Excited to share thoughts w/
@ForeignAffairs
on the underlying drivers of China's nuclear expansion, the implications for US-China security & overall relations, and essential measures needed to address core issues in nuclear and broader bilateral ties. 1/2
1/ China likely failed to predict the war. Even many Russian senior intel & mil officials, as well as lots of top Russian experts didn't seem to foresee the war. Given deep distrust of US, China probably dismissed the intel shared by US as psychological warfare to drive wedge.
7/ The biggest uncertainty is how China's small, closed, & opaque decisionmaking circle--with Paramount Leader Xi at the center--sees things & makes choice. The
#UkraineWar
highlights how Putin's small, closed, & frivolous inner circle ultimately determined war and peace.
4/ Option 2 is to seize the opportunity to improve relations with the West (especially US), by making good use of Western countries' growing interest to prevent a China-Russia bloc. After all, China strongly desires stable relations with US/West but questions their commitment.
13/ China is likely also shocked to watch Western countries butcher 🇷🇺's economy & isolate 🇷🇺government. It probably swears never to allow this happen on itself.
5/ China's high profile commemoration of 50th anniversary of Nixon's visit to Beijing is the most recent display of such Chinese desire. It is widely understood that access to West's technologies and markets will remain essential for China's continuous rise in near- to mid-term.
2/ China further failed to predict the strong international response or to fully appreciate its implications for China, thus the lack of rapid & effective readjustment of its publicly sympathetic position toward Russia.
20/ But what choice Beijing will make at the end of this crisis is going to be very consequential. Hopefully thorough debates among Chinese experts and between Chinese and international experts now can help people think through these issues and thus help promote the right choice.
9/ Observers have pointed out: in 🇨🇳, Great Firewall is much higher than 🇷🇺; also less civil society, tighter management of public thinking/perception, less open policy debate, less questioning of national narrative, no opposition. In other words, less internal checks & balances.
6/ This could be a pivotal moment, as how China makes this strategic choice would have the most profound geopolitical consequences for China's future and international peace & stability.
8/ The issue is more salient in China as power is more centralized under one leader. Besides KJU, there is probably no third person in the world that enjoys such absolute authority & overwhelming flattery for so many years. How that affects one's mindset/psychology? No one knows.
3/ To simplify, China faces two strategic paths going forward. Option 1 is to continue & even double down on the current "no upper limits, no forbidden zone, no finishing line" close alignment with Russia to promote global order & stability as they envision.
17/
#UkraineWar
highlights how information & perception gap can be a fundamental threat to international peace, but this problem is only getting worse between China & the West too.
10/ As such, despite the appealingness of Option 2 to some experts, Mr. Xi could well end up leaning to Option 1. As pointed out by observers, he shares Putin's worldview & believes the inevitable structural change of international balance of power determines China-West rivalry.
18/ For scholars, a key lesson from all of this is: to develop deep understandings about the impact of domestic decisionmaking environment on an opaque superpower's security/foreign policymaking is hugely important for future research of international peace & strategic stability.
19/ As for the
#UkraineWar
, China will likely take time to wait for the perceived total chaos to settle & for the new global geopolitical landscape to clarify, before making significant policy changes. Its public positions in the meantime will probably remain generic & abstract.
14/ This could further strengthen Mr. Xi's long-standing preference of self-reliance & autarky, believing China must be able to prevent external strangulation. It may limit how much China-West can prevent decoupling & develop mutually beneficial & interdependent relations.
15/ On top of these is the growing strategic perception gap at the societal level btw China & West. Longtime info bubble creates parallel universes where the two peoples disagree on basic factual issues. As Chinese experts believe
#UkraineWar
results from US abetting and
I am of the view that
#UkraineWar
generally reduces the risk of a near-term military conflict over the Taiwan Strait, but new uncertainties are rising too. We need to keep eyes wide open to avoid sleepwalking into a war over Taiwan. A thread🧵:
12/ The fact that Putin-Xi's personal bond has been a key driver of bilateral relationship behind which Mr. Xi reportedly has thrown his weight makes radical change of China's approach to Russia harder, as Chinese experts may not want to critique the wisdom of current policy.
11/ His solution to deter a potentially violent eventual showdown is to prioritize material power buildup, including accelerated military modernization & nuclear expansion. His recent preaching of "fighting spirit" to young Party cadres shows no readjustment of such mindset.
