Morten N. Støstad Profile Banner
Morten N. Støstad Profile
Morten N. Støstad

@MortenStostad

3,767
Followers
693
Following
177
Media
754
Statuses

Lecturer at @UCBerkeley , post-doc at @TheChoiceLab @NHHEcon . Studying inequality's consequences. Once upon a time I was an astrophysicist.

Joined February 2021
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Pinned Tweet
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
This semester I've been teaching "Economic Inequality and Growth" at @UCBerkeley . This is a thread with some of my favorite graphs. First, the headline everyone's-seen-it graph: falling then rising income inequality in Anglophone countries.
Tweet media one
34
385
1K
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
English-speaking Millennials are reversing an age-old trend, becoming more progressive instead of conservative as they age. But in the non-Anglophone West, Millennials look more or less like everyone else.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
100
704
5K
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Do people become conservative with age? An update with 21 countries and 546,013 individuals. The fascinating plot comes from @jburnmurdoch , based on the UK and US, and shows; 1. People become more right-wing with age. 2. Millennials are different. But is this true everywhere?
Tweet media one
83
744
3K
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
2 years
I sometimes get asked how to design surveys. This new working paper by @S_Stantcheva is the best introduction anyone could hope for: It's extensive, clear, and on the research frontier. If you're looking to run surveys, read this.
Tweet media one
17
423
2K
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
In honor of my last day of teaching "Economic Inequality and Growth" at @UCBerkeley , some more graphs. I'll start with the famous elephant curve popularized by @BrankoMilan . Between 1980-2020, most global growth was captured by either the global bottom 50% or the top 1%.
Tweet media one
13
174
686
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
A short primer on capital taxation, the most progressive type of taxation we have:
Tweet media one
9
110
658
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Ever wondered where inequality decreased the most in the last 10-15 years? The other day a friend asked me, and I realized I didn't know. So I crunched the numbers. Here are the 5 countries where income inequality decreased the most between 2007 and 2021:
3
166
536
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
#1 . 🇺🇾 Uruguay. Following progressive tax reform in 2007 and subsequent social reforms, the top 10% share dropped precipitously from 46% to 38%. The Broad Front govt coalition (2005-2020) also increased min. wages, introduced universal health care, and expanded social programs.
Tweet media one
4
64
495
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
But it is not true everywhere. Mainland Europe is quite different, for example. In Germany, France, Italy and Spain, millennials are right on track, following in the footsteps of previous generations.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
15
110
381
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Anyway, to return to our hypotheses, 1. Do people become more right-wing with age? Yes! Almost everywhere, with rare exceptions. 2. Are millennials different? In the Anglosphere, absolutely. But mainland Europe is different -- and each country has its own story.
16
52
360
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Headline: We really do tend to grow more conservative as we age. Across the West, the shift accounts for ~10 percentage points over the lifetime. But there are differences across the generations. Millennials have trended in the opposite direction (!) so far.
Tweet media one
13
67
345
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
Overall, taxation in the U.S. has shifted from those who own (capital) to those who work (labor).
Tweet media one
6
101
341
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
There are other countries where this millennial-specific trend is clear, especially in the Anglosphere. Here's Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
11
80
305
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
And a progressive U.S. tax system has turned regressive.
Tweet media one
7
76
276
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Very happy to share my JMP, w. @LobeckMax : “The Consequences of Inequality: Beliefs and Redistributive Preferences” We explore (i) how people think economic inequality changes society, and (ii) how such beliefs affect preferences for redistribution. 1/n
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
4
61
248
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
An interesting combination of facts: 1. U.S. income inequality has risen significantly since 1980, but 2. The share of U.S. citizens who say the income distribution is fair did not change between 1985 and 2015.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
11
54
246
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
3 months
Is there an increasing gender gap in young people's ideology across the developed world? Yes, at least in the long term. But there is significant country-level variation. The graph: 126,072 individuals in 21 developed countries over 70 years. Below, specific countries.
