How is balloon Twitter still a thing? States spy on each other. The correct response is to shoot the thing down, collect the debris for analysis, then maybe démarche the ambassador.
The stupid response is to start a new Red Scare, the way some in DC seem to be aiming for.
The Evil Empire has been reborn in the East. Russian barbarians threaten not only Ukraine. They threaten all of Europe and the whole free world. This is no mere incident, no coincidence, no maniac’s impulse. Putin has been building his Evil Empire for 23 years, in preparation for…
How does one negotiate with someone like Putin? “You’ve got to verify everything that he says or does. And you have to start from the principle that he’s not telling you the truth,” says former EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who’s negotiated with the Russian president.
When I was born, Europe was not a fully free-trade area. When I was five, the European Union didn't exist. When I was ten, there was no common European currency.
So I tend to view "Europe cannot come together" arguments with skepticism.
The problem with this argument is “Europe” doesn’t exist in the defense space. 30+ countries will make 30+ independent decisions- some contrary to US interests, such as accommodating Putin. The transatlantic alliance needs a leader and only the US can play that role.
This is beyond absurd. Why should the US make this kind of commitment to fair-weather friends like the Saudis in exchange for improving relations with Israel, something which is already happening gradually anyway?
“Prince Mohammed’s initial demands were steep: U.S. guarantees to defend Saudi Arabia from military attack, a Saudi-American partnership to enrich uranium for a civilian nuclear program and fewer restrictions on U.S. arms sales to the kingdom.”
This is really disturbing, suggesting more of an active role for the Pentagon in the war in Ukraine than I suspect many Americans would be comfortable with.
This has always been the problem with arguments in favor of regime change: the two most obvious successful examples are so extreme as to be useless for comparison.
P.S. Like Germany after 1945, a complete defeat of Russian imperialism in 2023 would begin to create the permissive conditions for Russia to finally become a normal, European country after the Putin era ends. 2/END
How in God's name is "Asia First" an isolationist policy? Is Asia part of America now? Is it "quasi-isolationist" to suggest that some regions are more important than others? 🤔
Back in my day, we just called that prioritization. And it was a core part of strategic thinking.
And I’m sure that everyone will be completely sanguine and unbothered about this, because spheres of influence are a thing of the past, and countries can choose their own alignments, right? 🤔
My takeaway from everything happening in Russia is that Toynbee was basically right when he pointed out that history is just one damn thing after another.
Crazy idea, I know. But if other countries don't like the United States wielding the most political power inside NATO, then perhaps they could develop their own military capabilities as a counterbalance?
Today my five year-old attempted to frame her sister for writing on the wall, scrawling her sister's name in huge letters.
It was a perfect plan, but she forgot one key detail: her younger sister can't write yet. 🤔
The irony here is Iraq should probably be considered MORE of a failure if we assume the goal was to build a stable, liberal order, than if we simply assume it was about terrorism or WMD.
Imagine looking at the Iraq war and thinking, "yes, that's how we build a better world."
I'm not opposed to a Napoleon biopic, but wouldn't it really be better as a prestige-style TV show a la "The Crown" that covers his whole life with different actors?
Many of us on the left have warned that it's a mistake to see the nationalist right as anti-war or anti-interventionist. They oppose nation-building, not use of force. This is militant nationalism:
Absolutely inexplicable. Why would Latin American countries blame the US for past ills, accuse the US of not offering anything to them economically, while welcoming Chinese trade that could potentially boost their economies? 🤔
Truly, a puzzle. 🙄
“It is telling that what seems to be intended as a reasonable and accommodating statement is, in fact, so jarring. China must accept America’s demarcation of the status quo.”
Janet Yellen’s speech was not reassuring.
Thrilled to announce with
@Tsihanouskaya
a comprehensive Strategic Dialogue between the U.S. and the leaders of the Belarusian pro-democracy movement & civil society and affirm our enduring commitment to a democratic, sovereign & stable future for Belarus.
