I'm working on an open world horror game with lots of gore and strange characters. If you want to help me out, please consider wishlisting the game and following me:

@Phantom_TheGame This code is great, and the replies from people who didn't get the joke are hilarious 🥲

@zlumer_eth I love it 😂

@Phantom_TheGame This is pretty good. But I personally would do the loop a 2nd time. Just to make sure that it really found the nearest enemy. I call it a pro developer move 🤓

@MrGemezl Yeah, I was actually worried the code might miss the nearest enemy. Could do a second loop with another variable of Enemy and do a "if(nearestEnemy == nearestEnemyJustMakingSure) { bla bla}", and probably put it all in a while loop until those two are the same

@Phantom_TheGame you can actually make this a little tighter by measuring to its vertices instead of just the origin there's also an optimization for distance checking using squared magnitude! here you go:

@FreyaHolmer A piece of art. Truly wonderful. Thanks for teaching me better ways, I thought I had already mastered Unity but apparently not.

@Phantom_TheGame Big ouf... I'm going to get back to you with a list of things to try out.

@DeSerrateGame 💀

@Phantom_TheGame I have never seen anything like this, your work should be framed and immortalized in a museum

@omoflop Omg is it that good? 😍Thank you!

@Phantom_TheGame I have concerns. 😅

@ZZhako Oh, did I forget a semicolon somewhere?

@Phantom_TheGame have you tried GetComponent<Transform>().gameObject.transform? its usually faster

@elvismdd Good find, I might update my code to that

@Phantom_TheGame This would immediately fail any code review. nearestDist should be initialised to float.MaxValue. Apart from that, it’s perfect! 👌

@sefless Ohh I was actually gonna do float.MaxValue, but I though it would require a lot of ram since the number is so high. Thanks for explaining though

@Phantom_TheGame It's colourful i'll give you that much....

@DCAnonBro My teacher used to say "the more color, the more dollar"

@Phantom_TheGame try putting the FindObjectsByType INSIDE the for loop :)

@OYHDev Ohhh why didn't i think of that