@naval You're all for banning when it inconveniences you mildly. But the thought of banning for inciting violence that leads to the deaths of multiple people with more violence planned is just a bridge too far. Tweet added by Rohan Gilkes, CFA @rohangilkes

Rohan Gilkes, CFA

3 years

@naval You're all for banning when it inconveniences you mildly. But the thought of banning for inciting violence that leads to the deaths of multiple people with more violence planned is just a bridge too far.

10

4

308

Naval

@naval

3 years

First they ban accounts. Then, they ban apps. Finally, they will block websites.

2K

7K

41K

Naval

@naval

3 years

@rohangilkes AngelList isn’t a communications monopoly. Huge difference between what a monopoly can do and a non-monopoly. But you are just here to score points, not discuss in good faith. Good riddance.

5

0

56

Vaibhav Namburi

@veebuv

3 years

@rohangilkes @naval I love that you don't hold back!

0

3

Bruno Nascimento

@posthardcode

3 years

@rohangilkes @naval Word.

0

1

Rohan Gilkes, CFA

@rohangilkes

3 years

@NapoleonQuots @naval I mean we can make up stuff as we go along if you want. But that has nothing to do with the original tweet that got us here. It was about a slippery slope of bans, not about an unslippery slope of not banning enough people.

0

10