@mark_bauerlein
Mark Bauerlein
4 years
In 1997, I asked a colleague in American Studies what was the single focus that united all the disparate parts of her field. She answered, “Against American Exceptionalism.”
14
20
113

Replies

@A_Man_in_Full
A Man in Full
4 years
@mark_bauerlein As Kenneth Lynn famously put it, anti-American Studies.
0
0
1
@sabrecav
sabrecav
4 years
@mark_bauerlein That’s not going to produce another Tom Wolfe...
0
0
0
@ArchieG1946
Archie Goodwin
4 years
@mark_bauerlein The “New Americanists” In literary studies offered nothing but spiteful “ideological critiques” of the whole of American literary history, particularly of the 19th century. Everywhere they looked they found their preordained conclusions: racism, misogyny, imperialism, etc.
0
0
1
@CampSakima
Ken Meyer
4 years
@mark_bauerlein I guess they should rename it “Anti-American Studies”.
0
0
1
@JoshHochschild
Josh Hochschild
4 years
@mark_bauerlein “Against American Exceptionalism” is even more simplistic and anti-intellectual than American Exceptionalism was. Now enough time has passed, I think, it is old enough that it has to be taught as just another trendy historiographical theme, not used as the organizing principle.
0
0
2
@munderw341
Mary Underwood
4 years
@mark_bauerlein Sad. I was raised on that with the other side being the duty we had as a blessed exceptional country. Noblesse Oblige. Throughout our history we have lived up to that ideal better than any nation on earth.
0
0
2
@edgecitykid
torpido
4 years
@mark_bauerlein A perfectly woke response. Your colleague stated her position, which isn't what you asked. They cannot distinguish between a culture trait and a position..
0
0
0
@nes_nathan
Nate (on the) Stone
4 years
@mark_bauerlein When the culture war is written and studied properly by future historians, the bequeathing of the education system without a struggle will be seen as one of the stupidest decisions in the 20th century.
0
0
2