16/ as state media overwhelmingly adopt Russian narratives, it is kind of hard to expect strong advocacy for Option 2 from the experts community, public opinion leaders, or the general public.
1/5
Why have so many Chinese diplomats become more aggressive recently?
These are senior diplomats; it is unlikely they don't see the consequences of their aggressive words & deeds. They must know they are destroying China's international image, more than any foreigners can do.
In this
@ForeignAffairs
paper, I examine how the internal feedback loop among China's leadership, policy elites, & the general public creates an underappreciated & unaddressed risk of war over Taiwan and what the international community can do to help.
Japan’s decision to release
#Fukushima
water has dominated Chinese media and public attention for weeks, fueling a surge in anti-Japan sentiment & causing widespread salt hoarding.
Another example of widening information & perception gaps between China and rest of the world. 1/7
Personal update: I have started a new position as visiting research scholar at
@Princeton
's Program on Science & Global Security. My
@CarnegieEndow
affiliation won't change. Look forward to working w/ new colleagues & reconnecting w/ old friends! Excited to share office w/ Frank!
It is not just "nationalism" that prevented China from importing Western mRNA vaccines but the paranoid belief that to rely on Western vaccines constitutes a national security risk. A vivid example of massive humanitarian consequences of the securitization of non-security issues.
COVID-19 is a political pandemic because it would likely not have happened but for the pathology of the Chinese state. China’s COVID Zero crisis is also political. Blind nationalism prevented Beijing from purchasing Western mRNA vaccines that work far better than Chinese ones.
After a memorable year at Princeton and with deep gratitude to colleagues at the Program on Science & Global Security for hosting me, I will be working at
@CarnegieEndow
's DC office. Looking forward to meeting with old friends and making new connections in Washington!
Happy to share my new research paper on China's No First Use nuclear policy and its implications for the current international debate around the issue of NFU, published in the Asian Security.
Link for 50 free online copies:
The silence in China was a little awkward after Kim Jong Un touted his determination at the recently concluded 8th party congress to push forward a full-fledged nuclear program and publicized impressive future nuclear development plans.
Honored to be interviewed by
@SCMPNews
on
@HuXijin_GT
's call for China to quickly build at least 1000 nukes.
A short thread on China's domestic debate on nuclear expansion.
21/ Both sides need to understand the domestic perceptions underlying the increasing risk of US-China sleepwalking into conflict over Taiwan. Even an inadvertent Taiwan conflict could formally launch the world into two blocs & major power wars. It's hard to overstate the stakes.
Glad to share my new research paper on China's Approach to Arms Control Verification:
It analyzes China's position, thinking, & underlying causes, in the hope to promote more effective international engagement with China on arms control verification.
2/5
It is more likely that they choose not to care, because their aggressive performance on the international stage would win themselves greater career success domestically, in a political system that has undergone dramatic change in recent years.
1/ The most desirable outcome for China remains peaceful unification. To Beijing, this means to avoid war & use time to further build up material power, including military power. By the time China establishes clear military advantage, Taiwan and US would have to accept reality.
Over time, however, as China unconsciously sinks deeper into its own universe of facts and truths, it develops a stronger conviction about its righteous role to challenge the false narratives and biased rules dominated by the “morally corrupt” West. 6/7
Would be useful to study how China reached this belief. At that time there were many warnings from Chinese analysts about US military attack. I laughed at such crazy analysis as it appeared paranoid & lacked evidence, only to find out I was wrong to dismiss its policy influence.
“the Chinese believed that Mr. Trump planned to launch a military strike to create an international crisis that he could claim to solve as a last-ditch effort to beat Joseph R. Biden Jr.”
4/5
In future crises, if PLA officers, like some Chinese diplomats, also calculate that it is in their personal interests to act extra tough, even if they know their aggression could cause war and cost China dearly, they might still feel incentivized to do so.
4/ More important, China increasingly believes that even though China wants to avoid conflict, the US is becoming more desperate to undermine China by playing the Taiwan card. US efforts to strengthen ties with Taiwan are viewed as indisputable evidence of US strategic hostility.
13/ As for Chinese experts, they watch
#UkraineWar
as a real-world simulation of a future US-China conflict. There is growing optimism that Russia is not losing despite fighting the entire West.
