So what happens if you get your first covid shot, but then a shark bites your arm off just above where the needle went in, like about 47 minutes after you got the shot? Does that dose still count?
As a scientist I need to know these things.
Questions for faculty candidates at chalk talks:
1) Of the faculty you’ve met so far, whose research did you find most boring?
2) Would you rather be attacked by 3 small sharks or one really big one?
3) What is your plan if none of your experiments work for the rest of your life?
A short thread about faculty and workloads:
In my experience, most faculty who admit to feeling grossly overworked (🖐) don’t do it for some perverse sense of glory, martyrdom, or twisted enjoyment. We do it because the job seems to require it. Quite often it turns out. 1/3
Faculty at non-R1s spend a lot of time vetting & training students. The successful ones often go on to R1s, where those faculty reap the benefits. It’s all good, but it takes a toll on our publication output. Please consider this when judging our productivity and contributions!
One difference between science now and 20-30 years ago is that I can essentially read an older full-length article in 10-15 min. New articles I need a week. And the number of articles I should be reading has also increased 10-fold.
As a grad student and postdoc, it felt like my job was to somehow carry a ball across the goal line, which was hard.
As a PI, it’s sometimes felt like my job has been to carry a person carrying a ball across the goal line, which is much harder!
Scientific maturation: The transition from thinking that you don’t understand because the other person is much smarter than you, to thinking that you don’t understand because the other person didn’t explain it well and might very well be full of crap.
A shoutout to Postdocs:
Some of us might reflect, “Those were the best years of my career. I wish I could go back!”
But we mostly don’t mean it. Yes, focusing solely on science was nice. But the pay was lousy and the pressure unrelenting. I still have nightmares after >20 yrs.
Grant tips (
#3
)
When choosing between a review panel that is familiar with your work versus one that doesn’t know you as well, ask yourself
“Do I want to be punched in the nads by a bunch of strangers or do I want to be stabbed in the back by people I thought were my friends?”
🥂 Here’s to scientists who have the grit to publish papers that aren’t sexy but do contain solid useful data. It’s not glamorous and the papers definitely don’t write themselves! But I’ve learned a lot of useful true things from reading such papers that have helped my research.
We do it because the further we get in our careers, the more the responsibilities get piled on. Real ones that feel like they matter. And we don’t want to let others down. And above all we want to do things well, for ourselves. And, yes, we even say “no” sometimes. 2/3
When I Retire (an aspirational poem)
When I retire I want colleagues to say:
Why are you retiring?
You’re still publishing papers!
You’re still doing important service!
You’re still teaching a key course!
Yes.
1/6
Most of us aren’t extolling this way or telling others they should copy this lifestyle. We’re just being honest. And if we complain sometimes, that’s what humans do. And we still get out and do things, are involved and attentive parents, and even slack off sometimes. 3/3
We write indecipherable script onto tubes with blunt sharpies using ink that rubs off just by looking at it. Then we put it in a warped box with no dividers, shake really hard, and let it build up a thick frost for years in a minus 20. Finally, we get mad when we can’t find it.
What are everyone’s favorite ways to organize plasmids in lab? We use Benchling, but they don’t have a great list view so thinking about having a Google Sheet on the side.
Given stagnant funding levels, the justifiable need to increase trainee pay, and widespread difficulties in attracting qualified personnel, it’s hard to escape the conclusion that there are too many academic labs attempting to operate in the US.
That includes me. And maybe you.
Heading to Ann Arbor to see my son. Also, having no shame, I invited myself to give a talk tomorrow! (Gyorgyi Csankovszki is very kind!)
Do I list this on my CV as an Uninvited, Imposed, or Inflicted Seminar?
Some people in the lab apparently dressed up like me for Halloween. I totally missed it. I thought, finally these people are starting to dress in a sensible manner!
This is getting personal… A good friend with stage IV breast cancer was just told that she can’t get into the hospital for surgery because they have their hands full with covid patients.
