Hilary Allen Profile Banner
Hilary Allen Profile
Hilary Allen

@ProfHilaryAllen

3,499
Followers
262
Following
10
Media
860
Statuses

Professor of financial regulation, American University pessimistic financial futurist #driverlessfinance

Joined July 2021
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
5 months
I was very disappointed to see the SEC approve exchange-traded Bitcoin products for retail investors. Everyday investors will be harmed, crypto will be brought closer to the core of our financial system - and for what?
1K
116
580
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Today, Lummis & Gillibrand launched their "bipartisan" crypto bill. It's bipartisan in the sense that senators from different parties are giving the crypto industry pretty much what it wants, but it doesn't honor the regulatory goals that Ds typically prioritize. A thread.
18
137
527
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
I just posted my new essay, DeFi: Shadow Banking 2.0? TL;DR: DeFi is neither decentralized, nor very good finance, so regulators should have no qualms about clamping down on it to protect the stability of our financial system and broader economy.
48
86
414
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
THIS is how crypto becomes systemically important. And with no real world productive capacity to compensate for that systemic risk. It’s like watching a car crash in slow motion.
@Blockworks_
Blockworks
2 years
BREAKING: Coinbase partners with BlackRock to offer crypto services to institutions
384
1K
7K
16
73
335
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
5 months
Bitcoin and other crypto are at best a means of gambling. They will never be able to deliver on promises of financial inclusion, efficiency, decentralization, and privacy, for reasons I articulate in my new draft Fintech and Techno-Solutionism.
424
76
265
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
I truly appreciate the appeal of decentralization in finance, but that's not what crypto is creating. Instead, we're just getting new avenues for institutional players to take our already hyper financialized system to eleven. See yesterday's headlines:
12
35
251
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Crypto is only worth what the next person is willing to pay, so the crypto industry always needs new investors. I find it deeply concerning that the potentially exploitative financial inclusion narrative is shifting to the developing world - predatory inclusion gone global?
@restofworld
Rest of World
2 years
We spoke with a dozen people from countries including Argentina, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq and Nigeria, who invested in Terra and its accompanying Luna token, and who have now lost thousands of dollars in savings. “I have nothing left, not even a penny.”
1
16
22
5
93
224
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Stablecoins can't be made truly stable without some kind of government backing - so should they even exist?
35
49
221
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
A succinct summary of my worries that crypto's financial inclusion/human rights narratives are just window dressing for predation: "these systems end up hiding a new elite, which is probably just an old elite in a new arena."
9
36
138
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
I feel terrible for everyone losing their shirts in the crypto crash but I hope this knocks some sense into policymakers. If this is allowed to keep growing and causes a financial crisis, it won't be just crypto investors losing their shirts, as I show in
13
22
135
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 month
Another epically bad stablecoin bill has just dropped (this one from Sens Lummis & Gillibrand) and so it’s time for another epically long tweet thread pointing out the ways in which this bill will make us worse off.
10
44
127
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
"The number of entities sufficient to disrupt a blockchain is relatively low: four for Bitcoin, two for Ethereum, and less than a dozen for most PoS networks." If blockchains aren't decentralized, what's the point? Why put up with energy costs/ransomware attacks/fin instability?
@TylerGellasch
Tyler Gellasch
2 years
DARPA funded an assessment of some blockchain stuff. Tl;dr: It says this shit is centralized and vulnerable. Lots to chew on, here. Makes me wonder if ⁦ @SECGov ⁩ wants to reconsider if Bitcoin is a security…
18
89
218
29
31
124
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Finally got my hands on a hard copy of my book! It feels like my own little victory over the supply chain…
Tweet media one
10
11
125
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
When the biggest proponents of crypto/blockchain/Web3 tech can't coherently explain its benefits (let alone justify its myriad externalities), that should be a major red flag. Financial regulators REALLY need to start listening to tech critics.
@cwarzel
Charlie Warzel
2 years
I wrote big ole newsletter about “the hollow abstraction” of Web3 and those videos of its biggest boosters struggling to articulate a concrete vision for their next big thing
21
83
466
9
26
115
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
Rs on House FS and Ag Cttees have dropped text of their digital asset market structure bill, which they’re rushing into markup next week. There are many reasons to pump the brakes on this bill, and I’ll discuss some in this thread. But first - what’s really driving the rush?
34
40
113
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
Crypto is now facing an existential crisis. The SEC is cracking down on securities laws violations, and most Americans have wised up to crypto’s problems, with 75% of Americans who have heard of crypto saying they don’t trust it. .
