Semi-retired hedge fund founder. Ex hot-shot lawyer, ex hot-shot strategy consultant. Value+macro in crypto, technology, Buffett-style old economy & commodities
I nailed the GFC - saw it coming, heavily shorted into it, kept making money running net-flat for months while most were getting destroyed. Then I botched the turn, getting net short early into a monster rally and giving back more than half my fund's outperformance.
1/4
In the last 24 hours, two of our leading media sources (NYT & WSJ) have produced research pieces with hard data on why the U.S. should ban TikTok.
Here is the NYT's killer chart. Tiktok systematically censors 80-99% of posts on certain viewpoints, relative to Instagram.
1/3
The worst problem is not censorship, but rather actively promoting propaganda. The WSJ covered that. Here are charts showing the evolution of Gaza/Israel content on test accounts. The key fact is: those videos ran 4:1 against Israel.
2/3
Another key fact: The U.S. has had laws banning foreign ownership of TV stations & networks since the birth of TV. Most countries have similar laws.
I was a constitutional litigator and am usually a 10 out of 10 on First Amendment absolutism. This is not a difficult question
3/3
I am an ex-hot-shot-litigator. I can read the $TWTR docs and know how these things play out in real life. Elon has successfully violated legal constraints without real consequences for his entire career. It has made him overly bold. This is the one he will finally probably lose…
Nice homebuilding tidbit from
@hkuppy
, shared with his permission. LOL.
“Had drinks last night with someone senior at one of the top 10 national builders. As he put it, things slowed dramatically in April/May. Currently, they only have 5 buyers for each home, instead of 25.”
This is the best "favorable homebuilding supply/demand trends" chart I have seen in 12 years of looking at them.
I dare anyone to look at this chart and keep making analogies to 2006-09.
@Mike59655549
I agree, Instagram is not the unquestionably correct baseline. But it is the probably the only baseline we have. Even more: I am willing to accept, based on everything I know qualitatively, that it actually is a fairly good baseline.
You will probably not be able to predict the turn; you may not even know in the moment that it has come. In March'09, Bernanke's "green shoots" comment and an internal Citibank "things are OK" memo seemed like ridiculously thin catalysts to launch the real bull market.
4/4
I vividly remember the one sentence of advice I should have heeded but ignored in Feb'2009, when the S&P 500 was at 750-800, weeks before bottoming at 666: "I don't know which direction the next 100 points on the S&P will be, but I do know for the next 1,000 points."
2/4
Here's the most important thing I can say about
#uranium
stocks:
Lots of bearish or uncertain posts over the last month, simply because prices fell a bit. Narrative is chasing price. WTF are people thinking??! Get your heads out of the short-term weeds.
1/5
…if and only if the $TWTR board maintains its spine.
Until yesterday I had assumed the board would cave. But now it appears Elon has overreached. He may have backed the board into a corner so tightly that they will fight and then keep fighting.
I cannot overstress how terribly the end of the $TWTR v. Musk hearing, covering Musk's failure to produce some of his Signal & SMS texts, went for Musk. Speculating on whether the judge will formally order an "adverse inference" at trial on factual issues misses the point.
1/
The setup now is not as extreme as 2009, but it's the closest we've been since then. You must position to surve a further big market drop, because it's possible. But (1) it's not probable, and (2) it would end. You should also position to make lots of $$ when the turn comes.
3/4
@hkuppy
helped get me into $STNG years ago and back into uranium last year. I helped get him back into homebuilding-related stocks. We both now have the homebuilding thesis as our
#1
largest equities exposure. He just wrote another good explanation of why.
Sending missiles at container ships but not tankers is a sneakily smart move by Iran's proxies.
All the major container shippers have ceased sailing through the Suez; they have to go around Africa instead.
Container ships move manufactured goods from where they are made...
1/4
I'm with
@hkuppy
on uranium, in both direction & amount: Never before have I seen industry fundamentals exceed my initial bullish expectations so much in the ~year following my purchase. Yet uranium stocks were flat in 2022 and are up only ~14% in January.
After reading the $SAVE / $JBLU post-trial filings, I was hoping Mr. Market would let me buy a few more shares in early January near $15. Now he has, and I have.
Everyone with a publicly-shared view has said the filings were favorable for $SAVE.
1/9
I'm calling it: I'm now as bullish stocks as I've been in 50 weeks. (I nailed the bottom last October.)
