China Hype. In the current political environment, politicians and commentators alike are competing to demonstrate who can make the most extreme charges against China.
But is it? Declaring the US the winner in the global economic growth race by comparing it only with its established, aging G7 counterparts may be like awarding a medal to the American sprinter in the 100-meter Olympic race by excluding world record holder Usain Bolt.
1/ The title of a Foreign Affairs article last week announces a favorite storyline among many DC China watchers: “Xi Can’t…” But ask yourself: how many times in the past year – or decade – have you read the headline claim, “Xi Can’t…”
In China for heavy schedule of meetings with Xi’s foreign policy leadership team. Today’s included Wang Yi (China’s Foreign Minister and Director of the CCP Central Foreign Affairs Commission—essentially holding both the jobs of US SecState Blinken and NSA Jake Sullivan).
1/ Why is TSMC’s attempt to build a semiconductor factory in Arizona falling further and further behind? “TSMC’s debacle in the American desert” from Rest of the World offers clues:
That requires leaders in both countries to identify what Kissinger called a new “strategic concept” that satisfies the contradictory imperatives to simultaneously compete and cooperate.
China’s withdrawal of its pandas from the Washington National Zoo is a textbook case of “dumb” power. In an age where people talk about hard power, soft power, sharp power, we need at least one more bucket: dumb power.
But if war means suicide for both nations, then the central truth Reagan captured about nations with robust nuclear arsenals remains as true today as it was during the height of the Cold War: “A nuclear war cannot be won and therefore must never be fought.”
Will solar be the new oil? In an op-ed in the print edition of the FT today, I note that for the first time in history, global spending on solar energy production will outpace spending on oil production this year: $380 billion on solar compared with $370 billion on oil
As
@WSJ
and other outlets sound the alarm that China’s 7.2% increase in military spending is “another hefty increase” in its decades-long military buildup, it is important to examine the facts.
There, he said: “The Thucydides Trap is not inevitable, and Planet Earth is vast enough to accommodate the respective development and common prosperity of China and the US.”
Who is winning the global EV race?
The answer: China, China, and China.
In 2023, China sold over nine million EVs—six times the US. In Q4, China’s EV champion, BYD (which is backed by Warren Buffett among others), overtook Musk’s Tesla to become the
#1
global EV automaker.
While Xi’s primary objective in meeting with US business leaders (I was included as a ‘representative of the academic and strategic community’) was to emphasize that China is “open for business,” he was also interested in engaging about the broader geopolitical relationship.
The US and China exist in 21st-century conditions in which each nation’s survival depends on cooperation from the other to address shared, existential challenges (nuclear MAD, climate change, global pandemics, etc.)
Over the past four months, the total of all the territory Ukraine has recovered is 140 square miles. If it continues “gaining ground” at this rate, it will not fully liberate its territory in the 21st century.
Unipolarity is over, and with it the illusion that other nations would simply take their assigned place in a U.S.-led order. That will require accepting that there are spheres of influence—and not all of them are American. See my latest in
@ForeignAffairs
Across nearly every dimension—tech, trade, industry, military, and global influence—the US and China are destined to be the fiercest competitors history has ever seen.
The Peterson Institute’s Nick Lardy’s recent in Foreign Affairs, “China Is Still Rising,” offers a number of inconvenient facts that remind us to follow the numbers instead of the narratives.
Thucydides' Trap, a concept about potential conflicts between emerging and established powers, is often linked to China-U.S. relations. In an interview with Liu Xin, Professor Graham Allison, who coined this term, emphasizes learning from historical mistakes to foster peace.
Note: the IMF’s World Economic Outlook also reports that China grew 5.2% in 2023—more than 2x as fast as the US. Could a runner competing in the Olympics claim a gold medal if he had just been lapped by his closest rival?
Biden has an opportunity to hurt Putin’s Russia and help Team USA: the administration should create Scientific Freedom visas to attract superstars from Russia to come to the US and show Putin what free individuals in an open society can create. My latest:
While as I’ve written, I believe it is essential to recognize that China is and will be the fiercest rival a ruling power has ever faced, I am also convinced that the current demonization of China confuses more than it clarifies.
Last week, I was interviewed by
@NYMag
about the dangers of demonizing China. As politically profitable as demonizing China now is, it leads individuals to overestimate China’s strengths and to underestimate its vulnerabilities.
In my search for avenues by which to escape Thucydides’s Trap, I am finding many insights and clues from both Chinese history and philosophy that has historically had a capacity for embracing contradictions and complexity.
