerdtv @TweetingCynical @PeterMcCormack There *are* 2 ways

2

0

15

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@sabotagebeats @MyLegacyKit @tortsch Notice that if you rearrange the letters of desantis, take a few out, and add some other ones in you get satoshi. Coincidence? You decide.

2

0

11

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@StopAndDecrypt Basically this happens all the time. 50 minute block times are pretty common. 60 minute block times are much rarer. We've not seen 5 of them in any 300 block window since blocks 494040 to 494085 in November 2017.

1

0

14

Greg

@gm7t2

14 days

@LeonidasNFT Maybe? Probably?

3

0

12

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@1waterhole @PeterMcCormack There is strong support at 0 sats.

0

10

Greg

@gm7t2

3 years

@CoinCornerDanny That transaction is only moving 3500 BTC. The rest is change, going back to the same address it came from. (Don't reuse addresses like this; it is safer to use each address only once) 3500 BTC is worth in the region of $175 million (50k * 3.5k = 175kk = 175M)

1

12

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@owocki @Ivshti @antiprosynth Chain rewrites happen every day. The overflow bug fix was a soft fork to fix a bug in the Bitcoin base layer. The DAO fix was a hard fork to save Vitalik and friends lots of money lost due to a buggy contact they foolishly trusted.

1

10

Greg

@gm7t2

3 years

@bennd77 Does OG stand for Overweight Grifter?

2

0

9

Greg

@gm7t2

12 days

@software_smithy @LeonidasNFT 0.01753330 BTC setup 4.73324722 BTC airdrop 0.41215356 BTC postage 5.16293408 BTC total 75,486 addresses 6,839 sats per address

3

1

11

Greg

@gm7t2

3 years

@HirangaG @spencecoin @fvckrender .scr is functionally the same as .exe. It is commonly used for screensaver executables, and for disguising executables

1

0

10

Greg

@gm7t2

1 month

2

0

9

Greg

@gm7t2

3 years

@PrestonPysh @DiMartinoBooth You got it backwards. Bitcoin is simply OccupyWallStreet but with an actual solution instead of tents and folk songs.

1

0

9

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@StopAndDecrypt Even if you only accept 200 block windows it happened 25 times since block 500k. Most recently blocks 562640, 562658, 562735, 562776, 562786 (blocks took 56, 64, 58, 51, 53 minutes resp.)

1

0

9

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@TitaniaMcGrath "if you want to be your own country so bad, find an island". Isn't that exactly what they already did?

1

0

8

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@DrBitcoinMD @PeterSchiff Buy 5 BTC @8k Instead of betting 50k. If BTC goes to 20k you make 60k profit (instead of 50k) and if it goes to 2k you lose 30k (instead of 50k). Better for you either way. Peter can take your bet, hedge by buying 5 BTC and guarantee a profit.

2

0

7

Greg

@gm7t2

14 days

@TheCryptoLif7 What are you looking for exactly? What addresses do you want connected? And what do you mean by connected? My block 9 sats are connected to satoshi, but I didn't create Bitcoin...

3

0

9

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@jenniferm_q 1. 6 shoes = 30 so shoe = 5 2. 2 men + 10 = 20 so man = 5 3. 4 straps + 5 = 13 so strap = 2 4. shoe + (man + 2 shoes + 2 straps) * strap = 5 + (5 + 2*5 + 2*2) * 2 = 5 + (5 + 10 + 4) * 2 = 5 + 19*2 = 5 + 38 = 43 Right?

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

17 days

@rodarmor @jimmysong it wouldn't have taken much research to discover that sniping of token names isn't possible due to the commit/reveal requirement. The high fees are mostly due to minting of tokens (where individuals are issued a portion of the initial supply of an existing token).

1

0

8

Greg

@gm7t2

5 months

@ChristisCrypto > moved since 2019: 707,066,028 🪽 > moved since 2020: 3,3542,017 🪽 > moved since 2021: 227,135,720 🪽 > moved since 2022: 29,259,224 🪽 To clarify, those are the numbers that most recently moved in those years. Eg. 707 million sats moved in 2019 and not since.

0

1

8

Greg

@gm7t2

2 years

@theGoronFreeman @RightOfEast Did you mean to say they were out of commission for a week?

