Eleftherios Profile
Eleftherios

@lftherios

3,704
Followers
171
Following
11
Media
1,966
Statuses

founder @radicle @dripsnetwork

Berlin, Germany
Joined March 2011
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
1. Fork #Libra 2. Rename to Libre 3. Remove consortium of companies 4. Replace with consortium of non profits that defend digital privacy and free speech 5. โœŒ๏ธ
30
75
512
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
0. What the decentralized web can learn from Wikipedia ๐Ÿค“ Many people in the blockchain community consider @Wikipedia irrelevant for their work as it doesn't employ economic incentives. We disagree and share our research findings below๐Ÿ“’๐Ÿ‘‡
@oliverbeige
๐Ÿ…พ๏ธ๐•๐•š๐•ง๐•–๐•ฃ ๐Ÿ…ฑ๏ธ๐•–๐•š๐•˜๐•–
5 years
Don't trust anyone on DAOs who hasn't spent at least a year in the bowels of Wikipedia deletion decisions, admin elections, and arbitration proceedings...
9
30
166
11
187
428
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
is the no1 story on HN today. me happy ๐ŸŒฑ @radicle
Tweet media one
3
18
209
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 months
Today Iโ€™d like to share a new mechanism that has been powering our work with @dripsnetwork . ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ’ก๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป ๐Ÿ’ง Continuous Dependency Funding (CDF) is the first continuous mechanism for funding public goods, empowering protocols to to continuously allocate a % of their revenue or assetsโ€ฆ
16
38
147
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
Last week we released @radicle_xyz , a decentralized alternative to Github built on IPFS. โœจ The software is still very alpha, but below is some history and context for our project ๐Ÿ‘‡
1
44
142
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
Excited that @ciaranoleary @jmonegro @cburniske @crainbf @FEhrsam and many other talented individuals are backing our project . Rolling up our sleeves for a more resilient infrastructure for the open source community โœŠ
4
11
115
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
1/ I am continually surprised by how confused people are when it comes to 'OS sustainability'. Most people are very confident they understand the problem, but when you speak to them, they immediately default to 'let's incentivize contributions to OS' ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
3
26
92
@lftherios
Eleftherios
2 months
Radicle is the no1 story on HackerNews this morning and we haven't even launched v1.0 yet ๐Ÿ˜ฎ @radicle
Tweet media one
6
11
74
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
We @oscoin are hiring open-source engineers and I would love for a woman or person from an underrepresented group to apply, as we want to create an inclusive culture early on! Contact me for details or retweet for exposure ๐Ÿ™
2
42
64
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 months
Radicle is gearing up for its 1.0 release, currently scheduled for Q1 2024. This is something that we've been working on for years so it's quite exciting to get closer to that milestone. ๐ŸŒฑ ๐ŸŒ Thinking ahead, imo the next challenge is to incentivise a network of @radicle seedโ€ฆ
17
12
58
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
23. Thank you for reading. ๐Ÿ™ You can find our complete research here: /fin
9
6
58
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
1. Since its launch in 2001, Wikipedia has managed to create one of the Internetโ€™s greatest public goods. Its success is particularly impressive considering that the site is operated by a non-profit organization and most of its content is crowdsourced by unpaid volunteers.
2
3
50
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
"crypto collapses the cost of building and scaling information networks by replacing centralized coordination with universal financial incentives" from @placeholdervc thesis
2
12
52
@lftherios
Eleftherios
4 years
our work on radicle-link is at the front page of hackernews today โœŒ๏ธ
Tweet media one
2
4
49
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
5. This is in-line with Ostrom's principles for governing the commons. ๐Ÿ‘‡ Drawing an analogy to blockchain-land, if these policies are Wikipedia's "protocol", then this protocol can be amended over time and its evolution is part of the protocol itself.
1
5
45
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
Two weeks ago we announced , a free program for learning the foundations of #p2p and #blockchain technologies. ๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ‘ฝ๐ŸŒˆ The program will take place in Berlin during November and applications are open till Sep 22nd! Reach out for info or please retweet ๐Ÿ™
2
21
44
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
14. Wikipedia seems to have found a way to incentivize participants' attachment to their pseudonyms without evidence of real-world identity! The reason is that reputation in this community is based on a long-running history of small contributions that is difficult to fake.