In addition to commending him for what he and President Biden achieved in San Francisco in establishing a solid foundation for a stable, constructive relationship going forward, I raised a question about the metaphor he had used in his discussion with Chuck Schumer last October.
- Contrary to the belief that investors have lost all confidence, private investment increased about 10% in 2023 when excluding the real estate sector.
For more, Lardy’s article is a good read.
My China team’s China Hype award for the week goes to the anonymous author of the
@politico
piece headlined “Xi Goes Full Stalin.” It argues that Xi has now become the new Stalin! Specifically:
3/ Driving this recurring error: disappointment that China has not followed the path of Japan and Germany, democratized, and taken the place America has assigned it in the international order; despair about what's happening in the US; and hope that China will fail before we do.
Inconvenient CHIPS Act Facts
Claim: The CHIPS Act will help restore US leadership in semiconductor manufacturing and reduce US reliance on Asia for advanced chips.
Visited Zhongnanhai, headquarters of China’s central government, on my recent trip to Beijing. Productive meetings with officials at the highest levels. As in the US, debate over the diagnosis is over. The question now: how to secure vital interests without stumbling into war.
When I asked Lee Kuan Yew, the founding father of Singapore, a decade ago about whether India could become the next China, he answered directly: “Do not talk about India and China in the same breath.”
Contrary to claims, China is not 10 feet tall; nor is it peaking and on the brink of collapse. To create and sustain a strategy for meeting the China challenge, Americans must understand our competitor as it is—rightly assessing both its strengths and its weaknesses.
Henry Kissinger was America’s greatest living statesman, Harvard’s most accomplished living graduate, and the model practitioner of statecraft as Applied History.
In my recent interview with
@NewStatesman
, I argue American politics is driving towards something that could become a provocation that China could not avoid
4/ In 2017, as Trump became president, Destined for War offered my best judgement that Xi was “the most ambitious, competent, and consequential leader on the global stage today.”
But for serious outlets like
@politico
who are seeking to help readers understand what’s actually happening in the world, where commentators make extreme claims without providing evidence or analysis that supports them, not good.
This year’s Munich Security Conference included a session on Applied History titled “The End of the End of History: Rethinking Western Policy Towards Russia," sponsored by the Ax:son Johnson Foundation (one of the major supporters of Applied History).
In one line: what we the living owe the dead is to avoid unnecessary wars. Unfortunately, many Americans see Memorial Day as just a holiday to mark the beginning of summer.
5/ Assessing the performance of international leaders over the past 5 years, that judgement seems correct. Looking ahead to the next 5 years, who has another candidate they’d bet on to displace Xi from this perch?
Before Trump takes action in Syria, he should ask: and then what? What will Russia do in response? And at the end of the sequence of actions and reactions, will Americans be safer than before? Bismarck warned against playing chess one move at a time.
Brzezinski warned in 1997 that the greatest long-term threat to U.S. interests would be a “grand coalition” of China and Russia, “united not by ideology but by complementary grievances.” Few heeded his admonition.
In a forthcoming essay I wrote celebrating my professor Henry Kissinger, who reaches his 100-year mile marker tomorrow, I thanked him for enlarging our conception of a meaningful life
Among the interesting findings reported by the Journal: “Most small drones from the US startups have failed to perform in combat.” The Ukrainian military added: “Made-in-America drones tend to be expensive, glitchy, and hard to repair.”
At a time when the US Navy also reports China having 200 times more shipbuilding capability than the US, the nagging question is: can the US make anything at scale or at a price point that can compete with China?
In the social media world, the more extreme the claim, the more clicks it gets. And if clicks were the the metric of interest, this piece would get a passing grade.
The author claims Xi has “ramped up repression to totalitarian levels.” Compared to what? Xi’s corruption investigators have purged far bigger “tigers” than Qin Gang and Li Shangfu, who aren’t even on the Politburo.
Second, India’s economy remains much smaller than China’s. At the beginning of the 21st century, China’s GDP was about three times larger than India’s. Today it is around five times larger.
China’s 2024 military spending will increase by less than the overall government budget (8.6%), less than food and oil expenditures (8.1%), less than science and technology expenditures (10%), and less than debt and interest payments (11.9%).
Third, India has been steadily falling behind in the science and technology race. China graduates nearly 2x as many STEM students and spends 2 percent of its GDP on R&D, while India spends 0.7 percent.