1

0

8

Greg

@gm7t2

4 months

@TO161803398875 @jconorgrogan There is no way to send coins into the genesis block. Blocks are immutable. I'm surprised at investopedia writing such nonsense.

1

7

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@ToneVays @rogerkver @slush_pool He said he would donate if it confirmed "today" and it didn't. Seems like a clear loss for Tone. They are in the same room. Everyone knows days end at midnight local time. Either way the mempool cleared out overnight as it usually does at the weekend.

1

0

7

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@a_nisbet @BiggestComeback Unsustainable...

0

3

8

Greg

@gm7t2

3 months

@PlanHub_ca 180 MB at 4.6 kB/s takes about 11 hours. Not 39 years

2

0

8

Greg

@gm7t2

6 months

@TO @ordinalswallet @veryordinally I just encountered this problem. It turns out that ordinalswallet uses: m/86'/0'/0'/0 and everyone else uses: m/86'/0'/0'/x/0 where x is 0 for receiving addresses and 1 for change Ordinalwallet is missing the x (0 or 1) for receiving or change addresses.

2

0

7

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@AlignTime @eyed_lad @Hockyal34 @francispouliot_ @Cernovich You're

1

0

7

Greg

@gm7t2

1 month

@ObeyMr_1400 @btcordinal No. The airdrop transactions are being done at fee rate 8 and 14, which was too low to confirm during the US daytime today. Batch 28 of 78 is currently in the mempool

2

0

6

Greg

@gm7t2

9 months

@ZedZeroth @Bodega_Brat @DAnTerBTC Every sat name that currently exists has 11 letters. The last 11 letter sat name is projected to be mined of the 5th of November this year Aaaaaaaaaaa! After that, the 26^10 combinations of 10 letters will take 19 years to be mined. Dec 2042:

Sat 2094528787769348

ordinals.com

2

5

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@RichardHeartWin No product? Aren't you about to print billions of tokens and sell them to your followers in exchange for ether with the promise of "mad gains"? It does feel pretty scammy to me.

2

0

6

Greg

@gm7t2

3 years

@PaulieTandoori @paulkrugman He said it was like 2000. He is using 'like' to mean 'similar to' as opposed to the way today's kids use it where it means nothing at all, like 'um' or 'uh'. "This is like really cool bruh"

0

6

Greg

@gm7t2

2 months

@LeonidasNFT ᛤ ᛤ

0

1

6

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@MrCartmenezz @Cernovich What is that apostrophe in "typo's" for?

1

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

14 days

@ElRaulito_cnft > We need a way to create same outputs amount of runes to 1000 users in same tx Read the spec:

2

0

6

Greg

@gm7t2

5 months

@ocean_mining Will OCEAN be censoring any types of transactions? Luke had spoken out against @rodarmor 's on-chain inscription transactions in the past, so I'm a little worried that OCEAN will be attempting to censor these transactions.

1

5

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@vakeraj @AleksSvetski Just wait until you find out how babies are made!

2

0

6

Greg

@gm7t2

28 days

@lifofifo If you do this, be aware that the minted runes will by default go to the first non-OP_RETURN output, which typically doesn't go to an address in your wallet for ord txs

1

0

6

Greg

@gm7t2

20 days

Verifying myself: I am greg7t2 on . tNdRMaEwR5Z7gPDXCUeVXWzbY9QfJ-rfXC_j /

3

0

6

Greg

@gm7t2

8 months

@i1_roger @LeadingReport The CDC says that the new variant may cause more infections in the vaccinated but doesn't say what they are comparing it with. They could mean "more than previous variants" or "more than in the unvaccinated".

6

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

3 months

@LeonidasNFT 1. I don't reuse addresses. I am active on probably hundreds of addresses. I would get many times more inscriptions in the airdrop than people who reuse 1 address. 2. How are inscriptions related to runes? Aren't they entirely separate protocols? I'm not seeing the connection.

2

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

4 months

@TheChygarev @McMintzOfficial @gunsnrosesgirl3 That would be great except that noon would drift by 4 minutes each day, and after about 6 months of that, noon would be at midnight...