*Small-caps back near lows
*Many valuations good again
*Sentiment back to bearish
*Fed signalling no more hikes
Stocks can do well if macro is merely less bad than feared.
1/2
The EV market will be stagnant and disappoint expectations for the next 5 years.
Existing battery technology leaves range anxiety, inadequate charging networks, and dying battery packs as real issues.
Car makers are running out of early-adopter buyers who don't care.
1/4
I have read so much
#uranium
commentary & analysis in 2021-2024; it's rare to see something new.
This tidbit from $CCJ's Grant Isaac yesterday is good, segmenting utility buyers. More demand is coming. We are nowhere near above-replacement buying, which is when
#uranium
moons.
A true story about me and $XPO:
A long, long time ago, $XPO was my fund's largest holding. Back then it was a tiny little trucking and 3PL business located in a tiny little town. But it was exquisitely run, with an A+ management team for a business that size.
1/x
Now that so many of my favorite stocks (i.e., large positions) have ripped 20-30% higher in 2 weeks, what is my new favorite stock? That's easy. It isn't even close. $SAVE. It has fallen 40% in 2 weeks (from $16 to $9.50), despite only modest changes to its expected outcomes.
1/9
My friend
@John_Hempton
asked today in a specific case, how much incremental money is required to cause a big one-day price jump on heavy volume? This is one of my intellectual pet peeves in investing. Over many years, 98% of the comments I see related to this issue are wrong.
My current odds on scenarios, in declining order of cynicism:
1. 30% - Keith Gill sold his Roaring Kitty account on X for 8-9 figures.
2. 50% - Keith Gill spent months devising a plan to buy a ton of calls and tweet his way to a 8-9 figure trading profit with no SEC risk.
I have been following $AAPL as a professional investment analyst for a long time. Here are my personal anecdotes on how clueless we all were, before it happened, about the rise of smartphones and of $AAPL as a software business.
1/8
For 2 years I kept seeing $SNAP down 15-30% every earnings release and thinking "surely this can't continue for more quarters, traders will wise up and price it in." Nope.
An ode to my genius partner from my hedge-fund-running days, whose only 4 buy suggestions in 2013 comprise one of the best quadfectas in investing history.
1. Bitcoin at $35
2. $TLSA at $3.50 (split-adjusted)
3. $XRO.AX at $7
4. Pre-IPO Uber stock at a $5 billion valuation
1/7
$SAVE is +50% in the 2 weeks since my triple-down trade and public table-pounding.
I am not selling any. I'm playing for +200% ($30). The last 2 weeks of trial testimony was excellent for both $SAVE's antitrust case and its (low) risk that $JBLU successfully recuts the deal.
Now that so many of my favorite stocks (i.e., large positions) have ripped 20-30% higher in 2 weeks, what is my new favorite stock? That's easy. It isn't even close. $SAVE. It has fallen 40% in 2 weeks (from $16 to $9.50), despite only modest changes to its expected outcomes.
1/9
Excellent find by
@hkuppy
on new-home affordability at today's prices and mortgage rates. It is obvious that national avg's are misleading, skewed by high prices in ~10 coastal metros w/ few homes built. Here is every # you'd want on that issue, and more.
Wow, I am having my fourth "this price is stupid, buy" moment in 2 weeks. This time on something I have never owned before but know extremely well: $PLNT, Planet Fitness.
Look at this horrendous chart. It's a buy today, finally, on big news. I just bought in the low $51's.
1/6
$VAL: "We're doubling our buyback authorization and we'll use it."
Not much other news
Stock +5%
$TNK: "We'll be debt-free in a month but won't discuss what we'll do with all our cash."
Not much other news
Stock -7%
Investors *really* don't trust these managements.
Justifiably.
6 months ago
@Josh_Young_1
started flagging how Europe's sky-high energy costs relative to elsewhere would chase industrial production out of Europe & into US. I said "sure but it will start very small & will take years. It's too soon to matter." I was wrong, it took 6 months.
It is a surreal experience to see all my shitco shorts up 3-4% premarket and know that those moves might be "correct" based solely on meme-stock OG - who was 100% WRONG about his big stock bet over even the medium term - posting an image of him sitting forward in his chair.
$CLMT has been off my favorite-stocks list for a while. At $13.70, it's back to
#3
(after $VTY and $XPOF). It's worth ~$40. The C-corp conversion, first clean quarter of renewable-diesel earnings, and RD spin-out are all imminent. I just bought more.
This podcast is a must-watch for anyone trading $SAVE, probably even if you subscribe to MDC's trial notes service.
