Several years of studying mathematics and physics have led me to a place where I feel that I don't understand anything about anything. But at least I worked very hard to get to this place
Wittgenstein in my head to me in my head:"Mathematics is neither invented nor discovered; mathematics is an activity. Ask yourself, is dancing invented or discovered?"
I adore books which are written on a typewriter and where all the special character are hand drawn in a size inconsistent with the typed font. Such charm and such amazing math history (from not at all that long ago)
How do you... study math and like... learn anything? Asking for a friend.
In all seriousness, how do you keep your spirit up when you self study amd keep hitting a wall every other step?
Physicists: reality is much more spectacular than anything philosophers imagine
Also physicists: reality is like a bunch of differential equations which we solve
For those who think that "random variable" is bad terminology, have you considered how bad algebra is with terminology? "Group"? "Ring"? "Field"? "Module"?
Mathematics is the language of the universe, and first order logic is the language of mathematics. Therefore, first order logic is the metalanguage of the universe
Mathematics is both a spider web and a rabbit hole. Everything is interconnected so suddenly you can find that you have gotten way further underground than you wanted to be. And the web is sticky. I hope the rabbit-spiders are nice creatures
Levi-Civita is only one mathematician even though he sounds like two, but to compensate we have Riesz who sound like one mathematician but are in fact two
Math feels frustratingly huge and deep. After so many years of study it seems that I haven't gotten further than knowing some terminology and a few elementary results
Question: A function is defined by f(x)=(x²-9)/(2x+6). For which values of x is the function not defined?
Student, going for the surprise checkmate: They say that the function is defined, so it's defined
Cauchy's theorem says that if you have a holomorphic function f on a disc and a finite group G of order divisble by a prime p then the integral along a closed curve of f is 0 and G has a subgroup of order p
A life hack in analysis is to denote your measures by μ, ν, and λ and read them out as the measure, the neasure and the leasure. Just as in differential geometry you have manifolds M,N of dimensions m,n becames manifold of dimension and nanifold of dinension
One of my favorite results in algebra is that any ring (non necessarily with identity) can be embedded as an ideal in a ring with identity. It is such a cute theorem
Thinking of that time during a differential geometry lecture when my brain stopped working for a minute and I asked what was meant by the ordered pair (a,b). The answer was, of course the interval a<x<b
What is a good math textbook like? Is there a difference between what is a good one when you learn a subject the first time, vs. when you learn it subsequent times?
Is anything in analysis actually exciting and beautiful or is it just a tedium to make rigorous all the things done with derivatives, integrals, Fourier transforms, Haar measures etc in applications?
The loop is :
1. Try to study measure theory
2. Get unmotivated and try to study algebra instead
3. Get unmotivated by algebra and procrastinate
4. Try and fail to get motivation
5. Return to 1
When I did physics I used to do derivatives, integrals and PDEs by following my nose and goofing around, and it was so much fun. Then I became more mathematically inclined and somehow I like analysis way less. It's not disliking rigor. I like rigor. I wonder what happened
Mathematics is both an art and a science. The former project was founded by Emil Artin who is a very renouned mathematician. The latter was founded by Emil Sciencein who has sadly remained mostly forgotten
I have lost all enthusiasm for learning. Studying feels like a chore, and I'm very uncertain why I do it anymore, other than I can't imagine what to do instead
Is it just my misconception or is the philosophy of mathematics overly focused on sets, arithmetic, and the real number line (compared to other math subjects)?
What is a good PDE book (for the more rigorous theory rather than methods) that can make the subject more exciting? I usually get recommended Evans, but that one fails to capture my interest, for some reason
Whoever wrote the history of mathematics seriously overestimated the number of Bernoullis a reasonable person can keep track of. Someone should go back and fix this