“Leaders in Washington need to face an uncomfortable truth: A self-reliant EU is a better partner than a dependent one.”
My former colleague
@benjaminhaddad
in foreign policy, making a lot of sense.
#BREAKING
Saudi Arabia said it has decided to allow its diplomats to resume work in Damascus, more than a decade after withdrawing them over the Syrian civil war
Think I'll just leave this quote from the Biden administration's National Security Strategy here.
"We have too often defaulted to military-centric policies underpinned by an unrealistic faith in force and regime change to deliver sustainable outcomes."
🤦♀️
"U.S. leaders should consider sending private messages to Iran’s political and military leaders indicating its resolve to see them removed from power should they not abandon the nuclear program," CNAS experts find in a NEW report. Read more:
The thing is, imagine how insane this would have sounded in, say, 1975. That the problem wasn’t the balance of power or nuclear weapons, but rather our failures to adequately punish the Soviet Union for breaking liberal norms? 🤔
At a certain point, I think we just have to accept that everything about Trump's moral character has already been put before the voters for consideration and... they just didn't care that much.
At this point, I feel like we are stuck in some kind of bizarre news loop about Trump in which every "breaking" story is just a retread of a past "breaking" story.
Here's one from Oct 2016 about Trump creepily lusting after Ivanka:
This column's arguments about China and the Cold War remind me of nothing so much as the episode of Blackadder where they discuss the origins of WWI. 🤦♀️
The idea that the war in Ukraine will destroy global order is just a modern revival of domino theory. You'll see it in commentary that Putin's invasion will embolden Xi Jinping to attack Taiwan, or somewhat less subtly, in this actual not-ironic editorial cartoon. 😬
Intelligence leaks surrounding who blew up most of the Russian-backed Nord Stream pipelines last September have provided more questions than answers. It may be in no one’s interest to reveal more.
The idea that it is somehow impossible to negotiate with adversaries is entirely ahistorical.
There are entire subfields of international relations and history devoted to understanding diplomacy, negotiations, intelligence and verification... all of it!
It's a well-written argument, but it really should have a disclaimer up front. How is it not a conflict of interest that the author of an article about why Europe should 'Buy American' on arms is employed by Boeing?
I look at this and it boggles my mind that some European states aren't hedging more on defense given the obvious growing undercurrents in parts of the Republican party opposed to continued US blank check support for European defense...
Ok, I read Macron's Echos interview about China. He said nothing new, and nothing the French haven't been saying for decades. What Americans should take away is that the IRA pisses off Europeans. We need to deal with that.
Pleased to contribute an essay to
@ForeignAffairs
series on one year of war in Ukraine.
I wrote about what the war has shown about great power competition — and why it’s so important not to learn the wrong lessons from 2022.
“Israel’s military operation in Gaza is both strategically and morally unrecoverable. The legacy of this maximalist assault will haunt Israel for years.”
This is very well done.
More fundamentally, arguments that Ukraine is the lynchpin of global order fall down on comparison.
If the war in Ukraine will cause liberal order to collapse, why didn't Nagorno-Kharabakh? Why didn't the invasion of Iraq? Why not Israeli intervention in Gaza or KSA in Yemen?
On international relations, the main problem with Fukuyama's argument was always the notion that ideology drives conflict, not power or policy disagreements.
The only reason his theory looked plausible was the preponderance of US power in the 90s/2000s.
This is either the dumbest thing I've ever read, or the most brilliant idea ever formulated.
Next up: let's solve world hunger by giving everyone a burrito.
The other thing is: this isn’t true! Putin has escalated repeatedly, from mobilization to infrastructure strikes. He has refrained from direct attacks on NATO and nuclear use, but these are near the top of the escalation ladder. Lots of escalation options between here and there.
The logic here: We've been lucky so far, so let's push it. It hasn't happened yet, so clearly there's no danger.