Tweet media one
11
76
234
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
3 years
Hello Twitter! I'm presenting at the EEA conference tomorrow, and thought this was a good time to talk about the paper (co-auth with F Cowell, LSE). In short; we argue that decades of economic theory has implicitly assumed that economic inequality has no societal effects. 1/n
4
37
198
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
At the same time, it's clear that inequality is usually a policy choice. There is no intrinsic trade-off with growth; 🇺🇾, 🇨🇱 and 🇸🇰 all experienced strong overall growth in the period.
2
32
197
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
#2 . 🇨🇱 Chile. After increasing spending in health (6% → 9% of GDP) & education (3%→6%), the top 10% share decreased from 61%→54%. Chile's inequality was the highest in our sample in 2007, and remains #4 in 2021 (below 🇧🇷🇵🇪🇲🇽). This fueled recent protests and govt change.
Tweet media one
1
15
188
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
This is based on my thread here: Which is based on this work by @jburnmurdoch :
@jburnmurdoch
John Burn-Murdoch
1 year
NEW: conservatives have a Millennials problem. In both UK & US, it’s not just that Millennials aren’t voting conservative because they’re young. Every previous generation grew more conservative with age, but Millennials are not playing ball. My column:
Tweet media one
1K
6K
27K
2
18
189
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Had fun making this, thanks for the idea @jburnmurdoch . If anyone wants a different country, let me know and I'll see what I can do.
33
11
178
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Some immediate takeaways; There are many ways to reduce inequality. Social policies, improved public funding, minimum wages, low-wage growth through market policies, and so on.
1
21
161
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
I saw @jburnmurdoch 's post yday () and got curious about whether this was a US+UK story or a global one. With the database (see the list of countries attached) and some good help from @amorygethin , here's the story:
Tweet media one
@jburnmurdoch
John Burn-Murdoch
1 year
NEW: conservatives have a Millennials problem. In both UK & US, it’s not just that Millennials aren’t voting conservative because they’re young. Every previous generation grew more conservative with age, but Millennials are not playing ball. My column:
Tweet media one
1K
6K
27K
2
31
160
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
And finally, because it was a university course; The chance of getting in to an "Ivy Plus" college is 77 times higher for children in the top 1% than those in the bottom 20%.
Tweet media one
3
39
159
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Norway and Sweden are relatively stable overall, with millennials trending softly left. Denmark is the opposite and closer to the other European countries, and Finland has a strong progressive millennial bend (probably due to @MarinSanna !)
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
3
25
149
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
Why? Well, taxation plays a huge role. Top marginal income tax rates have fallen drastically in many countries.
Tweet media one
3
30
153
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
#5 . 🇸🇰 Slovakia. After entering the Eurozone in '09, Slovakia decreased its top 10% share from 27% to 23%. This is the 2nd-lowest in the sample (after 🇳🇴). The min. wage has risen fast (26%→41% of avg. wage) at the same time as unemployment has fallen (11%→6%). Impressive.
Tweet media one
1
19
146
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
The income tax is only a small part of that story. Corporate tax rates have plummeted across the world.
Tweet media one
2
24
146
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
It's not all taxation, though. Market wages are crucial as well. Here is the minimum wage in France and the U.S. from 1950-2015. Income inequality barely changed in France during this time.
Tweet media one
3
24
145
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Japan, Hungary, and Switzerland all have interesting patterns. (You might say that Japan is not in the West -- true. It is one of 31 more countries and ~600,000 more respondents not included in the main graphs, as left/right is often unclear outside of the West.)
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
5
21
140
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
Speaking of the minimum wage, in Brazil the minimum wage was doubled over 16 years. The resulting compression of the wage distribution is stunning. @NiklasEngbom & Moser 2022
Tweet media one
2
16
143
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
This mirrors what @jburnmurdoch finds in the UK and US, which we replicate. (Note: Only election polls until 2020, so fewer data points.)
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
2
16
131
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Belgium and the Netherlands are also similar to these, perhaps with some downward trend for millennials in the latter: (PS: I'm noting the millennials specifically, but every generation is interesting -- lots of stories to take from each graph.)
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
3
18
125
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Great to see this out in the open! I'm very excited to be joining the amazing @TheChoiceLab at @NHHEcon for a two-year postdoc starting this September.
