@Laurieluvsmolly
@SecretaryPete
You didn't read it did you?
It would INCREASE the inspections and would use equipment that would find defects that are harder to see.
Frequent inspection (constant) Vs. Annual inspection.
It'll catch issues SOONER and is better at detecting small problems.
2
4
63
Replies
The facts don't lie. The 2021 letter you signed was obviously drafted by railroad industry lobbyists.
It supports waivers that would reduce visual track inspections.
Now: will you vote to help us toughen rail safety accountability and fines, or not?
First
@SecretaryPete
was m.i.a. on the derailment
Then he lies to media claiming my 2021 letter calling for more track inspections was a letter calling for deregulation
He is an incompetent who is focused solely on his fantasies about his political future & needs to be fired
5K
3K
16K
3K
13K
62K
@SecretaryPete
@BonHanson79
I see Marco Rubio’s signature on this letter for waivers in lieu of labor-intensive inspections.
69
832
3K
@Resident_NEOK
@SecretaryPete
Not all advocacy groups believe this is safe. Sounds like a labor cutting move by republicans.
11
2
56
@Laurieluvsmolly
@SecretaryPete
They do it more often.
It's a MORE intensive inspection.
It finds MORE defects EARLIER (before they are a real problem).
Yours (&the Advocacy groups problem) is the labor. Not the safety.
You just reveled that.
1
2
18
@Resident_NEOK
@Laurieluvsmolly
@SecretaryPete
This article describes two sides of ATI vs. Visual Inspection:
Argument is ATI does not catch everything, only status of track. Other track issues, like vegetation and non-track obstructions, could be missed if track inspection is fully automated.
0
0
0