Signing a declaration “under plenty of perjury” beats the previous best legal typo I saw back in 1998, which was an appellate brief seeking to overturn a trial court decision that concluded, “the judgment below should be revered.”
THREAD: I had to be in Salt Lake City on Friday, June 19. Assumed flying w/mask was the only way. Watching “Midnight Run,” thought hit me: What about a sleeping compartment on a train? Always wanted to do; never had time. Now I have time-I’m just reading to prep for an argument.
Justice Thomas concurs in Trump v. Hawaii to throw cold water on growing practice of district courts imposing nationwide injunctions and says "[i]f their popularity continues, this Court must address their legality.".
To emphasize the positive on a sad night: Kids from the "outer boroughs" (Brooklyn & Queens (kinda Trenton)), born to immigrant fathers (Odessa & Sommatino) & 1st generation mothers, rose to the top of their profession despite naysayers. And remained friends despite differences.
I've been handling one pro bono case for 9 years, through criminal appeals, habeas, & now deportation proceedings.
Successes have been few & frustrations many. But I persuaded ICE to release her to her family. She'll be home tonight for the 1st time since 2013. They're ecstatic.
Nothing more unnerving than when you call the main line at a judge's chambers and someone just answers, "Hello." Only one person answers the main line that way.
When I get the other side’s brief in, I put Post-It tape flags on every point I need to respond to. Then I peel them off as I address the point in the reply brief. When I peel off the last flag, the reply brief is ready.
I had an en banc argument in the 4th Circuit Thursday. I start argument prep by writing down every question that occurs to me. I start with a giant deck; as argument approaches, deck gets smaller & smaller. Spend last day practicing a small number of the most important questions.
After weeks of calls, emails, letters, I finally succeeded in getting my (high-risk) client released from the Bureau of Prisons. Just got a very welcome text from him: "I'm home." Some good news for once.
Justice O'Connor asked me my first question during my first Supreme Court argument.
You know the current practice of giving the advocate 2 clear minutes to talk at the start of argument. This is the polar opposite. A very tough questioner.
The Solicitor General's reply brief supporting its (deep breath) motion to vacate the 5th Circuit's stay of the district court's preliminary injunction of the Texas abortion law (got all that?) is unusually hard-hitting. Its reply briefs are ordinarily "government grey." Not here
11/ At the top was the Continental Divide. As pretty as the ride up was, the ride back down was even more scenic. Along the way, a total of 10 rafters mooned the train; the attendant told me they call this "Moon River."
Sandra Day O'Connor spoke at the DC appellate inn of court. She walked up to me and said "Hello John." I must have looked surprised as I silently wondered whether she remembered me from when I clerked for a colleague 20 yrs earlier.
With bemused smile: "It's on your name tag."
Next up in the guitar god parade: Eddie Van Halen's "Frankenstein" parts guitar, assembled and painted by the man himself. Maybe the most iconic guitar of the 80s.
If this bores you, you'd better mute me for the next 24 hours or so. I took 330 photos in about two hours.
I'm in Arnold & Porter's NY office for meetings. Any suggestion I timed my visit to coincide w/the Met's exhibit of famous rock instruments is deeply offensive & I reject it.
But the exhibit was open, so I went. It's amazing. 1st up: Clapton's "The Fool" Gibson SG, used w/Cream
7/Then began the real meat of the trip: The California Zephyr, leaving Chicago at 2 pm. The first leg took me across central Illinois, within an hour of where I grew up. This landscape is really gorgeous to me. These scene is near Princeton, IL.
I once held an original manuscript letter George Washington wrote in January during some year late in the 18th Century. It was a very cool piece of history, but the main thing I noticed was that he'd written the prior year at the top and had to cross it out and correct it.
13/ Sunset on day 3 came near the scenic, hipster-rich town of Helper, UT. I'd like to visit there in earnest some day.
We arrived in Salt Lake City about 11:35 pm on June 18, only about a half-hour late. Not bad given how much ground we'd covered.
As someone who has resisted the temptation to become cynical during 26 years of living in D.C., nothing gladdens my heart like someone listening and *then* making up their mind.
2/ Mute now if this bores you.
Stir-crazy family joined plan for socially-distanced vacation. Western trains are famous for scenery--& believe it or not, food. Planned to take California Zephyr to SLC & to return on northern route (Empire Builder) to avoid seeing things twice.
If you don't like an associate's work, tell *them* -- quietly, tactfully, and constructively.
If you like an associate's work, tell *everyone* -- especially their bosses. (I even told one of their parents because I happened to see them in person.)
One of my favorite emails to send is bragging to the other partners about an associate who killed it. No matter how busy, taking a moment to send those emails will brighten the recipients' (and your) day. It extends to everyone else, too. Brag about people to their bosses.