1

0

6

Greg

@gm7t2

3 years

@satoshiburd @OPENDIME 32 bytes is 256 bits. That's the size of the BTC private key it stores

1

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

1 month

@LeonidasNFT If a Rune was etched in the 20th transaction of the 500th block, its ID would be “499:19” because both numbers are zero-indexed

1

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@StopAndDecrypt Note that the recent 5 slow blocks don't qualify because block 596013 only took 49:59 to mine, not more than 50 minutes, and block 596060 took 49:36. Only 3 of the 5 took over 50 minutes.

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

3 months

@LeonidasNFT > there are ~110,000 addresses that held 3 or more non-TXT/JSON inscriptions at block height 826,600 All my inscriptions are in different addresses, so none of my addresses have ever held 3 or more inscriptions. Address reuse is a bad idea. Please don't encourage it.

1

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

13 days

@mustvlad @LeonidasNFT Plus 546 sats times 75k for the "postage". It came to around 5.2 BTC in total

1

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

10 months

@lifofifo Thanks for the shoutout 😀

1

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

1 month

@TO @tropoFarmer @rodarmor This must be a new definition of "final implementation". Why would he tweet that this is the final implementation if he intends to change it to include more hard-coded runes?

3

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@_SEO_UX_CRO @taryntesta @reallygraceful They didn't have to, but did it anyway. "After ensuring the non-toxic nature of this ingredient, rats were fed mung bean protein and their excrement was analyzed for undigested proteins. No rats were killed to assess digestibility."

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

3 years

@KayciGranigan @ppv_tahoe @realDonaldTrump Counting is where you go 1, 2, 3 and the numbers go up. This is something different. The orange number went down.

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

13 days

@NFTNURI @LeonidasNFT There are the DOG tokens

1

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@clarkejps @RogerTheHelmet @markbromby @KTHopkins Has gone to the dogs.

1

0

5

Greg

@gm7t2

13 days

@mustvlad @ElRaulito_cnft I'll tweet the details later, but basically, I used this:

1

0

6

Greg

@gm7t2

6 months

@const_quary @billyrestey But I rarely tweet

3

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

3 years

@APompliano What is this, a salary for ants? I demand at least a dollar per day.

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

10 months

@lifofifo @dcfwd My pixel panda pfp is a clue...

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@ToneVays @rogerkver There is nothing wrong with paying 1 sat/byte for low priority transactions. Bump the fee later if it doesn't confirm soon enough.

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

1 month

@CryptoShira @SkullxNFT @Knox556 Also: Output size: 666 sats Collection size: 6666

1

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

28 days

@mononautical Are you saying that all the inputs to a tx have to be signed by the same custodian? Because that isn't true

1

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

5 months

@giacomozucco @mrldotsh @LukeDashjr @markgoodw_in @BitcoinRothbard @dannydiekroeger @Pledditor @Beautyon_ Had he said whether miners will be able to build their own blocks, and if not, has he made it clear what txs he will be censoring, if any? All I've seen is that he defines some transactions as "not transactions" so that he can then define his censorship as something else..

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

13 days

@mustvlad @LeonidasNFT 0.01753330 setup 4.73324722 drop 0.41215356 postage 5.16293408 total 75486 addresses 6839 sats per address

1

4

Greg

@gm7t2

5 months

@TheMOTOorg Thank @lifofifo . He is the one who commissioned that feature :)

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@KetoAurelius That don't make no sense. Do you mean *with* zero side effects?

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

1 month

@rodarmor Does this mean you won't be changing the op_return magic number from 0x13 after all?

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@MrHodl @MsHodl @BrianLockhart @StopAndDecrypt You don't need enough space to store the initial download in full. The pruning happens as the chain is downloaded. You can (and I have) set up a pruned node from scratch with less than 10 GB of free space.

1

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

9 months

@marmostock @LeonidasNFT 0 exists. 120,999,998 is correct

1

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@wtogami To be fair doesn't Bitcoin Core default to the same position by skipping verification of old signatures via 'assumevalid'?

2

1

4

Greg

@gm7t2

1 month

@7YellowSapphire @CryptoShira @SkullxNFT @Knox556 I inscribed over five thousand of them at the same time. Check the neighboring inscriptions. There is an unbroken block of 505 of them.

2

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@CryptoCobain Bought a pornhub subscription about a week ago.

