I posted a question I hear a lot on my blog. (Don't worry, it's just like a podcast but w/o the suppositories.)
"Not yet mainstream, non-traditional, logical and reasonable evolutionary explanation for the average greater strength of human males"
Hands down best human evolution paper of 2023 and a contender for the best human evolution paper of all time.
"Moving beyond the adaptationist paradigm for human evolution, and why it matters" by Lauren Schroeder and Rebecca Ackermann
Me, scrolling through free movies: Penguins? ... Rio? ... Ice Age?
4-year-old: No ... no... no
Me: Ghostbusters, but with girls?
4-year-old (who only knows about original), screaming, throwing self across room: YES! I NEVER KNEW I ALWAYS WANTED THIS! I CAN’T BELIEVE IT! YES!
Human races are not like dog breeds; refuting a racist analogy
Peer-reviewed,
#openaccess
#anthropology
#scicomm
scholarship speaking to a broad audience
HEY SEXUAL SELECTION!
You think you are the reason why men are taller than women, but if you want to remain the star of this story, then...
THE OVARY’S IN YOUR COURT.
I wrote a paper that you can’t ignore.
A (delighted) thread.
Anthropology Twitter! Anthrotwitter!
I'm dying for examples of natives/ informants/ interlocutors fucking with anthropologists but I don't know the search terms. I don't know where to start. And boy do I want to start.
Hot take for all the evolutionary biologists and psychologists out there: Human estrous/ovulation is not hidden/concealed. We just wear clothes and chimpanzees do not.
Now may be a good time to share this paper, again. It’s all about how selective breeding of dogs has been tangled up in misconceptions (many of which are racist ones) about humans. To write this, I read a lot of the eugenics lit and it was horrible.
Masturbating to a new thing for 3 months, keeping a notebook where I record how I feel after each bout, then writing a peer-reviewed article in Qualitative Research about my experience compared to others (who masturbate to the same content) was never a possibility for me.
Because people continue to be upset by it, I'm turning my infamous blog post from 2018 into a🧵
It is unethical to teach evolution, no matter the organism, without confronting racism and sexism
by Expert in Human Evolution & the Good, Bad, and Ugly Narratives We Build About It
I have melanoma. The cure is a large, floppy, fluffy puppy and a bigass Christmas tree but you just can't get either one of those things right now, so I started drinking a bit earlier today than most days. If you too have melanoma, then don't fucking google melanoma and also ❤️
Hominin dudes breaking each other's penis bones (but not hominin chicks breaking each other's clit bones, etc etc) with the intentional goal of temporarily sidelining dudes from The Babymaking Olympics is why boners are boneless. 🧐Read all about it!
Sapiens has sold 21 million copies. That’s a lot of people who come away from its sloppy treatment of patriarchy thinking what they already believe: gender inequity is because of evolved sex differences. My book reveals that science is not on the side of sexism.
#PitMad
#A
#STEM
@DrJenGunter
Did I ever tweet to you how I was on a grand jury and explained to a detective that his calling everything including the vulva a “vagina” (and leading the perp to too) was a huge problem if he wanted to, like, make any fucking sense to us. One woman nodded along. That is all.
Science created race/racism and so it’s up to scientists to actively tear it down with our students. To all the scientists who said that’s for history teachers to deal with, not you: I expect many of you to have changed your mind by now.
Students. Let your professor be done with the course when the course is over. We're in a pandemic too. We let you bend the deadlines all semester. We're done now. End the madness. Please. Just let it go. Be done. Please.
Our department is hiring two "multicultural fellows": an anthropologist (of indigenous studies) and a sociologist (of race) ! You will start as a one-year postdoc and then transition into a tenure-track assistant professor. Join us!
Male gorillas and orangutans are twice as big as females, but chimps and bonobos have lower sex diffs in body size. The textbook explanation is sexual selection: male gorillas and orangs are competitive, with big winning males excluding smaller males from reproduction, thus... 1/
We need a well-funded
#scicomm
#anthropology
outfit focused on translating human biocultural variation to the public with the explicit goal of eradicating any more misuse of science towards racist and sexist ends, and other terrible treatment of humans.
Not having functioning ovaries means that roughly half our species' skeletons have no choice but to keep growing after those with ovaries stop growing. Hope you enjoy this thoughtful piece about people with and without ovaries by
@NerdyChristie
:
I am learning how to teach my human evolution course online because it must be done. And if I am told one more time to "keep it simple" I will lose my complex shit.
If it were "simple," we wouldn't spend 14 weeks on it only to discover that we know next to nothing.
#Highered
My anthropology course "Sex and Reproduction In Our Species" is intensely an "information literacy" trip and this Fall semester we will be listening to today's episode of
@OnPointRadio
thanks to
@DrJenGunter
and her vagenda!
