@ochepedia
Christopher Kempf
6 years
Gary Anderson's last 250-or-so darts at treble 20. A good look at how Gary often uses the first dart, which is often low, as a "marker". There is of course some margin of error with the dart placements on the graphic, but I've tried to be as accurate as I can.
Tweet media one
37
114
421

Replies

@adamfadamf
Adam
6 years
@ochepedia Assume you've just watched and recorded these yourself?
1
0
1
@ochepedia
Christopher Kempf
6 years
@adamfadamf Yes. I probably won't do that again unless I get paid!
2
0
6
@andymac1203
Andy Macartney
6 years
@ochepedia Complete nonsense about the low being a marker Garyโ€™s Darts sit up so a low dart would be a blocker
1
0
1
@ochepedia
Christopher Kempf
6 years
@andymac1203 Good point. He does tend to switch if the dart is low. Thanks for your comment Andrew.
1
0
0
@stevenrmartin19
Steven R Martin
6 years
@ochepedia Good work. Interesting all darts landed well inside the T20 none close to the wire
1
0
1
@ochepedia
Christopher Kempf
6 years
@stevenrmartin19 Thanks Steven. Don't read too much into that - the dart point takes up a much larger area than my little dots, so they can't be placed too close to the wires in the graphic.
0
0
1
@dt_mckee
David McKee
6 years
@ochepedia Brilliant analysis mate. I would agree with others that if Garyโ€™s first dart is low then I worry about his score. However if he gets 1st one in at an angle, I think he usually bangs a 180 easy. Keep up the good work ๐Ÿ‘
1
0
0
@ochepedia
Christopher Kempf
6 years
@DavidMc06263366 Thanks David. It would take a level of sophistication of which I am not capable to look at the dart angles! ;)
1
0
0
@Happy_Tramp
The Happy Tramp
6 years
@ochepedia Great stuff Chris! (My treble-20 map would look like confetti in a hurricane.)
1
0
3
@ochepedia
Christopher Kempf
6 years
@Happy_Tramp Thanks! So would mine.
0
0
0
@ochepedia
Christopher Kempf
6 years
@footy_nut Wright's 3rd dart T20% with 120 already scored is around 40%, a little lower than the rate for the other two darts but not by much.
0
0
0
@DanKHansen1
Dan K. Hansen
6 years
@ochepedia Btw. I could be interesting to see how far off a first, second or third missed. And also if the throws were grouped. Here you canโ€™t tell which first relates to which second and thirds... still very interesting though! ๐Ÿ‘
1
0
0
@ochepedia
Christopher Kempf
6 years
@DanKHansen1 No doubt! the limitations of this display are myriad. This was just a little experiment to see how this information could be visually displayed. The response to this graphic has been waaaay out of proportion to its quality!
2
0
2
@Kaatje180
Karin
6 years
@ochepedia Thought I saw an Unicorn board after one leg ๐Ÿคฃ
0
0
5
@WorldWideDarts
WorldWide Darts
6 years
@ochepedia OMG! There must have been an amazing amount of work that went into this one post. Brilliant! ๐Ÿ‘
0
0
3
@Ashdown_
Ashdown
6 years
1
0
0
@woodsyyy
michael woods
6 years
@ochepedia @martybrown13 ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚
0
0
1
@ochepedia
Christopher Kempf
6 years
@DanTheStripe On this form, it may well be pretty close to 1 in 500. T19 and D12 are statistically the hardest darts to hit, however, and there aren't many recent cases of Gary missing them on TV for us to evaluate.
0
0
1
0
0
1