It's dumb that our debates about cities are like
"should our cities just have single family housing or should there be be townhouses too?"
when the contest of ideas should be
"should our cities be solarpunk or cyberpunk?"
So with this bill, NZ has:
- no more single family zoning
- no more parking requirements
- no more min. lot sizes
- 3 stories everywhere
- 6 stories near major transit & job centres
This is one of the most significant housing bills passed anywhere in the English speaking world
it's insane how quickly NZ has:
- abolished single family zoning
- abolished parking requirements
- abolished min lot sizes
- legalised 3 stories everywhere
- legalised 6 stories near major transit & job centres
- legalised unlimited density within city cores
Changing NZs name to Aotearoa is good in its own merits, but also being at the top of every alphabetical webform drop down list would save so much time
It's crazy how obvious is it when you constrain moderate densities. LA harshly jumps from single family to high rise, while Shinjuku gently rises as you get closer to the city centre
In a city with 1.7 million people, the mayor has been elected with just 0.14m votes.
Less than 10% of the population is not a serious mandate to do anything.
We need to fundamentally rethink how we do and how we use local democracy.
The lesson from Tokyo for Anglo cities: don't micromanage private land use, just focus on nailing your streets (the most core urban infrastructure), and good land use will follow.
A lot of young white guys my age end up getting really into fascism or leninism and so forth so I'm really glad my online radicalisation just made me really want to build housing
Love how you look at Tokyo and think, "yeah, they've got some big buildings, but most of it is low density" until you zoom in and realise all those 'low density' builds are like 5 to 10 storeys
Jacinda's response to covid finally feels in line with her response to housing, climate, inequality, mental health, and every other crisis shes said a lot of nice things about
Urban streetscapes typically thrive the most when they are the culmination of many peoples' vision for what the street and city should be, not just diktat of one designer.
But our zoning rules only allow people to build when they amalgamate sites, to limit "externalities"!
"if we intensify, people will live in cramped conditions"
No. If you build more floorspace, each person on average will have more floorspace to themselves. Its just if you don't build apartments, people overcrowd low intensity dwellings
Some people have a natural dislike of light rail because they think 'light' is like 'light beer'. In reality, it means it doesn't have to accomodate heavy freight vehicles, so it can accelerate faster, make tighter corners, and go up steeper slopes.
The wild thing about people opposing a carless Queen Street is that it doesn't connect anywhere to anywhere, it has fuck-all on-street parking, and zero off-street. Literally the only thing a car can do on Queen St is drive through it!
I'm pretty convinced that having a state-owned housing developer that makes up a significant portion of the residential sector is a superpower in the fight for upzoning -- and explains why NZ has had more success than eg California
There's no quick fix for a housing shortage that has built up over decades, but the government could allow 3 storey townhouses by-right everywhere in our cities, basically overnight.
There's no reason not to.
really feels like the Labour caucus saw a couple of negative opinion polls about lockdown and decided to throw away everything we've worked towards for nearly 2 years
With Act looking like it'll probably slip below the 5% threshold, now is the time for Labour and Greens to build a metric fuck tonne of affordable housing in Epsom to throw Seymour out of Parliament for good
According to the cost benefit analysis, this will effectively produce a wealth transfer of ~$200,000,000,000 from existing landowners to renters and first time buyers over the next 20 years
it's wild that some dude in the 80s pulled an inflation target of 2% out of air entirely based on vibes, and now 40 years later we're going to crash the economy to meet it
please, greens membership, as a marginal green voter I'm begging you: I don't give a flying shit about this school, I just want trains, houses, and cleaner air
Berlin Apartment, cheaper than practically anything you could rent in NZ. The idea that we can't have this is made up to scare small children (millennials)
Not enough is made about how much we destroyed to build "Spaghetti Junction" -- bowling entire walkable neighbourhoods (largely populated by working class folk) and paving over parks to build the least efficient transport system known to mankind
I'll be honest: all my urban policy wonkery, in the end, is just to make streets where I can eat copious amounts of delicious l food on cheap plastic furniture with 20 others as I watch the world go by
In Avondale, a racecourse sits on 35ha of land, and pays Council $200k in rates each year.
400m away, a 117-unit Kiwibuild building sitting on 0.25Ha of land pays an aggregate of $250k.
We have a tax system that rewards leeches and punishes progress. Land tax fixes this!
Driveways are some of the most comical examples of how we just don't do planning in NZ.
With better coordination, we could be saving land, incrementally opening up the middle of deep blocks for development, and providing useful pedestrian cut-throughs
In 2024, we're doing MIXED USE
That means new apartments are bringing more dairies, hairdressers, pharmacies, restaurants, bars, and supermarkets to the suburbs
I have this absolutely deranged idea to Gold Coast-ify Auckland by building clusters of towers around a metro train line that runs along the Waitematā coast
every time there's major storm, West Auckland sinks. yet whenever we discuss housing, everyone else says "sorry, our pipes can't handle it" and housing gets pushed to... West Auckland.
There's an alt. timeline when it becomes apparent that this is more than a regular storm (circa 3-4pm), the Mayor goes on the radio & urges out of caution that all businesses that can to close early and send their staff home, don't go to the concert, avoid the floodwater, etc
You can buy a decent ebike for less than a single years worth of bus fares. You can buy a decent e-scooter for less than a single years worth of car insurance.
micro-mobility is by far the cheapest form of motorised transport, just bizarre to cast it as for rich people
nothing more classic in housing debates than condemning both yimby + nimby, while pretending to be an unspecified third thing, but rolling out all the normal nimby talking points
I'm being told that 4 year terms are "undemocratic" so I've produced a truly democratic system: 0 year terms. You can go change your vote at vote at any time. Seats are changing in real time. All politicians live in true fear of The Worm
When hospitality begins to reopen in Auckland, allowing "streeteries" to take over carparks will help businesses meet socially distanced capacity limits.
But in the city centre, where businesses have been hit the hardest, we need street closures to give restaurants a hand up 👇
The year is 2020. Kiwirail are ripping up the entire network to build new tracks.
The year is 2023. Kiwirail are ripping up the entire network to build new track bed and tracks.
The year is 2025-
This is a typical local government meeting. These are the people driving decision making. Any solution to the housing crisis which doesn't involve shifting decision making away from crowds like this will not work.
Grafton Station is probably one of the most underrated improvements of 21st century Auckland PT -- although relatively basic, it has:
- access on either end of the platform
- lift access
- schools and hospitals nearby
- bus transfers on the doorstep
and it cost only $3 mil!
Cameron has shared this chart a few times now. It's inaccurate in 3 ways. Here's what an accurate comparison of Auckland and Wellington City looks like. A short thread:
the idea that the appropriate response to a housing shortage is more roads - rather than more townhouses and apartments - is only suitable if your solution is more people living in cars