The disdain for / distrust of genius might be the single thing I felt most alienated by when I first got into literary studies. I literally couldn't understand why we were there if not to read and talk about geniuses.
@GDess
what’s strange about this passage is now noncommittal it is. When it starts you think she is going to endorse the move beyond the amoral “is it interesting?” but then she describes what succeeds it in a voice that makes it sound even shallower
I wrote about Ben Lerner, my traumatic memories of literary studies in college, and the hatred of literature in the editorial for our new issue on art and experience (subscribe today!)
Great new issue of
@Harpers
out today, beginning with
@laurenoyler
"getting paid about 50 percent more than DFW" for a cruise ship essay that is, imo, at least 50% better than his
“We tried, and we failed, to save the world from our parents. And because we failed, we have been written out of history.”
Been waiting a long time for someone to write this article
@moonbeeaam
it has a lot to do with the style and the deliberate attempt to create an impression of spontaneity and "unartiness." The David Shields book Reality Hunger, as annoying as it is in some ways, is extremely helpful on this (I got the term from him).
"We are giving young people the idea that the unhappiness that they have about their relationships is a matter to be taken up with the authorities.”
@wesyang
on Jeannie Suk Gerson and the "bureaucratization of intimate life":
"Yale’s renowned expert on 'the good life,' would, without hesitation, lie motionless and alone inside of this machine for the rest of her days."
@jennfrey
on happiness at Yale: shocking in the best ways
there's a certain group of Gen X middlebrow writers, almost all white and male, who once ran blogs with names like "Rogue" and whose sole occupation is now to extol the virtues of fact checking, censorship, and moralistic mob justice on Twitter. What happened to these people?
@dnbrgr
'arguments about wokeness are so far down my list of concerns that here is a 15 tweet thread on a short column in NY Mag that goes out of its way to misrepresent the column and defame its author'
For the
@ChronicleReview
I wrote about the reception of "Why Liberalism Failed" the non-liberal right, and what's being proposed to follow the "dead consensus":
Excited to finally share the essays from a packed issue 27 of
@the_point_mag
. I'll follow with a thread introducing them but wanted to start by encouraging you, if you like the work we do and want to make sure it continues, to subscribe to the magazine:
so the point of this Atlantic article is that while it's hard breaking up your family at least your children can have a model of how to care about nobody besides themselves?
Always amazed to come on here and see people I otherwise respect jumping (with both feet!) onto an abject pile-on. What is the point? Is it just to feel a part of things or do people really think they have a distinctive way of registering their agreement that “this is bad”?
I wrote a book about David Foster Wallace, philosophy, and why it's important to know the difference between therapy and theory. If you're in Chicago, come hear me discuss it with
@BenWKJ
at
@SeminaryCoop
this Friday night:
At a time when many humanities institutions are contracting,
@the_point_mag
continues to grow and branch out into new activities, including our
@publicthinking_
initiative. If you value this work, we hope you’ll consider making a donation
"The frustration of the professoriate has been redirected inward. We shout at each other rather than speak to the public." John Guillory in the new "Criticism in Public"
Ohio’s Democratic candidate for Senate, Tim Ryan, has put forth an economic platform that is pro-union, manufacturing nostalgic, nationalistic, and Sinophobic, trying to appeal to Republicans and independents as much as Democrats,
@etammykim
writes.
"Rose took her interlocutors’ errors to reflect a more general drive to make politics 'safe'—safe not so much from physical danger as from becoming complicit in violence or oppression." Maya Krishnan on the philosophy of Gillian Rose
This week on the
@Harpers
podcast, I talked to Adam Kirsch about Zadie Smith's "The Fraud," autofiction, the two waves of Gen X fiction, and the different ways that writers born in 70s have dealt with the millennial challenge
"If philosophy is going to “change anyone’s life,” as its popularizers are fond of claiming it can do, then the people writing it must be willing to be changed by the people reading it." Becca in
@yalereview
In the new
@Harpers
,
@togglecoat
reads Roth in Newark. It’s an essay that, in a remarkable tribute to its subject, refuses to “kill its engine peacefully at the border between fiction and reality”
"How the Harvard Law School faculty came to be seen as out on a perilous limb for defending 'the most basic principles we teach' is part of the submerged history of our time."
@wesyang
's new column, on Title IX and the "wider shift" in liberalism:
I’m of the ‘is it interesting?’ generation but think there are more, um, interesting ways of describing this transition than attributing it to social media. Amoralism produces its own backlash just as hypermoralism does.
"Becoming a citizen doesn’t happen overnight. Like living with war, it’s slowly becoming the new normal."
@RihamKousa
, who became a German citizen this week (!), wrote movingly about growing up stateless for our nation states symposium last year
interesting essay that suggests how burnout, like so much of the vocabulary we seem to have inherited from the 1970s, filters the response to substantive socioeconomic developments through a fundamentally therapeutic idiom
this piece on academia and the art world made me wonder: Is there any conversation about the role of aesthetic experience in art history depts right now that is comparable to what's happening in literary studies? if so, where?
Very excited for this conversation and have already promised Ryan we will work out the relationship between fiction and political memory. After that Becca will explain moral realism once and for all. Don’t miss it!
Still remember when grown ups began proudly advertising how much they liked reading Harry Potter. In retrospect this was not only annoying but also an important cultural moment.
I feel about Franzen the way some people say they feel about W.--now that he's out of power all this stuff I used to find intolerable just seems earnest and endearing
LRB, Sidecar, Bookforum, NYRB, The Nation, The Baffler, The Point, Jewish Currents, Poetry. I sympathize with the financial precarity associated with the critic, but there is some really remarkable work being written. (Also: nothing wrong with a good CTR.)