@NHHEcon
NHH Department of Economics
1 year
We are pleased to announce that @MortenStostad has accepted the job offer as Postdoctoral Fellow in Behavioural Economics @NHHEcon and @TheChoiceLab . Morten is a PhD-candidate from the Paris School of Economics. @PSEinfo
0
2
34
25
2
129
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
#3 . 🇸🇻 El Salvador. While struggling with low GDP growth in the period, the top 10% share decreased from 46% to 40% in El Salvador. Increased trade diversification grew the middle-class, and tax revenue increased from 16%→19% of GDP, largely due to improved enforcement.
Tweet media one
3
10
115
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
There is much more to be done, but the study of inequality is growing up. Credit to @gabriel_zucman for putting most of this together (and doing much of the original work in the first place!). I'll probably post the lecture slides sometime in the future.
11
9
121
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
This is all private wealth, though. Governments are dead broke.
Tweet media one
9
19
119
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
2 years
Is it possible to make an accessible thread about economic theory? Well, let's try. Let me try to explain to you why: * minimizing inequality is not the same as maximizing the income of the poorest, * why economic modeling forgot this for a long time, and * why it matters.
2
21
116
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
In other words, wealth inequality is more important than ever. Unfortunately it is also on the rise.
Tweet media one
2
22
115
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
And across the world, wealth is becoming more and more important. Wealth-to-income ratios are rising everywhere.
Tweet media one
2
17
111
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
#4 . 🇪🇨 Ecuador. The top 10% share plummeted from 46% in 2007 to 38% in 2016. High oil prices allowed progressive govt spending, and the min. wage increased quickly. Since 2016, however, the tides have turned. Austerity and pro-market policies increased the top 10% share to 41%.
Tweet media one
1
11
104
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
Capital taxes are progressive because capital is very unequally distributed. For the bottom 90%, capital income is ~15% of total income. For the top 1%, capital income is ~50% of total income (and much higher for the top 0.1%, 0.01%, etc).
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
2
11
107
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
5 months
Perceived inequality has been in the news lately. Do you believe Saez-Zucman or Auten-Splinter? And how much does perceived inequality really matter? In a short new WP I add to these debates, showing a simple fact: Fairness beliefs causally affect perceived inequality levels.
2
17
102
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
But inequality is also about wealth. Why we accumulate is a bit of a puzzle. When we retire, wealth stays constant -- we don't use it up. @LuisBauluz @TimothyAMeyer
Tweet media one
2
13
104
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
To bring us back from theory, economic inequality also strikes on other dimensions. The child penalty graphs of Kleven, @landais_camille et al are a beautiful and depressing example.
Tweet media one
2
14
98
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
9 months
An addendum: I will also be a Lecturer at @UCBerkeley in Jan-April 2024, taking over "Global Inequality and Growth", Saez and @gabriel_zucman 's inequality course. Very excited about the opportunity and looking forward to visiting the Bay Area again.
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
Great to see this out in the open! I'm very excited to be joining the amazing @TheChoiceLab at @NHHEcon for a two-year postdoc starting this September.
25
2
129
8
1
92
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
Why is this? @PikettyWIL 's theory of r>g argues that high after-tax rates of return on capital makes it easy to accumulate faster than the economy grows. In other words, low wealth inequality in the 1900s could be a historical aberration.
Tweet media one
1
17
89
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
@DominikWurnig @jburnmurdoch Here's Austria, Germany and Switzerland.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
5
14
79
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
To finish; I found it interesting to learn the answer to my friend's question, and I hope you all did as well. Any other analysis on these countries is welcome! And watch this spot; I'll write about the 5 largest inequality increases soon.
3
3
78
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 month
Homelessness is about inequality, not poverty. Overall, homelessness rises with average income across states. There are homelessness epidemics in San Francisco and New York, not in Mississippi (which has the lowest rate in the US).
Tweet media one
4
13
80
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
I should also say that this is a simplified primer to a very complex issue. There are many things I don't mention. The commodity boom that affected every LatAm country, Ecuador's massive inequality-fueled protests in 2022, El Salvador's deep crime problems, and so on.
