If you weren't working on race/empire prior to summer 2020, yet are suddenly publishing in this area, I'll check back on your research in around 10 years.
@JoshuaPotash
I like Graeber's take on this: online utopia is what they started promising once it was apparent that the flying cars and Jetson's like future wouldn't pan out, to say the least
US cultural industries rewards Asian diasporas for being ignorant of our cultures, while claiming "expertise"... for the crudest geopolitical motivations, while claiming "neutrality." This isn't about authenticity at all; it's about Asian American *cultural underdevelopment.*
NEW: Wrote about how Chinese nationalists and Gamergaters likely got together to push out massive sales of a ultimately mediocre game, Black Myth: Wukong. I also dived into the IGN report from last year and verified the translations myself.
More here:
If my scholarship isn't good enough to get past the desk reject stage at your journal, I don't see how I'm qualified to review the papers that get sent out for review.
"But the rest of it is a way to globalize a story that was very heavily Eastern-focused into a Western perspective, a global perspective." Same old false universality of Western = global.
The situation is even sadder: Asians who dunk on their parents do it because (they think) it's what non-Asians want to hear. They are willing to mock their own families to demonstrate "I'm not like them," that is, to signal their desperation for "belonging."
The attack on Claudine Gay was never about plagiarism and its absurd to debate the charge on technical merits. It was about anti-Blackness, anti-Palestine, and disciplining the Ivy League Management.
The acceptable ways to speak about class in a liberal society
(a) class as identity/culture
(b) as opportunity/lack thereof
(c) as psychology/attitude
(d) as privilege/status
The idea that some European thinker (Foucault, Hayek, etc.) is responsible for worldly injustices is an idealist conceit. It makes much more sense for a moralist Right than a materialist Left to hold it.
Do what you want with "Asian hate," but STOP this East Asians are the white people of Asia talk.
White people are the white people of Asia. In fact, "white status" was the point (reason for existence) of the first global spanning racial systems.
The claim that liberalism turns to fascism as a last ditch effort to save capitalism is an infantile fantasy. The reality is that, from the very beginning, liberalism's treatment of colonial subjects has been utterly fascist.
The basic deal on offer for Asian diasporas in North America is serve as a tool for white pleasure/capital accumulation, but renounce any dimension of political agency/cultural development. This is the key differentiator of "good (model) Asian" vs "bad Asian (peril)."
"Race theories" propose that Asian groups have high incomes in North America due "proximity to whiteness" and/or "distance from Blackness." This is ideology in its purest form: it mistakes consequences (racial identification) for causes (which are actually political economic).
In event of US/China war, the US will open "selective" rather than mass incarceration camps for Chinese people. (They will be comparable to Japanese Hawaii camps during WWII.) I will bet money it. This is also the wager of Chinese American conservatives.
Imagine voluntarily cutting off all ties with ancestors, ruthlessly subordinating oneself to market forces, faking ones way into a fake culture, and calling this... "liberation" and "progress."
Students are exercising their rights to assemble in solidarity with Palestine on the UConn Storrs campus. Two students have been arrested already, and the arrest vans are looming on site. PLEASE SIGN AND SHARE:
Believe it or not, "decolonization" and "land back" doesn't mean kill and expel all settlers. It means, roughly, indigenous collectives wielding political on their lands. Not monopolizing it like settlers.
"There is no 'Asian American' culture" and "your 'homeland' culture is backwards" are two sides of the same colonial messaging: "In short, you have no culture, none of any value at least... naturally, you will assimilate."
SYMPOSIUM: ASIAN/AMERICAN POLITICAL THOUGHT
@theory_event
, Number 45, October 2024
This symposium is the first on Asian American Political Thought in Political Science.
"Europeans, you must open this book and enter into it. After a few steps in the darkness you will see strangers gathered around a fire... They will see you, perhaps, but they will go on talking among themselves, without even lowering their voices." —Jean Paul Sartre
Video from Pomona College showing the massive police presence. School administration has ordered the arrest of at least 21 students. This should be getting national attention.
“Racial formation” is academic talk for the question of what alliance of political forces can transform a society's racial fundamentals. Few use “racial formation” in this fashion anymore because few read Michael Omi & Howard Winant seriously. 1/6
On my estimation, the average undergrad today at a large public university is surveilled, supervised, performance reviewed, and professionalized about ten times as much as their counterpart from twenty years before. All this has zero to do with learning.
Asian Americans, we don't need the Ivies, much less to get obsessed over them.
Just go to an Asian American university like the UC Berkeley or the UH Manoa.
The worst that will happen is you'll never write for the New Yorker or serve on the Supreme Court. *The Horror*
This anti-Asian attitude is absolutely normal in US academia. Were I feeling suicidal about my "career," I could name a dozen white guys exactly like this. The only difference is he thought could get away with saying the quiet part loud bc he's Upper Management.
@nhannahjones
@Lemmy012
@caitlinmoran
Agree 100% with this explanation. The "had a brain freeze on camera" or "all words are hard to define" explanations are, ironically, also short on specifics.
@SecondRingSZN
Yes, that too... all non-US pride is a no-no, but taking pride in being Chinese is especially evil according to the industry. Writing about being ashamed of being Chinese/Asian, by contrast, is almost an guaranteed YES to publication.
Dear Methodologists: reading a book over and over, taking notes, speaking about it with other readers, relating it to other writing, and maybe writing about it... this is a "method." And a rigorous one at that.