6
29
107
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
As I explore in a new paper, VC has been driving the crypto industry, including by actively seeking to get the law changed to accommodate and legitimize it (a strategy known as “regulatory entrepreneurship”).
2
14
85
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
When it comes to the goals of both investor protection and financial stability, this bill is a deregulatory departure from the status quo. It gives most jurisdiction over crypto assets to the CFTC, which has no investor protection mandate and far fewer resources than the SEC.
3
11
83
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
It's go time! My new book, Driverless Finance: Fintech's Impact on Financial Stability is now available for pre-order:
3
16
80
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Why a lighter touch? Crypto lobbyists would talk about allowing innovation, but viz the letter which lays bare the fundamental flaws and limitations of the underlying technology. This is not innovation that merits a light-touch bespoke regulatory regime.
4
18
79
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 year
Great reporting on the six (!) people who maintain Bitcoin's code. For all of those who think that software is set-and-forget and can operate autonomously, "Software needs more care and feeding than many people think"
10
14
78
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
7 months
"like so many cos in the crypto industry, [FTX] propped itself up on an imaginary foundation of tokens it had invented, and that foundation was bound to fail eventually. When the next company in its position falls, the only surprise should be that ppl expected any other outcome"
6
11
78
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Is FTX really claiming that they have FDIC-insured brokerage accounts? The FDIC doesn't insure brokerage accounts.
13
10
75
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
In 2008, we learned from CDS that infinite synthesis of financial assets allowed leverage to be multiplied, making the financial system more fragile. Here we go again.
@dgolumbia
official parody of David Golumbia
2 years
in #cryptocurrency "tokens, @ProfHilaryAllen sees an innovation that is at its core comparable to the credit default swap," the financial product that led to the 2008 Great Recession @maxwellstrachan #web3 #metaverse #blockchain #Ethereum #fraud
1
3
13
2
16
73
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
First of all, does anyone really think that regulating the crypto markets is the most pressing financial or agricultural issue facing the American public? No. Instead, pressure for this legislation is coming from some venture capitalists, the crypto industry, and their lobbyists.
14
14
71
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
From a financial stability perspective, banks should not be issuing stablecoins. Why would the government want to put its backing behind something that is only used for crypto speculation?
3
7
70
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
As I’ve testified, it’s perfectly possible for blockchain-based businesses to comply with the securities laws, but the problem is that blockchain is not actually very good tech. So these businesses prob won't succeed on technological superiority.
64
18
71
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
The most charitable reading is that Lummis and Gillibrand believe the hype about stablecoins being the future of money, but they're simply not fit for purpose. As the BIS recently noted "crypto cannot fulfil the social role of money"
4
10
68
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Appreciate Gensler clearing up pervasive misunderstandings about stablecoins: Outside of use on crypto platforms, stablecoins generally are not used for commerce. U.S. retail investors have no direct right of redemption for the two largest stablecoins by market capitalization
6
10
65
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
The digital asset market structure bill isn’t the only terrible piece of crypto legislation being rushed into markup tomorrow. There’s also a very flawed stablecoin bill as well.
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
Rs on House FS and Ag Cttees have dropped text of their digital asset market structure bill, which they’re rushing into markup next week. There are many reasons to pump the brakes on this bill, and I’ll discuss some in this thread. But first - what’s really driving the rush?
34
40
113
20
33
63
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Many crypto assets already qualify as securities, but the bill ties itself up in knots trying to create a bespoke regime for those assets that is lighter touch than securities regulation.
5
7
63
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
So how does this industry profit? 1, assets can be made up out of thin air (often wash traded to pump up valuation) & then sold for profit. 2, exchanges engage in combinations of brokerage, exchange, clearing and proptrading activities (sometimes with commingled customer funds)
3
13
60
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 year
Thanks to @ForeignAffairs for the opportunity to lay out the case for banning crypto
@K8brannen
Kate Brannen
1 year
"Some have expressed concerns about the United States losing its edge as a global leader in cryptocurrency innovation, but it is undesirable to be a leader in an innovation this harmful." @ProfHilaryAllen for @ForeignAffairs :
77
32
114
73
14
54
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
If we are going to bring stablecoins within the banking system, at the very least they should be subject to the separations between banking and commerce imposed by the Bank Holding Company Act.
1
8
56
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
And I haven't even gotten to the tax issues...