I was a tippy-top-tier antitrust litigator back in the day. Andrew and Michael nail the key antitrust analysis points here. Highlights:
1/5
Side note: Thanks as always to
@chancery_daily
for the 178-tweet live-summary. Because that multi-hour discovery pissing match sounded like one of the most painful court hearings to live through that I've encountered, including when I was litigating.
5/5
Bloomberg's
@JavierBlas
and others are surprised that the Saudis are willing to voluntarily cut their production to 9m bbl/day, a 10-year low. I'm not surprised.
I'm guessing the Saudis, like me, believe that leaving more oil in the ground has its highest ROI in >10 years.
1/6
Plug Power $PLUG is a wondrous shitco stock promote. IPO'd in late 1999. Simply outstanding story-selling work by its management across 24 years.
Here is $PLUG's average share count over the last 10 years. One can never sell too much stock, right?
(All
#s
in millions):
1/8
Kirby likely privately agrees with me that actual odds are now up to 75-80%.
I used to get paid (as a litigator) to give case odds to clients. Incentives almost always favor being deeply overconservative.
"60%" = "I think they'll win but don't want to look stupid if they lose."
United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby thinks it’s a 60-40 chance that the JetBlue-Spirit merger closes, he says.
Kirby tells me he isn’t worried about the potential newly merged competitor: “I think we’re going to win no matter what.”
The 1-month fall in all commodities prices is now the 3rd largest in 90 years, behind only the Covid and GFC collapses.
This goes well beyond fundamentals: Crowded-trade unwind, cross-ownership contagion, forced deleveraging, and trend-following in an illiquid summer market.
Well, $SAVE sucked. I warned you in every thread: Even good judges (like Judge Young) routinely decide even strong cases (like this one became by the end) the wrong way. Even those situations really are like throwing a 5-sided die and getting the 1 side that says "YOU LOSE."
1/3
The pain of not making the expected $17/share on $SAVE continues to outweigh the relief of being able to exit with only a $5 loss. Bad mood all day.
Mrs. BeenThereCap, who knows the full story, just now:
Look of fake sympathy
Pats me on the shoulder
"You could have been richer"
@conorsen
Your ex-antitrust-lawyer says: No.
The homebuilding industry is not remotely an oligopoly. Waaaaaaaaaay too many builders in most geographies to successfully pull off this strategy. The shortage was caused by, first, the 2007-2012 bust, and then the Echo-Boomer buying bulge.
The $PACW situation is bonkers. Based on their 1Q release last week and this press release last night, PACW was absolutely fine as of yesterday - until the erroneously dire Bloomberg story came out.
1/2
OK let's condense all the new $SAVE $JBLU trial events & insights into a new outcome tree. Here are the key changes:
1. The tree has sprung several new required deal-recut branches because of the judge's repeated comments on partial injunctions.
1/5
Someone notes I said "probably." Lawsuit outcomes are NEVER certain. Only twice in 30 years have I set outcome odds as high as 90%. On one of those, the court ruled the other way.
Replies correctly note that both pieces of research I flagged are from months ago; the research merely received new play this week thanks to the TikTok legislation.
Let's riff on this theme some more:
$SD shareholders effectively own a fund that's 50% zero-coupon 5% short-term bonds & 50% a super-cheap oil & gas producer; the manager might sell bonds & buy more oil & gas if he gets a good price; *and the manager reports to Carl Icahn.*
👍
I have had 3 massively profitable multi-year homebuilding trades in 20 years based on simple, obvious-if-you-look, high-level industry insights. The trades work so well because most investors ignore or underweight these big multi-year trends.
1/6
Sprott physical trust's discount to NAV doubles as an effective index of
#uranium
investor sentiment. Here is the chart, through yesterday. It's down to -15% today.
Extreme bearishness, reached on only 4 other days in last 2 years. For absolutely no fundamental-based reason.
We are on the edge of witnessing the greatest oil trade of this century. As much as can be done trading 180 million physical barrels via RFPs (vs. flipping exchange-traded futures), they nailed the top, when it mattered most strategically, and now may be be nailing the bottom.
When prices are this low,
#natgas
traders should change their primary mental model from odds of the next move’s direction, to the potential sizes of the moves. That’s because the payoff asymmetry is now enormous.
1/4
My primary oil thesis is that global demand will remain robust for years. Emerging countries' demand will keep growing as they grow wealthier; DM demand will stay robust b/c renewables will take many years to dent it. I've posted supporting details for 2 years.
