And yes, we now have empirical validation of these observations, which date back over a century. Marx's citation patterns had a significant boost from the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, after remaining relatively flat in the preceding decades.
New email dump showing Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins coordinating a propaganda campaign to attack the Great Barrington declaration last October. More coming soon so here's a teaser...
We live in an Orwellian hell-scape. Facebook is now "fact checking" anyone who questions the White House's word-games about the definition of a recession.
Mansa Musa was also one of the largest mass-enslavers in the history of the world. In 1324 he embarked on a pilgrimage across Egypt to Mecca, bringing 12,000 slaves in tow.
The "Is Harvard Extension School real Harvard?" debate is fascinating precisely because it reveals the sneering contempt that the elite ranks of the academic far-left have for students who don't hail from their own privileged backgrounds.
Thread summarizing what we've learned so far of the Fauci/Collins email dump on the Great Barrington Declaration:
It starts on 10/14/20 when Collins instructs Fauci and his staff to "take down" the GBD and the "fringe" scientists behind it.
One of the great untold stories of the 20th century political left is how they lost the debate on economic issues *within* the economics profession.
So they moved over into the English department (and other humanities) instead, and resumed teaching discredited economics there.
When I found unambiguous factual errors in the 1619 Project, I first attempted to seek a correction through the appropriate channels at the New York Times. The paper gave me the runaround for months, then decided to do nothing.
Marx's ideas led to more exploitation, domination, misery, and death than any other philosopher in human history. To present a picture of him without accounting for any aspect of that legacy is an offensive farce.
Just watched the Hulu 1619 Project's first episode. It leans heavily into the claim that the American Revolution was fought over slavery.
Lord Dunmore becomes an "emancipator" in Nikole Hannah-Jones's account, propped up by Woody Holton.
Not mentioned: Dunmore was an enslaver.
The fuming about twitter that we've witnessed over the last week all boils down to this:
Musk is taking away the favorite toy of the self-important journalistic and academic elite, and sharing it with the masses. They're angry and embittered over that fact.
Sorry,
@nytimes
, but it wasn't
@harvard
that "found" these "instances."
Outside parties brought them to Harvard's attention, and Harvard tried to bury it.
The university only started to acknowledge them when they realized the publicly-released evidence was overwhelming.
List of actual historical claims made by 1619 Project creator Nikole Hannah-Jones:
1. The North was only reluctantly drawn into the Civil War in 1865
2. Europe is not a continent, but a white supremacist social construct.
This was called "careless cutting and pasting," "accidental," and "without intent" by various Ivy League officials when discovered last year.
So...how does one "accidentally" copy a paragraph from a book about Detroit, change its location to Atlanta, and pass it off as your own?
Also for those of you sharing one of those moronic "fact check" articles claiming that tipping comes from slavery, you're simply wrong.
Here's a travel guide to Europe, published in the 1730s.
The strangest aspect of the CRT debate by far is the advent and rise of CRT denialism. More often than not it comes from people who, until only a few months ago, regularly placed CRT at the center of their own scholarly work & who now bizarrely insist that CRT isn't a thing.
This convoluted editorial argues that Claudine Gay should keep her job because her plagiarism was "unintentional" (how does one "unintentionally" make small edits to conceal a lifted passage btw?), and because her critics' motives are in "bad faith" 1/
It appears that the guy who just got expelled from the Tennessee legislature...has spent the last several years tweeting out demands for the expulsion of other representatives from the Tennessee legislature.
Nikole Hannah-Jones has a longstanding pattern of responding to anyone who criticizes her work in print by posting a barrage of ad hominem attacks on their credentials.
At the same time, NHJ has never published so much as a single peer reviewed book or article.
Official channels do not work when the institution that houses them is corrupt and politicized.
Next time, I won't make the mistake of thinking that any of these entities are equipped or willing to police misconduct by their own.
Except it's not an error. Karl Marx was a vicious Anti-Semite. His essay "The Russian Loan" spread a ridiculous conspiracy theory about Jewish bankers manipulating governments into war in order to profit Jews. His hatred for Jews was unambiguous.