2/
#UkraineWar
puts pressure on this thinking in several ways: Believing the US-led West is using the war to destroy Russia, Beijing becomes more convinced an eventual showdown with the West may only be avoidable if China could change balance of power to its favor quickly enough.
6/ The mutual perception that "ball is in the other's court" is the reason for concern. US believes China is challenging status quo; China believes it faces growing US aggression, has less choice, and may sooner or later be forced to act.
China’s nuclear development goal continues changing, according to the 20th Party Congress report, which declares China will build a “powerful/strong strategic deterrent capability system (强大战略威慑力量体系). 1/2
🧵An important technical driver of China's reported FOBS+glider development is probably the perceived threat from US missile defense.
But a more complex question is: could the US readjust its missile defense policy to influence China's calculation behind its nuclear buildup?
SCOOP –
#China
has stunned US intelligence and military officials by testing a
#nuclear
capable
#hypersonic
missile that traveled through low orbit in space, making a full circle around the globe before speeding towards its target.
3/5
If true, I worry what this new trend would mean for a future US-China military incident/clash/conflict, which is becoming less unimaginable given how quickly mutual animosity is building.
The anticipated US-China statement against AI decision-making in nuclear weapons use would symbolize a shared, commonsense principle, but not a real contention point for either country, similar to the P5 statement on "nuclear wars cannot be won and should never be fought." 1/3
Biden and Xi set to pledge a ban on use of AI in autonomous weaponry, such as drones, and in the control and deployment of nuclear warheads, sources confirmed to the Post.
Important scoop by colleagues
@ipatrickbr
@markmagnier
, Amber Wang in DC
No evidence the new silos are intended as a bargaining chip. They demonstrate China's firm determination to enhance nuclear capability, in face of perceived US strategic hostility, and consistent with Mr. Xi's public order to accelerate strategic deterrent capability buildup. 1/3
🚨 Big China news 🚨
I found China's 2nd nuclear silo field, in Eastern Xinjiang.
@nukestrat
+ I estimate that it could eventually house 110 silos.
In total, China seems to be building ~250 new silos––the largest expansion of China's nuclear force ever.
3/ However,
#UkraineWar
resuscitates the US/West. US may remain somewhat distracted, but China cannot be as confident as before about its projected surpassing of US in foreseeable future. A less sanguine projection promotes "long-term pain worse than short-term pain" thinking.
5/ Convinced of US' salami slicing strategy to erode China's leverage over Taiwan, Chinese experts argue a resolute response to implement China's red line before it gets further infringed would be necessary, otherwise US provocation would only be emboldened.
5/5
This presents a growing challenge for preventing crisis and managing escalation. Decision-makers, and Chinese leaders in particular, need to understand the potential risks of this trend.
11/ Chinese leadership may also be relieved to see Putin's war decision did not cause serious domestic instability in Russia. Rather, Russian people mostly rally around the flag and Putin becomes more popular.
Today's US-China arms control & nonproliferation consultation is a positive but limited first step.
At
@ForeignPolicy
, I argue that exploring credible No First Use models can lead to more substantive nuclear, arms control, & strategic risk reduction talks.
14/ From this perspective, Russia turns out not really internationally isolated and its economy may survive sanctions; thus a much more powerful China would have a better chance to endure the consequences of a conflict and emerge victorious.
7/ Believing the US is emboldened by its perceived success in crippling Russia over Ukraine, Chinese experts see a greater danger of US going rogue and attempting more radical moves against China to similarly destabilize/destroy China.
10/ Some public opinion leaders’ recent calls for the Chinese public to be psychologically prepared for a war over Taiwan may or may not be directed from the top, but it aligns with Mr. Xi's guidance that "it is unrealistic to always want to live in peace and not want to fight."
China's changing geopolitical perspectives are behind its accelerated nuclear modernization.
To understand the Chinese rationale is important for thinking about future solutions.
In my new
@CarnegieEndow
commentary:
15/ There's also the popular belief that a rising power needs to take a decisive move at the right historical juncture to effectively assert itself and establish international respect & status; in fact, this might be the only way to shock the hegemonic West into reconciliation.
