15K abstracts
@NeurIPSConf
means
- 10K submissions (30% drop)
- 30K reviews (3 per sub)
- 5-10K reviewers (3 to 6 subs per reviewer)
Do we really have this many reviewers in ML?
5
1
28
Replies
@srijankedia
@NeurIPSConf
Right. Also hard to fix issues with missing reviews and mixed scores since reviewing takes place in July/Aug, right when ACs and Reviewers are off on summer vacation.
PC Chairs have their hands full this year. It's terrifying.
1
0
2
@berkustun
@NeurIPSConf
It's a scary number, but I feel the contrary – that ML might be the one of the very few fields that can genuinely handle that many submissions.
There has to be more than 10k unique authors publishing in NeurIPS and similarly-levelled conferences over the last couple years, yes?
0
0
1
@berkustun
@NeurIPSConf
lol the review process is *ALREADY* random… random number generators tend to scale quite well
0
0
1