Some Asian diasporics seem unaware that they're seeing themselves through white and/or Western eyes. Some of them know it and like it. Our very own fear of our very own existence.
In examining Asian diaspora thinkpiece writer-white editor alliances, we must ask ourselves: why we are politically and intellectually *underdeveloped*, what the conditions of this condition are, and who/what benefits from this cooptation/containment.
There is an especially bitter buyer's remorse when an Asian wholesale assimilates into white US culture, only to find they hate it (after all, it hates them) and who they are as a product of it.
This, I venture, explains A LOT of diaspora shenanigans.
An easy way to tell whether an Asian diaspora criticism of the Asian diaspora is motivated by concern for us:
Do they make these criticism, in person, to other Asians/Asian orgs or is it for their largely non-Asian audience online?
Academics who speak on topics outside their expertise aren't pretending to have universal expertise. We speak as -citizens- or -people- on matters of common or worldly concern. We are more and less than our expertise.
Undergrads, in my experience, don't care about disciplinary boundaries, transdisciplinary, ethics of citation, politics of publishing, methods war, etc. Their indifference makes sense. They're not professional scholars. Why are you trying to professionalize them?
_Politics, Groups, and Identities_ (
@PGI_WPSA
) has done more for the study of Asian Americans in political science/political theory than any other journal in the discipline
Prediction: EEAAO is going to sweep the Oscars.
Hollywood's task is to affirm liberal multiculturalism as competition with China heats up.
So, the Oscars are the "love the Chinese (American) people" part, while the US government is "hate the CPC" part.
Just stop reading and responding to Rawls, Habermas, Dworkin, Nusbaum, and Walzer, all of them.
Just ignore them. It's really easy. It's what they did to... well, the rest of us.
"Critique" just increases their citation count, and drags out the death throes of their death cult.
The Western academy wants from East Asian diasporic intellectuals is assimilation—with just a hint of difference. The required assimilation, however, is not total; there must be a residual, a remainder, a "beauty mark."
Asian American and Latine/x Studies should be in closer conversation bc our positions ("alien labor") are more analogous to each other than to other racialized positions in the US. The great delusion (a false reality at most) is that either of us have more in common with whites.
Is a bit ironic, but it's almost impossible to learn at a university. Certification and career functions have taken over completely. The result is cynicism and utter demoralization.
Diaspora Asians are the actual Asians. "Asia" is the racial/colonial category the West imposes on us. We have the most direct, most embodied experience of the category. We live in the Heart of Whiteness.
I am greatly disliking the comments that are steering towards “Asian diaspora don’t know shit compared to ‘Actual’ Japanese people” because I don’t like this attitude that diaspora as somehow “less” Asian, so it would be great if we could avoid such comparisons
Whites only want to hear about Asians in the West losing language, culture, and kinship. To play this role is to vindicate their "ideal" of national assimilation, which by virtue of our non-whiteness is supposedly open to all. Refuse it.
One way of understanding the "Asian American" position is (a) the US excludes us from homo politicus (e.g. citizenship) and (b) in the same gesture claims we are homo economicus (e.g. market actors) incarnate.
1% of the world own 43% of the wealth.
1% of startups drive over 80% of returns.
This power law is even stronger with books:
1% of books contain all the important ideas.
My new lecture series will take you through the only books you'll ever need. Watch the launch trailer:
My non-expert opinion is: I don't think Affirmative Action as a policy discriminates against Asian Americans; I think elite white universities, in particular Ivies, have a rough "cap" on Asian American admissions. These are distinctive problems.
@justinpodur
@Bobabestie49
So, you’re dealing with a man whose bias and prejudice are making him lose his mind, his intelligence, every day. He’s frightened. He looks around and sees what’s taking place on this earth, and he sees that the pendulum of time is swinging in your direction. —Malcolm X
Gonna be that guy and say the Hegelian egirls are no more ridiculous than any other online or for that matter academic theory community. The sneering contempt from the Academic Twitter comes from the sense that we've seen all this before... in our own circles.
The history of political thought is not the history of political activity. The former is not isomorphic with the latter. The former is not the "royal road" into the latter. The relation is estranged, tenuous, and distant at best.
Everyone needs affirmation, recognition, and belonging. What we are actually refusing is the weaponization of these needs for purposes of negation, misrecognition, and domination.
The Asian American Dream is even more ludicrous than the American Dream. You're supposed to be the "foreign" believer in some nonsense even the "nationalist" isn't credulous enough to believe in themselves.
What coheres the US nation state "domestically" is anti-Blackness, "territorially" is anti-Indigeneity, "internationally" is Orientalism. It is pointless to claim priority in any of these dimensions.
Story was already globalized. What they mean is the story hadn't been globalized in the way that Westerners wanted it globalized: bad stuff = China, good stuff = "Oxford 5."
Held a class discussion about what students feel the crisis of higher education is.
For almost everyone who spoke, the crisis about high costs of tuition with low expectations of return on investment. One or two students of color talked about accessibility after AA has ended.
Imagine if I read no English, read only John Locke in translation, learned about a few decades of English history through Locke, never had a serious discussion with a living English person, and read zero other European authors ... and called myself a "Locke-ist." LMAO.
This is a great example of how neutral sounding, anti-historical "social science" functions as propaganda. Even if these numbers actually measure something, could there be a *systemic reason* that Gaza Strip is "not free"? If so, what might that be?