In a Chinese op-ed I rebutted the main arguments by
@HuXijin_GT
& his followers, and explained why it is in China's interest not to massively expand its nuclear forces. Thanks to
@ChinaUSFocus
for translating it into English & publishing it:
18/ As more people embrace the dominant view with no thorough debate of its defects and consequences, a self-reinforcing echo chamber can already set the collective machine of the state down a path not necessarily strategically planned or carefully scrutinized by anyone.
12/ This is important to the Chinese leadership whose top priority is to maintain domestic stability and popularity but faces growing pressure as more people raise questions about government competence in handling Covid, economy, and other pressing domestic problems.
8/ The reported (now postponed)
@SpeakerPelosi
visit to Taiwan stimulates unprecedentedly tense Chinese discussion of need for very strong response. Many want a much tougher military reaction than before. If it led to war it is not up to us, is the increasingly popular sentiment.
9/ Under this siege mentality, although China would prefer to have more time to develop better military preparedness, it believes it would have to do with what it has when push comes to shove.
The expanding information and perception gaps, both in general and within these specific instances, demand significant attention from international media, foreign policy research institutes, as well as peace and anti-war communities. 7/7
16/ Admittedly, the top leader's view is what matters most but is never clear. Yet, the pressure to resolve the Taiwan issue comes from him. He links it to his goal of national rejuvenation & has displayed interest in developing the capability to resolve the issue forcefully.
20/ This happens against the broader background where China as a nation is at a critical juncture struggling about if its future rests with seeking to work with the West or more openly countering the West. A military spark over Taiwan could immediately end any remaining debate.
17/ As a result, hawkish views easily set the public narrative by dominating discussion and getting little pushback. As domestic public narrative becomes more unitary, debates are rarely about the wisdom of coercive unification but how. Little room remains for different thinking.
I wonder if the idea is exactly to keep China's enemies guessing. It would force its enemies to take all new silos seriously and bolster China's image as a much stronger nuclear power than before. Whether China will actually fill each silo with an ICBM is a different matter. 1/6
China is building more than 100 new ICBM silos--a major discovery by
@ArmsControlWonk
and
@dex_eve
and reported by
@JobyWarrick
.
My working hypothesis (as mentioned in article) is that China will deploy much fewer than 100 new missiles. (1/n)
My report "Narrowing the U.S.-China Gap on Missile Defense: How to Help Forestall a Nuclear Arms Race" will be launched at the
@carnegie
event.
Pls join discussion w/
@suea_thornton
,
@osmastro
,
@BethanyAllenEbr
& me on nuclear, BMD, & US-China competition!
Narrowing the U.S.-China Gap on Missile Defense: How to Help Forestall a Nuclear Arms Race
My new
@CarnegieEndow
report is now online and free to download👇
A short thread:
In a domestic environment that places “patriotism” above all else, reporters and analysts of news (and of the science behind it) spontaneously filter out politically unwelcome aspects of science. 4/7
Two leading Chinese nuclear policy experts have published an English article titled "U.S. strategy of damage limitation vis-à-vis China: long-term programs and effects":
19/ Somewhere down the path, the military option might start to appear appealing to decisionmakers. The machine of the state seems unconsciously drifting toward making the domestic public opinion environment conducive for the leadership to eventually make a consequential move.
China's nuclear buildup reignites debates on US-China mutual vulnerability relationship. There're ways US can mitigate the risks of acknowledging mutual vulnerability & steer the bilateral relationship to a more constructive path. My analysis
@nytopinion
:
No one needs to lie; no one is explicitly told to lie; they just speak and receive half-truth (for example, by not putting this issue into context and comparing with other sources of radiological pollution, such as discharged water from normal nuclear plants). 5/7
My new essay looks into the dangerous perception gap dividing the US & China and its implications for the bilateral relationship & international security.
Thanks to
@APLNofficial
for publishing it!
Unlike in ROK where public concern of
#Fukishima
water is also high (albeit less extreme & one-sided), the diversity of views and expert analysis in China is notably absent. 2/7
This is a deeper problem than deliberate government-driven propaganda, in the sense that most of Chinese officials, state media workers, policy elites, and the public genuinely don't think they are receiving and spreading misleading scientific information. 3/7
China should talk to Russia who destroyed the INF Treaty, deploying battalions of medium range 9M729 missiles (they can’t reach US). Where are they deployed? Who are they aimed at? Join Vienna talks; get answers on things like this!
