@CentreforCities
Centre for Cities
1 year
Poor #airquality is estimated to cause 28,000-36,000 deaths a year in the UK. Although proving politically difficult, @MayorofLondon 's #ULEZ expansion will go a long way to improve health and environmental outcomes in the Capital ๐Ÿš—๐ŸŒ‡ Find out why ๐Ÿ‘‡
45
15
47

Replies

@Togetherdec
Together
1 year
@Togetherdec
Together
1 year
ULEZ: @MayorofLondon keeps parroting โ€œcleaning up London air is vitalโ€ But even his mates at Imperial College have to admit that air pollution is โ€œLowโ€ Khan has no democratic mandate for this tax & surveillance scheme His desperate claims are hot air @TfL
Tweet media one
18
272
538
1
2
8
@Am28132
A.M
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon Thank god the underground is so cleanโ€ฆ๐Ÿคก
1
0
0
@MikeB2023
Mike B
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon Cited by the University of Cambridge who have no vested interest in skewing figures -
0
0
2
@lbasham26
Louise Basham
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon Bold in the dishonesty of how it is being forced on us with no discernible change in air quality . This was never mandated or discussed or voted for (only extension to North and South Circular). Ulez is wrong in Outer Boroughs. Do more in Central London, which is still bad.
1
0
5
@Iantaxi1
Iantaxi
1 year
@CentreforCities @LTDAForum @MayorofLondon Just checked pollution levels on I phone weather app . Guess what , showing low levels and in the green zone. Watch out for TfL fake figures
2
1
10
@ChrisKearney3
Chris Kearney
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon Where can I get one of those mini phonebox rucksacks in the photo?
0
0
10
@JimmyThePeaks
Jimmy ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ #AntiULEZ #FBPE
1 year
@CentreforCities @SadiqKhan @MayorofLondon That article is absolutely laughable and also fails to address the most important point - that YOUR impact assessment predicts that the improvement in air quality resulting from ULEZ expansion will be practically undetectable!
Tweet media one
0
1
6
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon ULEZ biggest rip of ever Tax the poor why not
0
0
5
@TflTruth
TFL TRUTH
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon Oh god the number keeps changing yet there's only ever been one recorded for a fact! STOP the nonsense ๐Ÿ˜’
1
0
7
@paulschapman
paulschapman
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon The Jacob's report showed the ULEZ will have negligible effect on air pollution. However a ยฃ1,000 drop in income would cost 7 months of lifespan and someone who cannot afford to replace their car will end up paying four times that.
0
4
14
@edgbo62
Edgbo62
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon Another think tank that prints lies for money
0
0
2
@Goatmasterfunk
Goatmasterfunk
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon How do? 90% of vehicles are already compliant and will be unchanged. How many of the remaining 10% will be removed from the roadsโ€ฆ.? Most will remain because you can pay a tax to kill apparently
0
0
1
@Davski2000
Davski2000
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon That's simply not true and misleading!
0
0
3
@JeffreyRumney
Jeffrey rumney
1 year
0
0
4
@LindaSWilkinson
Linda Wilkinson
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon Another unsubstantiated statistic. As with the cycle lobby, people see through the lies. You canโ€™t take people with you if you constantly lie.
0
0
5
@burts47
burts
1 year
0
0
1
@najimakarem
Naji Makarem
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon Itโ€™s a bit extreme to charge me ยฃ12.50 a day but o drive my 1996 VW Golf. I purchased this car because the government allowed the car to be sold in the UK. Why should I be punished and not compensated for their failure to regulate cars sold in the UK? They messed up not me!
0
0
1
@LeeBow74
Lee B
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon Talking total bollocks again. Why keep spreading lies?
0
0
1
@Bowmore52
Bowmore 52
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon Whereโ€™s the evidence to prove this assertion ?
0
0
2
@CyclingJam
Elliott Shields
1 year
@CentreforCities @MayorofLondon I find it crazy that people call it "bold" when we need to 10x more
0
0
0