4
7
55
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
4 months
Once again, the crypto industry is correctly diagnosing problems with the financial system BUT completely misrepresenting its ability to solve them. The claims in this report about potential speed/size/disintermediation are completely overstated. See
@TheBlock__
The Block
4 months
ICYMI: The State of Crypto: Fairer, Cheaper, Faster Everyday Finance- in partnership with Coinbase
5
1
14
11
18
59
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
And here's your regular reminder that crypto is not disrupting Wall St, they're merging (and as I warned in , the integration of crypto and repo is THE "terrifying worst-case scenario").
@FTMarkets
FT Markets
2 years
Banks turn to blockchain in search for high-quality trading assets
7
4
12
3
11
55
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
I'm saddened that this EO falls prey to techno-utopian notions that technology can solve deep-seated structural financial inclusion problems. Critical interrogation of crypto's actual utility is needed before promoting it
3
7
57
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
The SEC simply wouldn’t allow this in the securities world (with good reason - these kinds of conflicts have led to harm time and time again) . So while the tech is not incompatible with the securities laws, many crypto BUSINESS MODELS are.
6
8
54
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
To understand DeFi's problems, you need to understand the finance AND the tech. I unpack both in , but ultimately, I'm not a tech expert. That's why it's so great that some of the biggest names in tech have formally weighed in
3
14
54
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
At one conference when I presented my paper explaining that DeFi is not decentralized, I was told by DeFi proponents to look into MakerDAO. I did, and it did not seem decentralized to me - now the FT has come to the same conclusion:
5
12
53
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
The IMF's F&D magazine has published my short article The Superficial Allure of Crypto. It's a call to look under the hood of blockchain technology & appreciate that the negative externalities associated with this flawed tech cannot be justified
13
21
54
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 year
So the HFSC stablecoin bill dropped. TL;DR, it won’t fix problems with stablecoins (which aren't used for payments anyway), but it will extend govt safety net to more firms.
5
30
51
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 year
Also, "the only truly effective way to prevent runs and make stablecoins stable is to put a government guarantee behind them [but] It seems like a truly terrible idea to guarantee something that has no real use case other than facilitating crypto speculation."
4
7
51
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Otherwise we risk a fusion of large tech and finance, with tech giants becoming TBTF financial institutions. Section 605 seems to create a loophole in the BHCA for stablecoin issuers, though.
3
6
48
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
An important reason why stablecoins shouldn’t be brought within the banking system. We’d get all the moral hazard, but without any productive investment to show for it.
@jonsindreu
Jon Sindreu
2 years
An issue I feel is underdiscussed : DeFi has all the flaws of traditional finance, yes, but on top of this it basically finances other crypto projects, not houses or factories anywhere. It is as if traditional banks only financed other banks (essentially ONE big credit risk).
31
106
511
3
15
47
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
One problem we IDed with the draft bill is that it wouldn’t just give the crypto industry an accommodative regulatory regime , it would create opportunities for other kinds of securities to migrate into the same light touch regime, eviscerating the securities laws as we know them
2
10
48
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
To improve financial inclusion, ppl need access to straightforward financial services. Technology promises the moon, but won't fix incentives for predatory behavior that can thrive with complex products. @ChrisOdinet and I urge the Biden Admin to look beyond the crypto hype
@TheHillOpinion
TheHillOpinion
2 years
The problems with Biden's crypto executive order take us back to 2008 Via @ChrisOdinet @ProfHilaryAllen
1
5
20
5
9
48
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 year
As we watch USDC, I'm re-upping this: . The final sentence "Without VC funding, there’s a good chance that stablecoins would disappear — and that we’d all be a lot better off."
1
7
45
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
@EmilyStewartM @TheStalwart I'm all for enforcing existing securities/commodities regulation against crypto, but creating special crypto regulatory regimes is a recipe for disaster:
5
10
46
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Really good point. The run dynamics on stablecoins are a bit different from money market mutual funds because stablecoin holders often lack direct redemption rights from the issuer - most holders must go to a crypto exchange if they want to convert their Tether to fiat currency
@ahcastor
Amy Castor
2 years
Tether wrote a lengthy blog post explaining how stable and liquid it is and how it's honoring redemptions. Here's the thing: This is all complete B.S. because only a select few of its big customers can actually redeem USDT for $$ directly.
12
34
237
1
8
44
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 year
Let me conclude by shouting “WHY ARE WE EVEN DOING THIS?” Everyone knows stablecoins aren’t currently being used for payments; the underlying tech doesn’t scale well for processing lots of transactions; the WEF found s/coins don’t do anything for financial inclusion…
9
10
45
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
Blockchain tech can’t guarantee economic decentralization either – and even if it could, there would be no profit and so VCs wouldn’t be funding it. So blockchain won’t be delivering on that front either.
