I think we should normalize including a section or at least a paragraph in research papers that is devoted to what the authors tried and how they failed for the people who come next
A new paper day!
Thanks to my amazing collaborators, we have made a very impressive progress on computational aspects of mirror symmetry. This progress essentially allowed us to navigate through the complicated string landscape.
This paper will appear tonight on arxiv.
High school teachers can have much bigger impact on young people's lives than university professors. We forget that sometimes. I just received a photo of my geology teacher in high school. I never went to study geology, but this man has been a great inspiration to me.
A paper alert*
I made some progress on computing the string one-loop correction to the Kahler potential in 4d N=1 compactifications of string theory. The paper will appear 8:30pm EST on Thursday. Stay tuned for my paper
*A paper alert
We have found a solution in SFT that corresponds to GKP type of flux compactifications on toroidal orientifold compactifications. We also included a very concise summary of the paper. The paper will appear tomorrow on arxiv :)
Stay tuned for our paper!
My colleague gave me an idea to include failed/stopped research projects in my CV of failure, which I think is a great idea. So I updated my CV of failure.
I seriously don't understand the point this guy is trying to raise.
The non-perturbative string theory is often used as a synonym for the ultimate final answer for quantum gravity. If we admit that we don't know how to solve everything, that is out of honesty.
“You may have heard there’s a crisis in physics!! No there’s not.” -
@seanmcarroll
(Mindscape 263 intro)
This has gotten beyond ridiculous. Read this quoted tweet. WTF? What next?
“String theory is Planck scale physics that just happened to fall into the ElectroWeak regime.”…
In your application letter for
#PhD
/ postdoc, NEVER ever say:
"Hi prof"
"Hello"
"Dear Professor"
"Greetings of the day"
If you do, your email will be immediately deleted by 99% of professors.
▫️
Only start your applications with “Dear Prof. [second_name],”
And don’t…
Anyhow, at 8:30PM EST tomorrow my new paper will appear on arxiv. It's another one step closer to the explicit computation of the non-perturbative terms in the superpotential in low energy theories of type II string theories on Calabi-Yau orientifolds.
In the field of string phenomenology, we need more people who are computationally capable. The problems have gotten too complicated to work on with pens and papers only. Without computational efforts, it seems rather hopeless that we can explore a good chunk of the landscape
Postdoctoral students and academic researchers at the University of California said they will return to work on Monday after ratifying a new contract. But workers who help teach undergraduates and assign grades remain on strike.
What I've learned so far in my somewhat short academic career is that if some established senior researchers think that I am wasting my time on a meaningless research, oftentimes I am on the right track
A new paper alert*
Patrick and I have made very interesting progress on computing superpotential in F-theory computations with Sen limits. The paper will appear on Monday night. You should check it out!
I made more progress on computing string loop corrections to the Kahler potential in 4d N=1 vacua of string theories. This paper will appear on arxiv at 8:00 pm EDT on next Monday.
I started doing string theory as I wanted to do cosmology, but I have been stuck at supersymmetric compactifications for too long.. I should really escape this rabbit hole as soon as I can
I finally found some time to read this paper
What a tour de force computation! I think the numerical metric technology may really yield many amazing results
I like being a stupid person, and I don't quite mind exposing that I don't know much as I can learn much more after doing so in general. But, it is oftentimes difficult to find a place where I can be really honest without being laughed or judged at (or maybe it's just my feeling)
In my first year of ph.d I had pretty rough time. I can undoubtedly say that my struggle was enhanced by unreasonable ta assignment enforced by cornell on an international student who doesn't understand cultural differences
I think at certain point we should adopt the attitude of "shut up and calculate" to put an end to the debate. Arguments and debates cannot close the deals, but only serious computations can
The problem with the never-ending discussions on a de Sitter landscape in string theory is the bias with a certain camp: "We believe we observe a positive cosmological constant & we like string theory --> so string theory should have dS vacua". Reality is that we don't know yet
as one good friend of mine once said, maybe string theorists should have a mindset of mathematicians in that we should recognize that the problems we are facing are big and experiments are not guiding us so we should follow rigor patiently..
Given that string field theory is the only known way to systematically compute string amplitudes in generic backgrounds, sft should be really taught in string theory courses
having a regular group meeting with people who share some similar interests in physics would be just so amazing.. it would feel so good to share excitements I have with colleagues. kind of miss cornell environment now a little
maybe I have too thick of a skin, but I do this all the time. If people are too busy to work with me that's too bad, but I lose nothing (as long as I don't annoy people I am contacting.) And, if I am lucky, I get a new collaborator!
What do my academic colleagues think of cold contacting people for collaboration, especially at early stages of your career. What are some useful tips for this? Such as how much details should one mention in an email.
This is a breakthrough paper in computational algebraic geometry. It is not an overstatement to say that the results that are behind this paper completely reshaped how I do my research. Many congrats to the authors.
In 2022, I tried very hard to be an independent researcher. I think I didn't do a terrible job. A possibl3 downside is that maybe I worked on too niche topic that not so many people in the broader community care so much.
I forgot which QFT text I enjoyed the most. The most vivid memory related to QFT is struggling a lot to understand what the heck is going on most of the time. I think it took me at least 3 years to internalize the most basic concepts of QFT...
I am also one of them. In my undergrad, I was exposed to a strong anti string theory environment. (I think my undergrad institution has changed by a lot since then) That's why I decided to do particle pheno, more precisely neutrino and flavor physics, for my PhD.