Scientist & philosopher at the tender age of 29.
Biomedical physicist. Ultranaturalist. YouTuber. Fitness fanatic. (Your Majesty / Your Highness)
🇺🇸 🇮🇱
Science is NOT a democracy; the truth of a matter is never determined by the public's approval of the propositions put forward by scientists. Scientists, in the course of developing theories, are under no obligation to seek the public's approval of their claims.
HOWEVER.
When
The Dissident Right has to be the most tactically retarded movement in history. Jewish votes and institutional support were offered to you, on a silver platter, by the political Left. And your response has been to JQ them away. Are you people not actually interested in winning?
Critical theory is the single most fraudulent intellectual enterprise in existence, outclassing even religious apologetics in its shameless application of motivated reasoning and special pleading. All critical theorists are charlatans and fraudsters.
scientists interface with the democratic process in the course of advancing public policy, they are no longer engaged in the pursuit of truth; advocacy is an entirely separate activity, and is thereby beholden to the strictures of the democratic ethos.
ALL technocrats,
@kareem_carr
It's possible to lie with statistics, but it's much easier to lie without them. Your diverse stories may be rich, but they're also devoid of truth.
accountability to the public. Appearing on the podcast would be respectful of the democratic spirit. Appearing in court would be the outcome of provoking the wrath of that spirit, should one be proud and/or foolish enough to scorn it.
I AM PUTTING AN END TO THIS ARGUMENT.
Here are the Verbal and Quantitative GRE scores by college major. Here are the key takeaways for those of you who struggle with interpreting data (yes humanities, I'm talking to you):
scientific or otherwise, are obligated to present their case to the public for review whenever they want to advocate for a policy proposal.
As a scientist & technocrat who holds several licenses that legally ordain my privileges to act in the capacity of a biomedical physicist,
that justify a claim. If the technocrat is called to offer up those merits in a public forum and fails to do so, either out of incompetence or refusal, then the epistemic authority of the technocrat is legitimately called into question. If the aforementioned public forum is a
I am accountable to that very public whose trust in my *epistemic* authority has conferred to me the *legal* authority to restrict or authorize the medical application of ionizing radiation in hospitals around the country.
Neither epistemic nor legal authority is necessary nor
the public demands a technocrat who wants a claim to be legally enforced to justify that claim, the public is not asking for proof of the technocrat's epistemic or legal authority; that's already a given, by virtue of their being a technocrat. What's being demanded is the MERITS
sufficient to establish the truth of a claim. The truth of a claim is established on the basis of its own merits.
The legal ENFORCEMENT of that claim, however, rests upon one's *legal* authority to do so, and that in turn rests upon the technocrat's *epistemic* authority.
When
THREAD ON JEWS, BY A JEW.
Multiple things can be true simultaneously.
1) Jews are overrepresented in media, finance, and academia.
2) This is mostly a consequence of meritocracy.
Progressives and Nazis are united in their opposition to
#2
, albeit for different reasons. (1/15)
be well advised to engage the public on the merits of their case before that selfsame public enforces its legal right to hold technocrats accountable in court.
This is not a matter of whether one's debating skills or popular opinion have any bearing on truth; this is a matter of
court of law, then the incompetent and/or uncooperative technocrat's legal authority to enforce a given claim will be stripped away on behalf of the public to whom they are accountable. If the public forum is something like an online podcast, then such an outcome is not legally
enforceable. However, technocrats who wish to avoid the former type of public forum, and the substantially more tedious, challenging, and expensive process associated with defending one's legal authority in a court of law versus defending the merits of a case in a podcast, would
Are you mad? England is one of the most militarily successful nations to have ever existed. The last 300 years of our history has been non-stop winning until after WWII, when we suddenly decided to stop fighting and give everything away.
Just finished reading a famous Palestinian scholar's book about the history of the conflict. There's a lot to say about it, but this meme is essentially correct
1) To absolutely no one's shock, everybody gets BTFO by physicists. Here are the compared aggregates of the aforementioned scores.
You'll notice that the top spots are dominated by the usual suspects, with the only black sheep being philosophers. I suspect the reason for this is
Think about it. The Left sufficiently dehumanized Israeli Jews through its facile oppression discourse that mobs of people can now publicly justify the rape, kidnap, and mass murder of civilians, including children.
Who else will they dehumanize in this fashion? Who else (1/2)
I had a fascinating interaction with ChatGPT this morning, in which it generated-- without any prompt from me-- this intriguing image. I proceeded to psycho-analyze (albeit tongue-in-cheek) ChatGPT's subconscious to figure out why it made this.
Here's the conversation
1/🧵
@BFriedmanDC
The "non-military" way to get rid of Nazi Germany is to undercut them by offering all Germans a viable alternative: Statehood, economic development and self-determination. Instead, the Allies continually drive Germans into the arms of Hitler, fueling this never-ending cycle of
that philosophy departments in the US lean strongly towards the analytic rather than the continental persuasion, so philosophy students who apply to graduate programs in America tend to have stronger math and logic skills. We can safely assume that lovers of Heidegger, Sartre,
@CaitPsych
I'll get accused of making this up, but here goes.