7
9
46
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Section 808 requires some minimum cybersecurity standards, but what about testing the software for basic quality control/fitness for purpose? We do this for aviation software - we should do the same if our financial system is going to run on it.
2
6
40
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
A smaller point, but Section 701 is another example of techno-solutionism that could waste govt funds. Given the obvious limitations of distributed ledger technology ( again), why should regulators be forced to waste time trying to study ways to use it?
3
5
39
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Section 702 appears to be more about forcing the Fed to grant master accounts to the crypto industry - something that Lummis has been pushing for a long time.
1
6
37
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
The regulatory sandbox stuff in Section 802 is highly problematic. As I've explored, state-based fintech sandboxes are likely to result in a race to the bottom - so let's not let them operate across state lines.
1
4
36
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Also, this Section 802 supplies a definition of "innovative" that just means new, and the Section encourages anything that is new. But what if new = bad for investors or financial stability?
2
4
37
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
The industry would like to see crypto legitimized as an investment for retail AND large institutional players like 401k plans and pension funds. They also would like the blessing to keep running conflicted exchanges. And they would like it ASAP. Hence the rush on this bill.
3
3
37
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
Even some in the VC world seem to be losing interest – AI is the shiny new thing. The crypto industry desperately needs (i) new investors, and (ii) the ability to continue its conflicted business models. That’s where this legislation comes in.
4
2
37
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
If people need to be able to do this to protect themselves, I don't think crypto is the best way to go for "financial inclusion"...
@0xQuit
Quit
2 years
9a/ FUNNY BUSINESS The first functions I look at are `mint`, `transferFrom`, and `isApprovedForAll`. Take a look at the four screenshots below, and see if you can determine why I'd call them malicious. All are things I've seen in live contracts. Drop a comment if you need help.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
12
11
137
5
7
33
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Fun fact: in , I talked about the systemic risks of BlackRock’s Aladdin in one chapter, and the systemic risks of crypto in another. Guess they should have been in the same chapter. Sigh.
2
3
36
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
There's also a weird inconsistency btwn Section 702 (“Congress finds that “Digital assets settle with finality in seconds and minutes”) and Section 503 which allows for ad hoc negotiations w/ customers to determine what constitutes settlement finality for digital assets.
1
4
33
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
(Here’s the link to the OG paper on VC’s regulatory entrepreneurship strategy, and while we’re at it, also a link to a great new paper on “venture predation”).
1
7
34
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
There’s much more not to like about this bill, but I’ll stop here. The status quo isn’t perfect, but it does a decent job of protecting US citizens, and the public would benefit if Congress supported – instead of undermining – the SEC’s investor protection efforts.
24
3
34
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 month
And by us, I mean everybody but Circle and Coinbase – their USDC stablecoin will be the primary beneficiary of proposed stablecoin legislation. Although, there are a few parts of this particular hasty mishmash that might give even Circle/Coinbase pause.
3
4
34
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
My latest in The Hill on a very dangerous provision in the proposed digital asset market structure bill: an innovation mandate for the SEC. In an attempt to accommodate the crypto industry, Republican legislators would gut the broader securities laws
3
17
32
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
Most of our critique still applies to this revised version. It is still unnecessarily complex, riddled with loopholes, will become outdated as soon as tech and business models evolve, and is predicated on the fantasy notion that governance can ever be decentralized at scale.
2
3
30
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
I spoke to Bloomberg Crypto about the Lummis Gillibrand Bill. My assessment? Start over. (Also, this may be my favorite podcast I’ve ever done. @s_m_i is a fantastic interviewer).
1
4
30
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
And then, going back to my point about eviscerating existing securities laws, there’s Section 504 that would give the SEC a new innovation mandate, and regulated industry a new cudgel to undermine the SEC. Here’s my op-ed on this issue.
7
5
29
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 year
Some things must be allowed to fail, but close calls (even kind-of-close calls) are v hard in the moment - especially when dealing w unpredictable panic transmission. That's why we have to keep some thing from being close calls. Let's start by keeping crypto & banking separate.
6
6
29
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 month
The thing is, FDIC receivership only works if its lubricated by deposit insurance. So this bill is essentially promising FDIC support without charging for it.
5
3
29
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 month
(As an aside, USDC was one of the greatest beneficiaries of govt support for SVB: it lost its $1 peg as SVB foundered, and it was only restored once US authorities agreed to make USDC and other uninsured SVB depositors whole. Stablecoins aren’t stable )
7
4
25
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
The bill still doesn’t address the fact that blockchains are riddled with operational fragilities, and are not something you'd want to run a financial system on
2
1
28
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
(And this comes at a time when even lots of people in the crypto industry admit that decentralization is aspirational rather than reality – so again, why are we rushing so fast to create a regulatory framework for it?)