It hasn't happened yet BECAUSE Putin has no good way, but if sufficiently desperate, he may try a bad way.
And nukes are not the only option for risky escalation.
+
That 2016 open letter on Trump is still the most accurate take on his foreign policy:
“His vision of American influence and power in the world is wildly inconsistent and unmoored in principle. He swings from isolationism to military adventurism within the space of one sentence.”
@SevaUT
There's a lot of evidence for the foreign policy version of this too. A lot of the mistakes made by the US since 1991 would have been far less likely to happen during the Cold War...
Kind of amazing the extent to which we all just ignore the fact that US policy towards North Korea has been such a failure and with every missile, act like “oh, that’s just North Korea.”
Hear me out here: perhaps some kind of universal basic income for folks of advanced age, so they could supplement that income with additional work if they wanted, or choose not to work if their health were bad?
We could call it a "pension."
World Economic Forum: “We desperately need to disrupt our approach to retirement saving”
“Many people will want to work past mandatory retirement age…others will need to work longer to remain financially resilient in later life.”
Trump shouldn’t worry. This headline from today suggests there’s life after classified documents scandals in Washington, as long as you have the right connections. 🤦♀️🙄
My take: if you think there is a big distinction between the phrases “NATO expansion” and “NATO enlargement,” and that one is “right” and the other “wrong”, then you are giving someone else power over language that they do not deserve to have.
But again, the question isn't just American reliability. Its why European states - who have had an astounding US-taxpayer funded holiday from history - can't get their act together even after four years of Trump, and clear warnings that the US was going to de-prioritize Europe.
Actual social science FTW!
@PeterHarrisCSU
points out that it's not a binary question of whether "NATO expansion" caused the war in Ukraine. It was an INUS condition -- an insufficient component of broader factors that caused the war, but didn't make it inevitable.
Perhaps instead of arguing that the problem is Macron giving Xi Jinping a pr win, we should instead be contemplating what this whole episode says about divergent points of view on geopolitics even among close US allies?
Bombshell new exclusive from
@shaneharris
+
@smekhennet
:
Three months before saboteurs attacked Nord Stream, the U.S. learned from a close ally that the Ukrainian military had planned a covert attack on the pipeline network.
I have no doubt your opinions are sincerely held. But both you and your employer have a direct financial interest in the topic upon which you are writing. That’s the textbook definition of “conflict of interest,” and it at least merits a disclaimer up front for the reader.
Folks may not know this, but the main reason why I've always advocated for less US commitment to MENA & Europe was to focus resources on the rising threat of China.
But in the last year, the DC consensus has blown right past my concerns into full-blown war panic.
Poor
@mattduss
had to read Mike Pompeo's autobiography. You should read his review and what it says about some foreign policy voices on the right today.
Operationally, I’m sure putting this in motion makes perfect sense.
But it’s horrible PR to announce that US reserves might have to be mobilized to protect Europe right after a NATO summit with almost no visible progress on burden sharing.
Fascinating to see a liberal internationalist openly espouse what they accuse realists of wanting to do: kill international institutions if they don’t produce the preferred result.
It’s a tacit acknowledgment that power matters, but w/o noticing institutions help in other ways.
What a damning read. It’s amazing the extent to which America’s instruments of non-military power have atrophied — or been captured by other interests.
This is just not true. Western nations could provide Ukraine with planes - but that doesn't equal air superiority.
Unless you mean NATO should engage in direct conflict with the Russian air force? This sounds suspiciously like the "no-fly zone" arguments from last year.
NATO has abundant means to provide Ukraine security of its airspace and air supremacy over its battle space. Yet even now, those means lag. Meanwhile, US ex-officials seek to negotiate over Ukraine's head and behind Ukraine's back.
I’m not saying I have schadenfreude, but seeing the man who once told me (to my face!) that “women don’t have the mental capacity to think strategically” outed as a vile white supremacist is certainly a cheery way to start the weekend.