I rarely retweet myself, but I'm going to make an exception. If 1% of my followers give $5 each, that's ~$215 for brain tumor research; if 5% does, that's over $1,000.
If I've ever answered an obscure Supreme Court practice question for you, take 3 minutes and pay it forward.
My buddy Norm Emery is a US Army vet of many Afghanistan & Iraq tours. In 2017, he was diagnosed with glioblastoma-same brain tumor as John McCain.
2 years later, he's still fighting. Norm's raising money for brain tumor research. Please join me in supporting him--and retweet!
9/Sunset on Day two came in Creston, Iowa, in western part of state. We crossed Nebraska overnight and woke up outside Denver on the other side of the 100th meridian. What a contrast.
6/We pulled into Chicago via Gary Indiana and Chicago's South Side. Our next train didn't depart until 2 pm, leaving several hours for a quick bit of sightseeing and carry-out Chicago dogs.
4/ The Capitol Limited from DC to Chicago is timed to get you Chicago about 8:45 am, as the business day begins. We left DC's Union Station about 4:05 pm on 6/16. Fairly quickly got up into the mountains. Some scenic stops along the way, including at Harper's Ferry.
She just called from her husband's cellphone to say thanks. She's getting a home-cooked meal tonight and seeing her kids in person for the first time in six years. This makes a lot of the "beating your head against the wall" worthwhile.
I've been handling one pro bono case for 9 years, through criminal appeals, habeas, & now deportation proceedings.
Successes have been few & frustrations many. But I persuaded ICE to release her to her family. She'll be home tonight for the 1st time since 2013. They're ecstatic.
10/ After a 25-minute stop in Denver around 8 am -- long enough to pick up fresh breakfast and mug for photo outside client's office -- we got to the best part: the trip through the Rockies. Did some of this in observation car. (Note spotty mask use.)
This.
Michael Dreeben: 105 Supreme Court arguments
Seth Waxman: ~79
Ted Olson: ~63
Tom Goldstein: ~43
Lisa Blatt: 40
Roy Englert: 21
Supreme Court clerkship for all of the above: 0
Interesting analysis of the differences among the Trump Supreme Court appointees from David Lat. This corresponds with the thinking of the closest Supreme Court students I know.
Me: Halfway through the document, MSWord started renumbering the paragraphs at 1. I'll manually re-number that paragraph.
MSWord: He's renumbering one paragraph? He probably wants to go from a .5" first-line indent to a 1.69" hanging indent for every subsequent paragraph.
Me: This paragraph of the draft complaint has the wrong number. I'll manually re-number that paragraph.
MSWord: He's renumbering that one paragraph? I'd better reformat every paragraph from that point on in a completely different style.
McGirt is a great illustration that as a lawyer, you must assume nothing & verify everything. An early mentor defeated a perjury prosecution by showing prosecution couldn't prove a quorum of Senate committee was present, & thus wasn't a "competent tribunal." Think outside the box
This isn't a knock against the opinion, but McGirt sounds like the sort of thing a jailhouse lawyer dreams up.
"So I wasn't validly convicted because Eastern Oklahoma is actually still an Indian reservation."
And yet.
As Kavanaugh re-takes oath at White House this evening, worth noting that Sotomayor and Kagan didn't take oaths at White House. Obama wanted it that way as a symbol of their independence, administration officials said at the time.
#SCOTUS
I enjoy a good banana as much as anyone, but the only reason I see to eat a half dozen at a single sitting -- besides fraternity rush -- is to make sure you approach the lectern with the day's worst event already behind you.
THREAD: I had to be in southern France for fambly bidness. I was traveling with an adventurous eater now in culinary school, so though I’m a philistine who likes redneck food, I booked us a series of Michelin-starred restaurants. Mute now to avoid an old lawyer's travelogue. 1/
3/ Amtrak’s long-distance trains are double-deckers, with bathrooms, cafes, and some larger family rooms on the bottom, and sleeping compartments, and “roomettes” on top (or coach seating in non-sleeper cars). Gives riders fairly good views.
It may seem stupid, but it's worthwhile actually saying your answers out loud--it helps develop muscle memory to avoid stumbling over words, distills answers to make them more conversational, & drills cites/case names into your head so you don't need to look at the binder. /end
We are now farther from Green Day's breakthrough album Dookie (released Feb. 1, 1994) than Dookie was from the Beatles' appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show (Feb. 9, 1964).
8/ Our California Zephyr car was one of last made by Pullman, ~1979-1981; worn but nice. In response to question: intake for A/C appeared to be in hallway by door near A bedroom; low-traffic area. I'm told no circulation b/w bedrooms. We were only BR passengers for most of trip.