In the middle of the first date, she pulled me aside and took me to Tiffany's where she pointed out the hundred thousand dollar rock she hoped to receive as an engagement ring.
The blackest pill of all is this: there is no configuration of society or individual circumstance that will bring you happiness because the source is happiness is the pursuit of meaning. If you don't have meaning, then there is no amount of money or hoes that will give you peace.
and other such mystics, probably score considerably lower than students of actual thinkers like Russell, Carnap, and Quine.
2) The differences in verbal reasoning ability between STEM and humanities are smaller than the differences in quantitative reasoning ability. The upshot
Nazis think that Jewish success is symptomatic of Jewish conspiracy. Progressives think that meritocracy is a myth that enables white supremacy. Therefore neither can accept
#2
.
The Nazi position, though BS, at least has the benefit of being internally consistent. But the (2/15)
@FlyingBeagle_
@MarinaMedvin
@RYW1010
That's a question for Hamas. How many civilian casualties do they need to have on their conscience before they decide to stop crouching behind civilians?
I'm a medical physicist who works w MRI.
To be able to store military equipment there, they literally had to quench the MRI, meaning permanently disabling the magnet to prevent it from destroying their guns.
Hamas' mere presence degraded the hospital's life-saving capabilities.
white supremacists- when they finally accrue enough power to have no more need for the holocaust's rhetorical power- when they finally succeed in making Jews white- they will join their Nazi brethren in the belief that Jewish success is symptomatic of Jewish conspiracy. (15/15)
switch jobs, the STEM majors would probably do better at humanities jobs than humanities majors would at STEM jobs. We can do what you do, but you can't do what we do.
3) In a number of cases, STEM majors outperform humanities majors even in verbal reasoning. For example, math
The Left is being especially vicious right now because it has been caught in a moment of extreme vulnerability and weakness.
Do not mistake the aggressiveness of a cornered rat for actual strength.
Press the attack.
literally Hitler.
I've had family sent to Auschwitz and Treblinka. I've had family butchered by Einsatzgruppen & their Slavic collaborators. I have people buried in Babi Yar.
And I've never been amused by progressives who use the corpses of my fallen as political props. (12/15)
@KhaledBeydoun
I read community notes, like the one pointing out how you sent that fake hate message to yourself in order to fraudulently farm clicks. Does that count?
You don't get to spend 10 years turning campuses into ideological clearinghouses, and then cry "McCarthyism!" when your ideological opponents force you to abide by your institution's last remaining politically neutral standards.
As a result, their only recourse is to deny, censor, and reprimand those who acknowledge disproportionate Jewish influence. This in turn lends credibility to Nazi narratives about malevolent Jews in power. As it has always been, the far left and the far right are united in (8/15)
@TheLuchaJoe
@notgwendalupe
Nobody who watches this video feels anything. They just bob their heads if they agree with its messaging. It's a lecture, not a song.
They desecrate the memory of our fallen by turning the holocaust into a stick with which to beat their opponents. I wish more Jews would understand that when progressives condemn the holocaust, they're not doing it because they love you. (13/15)
their hatred for Jews. The far left is just less overt about it because if they became openly anti-semitic, they would lose the moral authority to continue opportunistically wielding their favorite rhetorical weapon against their political opponents: the holocaust. (9/15)
If progressives would just acknowledge that Jews got to their positions of influence fairly, there wouldn't be any drama. But they can't do that, because they're championing an ideology whose core premise is that meritocracy is a pretense that justifies white supremacy. (7/15)
They're doing it because they love the holocaust. Specifically, they love its rhetorical power. And when the day comes that they finally succeed in erasing Jewish identity by insinuating that we're all sellouts who get to our positions of prestige by collaborating with (14/15)
between the "more STEM" and "more humanities" subsets of the social sciences with respect to aggregated GRE scores.
tl;dr
Humanities majors- your disciplines are important, but let's not kid ourselves about the relative capabilities of STEM VS humanities people.
Dearest Jews-- the Left was never your home.
It was always a gilded cage whose sole purpose was to disingenuously marshal Holocaust rhetoric against the Left's enemies. They never cared about you; you were just a useful tool. And now that they have no more need for you, they
progressive position doesn't have even that. Let's take a moment to explore why.
The progressive POV is that to the extent that Jews, blacks, etc. succeed in a white supremacist society, they do so at the cost of their racial/ethnic "authenticity."
Which is to say, the way (3/15)
The escalating normalization of Jew-hatred on both the Left and Right is deeply troubling. I'm hesitant to use the word "demonic," but something very dark and vicious appears to have awakened in the hearts of far too many previously recognizable people.
must be that Jews are largely inauthentic. That is to say, most Jews are the Jewish equivalents of Uncle Toms. Under this view, Jews are essentially opportunists who trade away their identity in exchange for success. This is how it's possible for Jews to be complicit in (5/15)
Mexican kids made to live together in a facility that provides meals, shelter, education, and even PS4 games while their unauthorized immigrant parents get their misdemeanors processed? That's literally Auschwitz. Trump calls the media "the enemy of the people?" He's (11/15)
The holocaust carries real emotional power for reasons that should be obvious. And that power is something that progressives positively salivate at exercising at every opportunity. No remark or event, no matter how unremarkable, is too trivial to compare to the holocaust. (10/15)
I've known for a long time that Jews were destined to break with the BLM/privilege/decolonization crowd, but that it wouldn't happen without a major wakeup call.