This is such an important point, and something that we should all be aware of as we talk about European defense: recent spending increases may actually increase dependence on the US, not lessen it.
Putin is set to award soldiers who "took part in suppressing the mutiny" in Kremlin. Shoygu is ready to receive another award. Man is not going anywhere, it seems.
Why? If congress is directly managing a future war over Taiwan, then things have gone very badly indeed.
More useful for these lawmakers would be understating the economic, political, and strategic issues at stake — none of which you get from a wargame.
The Thai election results are remarkable. Voters, especially in Bangkok and urban areas, have almost entirely repudiated military-backed parties, with these winning less than 80 out of 500 seats in parliament on initial counts. A couple of thoughts on what will come next: 1/🧵👇
I have a lot of thoughts on this, many of them confused. But anyone willing to mea culpa themselves publicly as Max Boot does here should be applauded for that.
You can say all you like that anything short of complete Russian defeat is a loss for us, but it’s just untrue. This war has been a strategic loss for Russia for a year or more.
If this is correct, it would still be major strat defeat for Russia. I'm seeing the standard goalpost shifting all over this site: if RU not totally and completely defeated, huge loss for US/allies. World historical RU failure re its pol objective in UKR also = loss for US. 🤔
I continue to believe that this is the worst of all worlds -- repeating the mistakes of the 2008 Bucharest Summit without seriously considering if the alternatives might be better for everyone.
And there is no diplomatic settlement that can guarantee against future war!
Building robust settlements is a good goal, but on some level, you always have to accept this possibility, and just kick Napoleon's ass again if it comes to it.
@EmmaMAshford
You can't negotiate with Napoleon, he'll just exploit lingering revolutionary sentiment and Bourbon and missteps to return from Elba and restart the war!
How is it possible that in the year of our lord 2023 think tanks are still failing to adequately disclose their foreign funding when testifying before congress?
“China thinks the Middle East is important. That probably means we ought to think the Middle East is important" -- Lt. Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich, Commander of U.S. Air Forces Central Command
Why are we having constant debates about specific systems, rather than broader debates about our strategy in Ukraine? Well, for one thing, it's easier and less controversial to discuss details of weapons.
I know I'm by inclination a free trader, but if we can't all agree that "Made in America... by prison labor" is worse than just making those products abroad, then we have a bigger problem than just disagreeing about trade.
In what universe does making products in U.S. Federal Prison factories “represent American manufacturing at its best.”? Why is the
@CommerceGov
promoting U.S. prison factories at
@SelectUSA
this week?
Saying "great power competition has returned" without considering how or why that shift occurred now is the laziest screenwriting since The Rise of Skywalker.
Here is Zelenskyy's tweet on Xi call. I don't want to over analyse it but isn't it a bit curious that in the middle of a bloody conflict on Ukrainian soil there is no mention of it, no mention of Russia, but looking forward to "the development of our bilateral relations." 🧐
It’s more of an accounting trick than an accounting error, really, isn’t it?
I mean, we still have to buy the new weapons; the replacement cost is the true cost to the taxpayer, not the cost of the older systems themselves…
I’m deeply sympathetic to this argument, but if we did seize these Russian assets, it might have long term impacts on the dollar and on the global financial system that we can’t control.
“Bank robbers should not expect banks to honor their safe deposit boxes.”
@LHSummers
, Philip Zelikow, and Robert Zoellick outline an ambitious European recovery program focused on rebuilding Ukraine—and sustained by frozen Russian assets.
BREAKING: A group of former U.S. national security officials are holding secret talks with prominent Russians, including Foreign Minister Lavrov, with the aim of laying the groundwork for negotiations to end the war in Ukraine, sources tell
@NBCNews
.
This does not give me the warm fuzzies.
Seriously: this is really dangerous in the context of crisis management. We learned that the hard way during the Cold War.