1
3
42
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
4. Changing a Wikipedia policy or guideline is no different than changing any other page on the site. Its this fluidity in changing the rules that plays a key role in maintaining confidence in enforcing them. After all, people are more likely to follow rules they helped create!
2
0
39
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
7. Wikipediaโ€™s primary enforcement strategy is peer-based consensus. Editors know that when peer consensus fails, final authority rests with certain, privileged, volunteer authorities with long-standing reputations at stake.
2
2
36
@lftherios
Eleftherios
2 months
450 @radicle nodes and counting... network and seeds working perfectly ๐Ÿ’ช ๐Ÿ‘พ
0
5
38
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
5/ So there is a problem and an opportunity, that people tend to confuse. The problem of OS sustainability lies with maintainers. That's the big deal!!! Incentivizing contributions is an opportunity to create the future of work. But these are two different things. /fin
4
5
35
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
12. A notable theme of Wikipedias mechanisms is how uniformly cooperative they are! In contrast to the blockchain space where most mechanisms are punitive, at Wikipedia no editor has something to lose beyond the time spent on the edit & their reputation.
2
4
35
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
15. And assigning power based on a long history of user edits means that the "governing class" necessarily changes slowly. Comparing this with many token-voting schemes, Wikipedia's mechanism is therefore less subject to the โ€œhostile takeoversโ€ that some blokchain networks fear.
1
2
33
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
6. Hearing that anyone can edit a Wikipedia page (incl. its policies & guidelines), no money is staked, no contracts are signed, and neither paid police nor smart contracts are used to enforce guidelines, an obvious question arises: Why are the rules actually followed?๐Ÿค”
2
2
33
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
2. The way Wikipedia manages to coordinate so many people to produce such remarkable content is in our opinion well worth a look. This is especially relevant to teams in the emerging decentralized web that look to employ human input in their mechanisms (DAOs, committees etc.).
1
1
30
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
3. Wikipedia, at its core, is utilizing policies and guidelines that appear too informal to be of much use,especially without monetary or legal enforcement. And yet,these mechanisms have been remarkably effective at coordinating thousands of volunteers!
1
2
30
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
I had a nice chat with @HugoAmsellem about Berlin, economic & architectural decentralization & our work on @oscoin ๐Ÿ‘‡
@HugoAmsellem
Hugo Amsellem
6 years
0/ Thread: Eleftherios Diakomichalis ( @lftherios ) is the co-founder of @oscoin , a decentralized network and currency for OSS collaboration and incentivization. Part of the #BerlinCryptoCapital portrait Series.
Tweet media one
1
5
27
0
6
31
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
6. Moving further up the stack, last week Radicle announced its Ethereum integration. ๐Ÿ˜Ž It is opt-in and it complements the p2p network with: - a global namespace - DAO controlled repos - funding protocols that enable devs to get funding for their FOSS work๐Ÿ’ฐ
1
3
29
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
19. We believe that this โ€œiterative attitudeโ€ is particularly well-suited to assembling human input. Humans often take a long time to make decisions, change their minds frequently, and are susceptible to persuasion by their peers.
1
0
30
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
1. It's a collection of open protocols, where some of them are truly peer-to-peer and some of them blockchain based. All of them bundled in one user experience! ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป It's still very early on ( #beta -software) but >1200 projects are now being hosted there and growing ~10% WoW๐Ÿš€
1
2
29
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
2/ From my experiences, one of the main reasons for the confusion is the lack of awareness around 'maintainers'. Most people believe that OSS operates magically, simply based on contributions, but aren't informed about what a maintainer does and why it's so important
2
9
29
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
7. My favorite one is DAO controlled repos or Radicle Orgs ๐ŸŒป Conceptually, Radicle Orgs do two things: - they replace the GH org 'admin' with a smart contract (cc @VitalikButerin ) - they allow an org to treat Ethereum as their main branch, if they want that!
