1️⃣ It's hard for people to visualize removing tons or billions of tons of CO₂. What if we talked about CO₂ removal (CDR) like a time machine (e.g., this machine will take us back 5 minutes*)?
*ignoring the hysteresis in the relationship between CO₂ and climate change impacts.
Ignore this at your own risk.
Do not put your family in a small car.
Yesterday, my wife was driving my son to school and an oncoming delivery truck crossed the center lane and hit her head on — the driver had a seizure was going 40 mph.
I was on my way to work in a separate…
Twitter laid me off today. If you know of any open positions for project managers or senior software engineers, let me know. I was in charge of the feature that made sure every time you tweeted about climate change you were served a fossil fuel ad.
We’re working to bring more lower carbon energy to the UK – like hydrogen. And, we’re keeping oil & gas flowing to help meet today’s energy needs. And, not or – that's our approach.
Think about how close these people in motor vehicles are allowed to drive at speed next to people on foot, on bicycles, and in wheelchairs when they have no idea where the boundaries of their vehicles are.
Back in 1985, Carl Sagan told Congress that continuing to burn fossil fuels will increase global temperature, cause climate change, melt glaciers and ice sheets, and cause sea level rise.
His solution: Fewer government subsidies for fossil fuels and use of renewable energy.
Men deciding what women can do with their bodies is as crazy as people who’ll be dead in 30 years deciding what Earth’s climate should look like in 2050.
I talked to a city traffic engineer and it turns out one of the reasons we don’t have real protected bike lanes is because drivers don’t like it when they hit concrete barriers and damage their cars so cyclists are left with plastic sticks and paint for protection.
This line from
#DontLookUp
perfectly encapsulates what is special about Earth, and why we should fight for it. Evolution of intelligent life requires a planet that’s continuously habitable for 3 or 4 billion years. That such a planet exists is a miracle.
Explain to me like I'm 10 years old: If a CO₂ removal (CDR) technology is so energy intensive that it requires renewable energy to be effective, why isn't it better to use that renewable energy to replace fossil fuels before we're at net zero?
In light of the paper from
@GeoffreySupran
@rahmstorf
@NaomiOreskes
showing that Exxon predicted global warming extremely accurately between 1977 and 2003, this exchange between
@AOC
and Exxon scientists is worth revisiting.
Breaking: Activist from Just Stop Oil sprayed orange paint on Mexican oil company Pemex’s offshore platform Nohoch-A in the Gulf of Mexico.
Oh wait, I’m told it’s an explosion and fire.
People associate Hawaiʻi with tropical conditions but rainfall has been decreasing for decades because of climate change, drying out the lush landscape and making it increasingly susceptible to wildfire damage.
France has been given the green light to ban short haul domestic flights. They can do this because the trains are so good.
Also, they aim to get 9% of the population on bicycles by 2024 (up from 3%; the Netherlands is at 27%).
Potentially unpopular opinion: Solving climate change is the moonshot of our time and we should focus more on that and less on going to the moon (again).
In Bergen, Norway, there are no garbage trucks and no trash piling up on streets because all over town, there are receptacles that connect to an UNDERGROUND PNEUMATIC WASTE TRANSPORT SYSTEM. The waste collects for a bit, and then WHOOSH...it's off to the recycling center. 🤯
What is common knowledge in your field but shocks outsiders?
More than half the CO₂ emissions of the industrial age have been dumped into the atmosphere since 1990.
Decided to see how much of world total energy supply was still from fossil fuels and wish I hadn't. In nearly half a century, we decreased from 86.7% in 1971 to 80.9% in 2019.
Data from:
Scoop: DOE is announcing a massive investment in 4 direct air capture hubs. When built, each should be capable of removing over a million tons of CO2 per year (removing 1 million ton of CO2 is like taking ~200k gas cars off the road).
Even if CO₂ emissions decreased annually as much as during the pandemic lockdown, we wouldn't achieve our climate targets.
While individuals made huge sacrifices, the system remained. This shows that individual action will not solve climate change. We need the system to change.
According to the
#IPCC
AR6 Synthesis Report, to limit global warming to '1.5°C with no or limited overshoot', then global CO2 emissions decline:
* 48% in 6 years
* 80% in 14 years
* 99% in 24 years
(thanks
@_david_ho_
for reminding me to remind people)
What if fixing climate doesn't mean doing everything the same way, except with less CO₂ emissions, but fundamentally changing the way we interact with nature and with other people?
When I hear people say that we should use the ocean for CO₂ removal (CDR) because it's so big, I wanna scream that it's already removing 10,200,000,000 tonnes more CO₂ than it did before the industrial revolution!
What if we could:
• Sequester CO2
• Create more life
• Reclaim huge pastures and turn them back into forests
• Increase healthy food production
• Grow the economy
• And make money along the way?
How? By filling ocean deserts with life:
It's super depressing that bad news about climate change is like, "Omg, everything is gonna die," and the good news is like, "In paragraph 28d, COP finally acknowledged that fossil fuels exist."
Maybe unpopular opinion, but Stanford doesn’t need more money. I’d like to see someone give $1.1 billion to state universities and HBCUs to study climate change.
All of us are stressed and having a hard time, but at least we're not dealing with this.
"When you have public figures like [former Trump advisor Steve] Bannon calling for your beheading, that's really kind of unusual." – Anthony Fauci
People working on CO₂ removal (CDR), are we all on the same page that when you remove atmospheric CO₂, the ocean and land will outgas and equilibrate with the new atmosphere so that, for example, you’d have to remove 2 GtC from the atmosphere to achieve a reduction of 1 GtC?