This is some grade-A revisionist lunacy in the New York Times.
Police in NYC alone issued hundreds of citations for violating lockdown orders. California arrested a guy for paddle-boarding & ticketed people on the beach. Mississippi ticketed parishioners in a church parking lot.
Milei won a democratic election against a fascist party. Literally. As in Juan Peron based his political movement on Mussolini while an observer to the Axis armies in WWII. Contrary to what the left claims, Milei is repealing 70+ years of Peronist-fascist economic policies
Javier Milei continues his fascist rampage in Argentina.
He has authorised the Privatising of all remaining State owned industries (thats his donors cashing in).
He has also authorised the sale of all Social Housing and removed all rent controls
It is going exactly as expected
Meanwhile, remember that time when Joe Biden declared that we were in a recession in October 2020 without any NBER determination?
Funny how they don't fact-check that one.
President Obama and I left Donald Trump a booming economy — and he caused a recession. He squandered it just like he has everything else he’s inherited in his life.
Considering that Sowell has published multiple scholarly works on race and history, it is significantly greater expertise than Nikole Hannah-Jones has in these areas...which is exactly zero.
Nikole Hannah Jones's latest argument is to claim that the original 1619 Project - as published in the New York Times as part of a multimillion dollar advertising blitz - was just a rough draft, and the new book is the revised version by which it should be judged. Seriously.
Note that I am not suggesting that slavery defines entire legacy of Mansa Musa, or anyone else. History is complicated. But NHJ also has a long-established pattern of seeking the cancellation of some enslavers while conveniently overlooking this detail for other enslavers.
When I discovered signs of plagiarism by a prominent Princeton professor, I brought it to the university. They ignored it for 6 months, finally promised to investigate, then cleared him on the grounds it was "unintentional" - contradicting their own written policies.
Considering that the core of the 1619 Project was constructed around a rogue's gallery of economically incompetent "New History of Capitalism" writers, plagiarists like Kruse, and CRT activists, then yes. I do know its subjects better than the academics NHJ consulted.
I decided to take a sledgehammer to the claim that tipping emerged from slavery.
This thesis was most recently promoted by the creator of the 1619 Project, though it has also been upheld in multiple media "fact checks."
It is also historically false.
When I first discovered a historian had manipulated multiple quotes in an article at a Cambridge University Press journal, I brought it to the editors through appropriate channels. They gave me the runaround for over a year, then cleared the guy on a sham "internal investigation"
The 1619 Project K-12 curriculum makes some interesting word usage to obscure the fact that Mansa Musa, the 14th century king of Mali, was a mass-enslaver.
Imagine Nikole Hannah-Jones's outrage if a history textbook only described Thomas Jefferson's slaves as "servants."
Remember that time back in August when we were told that Florida's case surge was being caused by insufficient lockdowns, masks, and vaccine mandates, whereas the northeast successfully enacted "responsible" policies that kept cases under control?
The fact that Twitter's app functionality is more or less undisturbed after 75% of its employees were fired or quit strongly suggests that its previous workforce was bogged down in bureaucratic bloat and woke political "activism" from people who added no value to the company.
When the original 1619 Project came out,
@nhannahjones
repeatedly cited my work on Lincoln and colonization. Then she realized I was a critic of her project.
In the new book edition, it appears that I've been replaced by Ibram X. Kendi ;-)
There were only 2 historians out of 12 feature essay writers in the 1619 Project. Neither is an expert in the period where slavery actually existed in the US (1619-1865). One of them is a plagiarist. The 1619 Project's lack of expertise was ultimately the source of its undoing.
Karl Marx was infrequently cited and largely unknown outside of radical labor activism prior to 1917. The main reason we even know about him today is that the Soviet revolution put him on the map and elevated him into academic prominence.
When someone announces "I'm a Marxist" it's the economic equivalent of saying "I'm into astrology." You don't need to ignore everything they say, but it is a reliable heuristic showing that they're exceptionally susceptible to some really stupid ideas.