2
2
28
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
4 months
It kind of boggles the mind that Coinbase is making these kinds of claims at the same time that it's trying to defeat the SEC in court by arguing its business is offering Beanie Babies, not transformational financial services
6
10
27
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 year
Because right now, stablecoins aren't really used for payments. Let's call stablecoins what they are – a gateway to speculative investments, or poker chips, if you prefer – and regulate them as such.
@jp_koning
John Paul Koning
1 year
I wrote a quick post about payments stablecoins vs trading stablecoins.
Tweet media one
11
11
52
2
2
27
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
11 months
I just posted a new draft "Interest Rates, Venture Capital, and Financial Stability" In telling the stories of SVB & crypto, it highlights the VC industry’s unexpected and underappreciated contribution to financial stability threats in the early 2020s.
2
6
27
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Deposit insurance keeps banks stable so they can continue to fund productive enterprise (MMFs fund real corporations too). But stablecoins aren't used for anything other than betting in the DeFi casino. Why would the govt want to provide deposit insurance to stabilize them?
@BrendanPedersen
Brendan Pedersen
2 years
NEW: We got our hands on a discussion draft of congressional Democrat's first significant attempt to legislate stablecoins. We've uploaded the draft in its entirety here:
2
10
13
3
0
25
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 year
My latest in the FT today - with an assist from Regina George!
@TonyTassell
Tony Tassell
1 year
"To paraphrase the character Regina George in the film Mean Girls, lawmakers should stop trying to make crypto happen." - FT column by @ProfHilaryAllen
3
18
40
5
5
26
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
This problem arises because most financial assets are already in digital form, and the draft legislation said it would apply to any fungible digital asset whose ownership is recorded on a blockchain. But there’s nothing particularly special about a blockchain
2
2
26
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
Instead of fighting over the Howey test for investment contracts, the SEC will be forced to fight over Reves v EY for “notes”, or Landreth Timber for “stock” as traditional securities issuers try to litigate their way out of these categories & into the new light touch regime.
1
1
24
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
3 years
From my book: It's a bit like the Emperor’s New Clothes, w everyone afraid to admit that they can’t understand what’s so new and transformative about the innovation but w added financial incentives to keep going along with the story so that you can profit
2
5
23
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
Despite blockchain’s limitations, I’m sure that many issuers of existing securities would be willing to put their assets on a blockchain if it meant they could avoid SEC regulation but still have their securities traded on a public exchange.
4
3
24
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
In , I talk about many problems associated with financial institutions incorporating machine learning into their risk management models. @doctorow has one I missed - adversarial attacks on training data. Have to think about what this could mean for banks
@doctorow
Cory Doctorow NONCONSENSUAL BLUE TICK
2 years
But a burgeoning research field based on adversarial attacks on training data shows that we need to go beyond checking training data for bias. 10/
1
6
56
0
4
23
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
The SEC is still faced with unreasonable hurdles in rebutting people’s assertions that their digital assets live on decentralized blockchains and are therefore beyond the SEC’s jurisdiction.
3
3
24
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
Kind of ironic that a bill supposed to provide certainty about investment contracts will open up a big can of uncertainty about other kinds of securities. If certainty were really the goal, the bill could specify that all digital assets on a blockchain count as securities.
5
2
24
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
Concise but devastatingly comprehensive and effective, @Tonantzin_LC has written the seminal take-down of crypto's claims about promoting financial inclusion
3
10
22
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
Cue the contracts of adhesion with waivers built in: Want to use the exchange? Then you’ll need to let us use your funds…
1
3
22
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
10 months
(The new regime will be administered by the smaller and underfunded CFTC, rather than the SEC)
1
0
23
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
1 month
And so like the house bill, this bill provides a way for big tech platforms to basically become unregulated banks with implicit guarantees of access to the Fed discount window and FDIC insurance. Do we really have bipartisan support for THAT?
2
6
22
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
@ProfSautter I think that's an accurate depiction of recent crypto investing trends, but given that everyone who purchased Bitcoin since the end of 2020 is now underwater on their investment, I don't think that's something to celebrate. Viz @ChrisOdinet & me on predatory inclusion.
2
5
23
@ProfHilaryAllen
Hilary Allen
2 years
It's terrible that so many are losing money in the FTX failure, but if you want to understand how it could have been so much worse if banks had exposure to crypto, check out the prologue of .
20
10
22