Here's a sentence you *won't* read in
@ProfDavidDeming
's pro-testing
@TheAtlantic
essay:
"After making the SAT optional, the number of disadvantaged students attending Ivy League schools declined."
For a good reason: it isn't true. Data in the 🧵...
@ProfDavidDeming
@TheAtlantic
At
@Brown
,
@Dartmouth
, and
@Yale
, test-optional cohorts have had, if anything, a higher share of incoming first-year students eligible for need-based aid, based on their own data reporting.
So what’s the basis for the argument that test-optional “harms” low-income applicants?
@ProfDavidDeming
@TheAtlantic
@brown
@dartmouth
@Yale
The evidence cited: under test-optional, there are “hundreds” of low-income applicants who hide what are in fact very good test scores. So if we forced them to reveal those test scores they’d get in right?
Only if they continue to apply under a test-required regime.
@ProfDavidDeming
@TheAtlantic
@brown
@dartmouth
@Yale
If you think your test scores are a liability for your application to an elite college, and the college forces you to reveal them, you might well decide not to apply.
Elite colleges saw thousands upon thousands more applications when they went test-optional.
@ProfDavidDeming
@TheAtlantic
@brown
@dartmouth
@Yale
Here’s another sentence you won’t read in
@ProfDavidDeming
’s article:
“In their quest to keep low-income enrollment numbers up, without the benefit of test scores, colleges took unreasonable chances on unqualified students.”
Because, again, there’s no evidence this is true.
@ProfDavidDeming
@TheAtlantic
@brown
@dartmouth
@Yale
(Note that in the above graph colleges post low 2nd year retention rates in the cohort that entered in fall 2019, for whom the 2nd year would be fall 2020, when many institutions offered only remote instruction.)
@ProfDavidDeming
@TheAtlantic
@brown
@dartmouth
@Yale
It’s a fairly open secret: getting into Ivy League schools is hard. Staying in them is pretty easy. Look back at this
@DLeonhardt
chart, specifically that data point on the left. Students with a 1200 on the SAT who enroll in an elite college average a 3.0 GPA.
@ProfDavidDeming
@TheAtlantic
@brown
@dartmouth
@Yale
@DLeonhardt
Now, I get the counterargument "those 1200 SAT kids going to
@Harvard
have something else going for them that explains their 3.0 GPA."
Thing is, though, that the data suggest that the "something else" isn't related to academics. It might be athletic ability, family wealth, etc.
@ProfDavidDeming
@TheAtlantic
@brown
@dartmouth
@Yale
@DLeonhardt
@Harvard
So let me posit, then, that the typical 1200 SAT applicant can reasonably expect a 3.0 at an elite institution. Two points:
1) a 3.0 GPA is well above the threshold for worrisome academic performance. At most institutions academic probation kicks in when GPA dips below 2.0.
@JakeVigdor
@ProfDavidDeming
@TheAtlantic
Is there another country that students go to top colleges and high schools without testing?
The only one I know was China during Cultural Revolution for the similar reason.
@JakeVigdor
@ProfDavidDeming
@TheAtlantic
Data @ our school doesn't support
@ProfDavidDeming
argument. Acceptance rates at U of IL (including to engineering and business school & computer science program) increased from 44% when test required to 65% when test optional-95% of our students are Pell eligible.
@JakeVigdor