1/6
I am so glad that $JBLU & $SAVE called this United exec as a witness to talk about United's stealth ULCC. He testified 12% of United's seats are now Basic Economy, which *is* a ULCC. (Matches Spirit's pricing, no carry-on, no seat assignment, you *will* get a middle seat.)
1/4
$SAVE JetBlue started off by calling Andrew Nocella to the stand. He is the Chief Commercial Officer for United Airlines. He handles what type of aircraft they fly, where they fly, and almost anything revenue related.
They started by asking a bit about him and his past, then…
$TSLA should be -10% on the $HTZ news.
The owner of 60,000 EVs, after living with them for 2 years, announced that they suck and it's giving up on them. Customers don't want them, damage expenses are sky-high, charging options are inadequate, they don't hold their value.
Then $CCJ's profits will launch higher, sustainably. I own it. If Mr. Market is too stupid to credit $CCJ's years 3-20, the way it does for most stocks, I can wait.
Similar thinking should work for all
#uranium
stocks. So chill out, sit on what you own, and enjoy 2024.
5/5
Except, something just made me look at $XPO's stock chart for the first time in years.
Holy mother of God.
This was our fund's largest position. I could have just held it and gone to the beach for the last 13 years.
Proof yet again that you never know, in either direction.
7/7
The judge handling discovery is also the finder of fact at trial. She can, and almost certainly will, make at least partial inferences against Musk without the need for a formal discovery sanction. For that reason, she tactically _shouldn't_ order the formal sanction.
2/
My early $SAVE / $JBLU trial reactions:
JetBlue's cross of Spirit's CEO is *very* strong. Keys:
DOJ has been repeatedly flagging Spirit's initial resistance to a JetBlue deal based on antitrust concerns. CEO makes clear, with specific examples in support, that...
1/x
I have sold all my $SD and redeployed it all into $VAL. I have endured ~2 years of management sitting on a giant (for them) cash pile and talking about the "optionality" of not deploying it - including through a -80%
#natgas
downturn when M&A prices were lower.
1/2
Here is some new stock-picking alpha for you:
My most recent stock buy was $XPOF.
I have >10 years investing in fitness studio/gym businesses. I am X's current "axe" on $PLNT. I am best friends with and discuss investments with, IMO, the country's best fitness-chain CEO.
1/7
(P.S. I you're finding this thread without following me, I own $SRUUF, $CCJ, $KAP, $URNM, and $URNJ. I.e., I directly or indirectly own at least a bit of every producer worth mentioning, with a minimum of work or angst.)
Silicon Valley Bank's closest peer is probably $FRC.
Today $FRC's stock opened -25%, fell to -40%, rose to 0%, and was just halted at -24%.
I regularly watched these sorts of moves in late 2008. I haven't seen anything close to it since then.
Based on what we've seen already, she'll have plenty of other reasons to list for deciding against Musk on the key issues.
The real key is that, substantively, Musk's production failures & probable lying about using Signal are deserving of some inferences.
4/
$SAVE is being traded this morning by litigation noobs. When a decades-tenured judge tells you at the beginning of arguments that his questions won't indicate his likely decision, he means it.
An open tweet-letter to the management of SandRidge Energy $SD:
I am a long-term $SD shareholder with a long-term focus. I like your strategy of holding your cash for potential acquisitions. I like that you set the bar high for approving specific deals.
1/7
Here's the oil & gas sector average free cash flow yield over time.
These are the large caps. Small caps are much more undervalued. My holdings have 20-40% yields.
Oil & gas equity valuations might never increase. They don't need to for the stocks to generate high returns.
Friends don't let friends buy SPACs of pre-revenue tech start-ups, even if they are nuclear power.
$SMR is -25% after-hours on news that its only credible committed customer cancelled. -50% in 3 weeks, -80% in a year. 10 months of cash at current burn rate, no revenues in sight.
Here's why I got especially bullish (and long) oil
#oott
last week & today:
1. The recent fall from $93 to $74 seemed unjustified, driven by overly bullish positioning (longs got offsides) and by...
2. ...bearish gov't inventory reports. Those reports are likely erroneous.
1/4
Although I hate $CCJ's self-congratulatory earnings calls, I am at a loss for why the stock is -7% today. Every single negative I've seen is years-old news to anyone who's paid attention.
