@berkustun
Berk Ustun
6 years
@ruchowdh @KayFButterfield @johnchavens @vdignum @jonniepenn @j2bryson @tabithagold @maria_axente @robmccargow @Debbie_Hellman @fatconference We also associate “explainability” with ideas like “contestability”, “autonomy”, “recourse.” We should speak about the latter ideas separately since explanations in ML guarantee none of these things. Good thread here:
@mikarv
Michael Veale @[email protected]
6 years
Explanations are convenient for large firms in algorithms, AI, ML They don't give users control They don't shake-up power relations They don't shine light on systems as a whole It's irresponsible of researchers to jump on the explanation bandwagon without being critical of them
4
30
93
1
1
8

Replies

@ruchowdh
ruchowdh.bsky.social
6 years
20
12
36
@berkustun
Berk Ustun
6 years
@ruchowdh @KayFButterfield @johnchavens @vdignum @jonniepenn @j2bryson @tabithagold @maria_axente @robmccargow We should try to use “justice” instead of “fairness” to make it clear that we’re not talking about “parity.” There’s a nice story about this in the talk by @Debbie_Hellman at @fatconference last year.
1
0
5
@j2bryson
Joanna J Bryson
6 years
0
1
2