Amazing how many people think "debate" has to mean an oral interchange with no third-party evaluation or verification. Written culture, with lags and verification, is often the best means of substantive debate.
If you've ever watched *Goldfinger*, you have to wonder if the real ploy isn't somewhere else, such as auctioning off DMs, blackmail, etc., and the bitcoin thing just proof of concept.
I woke up at 12:40 a.m., concerned that I had placed too many of my assets in institutions covered by deposit insurance, and thus yielding subpar returns.
It is useful for people to know that reforming their views (and actions) will be rewarded, and that there is a statute of limitations in the non-legal sense too.
I just got interviewed by Tyler Cowen. It was exhausting. He kept asking me questions that were interesting but so hard they'd take an essay to answer.
My new project, 100,000 words written by me, a "generative book," the first published inside GPT-4, , *GOAT: Who is the Greatest Economist of all Time and Why Does it Matter?*
On Twitter, otherwise remarkably intelligent people will be taken in by "argument by photograph." The corruption of the proper use of images is one of the worst features of this medium.
Few want to say it, after all their previous yabbering, but "banks didn't use derivatives enough" is a big part of the current complaint about the banking system.