Please stop referring to the geographic dispersal of some human lineages from an African origin as an “exodus” as is done yet again here:
#evolution
#anthropology
I'm writing a non-academic book, have been for quite some time, and it took me until yesterday to realize that I can take the 15k-word Introduction out. Writers are allowed to just *begin* a book without all that justification and all those excuses. Whew!
“Fortunately for her, the men from the Anthropological Society—many of whom maintained the intellectual inferiority of women was based on skull size—presented a convenient group of test subjects.”
Alice Lee, one of the first women to attend London University, challenged the predominate notion that men's brains were larger and therefore intellectually superior.
Just published today! “There is no ‘obstetrical dilemma’: Towards a braver medicine with fewer childbirth interventions” | Just email me for pdf if you hit a paywall holly_dunsworth
@uri
.edu
Meanwhile in our Department of Sociology and Anthropology, one faculty member published an op-ed in the big local newspaper that says, "we cannot lose track of the fact that racism did not kill George Floyd." And so another published a letter titled "Racism Killed George Floyd".
Whenever I wonder if I’m saying “no” too often to requests to review papers, I think about that time I reviewed one where the author cited himself “pers comm” as evidence that women moan while receiving oral sex, and then I don’t wonder anymore.
In biological anthropology:
Sex broadly refers to biological characteristics generally related to reproductive anatomy or physiology and gender is culturally contextualized social and structural experience as well as expressions of identity.
Source:
I’ll tell you what... there is nothing like dreading, to the marrow, being the feminist killjoy at an upcoming Darwin Day event streaming publicly online. Nothing at all like it.
Do you teach in a big auditorium with bolted theatre seating that limits engagement? Can you set up your slides a bit early to project this kind of thing? It's fun (at least for me).
#highered
#Ravenclaw
So proud to have contributed my rage sweat to this book. Listen to women is the theme of my chapter. Thank you
@desilva_jerry
! Pub date is Jan 12 but my mom has already read it (& approves) because she pre-ordered it directly from
@PrincetonUPress
press!
Them: Hey Holly! Wanna host our TV show?
Me: Sounds fun! I want anthropology to go mainstream.
Them: Great! Just fill out this application we sent to hundreds of people which requires you to donate your good ideas for TV shows to us.
Me: Go fuck yourselves
The Myth of Man the Hunter isn't a myth about men hunting more than women. They clearly do. "Man the Hunter" refers to the myth of distinctly evolved male and female humans caused by and/or demonstrated by gender differences in behavior.
If we improve the scientific explanations of visible sex differences, then they are less likely to inspire unscientific beliefs about invisible ones. Fewer minds would leap illogically from ‘men are taller’ to ‘men evolved for competition and dominance’. As if women did not.
Race is not skin color. Race is not blood type or genes. Race is not ancestry. Race is not ethnicity. Race in the USA is a system of unequal power and oppression.
If you are against CRT this stupidly, then that's a truth that you already know and don't want others to know too.
Critical race theory is the belief that people have value based on the color of their skin, and that our race defines everything about us.
It's not just false—it's dangerous.
Love that today's Google Doodle is into the Nariokotome Homo erectus boy but find it surreal how Google thinks a thing you know a lot about is called something ("The Turkana Human") that you've never heard uttered in your entire life.
Something I had to say to an anonymous peer-reviewer/colleague this year, who tried to school me on binary sex, and that is relevant right now:
"People, whether they are alive or skeletonized in a museum collections, are rarely sexed based on the gametes they produce."
There’s a journal called Controversial Ideas. It has an interesting editorial board. One of them, Peter Singer, was just interviewed by The New Yorker. The reason I know about it is bc a pseudonymous author compared my anti-racism to a creationist’s, as if that disqualifies mine.
Karlie Kloss is 6'2"
But ...women are shorter than men! Karlie Kloss is short, even if only in her essence, naturally. She is short and you know it. And the only reason you won't say she's short is because you're stupid enough to be brainwashed by the PC police!
Ask undergrads "how racism affects you" and so many white people are flummoxed. They struggle to consider how racism that affects their peers affects them, indirectly, or about how they live in a racist system that they benefit from. This is a good question that I'll keep asking.
You have a time machine and can go to any time and place in human evolutionary
#history
(so between ~7 million years ago and yesterday). In order to catch an exciting or insightful peek at human
#evolution
, where and when do you go, and why?
#anthropology
Just heard a pediatrician on
@NPR
say (about the greater covid risk to BIPOC kids) that (paraphrase) “it’s not race, it’s social determinants of health” which tells me she said race but meant genes. How do we tell more people that race IS the social thing not the genes thing?