First, analysts have been wrong about India’s rise in the past. In the 1990s, analysts trumpeted a growing Indian population that would create an “economic miracle.” Yet that never happened. Will this time be different?
Fourth, while China has essentially eliminated abject poverty, more than 10 percent of India’s population of 1.4 billion struggle to survive on incomes below this World Bank threshold of $2.15 a day.
The IMF issued today its World Economic Outlook reviewing what happened last year and previewing the year to come. It notes that the US grew at 2.5% in 2023–outpacing all other G7 economies.
China’s 7.2% increase is nominal. If China hits its real GDP target of 5% and CPI target of 3%, its military spending as a percent of GDP will shrink in 2024.
The author claims Xi has conducted a “Stalin-like purge” while the world was “distracted by war in the Middle East and Ukraine.” The fact is: every official purged while we were “distracted” disappeared this past summer—months before war in the Middle East began.
My article on "The Myth of the Liberal Order" is out in the new issue of
@ForeignAffairs
. I hope you'll give it a read. Look forward to what I'm sure will be a lively debate!
The author asserts purged officials were members of Xi’s “inner ring.” But neither Qin, Li, nor the PLA Rocket Force members purged by Xi had worked closely with him for more than a decade—unlike the actual members of Xi’s “inner ring” on the Politburo Standing Committee.
As
@ericschmidt
and I write in today’s
@wsj
, America can’t afford to lose the chip competition. Between 1990 and 2020 China built 32 semiconductor megafactories compared with 24 in the rest of the world. None were built in the US.
Readers of Russia Matters’ weekly Report Card on the war will know that since Ukraine launched its counteroffensive on June 4, in half of the weeks Ukraine has lost more territory than it gained.
That nuance could offer conceptual guidance for a relationship that is destined simultaneously to be the fiercest rivalry of all times, but also a thick partnership in a world in which each rival’s survival requires significant cooperation with the other.
As Xi said to Chuck Schumer’s delegation in October, “Thucydides’s Trap is not inevitable. Planet Earth is vast enough to accommodate the respective development and common prosperity of both China and the US…China and the US should act with a sense of responsibility to history.”
@elonmusk
You have been one of the clearest-eyed realists in recognizing that China’s rise is a fact; that, in your words, China will “be great at anything it puts its mind to;” and that decoupling from a country that is the second backbone of the global economy is a fantasy.
Happy 96th birthday to America’s greatest living statesman. When we met fifty years ago, I wouldn’t have predicted Henry would still be my professor five decades later. But that’s a prediction I’m glad to have got wrong.
Another productive meeting with Vice President Wang Qishan of China on my recent visit to Beijing. Enjoyed insightful conversation about the US-China relationship and Thucydides’s Trap.
Lee Kuan Yew, the world’s greatest China watcher, made prescient predictions about China’s inexorable rise. After a decade of Xi, he’s been proven right. See my interview with Michael Morell on Xi’s China and the complexities of coexistence in a MAD world.
4/ But this wouldn’t even be China’s cheapest popular model. The Wuling Hongguang Mini EV, a joint venture between GM and Chinese automakers, goes for only $5,000 and still seats four. It outsells the Tesla 3 ($36,000) in China.
Wuling Hongguang Mini EV: $5,000
Three huzzahs for Stephen Kotkin’s illuminating articulation of five possible Russian futures: Russia as France, Russia retrenched, Russia as a Chinese vassal, Russia as a North Korea-like pariah, and Russia in chaos.
In “Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap,” I note that leaders don’t have to be interested in war for war to entangle them.
As the prospect that in 2025, the US will be led not by President Biden but by his predecessor looms larger, how is this impacting other nations’ choices in dealing with the US today? That is the question I address in my recent Foreign Affairs article.
“Nearly 300 US-based drone technology companies have raised a total of about 2.5 billion in venture capital funding in the past two years.” And with how much hype and news stories in the press?
Below is MFA’s summary of Wang Yi’s opening remarks. After that, we settled down for almost an hour private, candid, off-the-record conversation about the ways in which China is seriously seeking to escape Thucydides’s Trap.
2/ The answer is China and China. China sold 30 million autos domestically last year. In contrast, the US sold only half as many—15.5 million. China also overtook Japan to become the world’s largest auto exporter.
As
@ericschmidt
and I wrote in
@wsj
, America’s average 5G mobile internet speed is 75 megabits per second--while China’s is 300. The US also trails China in 5G-related services. It's time to make these technologies of the future a priority.