DEPT. OF PET PEEVES: While preparing for a panel discussion I'm going to be moderating, I was reminded of how much it bugs me when people call Solicitors General or Attorneys General "General." It's an adjective!
Keeping w/ Clapton, next up is "Blackie," Clapton's fave guitar during early solo career--assembled from his favorite pieces of 3 guitars. Used to record "Cocaine," "I Shot The Sheriff," "Wonderful Tonight," & "Lay Down Sally." Sold at auction for $850,000 in 2004.
The guy on my left and the girl on my right at the 1984 Van Halen show started dating that night and later got married.
At the wedding, I gave them the ticket stub because it was the last thing ever to come between them.
(Groans abounded. But note price for 16th row center!)
Am I the only one who has noticed that Titus Andronicus never tours when the Third Circuit is sitting?
(I swear, the likeness is closer in person.)
L: Patrick Stickles R: Stephanos Bibas
Jimmy Page's "Number 1," bought from Joe Walsh. Pagey loaned a lot to the exhibit. Also pictured is his hand-painted "Dragon" Telecaster and Supro amp (both used for LZ's 1st album & "Stairway to Heaven" solo). And his theremin (used for Whole Lotta Love & No Quarter).
In my 8th grade graduation booklet (1981), I listed Keith Richards as the person I admired most--probably because of his skill in not dying.
The exhibit had the Gibson Les Paul Standard Keef played in the Stones' early days. Mick Taylor (later a bandmate) bought it from him.
I know of a case where the Clerk’s office called the chambers of the judge writing the opinion and sang “happy birthday” on the anniversary of argument. Does that count?
Perhaps someone should keep a list of federal appellate cases still undecided a year or more after oral argument. I wonder if the extra attention might encourage at least some judges to make those long-pending cases more of a priority (as they should be).
Me: I'll delete this extra "section break (next page)" on the last page to get rid of the extra page at the end of this impossibly fussily-formatted Supreme Court brief.
MSWord: Oh, he's deleting the section break? He probably wants to reformat the entire document.
Me: I'll delete the file number from the footer before PDFing this document to send it to the client.
MSWord: Oh, he's PDFing that document? I'd better put the file number back into the footer.
One last post. The Assistant to the Solicitor General who was the main person to impart Office's collective wisdom to me (the great Irv Gornstein) said only about 10 questions really make a difference to the outcome of a case. The last of your prep should focus on those. /realend
Heading back from getting carry-out, we noticed some activity at a ball field. So now we’re watching the local little league all-star game and let me tell you, it’s a perfect Saturday night.
In a related vein, I had a federal appellate judge once joke with me that he viewed an opening parenthesis as an invitation to stop reading and a closing parenthesis as a sign he was back on the clock.
Cut my use of substantive parentheses way down.
I'm reading a brief this morning (not in any of my cases) and it really illustrates an important legal writing lesson - long block quotes, even if you think the language from the cases or the deposition, or whatever, is *killer,* make a brief impossible to read.
#AppellateTwitter
Congratulations to my colleague Allon Kedem for winning a 9-0 judgment from
#SCOTUS
today in Wooden v. United States.
We have 2 cases in the March sitting. Both will be argued by lawyers making their Supreme Court debuts--partner Elisabeth Theodore & associate Andrew Tutt.
+1 on not talking to others. I took the bar w/my sister and she did not observe that beneficial practice. She came to me upset because she'd talked to someone & they couldn't even agree on subject area of one question. Worse still, I disagreed with BOTH of them. We all passed.
John Paul Stevens didn’t ask many questions compared to his colleagues, but they always cut to the heart of the matter and were usually hard to answer. Your work was cut out for you when you heard the grandfatherly, “can I ask you a question?” that preceded them.
In a misty St. Louis for the best part of my job: second-chairing oral argument for an associate. Today I’ll be pouring water for Max Etchemendy as he goes before the *en banc* 8th Circuit to argue US v. $579,475–a forfeiture case.
Me: This paragraph of the draft complaint has the wrong number. I'll manually re-number that paragraph.
MSWord: He's renumbering that one paragraph? I'd better reformat every paragraph from that point on in a completely different style.
Me: I'll delete this extra "section break (next page)" on the last page to get rid of the extra page at the end of this impossibly fussily-formatted Supreme Court brief.
MSWord: Oh, he's deleting the section break? He probably wants to reformat the entire document.
A multi-talented colleague of mine at the Office of Legal Counsel who had worked on the line at Le Cirque in a former life confirmed that the key to cuisine was adding cream and butter to the point just short of the customer saying, "this is just cream and butter."