Published my first essay ever on literature with Bookforum in 2006, on Harold Brodkey. Will always be grateful to Albert Mobilio for his patience and guidance with a totally inexperienced writer, something their editors clearly did for countless young critics.
loved talking w Jenn Frey about a bunch of our favorite things (Bloom, Murdoch, DFW, Cavell, morality and fiction), then thought if I really pushed it I could maybe get my mom and a few friends from grad school to listen
I regret the timing of our op-ed coming out today because we also have a new issue available, and it says more than any of us could in 1200 words about the positive form we think humanistic engagement can take outside the university.
This is about historians but captures the broader plague of academics who weaponize supposed expertise to make shallow or redundant political points. It's a way of being a "public intellectual" that manages to harm both the public and intellectual life
"These films were two Hail Marys for the two fronts of an ailing twentieth-century mass culture: prestige drama and bubblegum ubiquity, the atom bomb and the plastic doll."
This beautiful essay reminded me of a friend who always stands up for the weather as conversation topic: "It's fascinating, it affects everybody, and it changes every day!"
It’s a little known fact that Camus worked briefly as a meteorologist. For
@the_point_mag
I wrote about human barometers, plague clouds, and checking the weather in times of uncertainty. Huge thanks to John Palattella for the lovely edit ☁️
“Walter Isaacson is the perfect writer for the biographies of our times because he appears to be a born sycophant.” Sam Kriss on America’s court biographer:
In addition to our "10 most popular" list which is going around I wanted to share a few additional essays from the mag this year that have been very popular in my own head:
"By calling the literature I am interested in 'existential,' I mean to indicate its preoccupation with what it is like to be alive here and now." Was an honor working with Toril Moi on this essay on literary criticism and the "existential turn" in fiction
Thrilled to introduce this new series on literary scholarship and public criticism, hosted by
@JessSwoboda
. Check out her first interview with
@kjavadizadeh
on "difficulty," Elizabeth Bishop, the role of style in academic writing--and much more!
@the_point_mag
's "Criticism in Public"--a series of interviews with academics about public writing, academic scholarship & literary criticism--launches today! Check out my interview
@kjavadizadeh
on what it means to "add to the stock of reality":
Had a great time talking to Matt and Dave for the
@ConcavityShow
about Wallace, Wittgenstein, Cavell and what I mean by calling Wallace's fiction "therapeutic" in my book "Ordinary Unhappiness"
Issue 32 has already begun arriving in subscribers’ mailboxes, and will be online soon. But if you want to among the first to read it, you’ll have to subscribe:
"The comedic engine, for Chase, was this: What if things had become so selfish and narcissistic in America that even the mob couldn’t take it?" This is so good
"Are you game? she seems to ask. Or are you the type to flinch from reality?"
@parul_sehgal
on Dasa Drndic, whose work is excerpted in the next issue of
@the_point_mag
, as part of our first Literature section:
it's amazing the audience
@jennfrey
has built for
@eudaimoniapod
—a podcast where writers and academics simply speak in depth about their favorite books!—and it's one of the things that makes me optimistic about the future of the humanities outside of universities
Maybe biased but I’ve learned more about writing listening to this series than at any time since high school. I think the key is that the conversations never artificially separate insights about “craft” (for lack of a less irritating word) from discussion of content and ideas.
On the new episode of Selected Essays,
@JessSwoboda
and Zach Fine talk to Michael Clune about Thomas Nagel’s “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” and how to write literature that captures the rhythm of consciousness:
One of the background themes of
@Wesyang
’s
@ChronicleReview
essay is the courage or defiance it now takes to stand up for what very recently were considered self-evident moral and legal principles.
“Alternatively, we could conceive of the academy as a high-containment laboratory for ideas, even perilous ideas, which might enable us to understand and re-evaluate conceptions of human life that are so strange to us that they appear immoral.”
the best political essay of the year, written in 3 wks under constant barrage via Slack from editors eager to "promote the issue before people go offline for the holidays" (we needn't have worried)
"Like a bemused Fox News anchor, Agamben concludes that travel bans, canceling public and private events, and enforcing quarantine are all simply 'disproportionate'"
@a_n_a_berg
updates us on the senescence of the postmodernists
“All around me, from the apartments nearby and the hundreds of people watching the match below me, were the sounds of the game. I couldn't see it, but I could hear it.”
@_Zeets
captures the agony and the anxiety of watching the final
Having studied the "ancient quarrel" between art and politics for awhile now, a lot of the arguments are pretty well established. But in the later parts of this essay
@_ryanruby_
advances into what seems--to me at least--to be genuinely new territory
Sad to hear of the passing of Dave Hickey, who I began reading thanks to this piece by
@dan_oppenheimer
.
Hickey fought his whole career to save American art from Puritans of all kinds
"If you tried to understand museums by sitting outside and studying the demographics of who enters and exits, you would be missing something very important about what museums are for." For the symposium,
@AgnesCallard
on the "real" college scandal
Excited to present our top ten most read print articles of the year today, but also wanted to take the chance to highlight some other pieces I was proud to work on and publish this year:
"Smith’s precocious success can make it easy to think of her as a contemporary of Wallace and Wurtzel. In fact she was born two years before Batuman, and her sensibility is connected to her generational predicament." Adam Kirsch on The Fraud as Gen X novel
The practical result of a Hegelian reading of Antigone is a "fatalism so vacuous that an audience made up of Nazis and resistance fighters can both give the play a standing ovation, which actually happened at a performance in occupied Paris in 1944."
no one who reads the letter naïvely would understand the vehemence of the response to it. But one of the axiomatic facts of our culture right now is that no one should read anything naïvely
Thanks to everyone who came out Friday night at
@SeminaryCoop
and especially to
@BenWKJ
for reminding me what my arguments were at crucial moments. If you didn't make it, I hope you can still find your way to ordinary unhappiness!