@CSBarnard24 @IanDunt Am I missing something or is sections 2 and 3 window dressing as it is only examples of what could be done, and does not actually limit in any way what is able to be done under section 1?

@CSBarnard24 Is it saying NO court anywhere can rule on issues arising from the Bill? So, in practice no Judicial Review? It is the Government that will decide.

@CSBarnard24 @kevinhorourke The drafting is peculiar and substandard - one wonders were normal channels by-passed

@CSBarnard24 Remarkable is one word for it!! Terrifying & contemptible are others.....

@CSBarnard24 @bricksilk the breach is indeed very specific and limited - it only removes the frontstop

@CSBarnard24 @PickardJE

@CSBarnard24 @IanDunt They were right. They said Brexit would be clean and easy. We can now go forth with pride and spread our values - democracy, free trade, the rule of law - to like-minded countries from a position of strength.

@CSBarnard24 @jillongovt If it's not to be interpreted in accordance with case law of the European Court does that mean it also has to discount any UK case law that has been influenced by/ had reference to the European Court's rulings?

@CSBarnard24 Remarkably silly even by its own “political” standards.

@CSBarnard24 @EthingsG All part of a Brit 'government' narrative, supposedly to make out an 'obstructive' EU, if they have to back down on this??

@CSBarnard24 It’s a power grab, Do something before UK becomes a civil war zone

@CSBarnard24 Extraordinary...

@CSBarnard24 Looks like WM gov have been doing that rushing - again.