1
5
76
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
...first, a few methodological details: This is for the top 10% post-tax income share (health, education etc added). Data is noisy, so I'm using averages from '07-'11 and '17-'21. Only high-quality data from used (42 countries, most Americas+EU) #1 is..
Tweet media one
2
8
70
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
2 years
Very happy that I will stay for a year in beautiful Marseille after having been awarded a one-year visiting scholarship by @amseaixmars . This means that I'll finish my PhD and go on the market with this wonderful office view. Let me know if anyone is around for a coffee!
Tweet media one
5
0
74
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
And who knows, a global 2% tax on billionaire wealth could be next: There is real movement on global tax reform. A new era, perhaps. Thanks for reading!
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
4
9
72
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
Capital taxation is any type of tax on capital (wealth) or the income that derives from capital (rent, dividends...). Some notable examples are wealth taxes, corporate income taxes, estate taxes, and capital gains taxes. This differs from taxes on labor (work) or consumption.
1
2
72
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
China played a big part in the rise of the global bottom 50%. While even the poorest in China are much richer today than in 1980, income inequality in China has risen fast. Potentially faster than in the United States.
Tweet media one
1
12
69
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
25 days
And progress is not certain. The U.S. racial earnings gap was reduced in the 1960-70s but has stayed roughly constant since. @EDerenoncourt @cmontialoux
Tweet media one
1
10
70
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
@arcivanov @Nrg8000 The x-axis is the average age of the survey respondents in the generation. Example: If we are looking at Millennials (1981-97) in a 2020 election, they are aged 23-39 and the x-axis is likely to be ~31. Last data is also from 2020, so makes sense that last Millennial data is ~35
1
1
66
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
They're also important, however. The fall of capital taxation played a large part in the rise of income and wealth inequality in the US.
Tweet media one
1
4
67
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
5 months
A new NBER WP finds that redistributive preferences are more correlated to low-income than high-income citizens' preferences globally. What a surprising result. Goes against previous research and most models -- but the researchers involved are great. What could be going on?
@nberpubs
NBER
5 months
Contrary to median voter and elite capture models' predictions, low-income individuals' redistributive preferences are most predictive of actual redistribution across 93 countries, from Michel Marechal, @alain_cohn , Jeffrey Yusof, and @rfisman
Tweet media one
6
84
275
2
10
67
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
The rise of inequality in post-transition Russia is even more striking. And in contrast to China, GDP growth has not made up the difference. The bottom 50% in Russia has had negative real income growth from 1989-2016.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
1
19
63
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
11 months
The other day I wrote about how the income inequality increase in Denmark between 2007-2021 is one of the largest in the world. As a related point, it's interesting to see the evolution of the top 10% income share in Denmark, Sweden and Norway.
Tweet media one
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
11 months
#2 .🇩🇰 Denmark. In 2007 the top 10% share was 24%, similar to the rest of Scandinavia (🇳🇴=22%, 🇸🇪=23%). In 2021 it was 29%, above the EU average of 28%. Denmark cut top income taxes in '09, reduced transfers in various ways, and introduced a tax break for top-paid foreigners.
Tweet media one
1
9
18
3
12
62
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
Observing profit shifting is easy. An example: Foreign firms are overly profitable in tax havens. In Ireland, where corporate tax rates are 12.5%, each foreign firm worker makes 500% of their wages in profits. For workers at local firms the ratio is ~50%.
Tweet media one
3
15
63
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
1 year
And: * The data is incomplete; f.ex., Asia is not covered at all * Data is up until '21, so no recent events. Due to the averages, the trend is essentially 2009-19. * Asserting causality for complex phenomena is often difficult! * See for more data details
2
3
60
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
2 years
Hello Twitter. It's not ready for a full thread yet, but I'm presenting my JMP (w @LobeckMax ) at the first session of the EEA Congress (Monday 2pm). So here are some preliminary statistics: 1. Between 85% and 97% of U.S. citizens think economic inequality affects society.
1
8
58
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
And _also_ the talk about a global wealth tax. Today ministers from Germany, Brazil, Spain, and South Africa endorsed a global 2% wealth tax on the world's ~3000 billionaires:
3
7
59
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
7 months
Happy to see my paper with @LobeckMax as a WID working paper. Main takeaways: U.S. citizens strongly believe inequality changes society for the worse. These beliefs are meaningful determinants of redistributive preferences in ways that differ from traditional fairness concerns.