1
4
26
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
18. And while "slow governance" might not fit all use cases,it has its benefits. Wikipedias encyclopedic mission, by its very nature, can never be fully completed. As such, its mechanisms dont focus on resolving conflicts quickly.Instead, they prioritize iteration over finality!
1
1
28
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 months
1/13 As it seems that social graphs are in fashion again in Web3, I would like to share a few of the experiments we've done over the years and the learnings that led to and . ๐Ÿ’ง
5
6
28
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
5. Radicle-link gets its optimizations from Git. It is focused on "active data" and a familiar interaction model. It doesnt compete with projects like @IPFS @Filecoin @ArweaveTeam & @MySiacoin Instead it complements them,so one can imagine many designs that involve the above ๐Ÿ˜‰
1
2
25
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
4/ The second 'aha' moment comes when you show them the numbers*: - Contributions to OSS have been increasing nicely over the years - The number of maintainers hasn't!!! That's when people start to really get it. *(see the phenomenal work that @nayafia has done on the topic)
3
3
26
@lftherios
Eleftherios
7 years
after 6 1/2 beautiful years at SoundCloud I am moving on
1
2
27
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
4. The current state of the world is stuck between: - having convenience in the community edition of GH but no control or -having control with a self hosted instance, but being isolated from the rest of the network!! Radicle solvesโ˜๏ธso you dont need to trade one for the other๐ŸŒฑ
1
2
26
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
16. Blockchain networks which adopt similar reputation mechanisms and utilize them in their governance might expect to see two major changes: slower evolution of governance and sticky users!
1
0
24
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
This piece by @anildash and @TheAtlantic is unfortunately full of dubious statements and misinformation. Without assuming bad intentions or a specific agenda from their side, I want to call out point by point what in my opinion is incorrect, uninformed or misunderstood ๐Ÿ‘‡
@anildash
anildash.com
3 years
When we created the first NFTs back in 2014, @mccoyspace & I were trying to support artists and center their needs as blockchain technologies took off. In my first time writing for @TheAtlantic , I explain how things didnโ€™t go exactly as planned since then.
50
726
2K
1
3
22
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
3. There are a number of interesting things about racicle-link but my favorites ones are: a. the use of public private key crypto for identity&authority (a big upgrade from GH) and b. that it allows devs to be in control without losing connectivity with the rest of the network
1
1
23
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
13. This risk likely incentivises editors to make small, frequent contributions rather than large ones and to discuss major changes with other editors before they work on them. In addition, reputation-wise, evidence of a well-conducted dispute adds credibility to the disputants.
1
0
23
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
The Radicle architecture or how @radicle_xyz works behind the scenes ๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒป
1
7
24
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 months
10/10 Finally I would like to thank @JonasSFT , @notscottmoore , @cheekygorilla0x , @trent_vanepps , @gakonst , @vpabundance for their review and @cloudhead , @abbey_titcomb , @nicksdjohnson , @surfaquadreams and the entire @dripsnetwork team for conversations that led to this idea. ๐Ÿ™Œ
1
0
23
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 months
@dabit3 @basche42 @fileverse @radicle fair feedback. we went through a process of a complete rewrite of the protocol, so instead of talking too much publicly we simply kept building until we have something that will meet people's needs. now @radicle 1.0 is only a few weeks away (Q1 2024) ๐Ÿค—
1
1
24
@lftherios
Eleftherios
7 years
today my team @SoundCloud launched โ€˜The Uploadโ€™, an ML powered personalised playlist with fresh content you wonโ€™t find anywhere else!!
1
4
23
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
Obvious but understated: blockchain is the first big wave of tech that is almost exclusively build on open source
1
2
24
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
11. The last resort is a binding arbitration from the Arbitration Committee. This is the only option in which editors are not required to reach consensus on their own! This mechanism has been invoked only 513 times since 2004, evidence that the escalation process does its job.
1
1
23
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
20. Finally, Wikipedia employs what we call "soft security", which means security that is largely reactionary, rather than preventative or broadly restrictive on user actions in advance. The dangers of such a policy are obvious, but the advantages are perhaps less so.
