My man
@dharmesh
had an interesting insight:
When Olympians are obsessed with training, we think how amazing. So dedicated! Inspiring!
But when people are obsessed with their work/job, people think how sad. You need a life! You need balance!
On a recent pod
@MrBeast
talked about how he only thinks about YouTube and is obsessed and works a ton.
Commenters said how sad…you have no balance!
That’s silly. Why?
1) he’s happy. 2) you have to be obsessed to win big.
@thesamparr
@dharmesh
The difference is that in one you're working for someone else _as an employee_. If you're working for yourself, sure - work as much as you like!
@thesamparr
@dharmesh
The average age for an olympian is 27, so they have short careers
Question is, how long are you willing to trade work vs. life
People in my network, who used to be all work, are really starting to be ok with less money and more life.
It's been interesting to watch that shift
@thesamparr
@dharmesh
I think there is a clear difference between doing something for yourself (eg. olympian) and doing something for your job (eg. for the company/CEO)
@thesamparr
@dharmesh
Here’s a related insight:
When a CEO makes millions, you hear “they’re greedy.”
When singers, football players, or actors make millions more than CEOs, they “are so cool” or “really good looking” .
The inequality in charisma/good looks is far greater than income :)
@thesamparr
@dharmesh
I think the issue is that olympians are more or less proportionally rewarded for their efforts. Hard to beat even a few moments of world recognition.
People judge when work put in does not seem proportionally rewarded