@WIL_inequality
World Inequality Lab | WID.world
7 months
📄 NEW WORKING PAPER by @MortenStostad & @LobeckMax How do we believe economic inequality changes society? ↪️A majority of 🇺🇸 citizens believe inequality has negative consequences on society, regardless of political affiliation or income More findings⏩
Tweet media one
1
10
28
0
9
50
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
2 years
Leaving UC Berkeley after a fantastic seven months' visit. Thankful to Emmanuel Saez for hosting me and to all the wonderful people I met for making it a visit I'll remember. Back to @PSEinfo !
Tweet media one
1
0
49
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
Capital taxation is important, but complicated. Lacking state enforcement and global cooperation has created glaring loopholes. An increasing fraction of US profits are artificially shifted to tax havens. In 2016, the share was ~60% ( @gabriel_zucman )
Tweet media one
1
10
49
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
What's hidden in that graph is how tax composition has changed over time. Different taxes have different distributional impacts. Here are the taxes paid by the top 0.1% in the U.S. from 1910-2020, assuming all corporate tax is paid by firm owners (Saez & @gabriel_zucman 2019).
Tweet media one
1
10
48
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
Capital taxes are complicated partly because capital income is complicated. While labor income is mostly wages, there are many types of capital income.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
1
1
48
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
17 days
Fascinating new database on tax rates across countries. Here's how the top income tax rate correlates with the pre-tax (!) Gini coefficient, for example.
Tweet media one
@RSIT_tue
Research School of International Taxation
17 days
🚨Attention all international tax scholars! 💰🌍🧑‍🎓 We are super excited to share that our International Tax Institutions database became public! The ITI provides in a single place the most relevant tax indicators for more than 200 jurisdictions over two decades 🧵
Tweet media one
2
48
109
2
11
47
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
To think about how inequality can be reduced, let's go back a century or so. This is the foundational graph of developed countries: the rise of tax revenue between 1900 to ~1980. The creation of the modern state.
Tweet media one
1
8
47
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
5 months
Good news: Global poverty has reduced by ~30% more than we've thought since 1980. This is because an increased public sector -- transfers, healthcare, education, etc -- has had no effect on traditional poverty statistics. Fantastic WP from @amorygethin .
Tweet media one
@amorygethin
Amory Gethin
5 months
Global poverty is commonly measured by counting the number of people whose consumption falls below a given threshold. This approach overlooks an enormous component of people’s economic well-being: public goods. 🧵
21
399
2K
0
12
46
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
This might change, though. A 15% global minimum corporate income tax was recently agreed upon by 141 @OECD countries. It could be higher, and exemptions could be reduced, but it's a good start.
Tweet media one
2
8
45
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
So from the point of view of economic efficiency we can say the following: If high rates of return indicate economic activity, we should tax wealth. If high rates of return indicate economic rents, we should tax capital income.
2
3
44
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
My best guess is that we are entering a new era of global coordination on capital taxation. It is an extremely meaningful development unfolding before our eyes. Let's see where it takes us.
1
1
45
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
So -- how do we tax capital? The first question is whether to tax capital (a stock) or capital income (a flow). The two are conceptually similar. In theory, capital (wealth) taxes are capital income taxes that vary across the rate of return on capital.
Tweet media one
3
2
43
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
So some taxes are more progressive than others. Across the U.S. today, low-income individuals need to worry about consumption taxes, payroll taxes, and health insurance. Those at the top worry about income + corporate taxes. (To be clear, this just who pays, not incidence.)
Tweet media one
3
8
42
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
So, what if we only taxed capital income? Then the top 0.1% can hide their incomes in holding companies, trusts, re-investments and so on -- and save without ever being taxed. Unfortunate, because the rest of us have to pay taxes before we save. This is the current situation.