1
1
22
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
22. And while various attacks have been performed successfully (vandalism and spam, sybil attacks, pay to edit), Wikipediaโ€™s success is inspirational in terms of what can be accomplished through decentralized coordination of a large group of people!
1
1
22
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
Crypto-economies are changing the internet ๐Ÿ‘‡ - First technology wave (almost) exclusively built open source - First internet wave not centered around the valley - First time in tech that capital markets are truly global - First time in history we have digital scarcity
2
1
21
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
3/ The first 'aha' moment comes when you explain to them the following scenario: - You have a patch (fix) to contribute to a codebase. What happens next? - Someone has to review that and decide if they should merge it to the codebase. That's usually a Maintainer!! ๐Ÿค—
1
0
21
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
17. Sticky users are a consequence of the slow accretion of power: experienced users tend to stick to their original pseudonym precisely because it would be time consuming to recreate a similar level of privilege (both implicit and explicit) under a new identity.
1
2
21
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
An engineer from Red Hat thought that our docs were not as clear as they could be, so he wrote a post explaining the key concepts behind @radicle ๐ŸŒฑ
0
4
22
@lftherios
Eleftherios
7 years
I will be talking @soundcloud , data science and music, tomorrow at #dataldn , Friday at the @Cambridge_Uni . Message me if you want to chat
0
2
19
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
2. At the core of the design there is a peer-to-peer network build on Git called radicle-link. ๐Ÿ”— Radicle-link extends Git with a gossip network, so you can have a social experience around coding that is similar to the GH FOSS model but without centralized servers!
1
1
20
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
9. If you have a DAO today, you will be able to control a repo in a trust minimized way. If you don't, you will be able to delpoy a DAO or multisig from the app, something which imo is much more powerful and secure than the admin model of centralized platforms. ๐Ÿค—
1
1
19
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
8. Talk pages act as the first place for communication. And since talk pages capture a history of each editorโ€™s interaction, both in terms of content and exchanges with other editors, they provide the basis for Wikipediaโ€™s reputation system.
1
0
20
@lftherios
Eleftherios
2 months
many developers keep closing their eyes to what's coming. ๐Ÿ˜‘ our world is growing more polarised each day, and the internet feels it too. consider sovereign infrastructure today. we are doing our part with @radicle ๐Ÿ‘พ
@Teknium1
Teknium (e/ฮป)
2 months
"Nobody's arguing to ban open source models" >
Tweet media one
71
51
452
1
5
21
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
Despite the fact that each crypto-currency is an experiment in monetary policy, there is little information out there on how crypto architects go about modelling their supply curves (beyond digital scarcity). What are the best people / papers / resources you know on the topic?
3
4
21
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
9. If initial efforts by the editors to communicate on the Talk Page fail, Wikipedia offers many additional solutions for cooperative coordination. These allow the disputants to get input from a (potentially) large number of content experts.
1
0
19
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
Blockchain protocols provide a playing field for experimentation around governance systems and monetary polices (cc @FEhrsam ). Learnings from that process could become our most valuable resources for governing another class of digital organisms: AI
1
0
20
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 months
9/10 Today there is nearly $2m in Drips and many organisations like @OctantApp , @wevm_dev , @SnapshotLabs , @OpenZeppelin , @radworks_ are already dripping to their dependencies! ๐Ÿ’ฐ๐Ÿš€ Come claim your project on Drips and start splitting funds to your dependencies.โ€ฆ
1
0
20
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
@ummjackson Hey @ummjackson I think you are missing the point. The devs that advocate for a decentralized Github are not concerned about hosting. Github today is a platform for distribution, collaboration, CI that is indeed centralized, wrapped around a distributed protocol (git).
