@hemingquay
G.S. Quay
7 months
Your options are natural law or transhumanist dystopia. Pick a side.
5
1
20

Replies

@hemingquay
G.S. Quay
7 months
There is space in Christian tradition for a certain kind of libertarian argument (e.g. attempting to seriously enforce a ban on, say, masturbation would require a tyrannical surveillance state that would be more evil than the problem it was created to solve).
1
0
3
@hemingquay
G.S. Quay
7 months
What there isn’t room for is a fully libertarian worldview that regards as illegitimate any law not based on the Non-Aggression Principle. If we give up on natural law as a basis for human law, we’ve given up the whole game.
1
0
3
@hemingquay
G.S. Quay
7 months
Christians should not use the state to “force people to live like Christians” in the sense of compelling people to attend church or face jail time. But Christians should want the state to outlaw gay marriage for the same reason they want it to outlaw murder: natural law.
1
0
1
@357magnumdude1
357magnumdude
6 months
@hemingquay I'll take natural law
0
0
1
@NaziVogue
VogueNazis Work in AI
6 months
@NaziVogue
VogueNazis Work in AI
8 months
@GTP_Podcast I have had Neuralink for 10 years. It is a real-time neurological surveillance (mind reading for ‘hive mind’) and covert assassination tool. I am ‘beta one’ in Darpa #braini . Done for political revenge. I went to Congress nine days this year for help. They are all con men.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
104
198
302
0
0
0
@NaziVogue
VogueNazis Work in AI
6 months
0
0
0
@PalaciosJo51659
Michelle
3 months
@hemingquay Hello handsom
0
0
0