On the Teaching Philosophy fb group, someone offered their students an amnesty if they admitted to using ChatGPT in their assignments, and 23/25 students replied...
People say large language models are a watershed because, for the first time in human history, we've invented a technology we cannot control - but we haven't been able to control printers for 40 years.
I was really pleased to find my local library has a "Philosophy" section. Less pleased to see the three subsections: "Angels", "Ghosts" and "Astrology".
Agree with Haidt that phone-based childhoods are a disaster. Kids need a good old-fashioned PC-based childhood with lots of Starcraft, Half-Life and FIFA 98.
How strong is the evidence for pain in insects? The idea has often been dismissed, but an emerging new picture suggests it should now be taken very seriously. We've just released a full review of all the current evidence (free to read here) (1/4):
The best job talks start by giving an overview of your emerging research programme, then "zoom in" to an example of your best recent work, then "zoom out" at the end to lay out future directions. Start and end by generating excitement around your long-term trajectory. (2/7)
Should biology retire the word "fish" in favour of "non-tetrapod vertebrate"? The continued use of "fish" allows the general public to carry on believing there is this one kind of thing, a fish.
10 philosophy papers I liked in 2023, in no particular order (a thread with open access links). Be warned, philosophy will be understood deliberately broadly. 🧵👇
Whenever a new technology is invented, people say maybe the brain works like that. I want to be the first to say maybe the brain works like nuclear fusion.
I've taught intro philosophy for 7yrs now, and over time have come to stress more and more the existential stakes of the questions. Take knowledge and scepticism. This is not a low-stakes topic. People who become ensnared in webs of false beliefs live absurd and tragic lives. 1/2
My team has edited a special issue of the Journal of Consciousness Studies on "Animal Consciousness", and it's out today. Here is a thread introducing it. (1/13)
I'm surprised that so many philosophers are atheists yet believe in objective, non-natural facts about moral value. That's a weird stopping point. If you're willing to posit things outside the natural order, why go for valuer-independent values rather than a gigantic valuer?
It's very disorienting to live your life not knowing if you're at the very beginning of millions of years of history or in the last decades of a species about to burn itself out.
If philosophy journal editors took the same approach to headlines as their media counterparts...
Jackson, F. (1982). "I Locked a Girl in a Room for Years to See What Would Happen. Here's My Story".
Putnam, H. (1973). "The Great New Alternative to Water No One Is Talking About".
The bravest "problem of evil" take I've seen is from Soame Jenyns (1756), who argued: animal suffering is for the best because we enjoy it so much. By analogy, human suffering is for the best because higher beings (e.g. angels) must be able to derive yet greater pleasure from it.
Dan Dennett was a lifelong champion of (1) the explanatory power of cognitive science and evolutionary biology in relation to the big questions of philosophy, and (2) the integration of philosophy with scientific disciplines. An inspiration to me and many others in these ways.
The world's best universities (in my opinion) are ones that educate lots of people (e.g. the Open University, the UC system, CUNY). There's nothing impressive about universities that have the resources to educate large numbers but choose to educate a tiny elite.
My "Foundations of Animal Sentience" project is at the halfway stage. A good moment to take stock of what we've done in the past 2.5 years. Here is a thread with links to some personal highlights. (1/14)
It is hard to get all this right, of course, but that's mainly because it's hard to develop an exciting and credible research programme. The tragic thing is when candidates *have* done this but don't *explain* it. You've done the hard bit, now do the easy bit! (7/7)
The work in the middle should be an example of your BEST work, not some half-baked, unfinished new thing. Save the unfinished new thing for informal chat. (3/7)
My new book The EDGE of SENTIENCE: Risk and Precaution in Humans, Other Animals, and AI will be coming out later this year. There will be a print book and a FREE Open Access PDF. If you'd like a free PDF on release day, you can sign up for updates now:
Consciousness science is sociologically fascinating: it shows that a field can hold together without any agreement on what it is studying. It's like astronomy holding together when some people think stars are balls of gas and others think they are the souls of ancestors.
People in the hiring dept will be thinking: Why is this work important for the discipline? What is its significance beyond the discipline? What is excellent about it? What is original about it? A great job talk will answer these questions so that no one needs to ask them. (6/7)
Always enjoy it when philosophers are all "physics is our best guide to what there is" and physicists are like "literally all we do is crunch numbers, you may as well get your ontology from an accountant."
My colleague Mike Otsuka (
@MikeOtsuka
) has put a phenomenal amount of effort into facilitating informed debate on pensions - and into formulating reasonable proposals that deserved a lot more respect from employers than they've received. Thanks Mike!
I would love to see more attention in philosophy to Kant's neglected question: what may I hope? Here is a thread on why I think the question is a good and important one. (1/5)
I really dislike introductions to philosophy that make the subject seem frivolous, coffee-tablish - one day I want to write one that makes the subject seem as deadly serious as I think it is - a collision between different visions of how to live and how the world is.
An exciting moment for animal consciousness research: we are launching today the New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness () with 39 initial signatories, world-leading experts on🧠🐦⬛🦜🦇🐟🐙🦀🦞🐝🪰. We now invite anyone with relevant expertise to sign.
Exciting day for me -
@LChittka
and I have been awarded a grant of around $1m by
@open_phil
to look for markers of sentience in insects, and we are recruiting *TWO* postdocs. The ads are here, and please DM or email if you have questions:
There's a line attributed to Feynman (probably apocryphally) that "philosophy of science is as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds". I've always taken it as a compliment. Imagine putting birds in charge of their own conservation programs.