1
3
18
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
4. Originally we were thinking of releasing a blockchain based solution to the problem (paired with incentivisation primitives for FOSS) but we quickly realized that the problem doesn't need a token or a blockchain. So we split the two projects into @radicle_xyz and @oscoin
1
0
17
@lftherios
Eleftherios
8 years
Inspiring talk by @EdwardTufte - The Future of Data Analysis @revodavid #datascience
0
8
19
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
8. The latter is obviously very expensive at the moment (tx fees on Ethereum are ๐Ÿฅด) but layer-2 solutions are progressing quite fast. Bringing the world of Ethereum, DAOs and DEFI closer to the code collaboration experience is imo very exciting ๐ŸŒˆ
1
2
16
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
10. Some examples ๐Ÿ‘‡ - 1-on-1 advice on how to conduct a civil, content-focused discussion from an experienced editor - Facilitation by an experienced moderator, only available after lengthy discussion on the articles' Talk page
1
0
17
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
21. Wikipediaโ€™s security offers a level of adaptability and flexibility that is not possible with traditional security policies and tools. Security is guided by the community, rather than by restricting the community's actions ahead of time.
1
0
16
@lftherios
Eleftherios
1 month
if you are a developer interested in @radicle listen to the space below ๐Ÿ‘‡ we covered a lot of the ideas behind its design, the pros and cons vs @github & other centralized forges and what is coming next
@radicle
Radicle
1 month
2
1
6
0
3
17
@lftherios
Eleftherios
29 days
๐Ÿ‘พ๐Ÿ“ˆ
Tweet media one
0
3
17
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
6. After iterating with FOSS devs we concluded that Radicle needs to satisfy 3 properties a) it needs to extend Git with social features b) it needs to provide better guarantees for trust minimization workflows and c) it needs to be programmable and extensible
1
0
16
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
7. But going back to the promise of #web3 , I believe that the following 4 visions remain appealing: a. a web that respects user privacy b. a web where security is a priority c. a web where users are in control of their data d. a web where we collectively own the platforms we use
2
4
16
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
10. Additionally users will be able to use Ethereum's existing financial infrastructure to program value flows that fit their needs in the same experience. ๐ŸŒž Instead of a one-size-fits-all model, Radicle aims to give devs the opportunity to leverage protocols as they see fit.
0
2
15
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
From @bitcoin to #scuttlebutt , from #dao to smart contracts, the program highlights a spectrum of p2p tech&theories. Some of the speakers๐Ÿ‘‰ @StaccoP2P @keikreutler @liz315 @isthisanart_ @cloudhead @lucasvo We're focused on recruiting participants from underrepresented groups!โœŒ๏ธ
2
2
15
@lftherios
Eleftherios
1 month
Together with @cloudhead , we will be talking all things @radicle in roughly one hour from now ๐Ÿ‘พ
@radicle
Radicle
1 month
Join us this Thursday at 15:00 CET for a Twitter Space with the Radicle founders @cloudhead and @lftherios ๐Ÿ•’ We'll dive into the Radicle 1.0 release and talk about the history of the project and the design choices we made along the way. ๐Ÿ‘พ
17
38
103
0
0
15
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
great post from 2019 that very much influenced our direction with @radicle ๐ŸŒฑ Konstantin Raybitsev of the Linux Foundation lays the foundations for a decentralized alternative to Github๐Ÿ‘‡
0
6
15
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
my favorite character at crypto dinners is the guy that runs a crypto exchange but doesn't believe in decentralization / platform grade censorship resistance ๐Ÿ˜‚
0
0
15
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
Lots of great conversations yesterday at the #tokensummit . @NTmoney @wmougayar thank you for inviting me.
0
0
13
@lftherios
Eleftherios
7 months
dependency funding is the future for funding FOSS ๐Ÿ’ช
@vaneck_us
VanEck
7 months
Big announcement! We intend to donate 10% of our $EFUT ETF profits () to @ProtocolGuild for at least 10 years. Thank you, Ethereum contributors, for nearly a decade of relentless building & ongoing stewardship of this common infrastructure. Details ๐Ÿ‘‡
223
665
4K
2
4
14
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 months
Thanks to @octantapp Epoch two, another 22 ETH are dripping down Octant's dependency tree over the next 90 days! ๐Ÿ’ฆ๐ŸŒˆ Enjoy! 100% of funds heading to @wevm_dev @ethnimbus & Flask
0
8
13
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
@dwr @radicle should be added there too
0
0
10
@lftherios
Eleftherios
4 years
7/ Bureaucracy minimization is the killer use case.๐Ÿ“’ Bureaucracy within an org, and between an org and its platforms is recognized by many as one of the most significant challenges for organizations today. DAOs, by design, provide a programmable layer for org functions..