Pleased to share with
@BulletinAtomic
my speculation about possible military rationale behind China's nuclear expansion: the interest in escalation management capabilities could have significant implications for the U.S.-China nuclear relationship.
Many thanks to
@ArmsControlNow
for publishing my piece on "Underlying Challenges and Near-Term Opportunities for Engaging China" on nuclear arms control, in the most recent issue of
#ArmsControlToday
.
It is now available for free access at
If China continues eschewing arms control with the United States, diplomatic engagement stands as one of the limited but crucial means to reduce the risk of conflict, writes
@zhaot2005
in this month's cover story for
#ArmsControlToday
, available online at .
It is a great pleasure to review the excellent book "China’s Strategic Arsenal: Worldview, Doctrine, and Systems" edited by James Smith and Paul Bolt, in the newest issue of the Arms Control Today
@ArmsControlNow
:
I wrote a Chinese piece to analyze the security implications of DPRK's unchecked nuclear buildup. Nothing hostile against DPRK; nothing about China's North Korea policy; just tried to summarize facts, predict future trend, & explain the impact. But could not get it published.
The China-India border clash will reshape their security relations. In a new
@CarnegieEndow
paper,
@toby_dalton
and I explore what the future of the 🇨🇳-🇮🇳 nuclear relationship may look like.
It includes insight from senior Chinese experts we interviewed.
P.S. This is my effort, as a researcher, to understand & describe mainstream Chinese thinking & perception (not just what China says but also what it believes). Given the circumstances, however, I am not in a position to make judgement on the described views.
China & INF treaty: how China sees and may respond to the withdrawal by US; how this affects future US-China security relationship? My new
@CarnegieEndow
commentary on the demise of INF treaty & US-China strategic competition:
It is my pleasure to examine the potential implications of Russia's nuclear signaling during the Ukraine War for China's nuclear policy, in this joint
@APLNofficial
and
@Nautilus_Inst
policy brief:
If New START expires with no replacement, what are the implications for China's nuclear policy? How might China react? How would US-Russia-China trilateral nuclear competition look like? My new essay for
@CNA_org
, now available at
@CarnegieEndow
website:
Looking forward to discussing "Nuclear Weapons, Strategic Stability & the Future of US-China Relations" at
@asianstudiesgu
's US-China Conference on Monday, April 29.
Free registration link:
The media outlets I worked with before have all declined and said the content is too sensitive. One of them worried that the timing is not right to talk about DPRK's nukes, as bilateral relations are good & Xi just sent a message to congratulate DPRK's party congress.
How do China's growing SSBNs (strategic nuclear submarines) affect strategic stability? What to do to mitigate misunderstanding about this program & contribute to preserving US-China strategic stability? In my new
@CarnegieEndow
report (free download):
My colleagues at
@CarnegieBeijing
kindly summarized some of the key findings of my report on addressing the U.S.-China missile defense dispute in an easy to read graphic.
Check it out!
#CTCReadingNotes
#ReadwithCTC
The international community needs to be alert against alarmism & threat inflation. However, to understand the risk of a new nuclear race is the first step toward gathering the political will to mitigate this danger that would affect us all. We need no 2nd Cuban Missile Crisis!
My new report on China's nuclear ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) and implications for strategic stability will be launched at this event on Oct. 24 in DC:
Next week: Join us on Wednesday, October 24 at 1:00PM to discuss China’s nuclear ballistic missile submarine program and its implications for strategic stability.
To register, click here:
China seems less shy than before to reveal & showcase its newest and most modern strategic weaponry. China believes it is a message of deterrence w/ a focus on self-defense, but others may feel intimidated. Such a perception gap continues to fuel distrust & rivalry.
New and noteworthy Chinese firepower on display during today's
#NationalDay
show of force in
#Beijing
, including:
* DF-41 ICBM
* DF-17 hypersonic glider
* H-6N bomber
Here's
@CarnegieBeijing
Senior Fellow
@zhaot2005
.
What the Five Nuclear Weapon States Can Do to Contain Nuclear Risks
My contribution to new
@Livermore_Lab
report: Major Power Rivalry & Nuclear Risk Reduction: Perspectives from Russia, China, and the US. Together w/ Brad Roberts,
@baklitskiy
, Lewis Dunn