What happens next is absorption of Jews into the redpilled coalition, BUT-- AND THIS IS CRUCIAL-- IT CAN ONLY HAPPEN
will the Left tarnish as being deserving of rape and mass slaughter, of the forcible removal of land and property and life? Who will be next? Whose rapes and murders will they justify next? Think about it. (2/2)
you get ahead as a minority in a white supremacist society is by "acting white," but in so doing, you cease to be authentic.
Consequently, the progressive explanation for widespread Jewish success, even if they refuse to articulate what follows logically from the premises, (4/15)
white supremacy: they're just a bunch of sellouts.
Keep in mind that despite the fact that progressives seldom express this view in public, it follows necessarily from their premises. And the reason for this is that they refuse to acknowledge meritocracy as mostly real. (6/15)
I am publicly challenging Vaush to a moderated dispute over whether Israel has the right to exist, the answer to which will be decided by which of us can do the most push-ups. He has 3 seconds to respond or else he's a fucking coward
The anti-Israel side:
-North Korea
-Russia
-Iran
-zoomers who stan bin Laden
-the Squad
-Islamists
-communists
-Nazis
The pro-Israel side:
-well adjusted adults with jobs
majors outperform performance/studio arts majors, communications majors, architecture majors, and all varieties of education majors.
4) The lowest aggregate scores go to humanities majors. Some disagreement might arise over the extent to which social sciences are part of STEM VS
Jew-haters are out in force today, blaming Jews for their disproportionate representation among leftist leadership. As ever, they neglect to consider the disproportionate role Jews play in opposing leftist policy, opting instead to treat leftism as though it were a
(1/4)
The chances of being injured by a bear are approximately 1 in 2.1 million, according to the National Park Service. You are more likely to be killed by a bee than a bear, and way more likely to be killed by another human than by either bear or bee. And when bear encounters do
"Collective punishment" is when you retaliate against a population for the actions of one of its segments-- not when you hurt a population while retaliating against a government for its actions. The latter is called "war."
Deepest condolences to all DEI staff who will now have to go back to selling used cars, miracle cures, and multi-level marketing schemes.
Might I suggest learning to code?
The etiology of differences in group outcomes is immaterial. We issue no promise to the geriatric about their representation among Olympic athletes, no promise to lepers about their representation among beauty contestants, and no promise to right-handed people about their (1/5)
@grantbels
My dude, critical theory and its offshoots does EXACTLY what you're describing. The critical theorists were suspicious of science as a means of exerting capitalist control over workers and feeding imperialism via the military industrial complex.
DEI embeds itself in academic infrastructure like Hamas embeds itself in Palestinian civilian architecture. There is no removing this tumor without inflicting grave damage to the surrounding healthy tissue.
The universities cannot be healed by firing a few figureheads. The DEI infrastructure is not only honeycombed throughout these institutions, it is the entire raison d'etre of these institutions: a radical ideology dedicated to the overthrow of meritocratic Americanism.
Serious question, how do Arabic societies deal with the fact that every other guy is named Mohammed? "Hey Mohammad, Mohammed wants you to tell Mohammed that Mohammed's mom baked Mohammed a cake." Like how the fuck do they not get confused literally all the time
Zionist propagandists want you to think that the Palestinian national identity didn't form until after the establishment of the modern state of Israel. However, esteemed Palestinian historians have discovered this photo of the Palestinosaurus, which dates back 69 million years
Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-MA): “What I’m seeing on campuses is what I think of as illiberal leftism. I worry about Gen Z. Colleges are increasingly illiberal, and there is a rise of illiberal progressivism that is hostile to the concept of individual rights, free expression, free
Imagine being ignorant enough to not know that Israel issues plenty of advance warning to civilians before targeting their infrastructure, in which Hamas routinely embeds rocket launchers, munitions, and bases.
A cosmetologist has more authority on the topic of cosmology, than an ethnic studies professor has on literally fucking anything. You people are clowns and nobody likes or respects you and you know it, which is why you seethingly gatekeep with credentialist sneers.
They scream that Palestine is innocent and that Israel is guilty-- not to convince us, but to drown out their own conscience.
The images of 10/7-- rapes, murders, kidnappings-- are unbearable to the Leftist, because they reveal the Leftist to himself. They reveal that he
(1/4)
When I return to YouTube, there will be some major changes. Fitness content, medical physics, face reveal, radical revisionary Spinozism as a blueprint for meaning-making without having to commit to mystical or superstitious metaphysics, meta-science.... yeah there's a lot lol
@silkiestmaria
@SwipeWright
"The Authoritarian Personality" began that time-honored tradition of partitioning left and right wing political tendencies along a super-duper scientific metric which weighted all the right wing characteristics as inherently authoritarian, thus reifying the author's prejudices.