@MosesSternstein
@bencasselman
@BLS_gov
Yep—you have to take into account retiring housing stock too—and by this measure, square feet per housing unit has been stable (since the 1800s!).
The
@BLS_gov
Consumer Expenditure Report has tracked household budgets since 1984. How is the median household doing today vs then? In short: incomes are $16k higher, and food and clothing are cheaper. But the avg household is spending $5k more on
#housing
. (1/10)
@AzizSunderji
@bencasselman
@BLS_gov
Wait, I'm confused, but it's because I'm dumb. So square footage has increased since the 60's, but that's misleading, because []? (I understand the highlighted box to be saying that there are more people, but fewer people/house, so more units overall (but smaller) . . . but that…
@MosesSternstein
@bencasselman
@BLS_gov
Yeah, the authors argue that overall square footage up by 10x. But population up by 5x, and homes per person by 2x. 10x / 10x = 1. But! You may have something there re census data. My understanding is that census measures size only of new, not existing, homes. Is that wrong?