Tweet media one
2
2
42
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
One notable point from the last two graphs is that capital taxes are generally paid by the wealthy. This is intuitive. Capital (wealth) is _always_ more unequally distributed than labor income. Always. Note the axes numbers. @WIL_inequality
Tweet media one
1
8
40
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
24 days
Something I'll never unlearn: Relative poverty is just another way to measure inequality.
@MaxCRoser
Max Roser
25 days
$2 per day in Ethiopia — $36 per day in Switzerland. In our latest 'Data Insight', my colleague @EOrtizOspina highlights the large differences between national poverty lines.
Tweet media one
3
47
149
1
2
40
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
3 months
Going to ask this question to my students tomorrow. What does Twitter think?
Tweet media one
20
3
38
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
3 months
As a Norwegian, these are the most striking graphs to me. All the Scandinavian countries -- normally considered the most gender equal region in the world -- have the largest, most sustained gender gaps in youth voting.
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
3 months
In the Nordic countries, young women have been significantly more leftist than young men since the ~1990s. In Finland, Denmark and Norway the gap is currently at 20-40p.p., or what I'd call very large.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
2
2
12
3
5
37
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
2 years
Was happy to see this in AEJ:Applied today, by @thomas_blncht , @amorygethin and @lucas_chancel . Great paper pointing to the importance of "predistribution". The argument: The pre-tax distribution explains entirely why Europe is more equal than the US. Big policy implications.
Tweet media one
2
3
37
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
It's unfortunately more complicated, though. Suppose we only taxed wealth. Income shifting would be rampant. Business owners would declare all their income as dividends. Everyone who could would incorporate.
3
1
37
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
11 months
Where has income inequality increased the most lately? A few weeks ago I wrote about where inequality decreased the most since 2007 ( #1 : 🇺🇾!). Now we're back for the grim second round; The five countries where income inequality increased the most from 2007-2021. A thread:
1
16
36
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
To see why, think about inactive wealth (zero rate of return). In this case a wealth tax would be expensive. A capital income tax would be free. Vice versa for investments with high rates of return.
1
0
35
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
So suppose we tax both. The next problem is that capital is mobile. Profits can be shifted and the wealthy can move countries. In practice we _also_ need international cooperation.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
1
2
36
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
20 days
Reducing corporate tax rates -- a world-wide trend -- isn't solving the problem. There is a race to the bottom.
Tweet media one
1
8
35
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
There are other reasons to tax wealth, but I'll skip them here. The point is that we need both; capital taxation and capital income taxation.
1
1
35
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
2 years
Had fun watching @LobeckMax present our paper on inequality externality beliefs for @PikettyLeMonde and the Applied Economics seminar at @PSEinfo . Great crowd + comments, thanks for the feedback!
Tweet media one
0
2
34
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
14 days
For the top 0.1%, capital income is 60-90% of total income. This compares to 10-15% for the bottom 90%.
Tweet media one
0
6
34
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
3 months
Last week I asked what will happen to the Gini coefficient in income if the bottom 50% of the U.S. disappeared: The answer? The Gini decreases. Why? It's complicated.
Tweet media one
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
3 months
Going to ask this question to my students tomorrow. What does Twitter think?
Tweet media one
20
3
38
2
6
33
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
4 months
Paper I tweeted about a few weeks ago is now out in WP form. Main takeaway: Our perception of objective economic inequality is heavily biased by fairness beliefs (ideology).
@NHHEcon
NHH Department of Economics
4 months
"Fairness Beliefs Affect Perceived Economic Inequality" - new working paper by @MortenStostad ( @NHHEcon and @TheChoiceLab ):
0
2
9
1
6
33
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
18 days
Most graphs from Piketty, Saez & @gabriel_zucman (e.g. ). Also Hebous et al () and the Global Tax Evasion Report 2024 ( @taxobservatory , ).
4
1
32
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
2 years
Anyway, this is the last post. If you're here it means you read a full tweet thread on economic theory. Congratulations.
2
1
31
@MortenStostad
Morten N. Støstad
2 years
What is progressivity? For example, is indiscriminate student debt relief progressive? What about a flat tax increase? Or if we give $100 to the poor and $200 to the rich? In this thread, and in the attached short WP, I will argue yes. To all three. Why? Keep reading.
Tweet media one
1
8
29