And here is Anthony Fauci, lying in a sworn deposition, about his involvement in Francis Collins's directive to "take down" the Great Barrington Declaration.
I mean, sure, looting is counterproductive. But it’s hard to be mad about protests not prioritizing the private property of a system of oppression founded on treating people’s ancestors as private property.
Breaking: new FOIAs out of the NIH. In Nov 2020 a pair of NIH officials drafted a crazy memo to the FDA chief on implementing a national N95 mask mandate. The memo likens the mandate to emergency wartime powers, such as the suspension of habeas corpus.
More coming soon.
"We ignored the abolitionist movement in the 1619 Project because they were less than 2% of the white population" is certainly an argument.
It is not a good one, although it is consistent with the quality of 1619 Project historiography.
"Opposing the IRS in 2022 is racist, because something something 1862 something Civil War" appears to be the newest claim of the 1619 Project school of historiography.
Republicans don't just hate the IRS because it pays for things like highways and social security. There's history here. They hate what it represents. The IRS was created in 1862 specifically to fund the Civil War, to end slavery and to burn white supremacy to the ground.
It appears that 1619 Project writer Kevin M. Kruse takes the same approach to writing his academic books that a procrastinating undergrad uses at 3 am on the morning that the term paper is due...
An opening glimpse of just how bad the 1619 Project hulu "capitalism" episode is. It starts with NHJ asking Seth Rockman to define capitalism. Rockman is the new history of capitalism historian who wrote an entire essay saying capitalism is undefinable, but also wedded to slavery
The world's biggest ship docked in the UK yesterday, carrying 24 THOUSAND containers of consumer stuff
More than anything, this image encapsulates everything that is wrong with our society
Since Kevin Kruse is apparently claiming exoneration for clear and unambiguous acts of plagiarism in his doctoral dissertation & other works, here are 4 straight pages where he clearly cribbed both language and content from Rick Perlstein's "Nixonland."
This is Harvard's own policy on plagiarism. It describes what Claudine Gay did to a T.
Not surprisingly, her defenders are claiming that this type of plagiarism should get a pass. It's the same false argument they enlisted to defend Kevin Kruse, and it's all because of politics.
Marxists: "YoU hAvEn'T rEaD mArX!!%!"
Me: I edited a 250 page book of Marx's works. You're conflating disagreement with Marx with unfamiliarity, because you can't fathom that anyone would read and disagree with what you view as a religious text.
Critical Theory is little more than a conspiracist epistemology to rationalize why none of Marx's predictions panned out and why the revolution didn't happen the way he promised.
We should all be happy that this corrupt bureaucrat will no longer be
@NIHDirector
as of tomorrow.
History will judge him harshly for the immense damage he has done to science during the Covid pandemic by politicizing and weaponizing NIH funding.
If you want to see Anthony Fauci's end game in his own words, this is it: a radical restructuring of human behavior to accommodate the irrational brand of disease-panic that has characterized his entire career.
He published this in Sept. 2020.
@davidpugliese
@OttawaPolice
Didn't you write several articles promoting outrage over the fact that the Canadian military simply *monitored* the BLM protesters in 2020?
And now you want the same people to arrest this guy over his hot tub? Curious.
Another data point for my thesis - most "economic journalism" is terrible because journalists primarily learn about economics from humanities professors.
Last December, I released a FOIA'd email to the world, showing that Francis Collins ordered Anthony Fauci to wage a "devastating take down" on the Great Barrington Declaration.
A year later, Fauci is apparently lying under oath, denying he ever did this
New email dump showing Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins coordinating a propaganda campaign to attack the Great Barrington declaration last October. More coming soon so here's a teaser...
Just to be clear, this guy's argument is that historians should not criticize the 1619 Project - no matter the flaws - because doing so will give ammunition to the "wrong" side of the political spectrum.
If that's the case, history has ceased to be a serious academic discipline.