All in favor of prioritizing vaccinated people needing critical care raise your hand. 🖐
A dear friend (
@DanStarrUCDavis
) just reminded me of a comprehensive, user-friendly, example-laden chapter I once published on statistics.
As Dan succinctly puts it: “If this idiot can write it, you can understand it.”
It’s even got bits of humor.
Do’s/Don’ts
#7
‣ Do understand the relative order of qualitative ‘confidence-expressing’ verbs and their true meanings.
Demonstrates (damn sure) > Shows (pretty-damn sure) > Indicates (kinda sure) > Suggests (it might be true) > Implies (no idea really)
@geeky_jane
@prashant87_
Scientists.
We seriously need to STOP publishing in these predatory journals.
Yes, most of us got indoctrinated drinking their stupid cool aid long ago, but we can wean ourselves.
Stop sending them papers! And stop focusing on glam pubs during hiring, tenure, and grants. 🛑
#1
/4
THE FAY LAB ANNOUNCES A HANDY NEW CRISPR DESIGN TOOL – CRISPRcruncher
Takes any coding sequence and displays a comprehensive list of minimal substitutions that produce new restriction endonuclease sites while maintaining the original peptide sequence
Seriously screw these vain billionaires who want to make space flight “more routine”. How about we make recycling, quality education, healthcare, and about 500 other things routine first.
Grant reviews of famous books
#1
The Three Musketeers. Success of the individual musketeers is overly dependent on the success of the other two musketeers.
To Kill a Mockingbird. Missing detailed IACUC protocol for mockingbird euthanasia.
Moby-Dick. Fishing expedition.
Science is not about normal-sized people standing on the shoulders of giants. It’s about normal-sized people standing on the shoulders of lots of other normal-sized people.
@DrGuiton
Ow. Everything you say is true. But administrators are lazy, and so rather than evaluating you professionally, they put it on the students. I’m not saying there’s no place for evals, and student input can be very useful, but it’s utility for judging pedagogy is very limited.
A machine-learning model can be used to predict the future “impact” of research published in scientific literature, according to a
@NatureBiotech
paper. The model could aid in the construction of diversified, impact-optimized funding portfolios.
Breakfast cereals are mostly a tedious exercise in chewing and swallowing. Still I was unprepared for the utter joylessness of the bran flakes I encountered yesterday. The box should have contained a warning to alert those with a tendency towards melancholy.
I need to point out that the falcon probably wasn’t asked to review 10 grants & 5 papers or to serve on dozens of committees during her time of flight. She probably also wasn’t required to troubleshoot PCR or write an exhaustive response to reviewers. So…good for the damn falcon
A female GPS-tracked falcon flew from South Africa to Finland. In 42 days she flew over 10,000 km. That's 230 km per day. What have you achieved in the last 42 days? Source:
The Math.
100+ grants over 4 yrs. ~2 days per grant to read/write up. ~2 days of score revision and pre-meeting prep followed by 2-3 days for each of the 12 meetings. Add it up. It’s the same number of hours you’d work in a full time salaried position over the course of a year.
So, who else is sick of feeling like a deer in the headlights on Monday mornings where you mostly took the weekend off instead of using it to catch up on things you couldn’t get done the previous week?
Was wondering if there are any faculty who have specifically given a lecture on “how to give a talk”? I teach a grad level class (by Zoom) to about 25 students at Wyoming and was looking for someone to help me lead one of the upcoming classes. There would be some $ compensation.
The Dept. of Molecular Biology at the University of Wyoming is seeking a new tenure-track Asst Prof in basically ANY relevant area! The job is mostly research with some teaching and service. And you can have coffee with me. And lunch. Sometimes dinner.
Why academics shouldn’t write pop lyrics
#1
:
“A sizable number, though certainly not the entirety and perhaps not even an outright majority, of people were kung fu fighting.”
I hear the term “stakeholders” a lot and am wondering if these are people who assist at vampire killings?
In any case, we’re supposed to listen to them.
My attempt to (gently touch) the third rail. ⚡️
Agree. Disagree. Send us your alternate take! 😬
Or use it as a spring board for an open honest discussion between trainees and their mentors.