We're approaching the end of Year 3 of my "Foundations of Animal Sentience" project, so a good time for a roundup of what we've been doing in 2022. A thread with open access links. (1/18)
I've written an
@aeonmag
piece on animal and AI sentience with
@KristinAndrewz
. It's the first time I've written about what I see as the hardest problem in the AI case, the "gaming problem". 🧵(1/5)
Summer special: here are five recent philosophy books I can recommend, starting with 1/ Mara van der Lugt's Dark Matters, a history of the battle between pessimism and optimism in philosophy, from Bayle to Schopenhauer.
In science a normal talk is a showreel of what your lab has been doing for the last 5-10 years. In philosophy a normal talk is on whatever you just started writing and haven't yet finished. It can make interdisciplinary meetings quite embarrassing.
Think of those who sincerely believe emergency alerts turn the vaxxed into zombies - these are tragic lives, deserving our sympathy. We study epistemology because we cannot live like this. We need knowledge and contact with the truth in our lives for them to have any meaning. 2/2
Something I love about academia is that, whatever you're interested in, there will be fascinating and insanely neglected books on it gathering dust in libraries, and you can (for sure) be among the first 1000 readers globally of those books.
For the same reason, it's better if the work in the middle is developing a positive idea, not just saying "Big shot X says this, but they're wrong because…". Present YOUR ideas. Be the Big Shot X of the future. (5/7)
One of the pleasures of this time of year is re-reading Descartes' Meditations. The seriousness of it, the gravity, the intensity, the sense of everything being at stake. This is what philosophy is supposed to be.
Hybrid conferences are the best of both worlds: I can still do my session at 8am on a Saturday, but I get to skip seeing old friends, meeting new people and developing new projects.
The philosophy journal spiral: growth in submissions drives down acceptance rates, so each paper goes to more journals, driving down acceptance rates. We now have at least 10 journals with sub-5% acceptance rates, lower than Science or Nature. It's mind-numbing, Sisyphean.
Peter Lipton once gave me some advice that I like quite a lot: if a footnote says something important, put it in the main text where people will read it. If it says nothing important, delete it.
A puzzling thing about consciousness science is that many consider themselves materialists because they hold that the brain 'causes', 'gives rise to' or 'produces' consciousness. In philosophy these are all statements of dualism... (1/2)
I don't know why they say "face-to-face teaching", when faces can be seen much more clearly on Zoom, without masks. Shouldn't we call it "shared-air teaching"?
The point is to establish that your wider research programme is not bluster - you're already doing excellent work, so the exciting future directions are also credible. (4/7)
Cephalopod molluscs 🐙 and decapod crustaceans 🦀 should be regarded as sentient in the eyes of the law. This is the key recommendation of a report commissioned by
@DefraGovUK
from me and a team of excellent collaborators, released today. (1/11)
This will be fantastic - don't miss it. 8yrs after the founding of Animal Sentience, the first journal dedicated to the topic, it's time to review progress, map out agreements and disagreements, and lay out the next steps. Register now to be part of it!
Animal sentience should be central to "sustainability", in my view. The question should be: what is needed to create and sustain a planet of flourishing sentient life? And invertebrates have to be part of that. We have a new paper on this in Nature Food:
I admit I am frustrated by the uselessness of philosophy in a crisis. I want coronavirus to publish a book so that I can write an acerbic, devastatingly witty essay review.
The news that Frans de Waal has died will come as a blow to anyone working on animal sentience. There is a major shift in science towards recognising other animals as conscious beings with inner lives of their own, and Frans was at the forefront of it. He still had more to give.
The problem of consciousness is a test of our humility and open-mindedness. We don't have the answers. Even if we're very confident our favoured theory is correct, we should avoid talking as though the matter had somehow been conclusively settled.
When I read philosophy from the 1960s/70s, it feels very free and unencumbered - like there was no perceived need to frame ideas in relation to those of more famous people in the previous generation. I wonder how that was sociologically possible - and how we can get it back.
I like sci-fi most when the science is social science. Explorations of alternative social orders, forms of government, ways of life. This seems not just fun but also important.
Some say: I realize invertebrates may suffer, but I just don't care about it. Important to see that this is not an argument, just a report of a psychological state. Ethics is concerned not with whether you care but with whether you ought to care. (1/2)
The BBC has a report today about octopus farming and why it is a bad idea. They have obtained leaked documents that show (i) 10-15% mortality before slaughter, (ii) slaughter by dropping into ice-cold water.
What is the New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness and what do we hope to achieve with it? You can read our collective view at () but for my personal view, see the slides of my talk here:
It's truly the end times for UK philosophy if top departments like Kent (ranked 5th on GPA in the most recent REF) are being shut down.
@UniKent
should value its reputation for excellence in this area, it seems to me.
Sadly,
@UniKent
has announced plans to axe a number of smaller departments, including philosophy. We perform well on all measures, including student recruitment. But smaller subjects have less clout and are easiest to cut. Help us shout out our value to the uni! They need to hear
Are some animals "more conscious" than others? It makes more sense to regard consciousness as varying along multiple dimensions, leading to multidimensional consciousness profiles, or so I argue with
@Dr_AlexSchnell
and
@nickyclayton22
in
@TrendsCognSci
.
The tragedy of philosophy peer review is that we know a lot of good philosophy happens in it - a lot of back and forth, objection and reply - and the discipline would actually seem quite healthy if this were happening in print.
I'm the kind of person you want at parties because I can deftly steer either of the standard conversation topics (Taylor Swift and AI) round to my preferred topic of bees.
Something that troubles me: the emotional weight of engaging fully with the world, being fully open to the suffering of others, is overwhelming for anyone. So we all live by deliberately turning our attention away from suffering. How to do this just enough, but not too much?
Wittgensplaining: when you tell someone how a word in their own language is used, and assure them all their confusions would dissolve if they could just understand this.