Ah, cool. Just another district judge nominee that graduated the same year I did. Cool, cool, cool.
The relentless and inevitable march of time, so on and so forth.
Today I learned the difference between a "collision" (when two moving objects strike each other) and an "allision" (when a moving object strikes a stationary one).
To avoid becoming a statistic, I do not recommend correcting anyone's use of "collision" until the lockdown ends.
The last time I was in trial, there was genuinely one day where I was working continuously for 24 hours, with just a very few minutes for "bio breaks." It was miserable. But I thought it looked ridiculous to bill all 24 hours. So I billed 20.
I'm looking at these Nathan Wade invoices and he is billing an awful lot of time.
I don't do a lot of billables, but is it common to bill 24 hours in a day?
Someday, someone will start a rental car company whose business model doesn’t involve a single tired clerk orally requesting every piece of information the customer already entered to get the reservation, while a huge line of waiting customers looks on in despair.
I've been watching the Supreme Court fairly carefully since 1995. This is the first time I remember Ct hearing oral argument on a stay application. Addresses a common complaint about the "shadow docket."
I heard about individual Justices doing this in the 1970s, but not since.
BigLaw recruiting becomes judicial clerkship recruiting.
I don't know if there is a solution for the collective-action problem, but it's not great for the profession.
Unlike most reply briefs, which are half the maximum length of the brief they respond to, reply briefs supporting a certiorari petition are only only-third as long. Economy of expression is at a premium. No room for fluff.
Draft cert. reply As filed:
Today I argued a case in the 2d Circuit again Jonathan Massey, one of the greats of the appellate bar.
I’d been looking forward to it since I hadn’t seen Jonathan since July 1982, when he was my instructor at high-school debate camp.
#NerdLife
.
When I was in DOJ, I brought my dress shoes in to be repaired when I was declared non-essential during a government shutdown. Then a fugitive of mine was arrested and I had to show up for the initial appearance. wearing work boots. I looked like a large-animal veterinarian.
My theory of cowboy boots is that if cowboy boots are authentic to you then they're fine for Court.
if I showed up in Cowboy boots if would be about as accurate as if I tried to mimic
@TherealmsZ
's Queens accent.
Congratulations to my colleague, associate Andrew Tutt, for his unanimous win in Dupree v. Younger today.
@ArnoldPorter
puts a premium on getting associates argument opportunities.
The Supreme Court has not relisted any new cases again this week. This is the longest streak without relists I can recall since I began monitoring them 13 years ago. Since
#SCOTUS
typically relists a case before granting review, this suggests the Ct is not adding to the docket.
The Supreme Court has not relisted any new cases again this week; aside from last week's Michaels v. Davis,
#SCOTUS
has not relisted any new cases since Feb. 16. And am I correct the Court has only granted 1 case since January 22? Court is not adding a lot of cases to its docket.
Although scientists have made amazing strides in recent years, I don't think we'll ever truly understand what principle of physics makes smoke detector batteries fail only after 10 pm.
I’ve been picking up opposing counsel’s briefs for 25 years. I still hate it—enough that it is 1 of the few things I procrastinate. I rarely think “they’ve got us,” b/c you anticipate and preempt the worst stuff. But it’s a hard slog responding to a welter of plausible arguments.
@AdamCharnes
@BobLoeb
@johnpelwood
Is this feeling, or worse “they’ve got us” on opening OC brief an experience thing, or does it stay with you (however fleetingly) for life?
The kind of detail you notice when you slowly shuffle around Alexandria with an old dog: a cat’s paw prints left long ago in the clay of bricks before firing.
I love using notecards b/c you get used to reacting when asked something out of the blue & practice getting back to points you want to make. Also permits practicing while, say, walking around Richmond, taking in the sights -- the VA state capitol & the 4th Circuit. 3/x
Remarkable tool that allows you to compare 770 artists' live and studio tracks. Remarkably comprehensive, including even Air Supply (!) and Chilliwack (remember them?).
The Live Music Analyst helps you find search by artist and find their recorded live performances that "stand out the most compared to the studio version:"
(h/t
@kottke
)
Although I rarely refer to it, I like to have 1 skinny binder. On left I keep cites to authorities; on right I have outlines of answers to the most important questions and record cites. In the middle, my "spiel" -- what I would say if uninterrupted. That's the tab "MIPTC." 2/x
Hey, “pursuant to” fans:
Alito “under the Jones Act”
Breyer “under Chapter 7”
Ginsb “under the statute”
Gorsuch “under the Act”
Kagan “Under the Lanham Act”
Kava “Under the Federal Arbitration Act”
Soto “under Rule 29”
Thomas “under the FDCPA”
Roberts “under 28 U.S.C. § 1253”