The Fauci-endorsed Wired article is noteworthy for having one of the single worst hot-takes of the entire pandemic. It declared in October 2020 that the GBD should be ignored, because lockdowns were a thing of the past and would not be returning!
3. The 2008 Financial Crisis somehow used obscure finance tactics from the 1830s, meaning it was ultimately caused by slavery.
4. George Washington didn't support the American Revolution until Dunmore's Proclamation- 6 months after he took command of the Continental Army
Plagiarism does not cease to be plagiarism simply because the plagiarized party discovered it was their friend who did the plagiarizing, and decides to bless the plagiarism post hoc.
I'm genuinely amused that this is such a difficult concept for some academics.
LMAO!
It doesn't matter that the "victim" of this says it was no biggie, a minor infraction, these folks will stick to the script. When someone ideologically-aligned with them is being chased by a mob about something that happened 3 decades ago, they will change their tune.
The
@ldburnett
defense of Kevin Kruse's plagiarism repeatedly asserts that close paraphrasing, using nearly identical wordings without quotation marks, is "standard historical practice" and is therefore permissible.
The American Historical Association disagrees.
Again, note the complete lack of concern over the fact that she committed plagiarism, and that it is extensive. The academic far left only cares about preserving the DEI/Critical Theory racket at all costs.
After driving his country into 2 decades of starvation and mass death, Mao successfully restored China's GDP per capita to where it had been in <checks notes> the year 1700.
5. South America and Africa were pre-Columbian trading partners, which is how the Aztecs learned how to build pyramids.
6. The atom bomb was dropped on Hiroshima because the US had already spent money developing it and didn't want it to go to waste.
Rewatched the segment and...hoo-boy.
Holton points at the governor's mansion in Williamsburg, claiming that Dunmore issued his proclamation from this building as a sign of its significance.
None of this is true. Dunmore fled months earlier & issued it from exile aboard a ship!
Last night, the AHA dragged its president through a struggle session in which he issued an obsequious apology for "offending" readers by mildly criticizing the 1619 Project and politicized history.
Today, they locked their Twitter account and posted this. Dissent is not welcome.
Yes,
@woodyholtonusc
, I can.
I'll start with where you lied on camera and claimed that Lord Dunmore issued his proclamation from the governor's residence in Williamsburg.
He didn't. He was exiled aboard HMS William off the coast, because the revolution had already started.
Some of you have asked where Francis Collins and Anthont Fauci turned in their search for someone to do a "quick and devastating take down" of the Great Barrington Declaration last October.
Here is one of the answers.
Both
@nhannahjones
and
@woodyholtonusc
assert explicit parallels between Dunmore and Abraham Lincoln's emancipation proclamation. This stretches the evidence beyond all recognition. Dunmore's measure saw very limited use & only freed slaves on the condition of military service.
This falsehood needs a
#communitynote
. Only 2 of the original 12 featured authors on the 1619 project were academic historians.
Neither of them are experts on slavery.
It would appear that the 1619 Project's own editor did not read the book she edited, as its chapter on slavery and capitalism adopts an *explicitly* Marxist interpretation of labor economics.
You're not a victim of anything,
@nhannahjones
.
You engaged in propaganda yourself when the New York Times ghost-edited one of the most controversial claims out of the 1619 Project just in time for Pulitzer season, and you went on CNN and claimed you never said it.
Academia is quickly settling on a bizarre new standard for evaluating plagiarism wherein the plagiarized party may exonerate the plagiarist by simply giving it their blessing post hoc.
This is like saying "my friend gave me permission to copy his test answers."
Epidemiology twitter has a cry-bully problem. It's full of people who routinely engage in abusive, harassing, and downright vile behavior toward dissenters from lockdowner orthodoxy. And yet at even the slightest pushback, the same people take cover by claiming victimhood.
Looks like we have our first defenses of Kevin Kruse's plagiarism out of Princeton. The strategy seems to be to downplay its severity by presenting it as incidental & limited.
Not mentioned: several other examples have since come to light.