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

9 months

@ZedZeroth @Bodega_Brat @DAnTerBTC Since there are roughly 25 letters in the alphabet (just an estimate), each starting letter gives us 4% of the names. We have about 3/4 of the n's, plus all the a-m's, so 53%.

2

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@HillebrandMax Batching is when a single entity pays multiple people in a single transaction. All the inputs come from the same wallet. Coinjoin is when multiple entities provide inputs to a single transaction. The inputs come from multiple different wallets.

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

7 months

@ZedZeroth @raresatseeker Cool! Two things: 1. That was KnCMining. 2. They were splitting off the uncommon sats in the coinbase transaction itself. The dust limit doesn't apply there.

CoinDesk: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Crypto News and Price Data

Leader in cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, blockchain, DeFi, digital finance and Web 3.0 news with analysis, video and live price updates.

www.coindesk.com

2

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@TheCryptoconomy “Under A HEX” by Goldman Sats is a pretty well researched piece on #Hex .

0

1

4

Greg

@gm7t2

1 month

@LeonidasNFT @ord_io 112,777 inscriptions!

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@johnrfite @CryptoCobain You can't use "hashrate" to do anything other than double sha256. It won't help you brute force satoshi's private keys

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

13 days

@mustvlad @LeonidasNFT I'm sure it could be done more efficiently, but I was erring on the side of caution rather than efficiency. There's no tooling for doing this, so simple is better

2

1

4

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@riverish333 @CharlieShrem Uh, they're the same thing!

2

0

4

Greg

@gm7t2

13 days

@Lukasz26606152 @BTCBigBlocks @LeonidasNFT @CoinbaseExch I don't know. I've never used coinbase. Do you have a seedphrase for the wallet, or do they have it? "Not your keys, not your cute dog memes"

5

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

3 years

@PratikxPatel @ZubyMusic Carbs cause blood sugar spikes and dips cause hunger cause greater calorie intake causes obesity.

0

2

Greg

@gm7t2

3 years

@ArtYyuuuuu @adam3us @michael_saylor Sounds like you need to change your name to Usdmaxi then

1

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

9 months

@ZedZeroth @Bodega_Brat @DAnTerBTC Pick any first 6 letters. Fill in the last 5 to match the first 5 backwards. You have a palindrome. Sat 0 is nvtdijuwxlp. nvtdijidtvn exists (it is sat 5820102). So we need to count the sats from nvtdij to aaaaaa. That's how many 11 letter palindromes will exist

2

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@HillebrandMax @bitrefill Coincards has them.

1

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

9 months

@ItsFranken @LeonidasNFT You got the right answer by making 2 mistakes that cancel each other out: You didn't count 0, which exists, and did count 2099999999999902, which won't exist

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@ShervinD @DanDarkPill The contract allows you to send eth in exchange for hex. He is effectively selling hex for eth. He claims not to know who gets the eth but who do you think will get it?

1

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@jimmysong Can you explain what this means? Trying to understand but getting nowhere with it. Is he saying that it may take 5 years for the price to get back to its current level but that after 5 years it surely will? Because that seems like a bold prediction.

1

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@antiprosynth @owocki @Ivshti Your claim is that it wasn't a hard fork? Or that it didn't save Vitalik a lot of money? Or that the purpose of the hard fork wasn't to save Vitalik a lot of money?

1

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

13 days

@pawellwitt

1

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

12 days

@gjenthedegen @LeonidasNFT The rule was simple: every address that owned a runestone at block 840269 received an allotment of $DOG. Listing or not listing isn't even visible on the Blockchain

2

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

5 years

@brian_trollz Not in violation of the new consensus rules thoug, only in violation of the old ones. Vitalik single handedly changed the consensus rules. It's just that distributed you see.

0

2

Greg

@gm7t2

5 months

@LukeDashjr @markgoodw_in @BitcoinRothbard @dannydiekroeger @giacomozucco @Pledditor @Beautyon_ Will your pool be censoring inscription txs even if they pay high fees? Or is your pool anti-censorship? Will you be allowing your miners to choose which txs to include for themselves, or will you be forcing the choice upon them?

2

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

12 days

@gmdedo @LeonidasNFT You have. You just need to update the wallet

0

3

Greg

@gm7t2

4 years

@wtogami Core defaults to skipping verification of signatures for 624k of 644k blocks:

0

1

3