1/3
Keeping it informal avoids an issue for Musk to appeal; lets her more finely calibrate her inferences based on the context at trial and the specific factual issues; and lets her do it silently if she wants (i.e. doesn't need to mention adverse inference in the opinion).
3/
$SAVE stock is priced like the $JBLU acquisition very likely *won't* close (and $SAVE will go to zero). $JBLU stock is priced like it very likely *will* close (and $JBLU will take on a heavy debt load into a downturn). Rampant and mutually-contradictory fear today on both sides.
Now that the ban of Russian
#uranium
imports is becoming law, is there anything left for bulls to hope for, or do we just sit around for the next 5 years watching prices rise?
On the demand side, almost everything good that could happen, has happened. All I see left is:
1/4
I just heard Danny Kahneman say the following:
“People read my book [Thinking Fast & Slow] thinking it will help them reduce their cognitive biases. I *wrote* it, and it hasn’t helped me. I am one of the worst offenders. These things are very powerful and ingrained.”
Adam & Andrew didn't mention the $VTY buybacks until an hour into the podcast! Guys!
If you didn't get that far: This stock is massively undervalued AND MGMT IS COMMITTED TO BUYING BACK ~£1B OF SHARES IN ~2 YEARS. That's 1/3 of shares, if the price doesn't rise. Which it will.
Dear
#uranium
twit,
Uranium stocks are speculative assets. Current earnings are -ve for every producer except KAP (+ve) and CCJ ($0). The good times are in the future.
When markets dump, speculative assets dump harder. It doesn’t matter if your thesis is right. That is the rule.
(BTW "I was wrong" =
@Josh_Young_1
was right, 6 months before most others, again. 6 months seems to be his average. Natgas rebalance, OPEC+ capacity, DUC depletion...)
Coincidentally
@hkuppy
, who thinks like me in some important ways, just posted this yesterday. It's time, he says, to admit the outlook is now harder and cut back.
I haven't decided what to do. It's likely the year's most important investing decision
8/8
$JBLU's lawyers wrote a fantastic pretrial brief - except, now, for this one thing. If they had this witness lined up, why didn't they mention United in the brief?? They should have been hammering this point. I bet they will in the closing argument and post-trial brief.
4/4
People, why is this hard for you?
What Roaring Kitty did (or perhaps the buyer of his account) 100% is "stock price manipulation."
But it is, IMHO as an ex hot-shot lawyer (including securities litigation), perfectly legal manipulation. If the SEC sued, 90% odds it would lose.
One other observation from the $SAVE / $JBLU trial, which is just as important as the testimony. The few judge comments & questions I've seen over the weeks suggest that the judge is favorably disposed to all 3 of $JBLU's key arguments:
1/3
Some of my favorite pithy bits of wisdom:
"If there is any one secret of success, it lies in the ability to get the other person's point of view and see things from that person's angle as well as from your own." (Henry Ford)
"Ask more questions. Smile more often." (my mentor)
$XPOF: Your uncertainty is my opportunity.
$XPOF crashed 30% on Friday because it announced the U.S. attorney is investigating misstatements and the board had fired its CEO.
I bought more Friday at $7.50-7.60. I bought more today at $7.50-7.60. Here's why.
1/10
First free alpha of 2024!
$VTY is my favorite stock for 2024 and
#2
largest stock position. I have known it well for years. (
#1
is a 6-bagger, I wouldn't buy that much.)
You should listen to this podcast. Adam always does an outstanding job of laying out his investing theses.
1Q report
#3
from "stocks I own at 1x-6x earnings": $LGIH, the best US homebuilder from an owner's perspective. 5x earnings. 2022 guidance maintained for closings volume, raised 5% for ASPs and therefore revenues, raised margins. I'm raising my EPS estimate by 10% (to +12% YoY).
Turning to
#uranium
: Cameco $CCJ today is breaking past this cycle's closing high (a month ago) of $32.
Look at the 10-year chart. Without exaggeration, this is the choppiest chart I've ever seen for a stock that's clearly on a longer-term uptrend.
You're all a bunch of degens.
Over *any* recent time period - a week, a month, 3-6-12 months - the outlook for
#uranium
demand has been unchanged at worst and has usually improved. Same for supply. Over the last month, the demand outlook is unchanged and the supply outlook is *greatly* improved.
2/5
I watched Sea Ltd. $SE, a real internet business owned by big, serious growth investors, get ramped to the moon not only on multiple expansion, but also widespread expectations that every uncertain thing in its future would go exactly right.
It didn't.
1/2