1st rule of evolutionary biology: Don't talk about Darwin's faults.
2nd. Don't talk about Darwin's faults.
3. Attacks on Darwin are attacks on Science.
4. Attacks on Darwin are attacks on YOU.
5. Race is just biological variation.
6. Anthropologists are too dumb to engage with.
Thank you Darwin and Huxley! “Women’s contributions to science were played down for decades after Nature’s 1869 launch, by both the journal and wider society.”:
Ovaries exist, periods exist and so body size differences exist. Now, in that context, it's suddenly difficult to credit tall winning males for men's additional skeletal growth. This throws major doubt on sexual selection's role in sex differences in body size.
Genomics literacy matters: Supporting the development of genomics literacy through genetics education could reduce the prevalence of genetic essentialism
If you're teaching sexual selection, then I promise you that your students think that animals know that sex makes babies. Their minds are BLOWN if you suggest otherwise.
Help them out by giving them this: (email me if you want it for free)
There is a whole powerful class of old scientists/scholars with PTSD from and nostalgia for the war against creationists. That identity-shaping experience plus the self-label of "Darwinians" = major reasons why they are "appalled" by discussion of Darwin's faults and strike back.
As we advance science and its dissemination, fewer will mistake the human body for a blueprint for the patriarchy. But they will continue to make this mistake if we continue to understand evolution as if we haven't advanced over 150 years since Darwin.
My “lectures” are meant to be discussions, dialogues, to challenge my students who are doing the active work of learning, which has the effect of stimulating me (thank you students!). Recording myself talking alone to my a tiny white dot on my laptop is not that.
I don’t take down sexual selection in this paper, but I argue that we stop focusing on it when it comes to sex diffs in human skeletons. Expand the story. But you know what? The estrogen story is a better/stronger/evidence-based evolutionary reason.
Everybody grows at about the same rate until ovaries pump out so much estrogen that they cause long bones to end their growth. Bodies without ovaries have no choice but to keep growing for long after bodies with ovaries stop growing.
You thought Jordan Peterson was reckless with lobsters. Wait until you hear Jordan Peterson on orangutans. If you teach arrested development in male orangutans and don't talk out the implications for humans (or lack thereof), you are reckless too.
When I was a rookie, I thought I'd be helping to make sense of Homo erectus fossils. That turned into Miocene apes. Then I got hired in undergraduate programs that got me telling our (often batshit) stories about human evolution and feeling responsible for the consequences...
Next Tuesday (16th March) is the final UCL Evolutionary Anthropology seminar of term and we are pleased to host Prof Holly Dunsworth to speak about "This View of Wife: Rethinking evolutionary narratives of human sex differences"
Sign up here:
You have classrooms full of ovulators who are listening to this so-called "concealed ovulation" in humans and all this speculation as to how it evolved but they can't object because it means talking the real-talk about their monthly discharge to their professor and classmates.
I’d love to live to see the day that Darwin isn’t the first citation of most evolution themed papers (that aren’t about Darwin). I’ve done it, so this is not a subtweet. No, he’s not canceled. But he’s not scripture. Tying everything about NATURE ON EARTH to one man is weird.
What if I told you that human babies are not born underdeveloped/early? And what if I told you that freeing yourself from that fiction also lessens your bias against women’s bodies? Evolutionary stories have personal consequences.
#ThanksForComingToMyTedTalk
#anthropology
Mid sentence, while I was sort of baring my soul about my atheism to 120 students I barely know, a student raised their hand, I called on them, and they asked for clarification of the date of the upcoming quiz, so I clarified. That’s the tweet.
Rather than posting this paper on the blog (
@EcoDevoEvo
) , we wanted the quality control and approval of peer-review. And it cost us, personally, $2000 to make this
#openaccess
and to obtain permissions to reprint figures. We hope that it will be a useful resource.
Human races are not like dog breeds; refuting a racist analogy
Peer-reviewed,
#openaccess
#anthropology
#scicomm
scholarship speaking to a broad audience
Thanks,
@ChrisStringer65
!
We've learned to accept bipedalism without sapiens or even erectus anatomy. So, hopefully culture without sapiens brains can be something people can be open to too. After all, chimps AND human toddlers do culture and create with relatively small brains.
My kid, barely 5 years on this planet, is singing “Sweet Home O-O-Bama” to himself because he thinks that’s how it goes ... and this is why we have children, people.
@MichelleObama
@BarackObama
Racist takes on race inspired by the recent Nature paper are, as ever, equating race with human biological variation that patterns geographically due to ancestry. To lots of people that concept of race (insinuated by the US Census) is common sense but common sense is racist.