developer, spacefaring primate, international treasure hunter.
building for Bitcoin at
@BitfeedLive
and
@mempool
Find me on Nostr at mononaut
@monospace
.live
How does a lightning replacement cycling attack work?
There's a lot of discussion about this newly discovered vulnerability on the mailing lists, but the actual mechanism is a bit hard to follow.
So here's an illustrated primer...
🧵 1/n
someone just tipped Satoshi 26.9 BTC 😳
the destination of this transaction, 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa, is the P2PKH address corresponding to the public key which received the genesis block reward.
h/t
@__B__T__C__
A single custodian now controls the coinbase addresses of at least 9 pools, representing 47% of total hashrate.
As demonstrated by this consolidation of mining reward outputs from AntPool, F2Pool, Binance Pool, Braiins, btccom, SECPOOL and Poolin:
"Proof of Work is based on the laws of physics, so you have to work with the world as it is ... whereas because Proof of Stake is virtualized in this way it's basically letting us create a simulated universe that has it's own laws of physics..."
-- Vitalik
Since publishing their address 90 minutes ago, El Salvador have already received an additional 673,418 sats in random donations across 25 transactions.
We've decided to transfer a big chunk of our
#Bitcoin
to a cold wallet, and store that cold wallet in a physical vault within our national territory.
You can call it our first
#Bitcoin
piggy bank 🇸🇻
It's not much, but it's honest work 😂
We are happy to announce testing of Bitcoin Knots v25.1 has completed successfully, and is now deployed to production. Among other improvements, this upgrade fixes this long-standing vulnerability exploited by modern spammers. As a result, our blocks will now include many more…
Somebody just consolidated 2000 BTC from a bunch of coinbase rewards dating back to 2010.
Imagine hodling for 14 years as the value rockets from a few hundred dollars to $140 million 😳
Miners continue to eat away at the backlog of unconfirmed transactions.
According to my advanced technical analysis of the charts, the mempool should fully clear just before September 34th. 📉🤓
While everyone's distracted by jpegs, something else is burning blockspace and bloating the UTXO set.
Over the past month, it may have used up to 2% of block capacity, created 0.4% of the current UTXO set, and fueled the recent spike in P2TR outputs.
The address is also now the proud (or not so proud) owner of 67 inscriptions, including an airdropped "Runestone" and a copy of Eric Hughes' Cypherpunk Manifesto.
While everyone's distracted by jpegs, something else is burning blockspace and bloating the UTXO set.
Over the past month, it may have used up to 2% of block capacity, created 0.4% of the current UTXO set, and fueled the recent spike in P2TR outputs.
Hyperbitcoinization approaches, and a trickle of users soon becomes a flood. As the mempool fills, a Bitcoin influencer sits on the floor (having sold his chairs) and meditates on the evils of central banking.
A fellow Bitcoiner passes by, and calls out "fee rates are rising…
This signed message is proof that they were my funds
bc1qn3d7vyks0k3fx38xkxazpep8830ttmydwekrnl
"
@83_5BTC
is the owner of the funds that paid the high fee"
H2eqkv/w1BmTXxeVhnFNcjoR3di9Kfzp9eh8Q5mEzwjQelQPtfXgtpKCwlocQcqBmRkzJ6ZBHWtsIO5OtqSmAXo=
This is the largest Bitcoin transaction fee ever paid in dollar terms, at a cost of $3.14m.
The previous record holder was the PayPal/Paxos incident a few months ago, clocking in at only $510k:
ViaBTC just mined some blocks with abnormally many "prioritized" transactions.
Unlike Mempool Accelerator's radical transparency, ViaBTC's program is opaque, so we can only speculate why.
But there's reason to believe ViaBTC is actually losing a ton of money here 🧵
Marathon's new Slipstream service just broke the record for the largest ever Bitcoin block, measured in raw bytes, clocking in at 3,990.36 kB.
It contains the largest ever single transaction, at 3988.96 kB, a large image inscription related to the Runestone airdrop.
someone is spending a lot of money and effort splitting out ordinal sats right now.
the majority of this block is occupied by a giant web of transactions, grinding a single 10,000 sat utxo down into individual satoshis and then weaving them into 10k separate dust-sized outputs.…
To date, Bitcoin transactions have paid ~$3.2 billion in fees (at contemporary exchange rates).
The UTXO set sits at 148m outputs.
A 3-pack of
@OPENDIME
's costs $69 (-5% if you pay in Bitcoin).
Physical bearer instruments carry no fees.
Are you thinking what I'm thinking?
I just noticed that the ~83.7 BTC fee was exactly 60% of the stolen UTXO value.
(60% × 139.42495946 = 83.65497568)
And the attacker *also* swept a 100k sat UTXO from the same address, paying exactly 60k sats in fees 🧐
Since Magic Eden started using this address in early December '23, Coinbase has paid 65.16 BTC* to consolidate 183,743 inputs worth 140.30 BTC.
For 110,444 of those (worth 12.30 BTC), the fees paid actually exceeded the value of the inputs, leading to a dead loss of 34 BTC.
I'm pretty sure Magic Eden has pulled one of the most hilarious finesse moves on Coinbase I've ever seen
Basically for every marketplace purchase on Magic Eden, they include a tiny output for the marketplace fee. These are typically tiny outputs, 1000 sats, 2000 sats, etc. A…
Unofficial draft spec on MicroStrategy GitHub:
"The Bitcoin Inscription DID method (did:btc) uses the bitcoin blockchain exclusively to store and retrieve DID information. UTXOs on chain are used to control DIDs. Inscribing data in the witness of transactions allows for greater…
Bitfinex is the latest victim of this free deposit exploit, incurring a loss of ~8.5 BTC (so far).
Read on for a tale of intrigue involving shitcoin mining, bad fee estimation, and El Salvador's national bitcoin reserves.
👇🧵
I'm pretty sure Magic Eden has pulled one of the most hilarious finesse moves on Coinbase I've ever seen
Basically for every marketplace purchase on Magic Eden, they include a tiny output for the marketplace fee. These are typically tiny outputs, 1000 sats, 2000 sats, etc. A…
This block is full of large consolidations paying 10.0 s/vb.
At the time of mining, there were dozens of blocks worth of near-identical transactions all paying that same fee rate.
So how did
@mempool
know that these exact transactions would be mined next, and in this order? 🧵
amusing drama happening in atomicals right now.
tl;dr, the atomicals protocol invented their own transfer rules which aren't compatible with the PSBT schemes everyone has been using for trustless ordinals trading.
so they just yolo'd a marketplace using SIGHASH_NONE and now…
Let us explain what happen actually,
This address Seller:- bc1pyfzaks0fh3lh54jd3rp8vul303uans4msqhea9t98ftffn70a59qtdksp5
This address Buyer:- bc1p0fka9k6xxw9xx088lhxqg88hs07amt047gkdsq0479m65krzq6lsgjhe62
The actual buy tx from market:-
This surge in fees was mostly driven by inscriptions for another BRC-20 mint.
Once that finishes, rates will probably cool off a little (but maybe not for long).
ok, if I keep tweeting these records in real time I'll be here all night.
check back tomorrow to see if anyone manages to beat Foundry's 8.05 BTC in fees.
Once upon a time there lived on a certain blockchain a little mining rig.
The rig wore a bright red 3D printed exhaust fan shroud which suited her so well that everyone took to calling her Little Red Mining Hood.
One day, frustrated at never mining any blocks herself, Little…