2
0
13
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 months
4/10 So how does it work? ๐Ÿค” โœ๏ธ Org members collaboratively curate a list(s) of critical dependencies. ๐Ÿ’ธ They choose a % of their revenue or assets to be continuously allocated to this list(s) over time. ๐Ÿ›๏ธ They can modify or adjust the list(s) with any form of governance orโ€ฆ
Tweet media one
1
0
12
@lftherios
Eleftherios
2 months
spot the @radicle logo ๐Ÿ‘พ
@tjstebbing
Timothy Stebbing
2 months
A 1000 mile high mud-map of the Dogebox and what we're aiming for. The DRE (Dogebox Runtime Environment) is a user-extensible, secure execution app environment with APIs and resources provided by ring0 & ring1. Explain that in non-dev-talk pls: Dogebox aims to be a linuxโ€ฆ
Tweet media one
8
28
90
1
1
12
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 months
8/10 Additionally, Iโ€™ve heard over and over again how FOSS builders need predictable and reliable funding instead of bounties, grants, or other uncertain one-off allocations. With CDF at scale, recipients can count on a continuous and sustainable stream of support, making itโ€ฆ
2
0
12
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
@jmonegro @cburniske and the rest of the Placeholder team have stayed with us throughout the goods and the bads over the last three years. They've helped us shape the Radicle vision from day 1 ๐ŸŒฑ Excited to be working you guys & see you soon on the community forums! โค๏ธ
@placeholdervc
Placeholder
3 years
"Re-Decentralizing Git with @Radicle " by @jmonegro
1
20
77
1
1
12
@lftherios
Eleftherios
4 years
6/ - Bureaucracy minimization could be the killer use-case - Digital nomads are the ideal first user-group - DAO-enabled legal entities are a viable path fwd - Coordinating assets beyond money - On chain reputation could "smooth" coordination in a trust-less environment
1
0
11
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
2. Progress on decentralized storage as well as resurgence of p2p protocols gave us confidence that the timing is right. Today a lot more people are interested in re-decentralizing the web, concerned by the growth of internet monopolies.
1
0
11
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
1. We started the project with the belief that code collaboration infrastructure is too critical to be controlled by a single corporation in a closed source way.
1
2
11
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
8. On trust minimization @lopp 's blogpost was very helpful. Radicle, by design, minimizes the possibility for a malicious or compromised actor to tamper with your code.
1
2
11
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
9. On programmability, @jk_arni wrote a language for specifying arbitrary replicated state machines that became the foundation of the Radicle stack!
1
0
11
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 months
3/10 CDF centers on the idea of maintainable, publicly-fundable lists.๐Ÿ“œ Each list has its own Ethereum address, can support any curation mechanism and can even contain more lists. ๐Ÿ–‡๏ธ It draws inspiration from traditional finance's revenue-sharing models but introduces a novelโ€ฆ
1
0
11
@lftherios
Eleftherios
5 years
10. The project is still young and has many limitations specifically around offline writes and performance, but we are progressing quite fast so come contribute or fork it! โœŒ๏ธ
2
0
11
@lftherios
Eleftherios
8 days
no better time than now to release support for @torproject ๐Ÿ‘พ the @radicle team is doing its part
@radicle
Radicle
8 days
1/ Our latest release candidate (1.0.0-rc.6) includes support for ๐Ÿง… Tor ( @torproject ) when used as a transparent proxy. This means Radicle nodes can connect to each other through the Tor network for greater privacy and censorship resistance.
Tweet media one
2
17
57
0
2
11
@lftherios
Eleftherios
6 years
@cryptoversus There are key differences between the two projects. The main one is that oscoin is primarily focused on providing an infrastructure for code hosting & collaboration (ie what you trust today Github for, but p2p & decentralized). Then use it to enable new forms of incentivization
2
0
11
@lftherios
Eleftherios
3 years
@DennisonBertram @radicle @abbey_titcomb nope. your repos will be replicated by other peers that are interested in them and / or seed nodes (always on nodes, think like IPFS pinning nodes) like
1
0
9